Michael Jackson's kids found him collapsed 8 years before death

There are 20 comments on the CTV story from Aug 7, 2013, titled Michael Jackson's kids found him collapsed 8 years before death. In it, CTV reports that:

From left, Prince Jackson, Prince Michael II 'Blanket' Jackson and Paris Jackson arrive on stage at the Michael Forever the Tribute Concert, at the Millennium Stadium in Cardiff, Wales, Oct. 8, 2011.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CTV.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#79 Aug 16, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
<quoted text> its called reading through biographes..you should try it some time. and in no way am i denying that he molested people but unlike you im not assuming that he did without proper evidence...
I suggest you read the legal documents. The evidence blatantly proves Michael was a drug-addicted pedophile.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#80 Aug 16, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
can someone please tell me why were still bashing Micheal Jackson 5 years later ? the man is dead and remorseful what more do you people want ? to be honest i didn't know much about him up until hearing about his death. now i know loads of info on him. enough to realize that he was a genuine person that meant no harm. and for the last time people there is NO real evidence of this accusation. only people getting paid to say random things that may or may not be true...
We are actually tired of Michael's insane fans harassing anyone who speaks out against him, which includes sending death threats. If the lot of you would get off the internet, we wouldn't have to waste our time.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#81 Aug 16, 2013
Jermaine 7 wrote:
<quoted text>I already answered that question...get on the right page..
Your answer is incorrect. A grown man who sleeps with a little boy and keeps a nude photo of the child is a pedophile.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#82 Aug 16, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
We are actually tired of Michael's insane fans harassing anyone who speaks out against him, which includes sending death threats. If the lot of you would get off the internet, we wouldn't have to waste our time.
Does that mean you have received death threats? I am surprised that it hasn't been a libel suit for defamation.

The way you're going it is yet to come.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#83 Aug 16, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Does that mean you have received death threats? I am surprised that it hasn't been a libel suit for defamation.
The way you're going it is yet to come.
A libel suit for defamation? Are you out of your mind? You make not a bit of sense. When somebody sends a person a death threat, the police get involved.

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#84 Aug 16, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
A libel suit for defamation? Are you out of your mind? You make not a bit of sense. When somebody sends a person a death threat, the police get involved.
Try to forgive her dumbness.

OK don't. I never do.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#85 Aug 16, 2013
An NFL Fan wrote:
<quoted text>
Try to forgive her dumbness.
OK don't. I never do.
Bwuahahahaha!

We ought to start a new thread for her stupid f'loon quotes. Just when I think she can't sink any lower, she proves me wrong.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#86 Aug 17, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
A libel suit for defamation? Are you out of your mind? You make not a bit of sense. When somebody sends a person a death threat, the police get involved.
The false accusations you constantly make against MJ and the Jacksons are obnoxious. Don't be surprised if one them catch wind of the accusations and take out a libel against you. You always accuse them of being money grabbers. Bwhahaha Oh I just remembered, you can't have much being on Topix 24/7 so you will have to settle for the slammer.

“VITILIGO”

Since: Jun 10

IS A BIOTCH

#87 Aug 17, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Nanny? His doctors dealt the drugs in the guise of healing remedies. You know what they do? Yes you spying on them did cross my mind but I wanted to wait for your confession instead of accusing you. So you confirmed my suspicion. May I remind you that it's not a healthy practise and your children would be most offended to know that. Please respect their privacy Jina, they do have rights too.
Does your mother know that you call Indian people 'vermin who should be exterminated' when you post online?
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Nanny? His doctors dealt the drugs in the guise of healing remedies.
Randy said, under oath, that Nanny Grace was one of his suppliers. Those poor wretches being raised by a taker and a dealer.:-(

“VITILIGO”

Since: Jun 10

IS A BIOTCH

#88 Aug 17, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Bwuahahahaha!
We ought to start a new thread for her stupid f'loon quotes. Just when I think she can't sink any lower, she proves me wrong.
I still haven't seen anything sillier than when she said that Obama was the 9th black president of the USA although her excitement when he was captured for Acts of Terror came close.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#91 Aug 17, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
<quoted text> who the hell are you calling a "crazed fan" i never said i was a huge fan i just said that i don't jump to conclusions without proper evidence . now tell me,where did the evidence come from ? the court system ? if not than i will not conclude that he was or wasn't a pedophile. most of the time when something is found out about a star that its created by the media so they can make more money. most people by now realize this..
That's certainly a hostile post, on your part. I find this ironic because f'loons are now screaming how nasty other people are, who don't subscribe to the new-found religion of Michael Jesus Jackson.

The evidence came directly from the legal documents, stored at the Santa Barbara County Courthouse. They were scanned and are publicly available for your perusal. The first link is to the documents; the second is to the transcripts.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/ctdocs.php

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/transcripts.p...

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#93 Aug 17, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
non of those links said anything about the case...and i wasn't being hostile at all. if anything YOU were. you call me a crazy fan yet i don't call you anything for not giving proper evidence. why don't you search up on the subject some more than get back to me. i'm not trying to argue in any way with you. i just want SOLID evidence...I hope he wasn't a pedo,for the sake of the children he may have abused...
I have been posting link after link to legal documents, and in true f'loon style, you insist none of it was solid evidence. What more do you need? A photo of Michael performing fellatio on a young boy? Even then, you'd say it wasn't evidence, that it was photo shopped.

I'm going to ask you a question, and I'd like you to answer it. What grown man sleeps with a little boys and keeps a photo of him nude? It's on page 2 of this legal document.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#95 Aug 18, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
<quoted text>its obvious you do not like to be proven wrong so i'll just tell you your right and leave it at that to make you happy. ;)
Refusal to answer the question has been noted. But I'm going to ask it, again, and post the link to the legal documents in which the NAMBLA-recomended books, containing photos of nude and seminude boys, and the photo of one of his special friends in the nude are mentioned.

And now, the question. Why would a grown man sleep with a little boy and keep a nude photo of him?

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

In addition, here is more evidence Michael was a pedophile. This link is to a set of documents in which the D.A. planned to introduce Jordan's drawing and description of a blotch on Michael's penis, together with the photos of it, because they matched.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Mesereau, the favorite attorney of f'loons, never denied they matched.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#104 Aug 18, 2013
myniki813 wrote:
<quoted text>i guess your not ready for the actual truth and probably never will be.are these papers from the actual court case or what ? dude i don't have time to argue with you. there are idiots commenting to me that i have to take care of...
Refusal to answer the question has been noted, again. Now, I'm going to keep repeating it until you give an answer.

Why would a grown man sleep with a little boy and keep a nude photo of him. If you had the courage to open the link to the legal documents, you would notice the description of the child in the photo was fully nude.

The links I have posted are to the court case. The documents includes witness/victims testimonies, evidence gathered, search warrant, analysis of evidence, forensic lab reports, attorney correspondence, etc. They prove Michael was a pedophile who got away with child molestation. I'm more inclined to believe legal documents than f'loons in denial.

P.S. I'll be delighted to post more links for you.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#108 Aug 19, 2013
TraceyNewtonsuckscock wrote:
TRACEY NEWTON HANDS OVER HER NEGLECTED KIDS TO BE MOLESTED FOR MONEY.
She diddles her dog too.
persephoone

Sunnyvale, CA

#112 Aug 19, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Refusal to answer the question has been noted, again. Now, I'm going to keep repeating it until you give an answer.
Why would a grown man sleep with a little boy and keep a nude photo of him. If you had the courage to open the link to the legal documents, you would notice the description of the child in the photo was fully nude.
The links I have posted are to the court case. The documents includes witness/victims testimonies, evidence gathered, search warrant, analysis of evidence, forensic lab reports, attorney correspondence, etc. They prove Michael was a pedophile who got away with child molestation. I'm more inclined to believe legal documents than f'loons in denial.
P.S. I'll be delighted to post more links for you.
No charges were ever filed concerning the possession of the photo, therefore, no matter what your own personoal feelings may be about it, obviously the law doesn't consider the mere possession of that photo to be anything criminal.

Once again it is necessary to point out to you that NO legal doucments exist which prove that MJ was a pedophile.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#113 Aug 19, 2013
persephoone wrote:
<quoted text> No charges were ever filed concerning the possession of the photo, therefore, no matter what your own personoal feelings may be about it, obviously the law doesn't consider the mere possession of that photo to be anything criminal.
Once again it is necessary to point out to you that NO legal doucments exist which prove that MJ was a pedophile.
No-one said it was illegal to own. The question is why would a grown man who spent his life sleeping with boys own a picture of a nude boy he bedded? Does this not raise questions for you? You're behaving like you're a lawyer - Why dont you answer this question like a logical and rational human being?
persephoone

Sunnyvale, CA

#117 Aug 19, 2013
Pishpash1234 wrote:
<quoted text>
No-one said it was illegal to own. The question is why would a grown man who spent his life sleeping with boys own a picture of a nude boy he bedded? Does this not raise questions for you? You're behaving like you're a lawyer - Why dont you answer this question like a logical and rational human being?
Many logical and rational human beings would be mystified about your seemingly irrational, over-the-top response about a single photograph which was not implicated in any criminal wrongdoing.

Do you know the story behind that particular photograph? Do you know in what circumstances the photo was taken? Do you know anything about the boy, his family, and his connection with MJ?

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#119 Aug 19, 2013
persephoone wrote:
<quoted text> Many logical and rational human beings would be mystified about your seemingly irrational, over-the-top response about a single photograph which was not implicated in any criminal wrongdoing.
Do you know the story behind that particular photograph? Do you know in what circumstances the photo was taken? Do you know anything about the boy, his family, and his connection with MJ?
Well from past information gathered we can assume the boy in the photograph is Jonathan Spence, a boy MJ spent many nights alone with. A boy that witnesses claim to have seen be molested by MJ himself.

Now taking that into account, we must now wonder why MJ would keep a photograph of this boy in the nude. Pictures of nude boys is not illegal so will not have a criminal procedure implemented. He also owned another photograph of a boy with his bikini bottoms partially pulled down, this again is something very questionable.

We know MJ locked away NAMBLA approved books of naked boys, so we are well aware he has a fondness for such material. We are also aware that he has a fondness with boys in general.

Now you call my response irrational, which worries me slightly. For you to say that opens up a whole new can of worms, you would then have to use the same response for accused pedophiles who also keep photographs of naked boys.

I am not asking you to jump to rash conclusions, I am simply asking whether you find this questionable in the slightest.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#123 Aug 19, 2013
MJFRIEND wrote:
Will somebody please answer this idiots obsessive whining about a nude phot of a child that michael was never arrested for having in his possesion and that the idiot has never seen or been told the circumstance surrounding the photo.
Why are you rehashing what persephoone said after I have just responded to each of those points?
MJFRIEND wrote:
Michael saw nothing sexual about the photo. And he saw nothing sexual about sharing a bed with children it was how he was raised and he thought all children were beautiful . IN your sinister and evil minds your thinking "sex" michael was not. In his mind he saw nothing sexual about the boy
Ok so there is no question in your mind concerning his possession of a polaroid photograph depicting a boy he bedded, who according to some witnesses was molested by MJ? This is considered completely normal and sweet in your household?

If MJ saw nothing sexual with boys then why did he own the book ''Room to Play'' depicting photos of children that are altered with young heads morphed on older bodies to make them look sexualised? Another one of MJ's sick fantasies

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Family Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Minnesota kids too fat to fight, ex-generals say 19 min S o t N 7
News How to Witness to a Jehovah's Witness Ray Comfo... 20 min QUITTNER May 3 2015 1,245
News Why more than 100,000 people have asked TLC to ... 1 hr Tazo 11
News How to teach students not to do everything they... 4 hr tom wingo 2
News Hip hop with pop 5 hr I Got Lucky 1
News Why vaccinating our child is a good idea: Maria... 7 hr VACCINES MAIM KILL 1
News Anna Duggar Celebrates Jessa Duggar Pregnancy w... 10 hr Tazo 2
More from around the web