Michael Jackson spent A 23MILLION buy...

Michael Jackson spent A 23MILLION buying silence of at least TWO...

There are 146 comments on the Mirror.co.uk story from Jun 29, 2013, titled Michael Jackson spent A 23MILLION buying silence of at least TWO.... In it, Mirror.co.uk reports that:

Secret FBI files exclusively seen by the Sunday People reveal Michael Jackson spent A 23million buying the silence of at least two dozen young boys he abused over 15 years.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Mirror.co.uk.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#284 Jul 21, 2013
BadMan84 wrote:
Most MJ f'loons who post on YouTube are a bunch of nut jobs anyway. I remember when someone had posted videos of someone who I initially thought was just an MJ impersonator but it turns out he was this pretend comic also and something of a karoake singer (badly sung at that) and kept trying to make these sexual poses and posting about his "wife" or whatever. It was really creepy. But these are the type of fans who stay loyal to MJ no matter what. He deleted all of his videos though so I wonder if he is no longer an MJ f'loon/fan. You have to wonder...
YouTube sure does have a lot of freaks! It's f'loon central over there. They think they "defending MJ's honor" with their stupid comments all over his videos, and Robson's. As if anybody going to change their opinion because of some whack MJ defender on you tube! Some of them literally on the site all damn day defending a child molester, pathetic. I prefer this site hands down, most folks over here got common sense... with the occasional ridiculous f'loon comments of course.

Since: Jun 13

Fuquay Varina, NC

#285 Jul 21, 2013
MJisGUILTY wrote:
<quoted text>
YouTube sure does have a lot of freaks! It's f'loon central over there. They think they "defending MJ's honor" with their stupid comments all over his videos, and Robson's. As if anybody going to change their opinion because of some whack MJ defender on you tube! Some of them literally on the site all damn day defending a child molester, pathetic. I prefer this site hands down, most folks over here got common sense... with the occasional ridiculous f'loon comments of course.
They actually hurt MJ's "legacy" even more by acting like rabid pit bulls. It's like they're so full of rage at anyone who even mentions that MJ once sneezed and he used to have a booger come out of his nose back in 1977. Make that type of comment, they come out with their pitchforks with a digital camera ready to record them using it! lol

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#286 Jul 21, 2013
BadMan84 wrote:
<quoted text>
They actually hurt MJ's "legacy" even more by acting like rabid pit bulls. It's like they're so full of rage at anyone who even mentions that MJ once sneezed and he used to have a booger come out of his nose back in 1977. Make that type of comment, they come out with their pitchforks with a digital camera ready to record them using it! lol
Exactly! And the death threats just make them look like pathetic psychos. Makes a sane person stop to think about the crowd he attracted, only makes him look even more guilty. They don't realize they're contributing to the freakiness, crazy how they think they "protecting his legacy"... lol, please... On you tube? lol

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#287 Jul 21, 2013
BadMan84 wrote:
Most MJ f'loons who post on YouTube are a bunch of nut jobs anyway. I remember when someone had posted videos of someone who I initially thought was just an MJ impersonator but it turns out he was this pretend comic also and something of a karoake singer (badly sung at that) and kept trying to make these sexual poses and posting about his "wife" or whatever. It was really creepy. But these are the type of fans who stay loyal to MJ no matter what. He deleted all of his videos though so I wonder if he is no longer an MJ f'loon/fan. You have to wonder...
I know this f'loon named, Luna, on Youtube she's got close to two hundred videos about Michael Jackson over the years. A lot of coverage on the 2005 child molestation trial. Her Youtube page depicts MJ on it. You can easily tell she's obsessed with the freak. This one video mocking Jason Francia is one I'm certain she had a hand in filming and knows the foolish actor playing Jason. It's enough to make you go sick, and the other f'loons egg her on with compliments about her hard work. Like give me a friggin' break. She isn't feeding the homeless or finding them work with her stupid MJ videos.

Since: Jun 13

Fuquay Varina, NC

#288 Jul 21, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
I know this f'loon named, Luna, on Youtube she's got close to two hundred videos about Michael Jackson over the years. A lot of coverage on the 2005 child molestation trial. Her Youtube page depicts MJ on it. You can easily tell she's obsessed with the freak. This one video mocking Jason Francia is one I'm certain she had a hand in filming and knows the foolish actor playing Jason. It's enough to make you go sick, and the other f'loons egg her on with compliments about her hard work. Like give me a friggin' break. She isn't feeding the homeless or finding them work with her stupid MJ videos.
People making fun of child molestation victims will give them a secure place in hell. That's how delusional Jacko fans are. And yeah I heard of Luna but I surely won't add to her YouTube views...

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#289 Jul 22, 2013
BadMan84 wrote:
<quoted text>
People making fun of child molestation victims will give them a secure place in hell. That's how delusional Jacko fans are. And yeah I heard of Luna but I surely won't add to her YouTube views...
I don't either, but I'm familiar with her 'cause she blocked my previous Youtube username for being disruptive on many of her video comments. But I got a new username and I got myself back in. Today, a f'loon told me Jordan Chandler recanted one day after Wacko's death. I couldn't believe they continue to believe that erroneous statement which came from a blog. I had to correct the idiot.

Since: Jun 13

Fuquay Varina, NC

#290 Jul 22, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't either, but I'm familiar with her 'cause she blocked my previous Youtube username for being disruptive on many of her video comments. But I got a new username and I got myself back in. Today, a f'loon told me Jordan Chandler recanted one day after Wacko's death. I couldn't believe they continue to believe that erroneous statement which came from a blog. I had to correct the idiot.
And yet they tell us to not believe in the "lies". They believe lies daily man!

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#291 Jul 22, 2013
MJisGUILTY wrote:
<quoted text>
YouTube sure does have a lot of freaks! It's f'loon central over there. They think they "defending MJ's honor" with their stupid comments all over his videos, and Robson's. As if anybody going to change their opinion because of some whack MJ defender on you tube! Some of them literally on the site all damn day defending a child molester, pathetic. I prefer this site hands down, most folks over here got common sense... with the occasional ridiculous f'loon comments of course.
I noticed that too. Floons literally swarm any article or video that mentions MJ. Since his death, he has been overly praised and victims have constantly been discredited on numerous MJ related topics. Lately however more people are now commenting against MJ, and these are the people who were most likely on the fence. An example being the Daily Mail -

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-...

The top comments are a mixed bag with of course the typical floon comments of blaming other people apart from MJ, but there are thankfully other TOP comments supporting the victims. Hopefully this support will keep growing in time - I can only hope though...

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#292 Jul 22, 2013
BadMan84 wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet they tell us to not believe in the "lies". They believe lies daily man!
The gullible idiots would believe anyone singing the praises of Michael Jackson. The love affair they currently have with Tom Mesereau is only gonna last so long as he defends the kiddie fiddler. You can bet it's over, if Mesereau decides to defend one of Michael Jackson's accusers.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#293 Jul 22, 2013
Pishpash1234 wrote:
<quoted text>
I noticed that too. Floons literally swarm any article or video that mentions MJ. Since his death, he has been overly praised and victims have constantly been discredited on numerous MJ related topics. Lately however more people are now commenting against MJ, and these are the people who were most likely on the fence. An example being the Daily Mail -
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-...
The top comments are a mixed bag with of course the typical floon comments of blaming other people apart from MJ, but there are thankfully other TOP comments supporting the victims. Hopefully this support will keep growing in time - I can only hope though...
F'loons on Youtube typically use more then one Youtube username. That's why Youtube has become a safe haven for the nimrods. Another common tactic the fools do is vote multiple times online for anything related to Michael Jackson and the cases against him. Then they gather other f'loons to do the same and so the numbers are inaccurately tipped in his favour. I don't think in the real world, you'll find that much support for MJ. At least, I hope not.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#294 Jul 22, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
F'loons on Youtube typically use more then one Youtube username. That's why Youtube has become a safe haven for the nimrods. Another common tactic the fools do is vote multiple times online for anything related to Michael Jackson and the cases against him. Then they gather other f'loons to do the same and so the numbers are inaccurately tipped in his favour. I don't think in the real world, you'll find that much support for MJ. At least, I hope not.
They definitely gather more f'loons - They usually post MJ related links on to their fansites, give their warped opinion and indirectly tell them to comment or rate on the video or article. MJ fansites do have large followers, but its not too surprising since MJ is admittedly a HUGE pop ''star''. I think the majority of people are sane though

Since: Jun 13

Fuquay Varina, NC

#295 Jul 22, 2013
MJisGUILTY wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly! And the death threats just make them look like pathetic psychos. Makes a sane person stop to think about the crowd he attracted, only makes him look even more guilty. They don't realize they're contributing to the freakiness, crazy how they think they "protecting his legacy"... lol, please... On you tube? lol
Exactly. They just make him look more wacky. In fact, I think I read that the fanatics contributed to the Wacko Jacko machine themselves. I believed it then and I believe it now.
persephone

Mountain View, CA

#296 Jul 22, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
F'loons on Youtube typically use more then one Youtube username. That's why Youtube has become a safe haven for the nimrods. Another common tactic the fools do is vote multiple times online for anything related to Michael Jackson and the cases against him. Then they gather other f'loons to do the same and so the numbers are inaccurately tipped in his favour. I don't think in the real world, you'll find that much support for MJ. At least, I hope not.
You will also find that the hater delusion that fans only support him because he was was a celebrity is groundless and does not bear up well under scrutiny.

Families with a past history of fabricating lies and molestation claims, prosecutors who change dates to better accommodate molestation claims, are but two examples of why the criminal case agaiinst MJ was so deeply flawed.

It has nothing to with his celebirty status.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#297 Jul 22, 2013
Pishpash1234 wrote:
<quoted text>
They definitely gather more f'loons - They usually post MJ related links on to their fansites, give their warped opinion and indirectly tell them to comment or rate on the video or article. MJ fansites do have large followers, but its not too surprising since MJ is admittedly a HUGE pop ''star''. I think the majority of people are sane though
I'm with you on that. I think the majority of people are intelligent and can see through the web of lies Michael Jackson and his attorneys created for him. I know many who are willing to buy and listen to the music, but they are not fans of Michael Jackson the man. The difference between fanatics and fans is that fanatics are unwilling to separate the entertainer from the man. They keep him as one package and hence the ludicrous excuses and support for Michael's abhorrent behaviour for children.
rosalinda de la quatch

Sweden

#298 Jul 22, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> You will also find that the hater delusion that fans only support him because he was was a celebrity is groundless and does not bear up well under scrutiny.
Families with a past history of fabricating lies and molestation claims, prosecutors who change dates to better accommodate molestation claims, are but two examples of why the criminal case agaiinst MJ was so deeply flawed.
It has nothing to with his celebirty status.
Past history of fabricating lies –? Is this another shit-4-brains moment from yourself – unregistered and suspicious persephone –? How can you accuse anybody of fabricating lies when Michael Jackson himself was one of the biggest liars on this giant rock we call planet Earth – correct? He lied about being the biological father of the children – correct? He lied about his surgery and skin color – correct? He lied about the black spotted spots as described by Jordi – correct? And he lied about being badly treated and physically and seriously injured by the police – correct? But because you are a celebrity worshiper and hater of possible victims you want to make out that other people were the liars and not Michael Jackson – correct?

And what is this about those 'nasty' prosecutors that you have so much hatred for unregistered and suspicious persephone –? What are these dates they have supposedly changed –? This is another attempt of smoke and mirrors by yourself – correct? Are you conveniently forgetting that Michael Jackson's very own lawyer – Thomas Mesereau fabricated fake stories involving a former boy that stayed at Neverland – correct? He claimed he got married there when one of Michael Jackson's former Neverland staff was on baby leave – correct? But there are no records of this young man ever getting married at that location – correct? And this same lawyer also claimed that Michael Jackson's drug abuse and the blood spots which contained a drug that MJ was abusing was the result of vitiligo treatment – correct? But there is no liquid vitiligo treatment and it has been proven by the awesome prosecution that you hate so much – correct?

Since: Jun 13

Fuquay Varina, NC

#299 Jul 22, 2013
I think those who still buy his music that are more casual fans know his relationships with boys was unsettling (regardless of sex or not) and they probably believe he did molest kids due to him settling with at least three boys' families but they're also like "look the man released some great stuff anyway so I'll buy it". For some, it's harder to separate the music from the man because if they read the FBI files, it would make it hard for them to enjoy the music. The man who sang "Rock With You" was rocking with some little kid allegedly. I mean, it just doesn't look good but then people can be comforted that he didn't write it anyway so that's a good excuse to listen to it without feeling guilty of listening to it. Someone like R. Kelly would have a much more difficult time in separating the man from the music because if they believe R. Kelly was a pederast, it'll be hard to listen to him singing about sex ("Bump and Grind" for example). And unlike MJ, R. Kelly wrote the majority, if not all, of his songs.
rosalinda de la quatch

Sweden

#300 Jul 22, 2013
Also – what are these history of molestation claims that the unregistered and suspicious persephone talks about –? Is he talking about the claim that one mother claimed she was groped by security guards of a store –? That was never proven to be a lie by the mother and the department store paid out a compensation package which only indicates that they had no faith in the security guards they hired – correct? I honestly believe the suspicious persephone gets a kick out of hating on possible victims of sex crimes – correct? He seems to live in some kind of deluded world where he believes everybody who makes allegations of sex crimes are liars – correct?

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#301 Jul 22, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> You will also find that the hater delusion that fans only support him because he was was a celebrity is groundless and does not bear up well under scrutiny.
Families with a past history of fabricating lies and molestation claims, prosecutors who change dates to better accommodate molestation claims, are but two examples of why the criminal case agaiinst MJ was so deeply flawed.
It has nothing to with his celebirty status.
Don't talk to me about lies, when Michael Jackson was a con man and a liar to the highest degree. "Oh look Ed my poor, poor, shoulder literally separated by the police and I was locked up in a doo-doo-feces infested bathroom for 45 minutes. Please feel sorry for me world".
persephone

Sunnyvale, CA

#302 Jul 22, 2013
rosalinda de la quatch wrote:
Also – what are these history of molestation claims that the unregistered and suspicious persephone talks about –? Is he talking about the claim that one mother claimed she was groped by security guards of a store –? That was never proven to be a lie by the mother and the department store paid out a compensation package which only indicates that they had no faith in the security guards they hired – correct? I honestly believe the suspicious persephone gets a kick out of hating on possible victims of sex crimes – correct? He seems to live in some kind of deluded world where he believes everybody who makes allegations of sex crimes are liars – correct?
It's difficult to wade through the voluminous sludge that you keep posting, but I'll make an attempt.

Janet Arvizo never complained of any groping by any security guard at the time of her arrest, nor were there any signs of bruising to be seen on her mug shot. Those allegations came nearly a year later. Jc Penneys may have paid the settlement, but they also made it clear that they did not believe her version of events.

Of course molestation occurs, I never said that it didn't. Are you capable of conceding that false accusations also occur? And just how do you propose to tell the difference?
persephone

Sunnyvale, CA

#303 Jul 22, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't talk to me about lies, when Michael Jackson was a con man and a liar to the highest degree. "Oh look Ed my poor, poor, shoulder literally separated by the police and I was locked up in a doo-doo-feces infested bathroom for 45 minutes. Please feel sorry for me world".
Aside from that bit of whining on that 60 Minutes interview, I don't remember hearing anything much about it ever again.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Family Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Art in the Hands of Men conveys black male expe... 6 hr noobieR 1
News Your atheism isn&#x27;t going to keep your... (Apr '14) 9 hr emperorjohn 168
News Neighbors say Cobban Bridge replacement is necc... 9 hr MichaelDroste 1
News 11th annual kids festival happens this Sunday 15 hr sic 1
News Anti-vaccination program offered to gifted chil... 23 hr John 1
News Tele-Psychiatry Helps Reach Rural Kids with Men... Sat HumanSpirit 1
News Consider Homeschooling with ADD (Jan '13) Sat Paddling has its ... 10
More from around the web