Brad Pitt's mom writes: Obama is pro ...

Brad Pitt's mom writes: Obama is pro gay-sex, killing the unborn

There are 560 comments on the New York Daily News story from Jul 6, 2012, titled Brad Pitt's mom writes: Obama is pro gay-sex, killing the unborn. In it, New York Daily News reports that:

Brad Pitt's mother writes anti-gay letter to Missouri News-Leader: Says Obama 'supports same-sex marriage' and ' killing of unborn babies' Brad is a staunch and vocal gay-rights advocate.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at New York Daily News.

First Prev
of 28
Next Last
Robert

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#1 Jul 6, 2012
Enough already, these trubo-christians need to take their gay hatred and ideas on abortion the the pulpit and leave them out of politics we have a country to run.

Judged:

12

12

8

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#2 Jul 6, 2012
Robert wrote:
Enough already, these trubo-christians need to take their gay hatred and ideas on abortion the the pulpit and leave them out of politics we have a country to run.
Just 80,000 jobs added in June...which will be adjust downward next week quietly after the black bus is back in the garage.

Unemployment rate for blacks jumps to 14.4%...which means actually about 25% if you count all blacks out of work.

Lights go dim on another Obama energy project...the boy is consistant.

“Truth to Power!”

Since: Apr 07

United States

#3 Jul 6, 2012

Mother Knows Best:

Obama Voted for Infanticide several times as an Illinois Senator. When Obama was caught, he LIED about these votes claiming the language was different but the documentation proved otherwise.


Obama basically said he wanted babies that survived an abortion attempt to be slaughtered like a pig or a least left to DIE cold and alone in a broom closet somewhere.


What FILTH!

“Truth to Power!”

Since: Apr 07

United States

#4 Jul 6, 2012


Obama's bad moves on infanticide come back to haunt him

Since former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich pointed out in the Republican presidential debate on Wednesday that President Barack Obama supported infanticide, the media has been in an uproar. Many outlets are wondering where such an accusation could possibly come from.

Unfortunately, during the last presidential campaign cycle, too many outlets were too busy fawning over then presidential candidate Barack Obama and doing political hit jobs on GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin to bother to ask Mr. Obama about reports regarding his votes and remarks within the Illinois State Senate concerning the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. Additionally, Mr. Obama has done a good job in distorting his position in this area.

First, many Republicans and conservatives alike are referring to a 2003 health and human services committee vote within the Illinois State Senate. Former Washington Times columnist Amanda Carpenter covered this story in great detail in her Town Hall column in 2008:(emphasis is mine)

“We have a smoking gun committee report,” said National Right to Life Committee Legislative Counsel Susan Muskett.

Muskett’s “smoking gun” is a 2003 Health and Human Services Committee report recorded by Republican committee staff. It documents a unanimous 10-0 vote by the 2003 Illinois Senate Health and Human Services Committee, which Obama chaired at the time, to amend BAIPA to include the exact same language that was added to the federal version to protect Roe v. Wade. The committee report also shows a subsequent “final action” vote to determine if the bill should advance out of committee or be killed. The bill was defeated 6-4. Chairman Obama voted in the majority.

This means that, in essence, Obama voted to successfully amend the bill in a way that Obama has said would have enabled him to support it—before he voted against it. It also puts Obama further to the left of NARAL Pro-Choice America. According to a statement released by the abortion-rights lobby in the run-up to the U.S. Senate’s BAIPA vote in 2002,“NARAL does not oppose passage of the Born Alive Infants Protection Act … floor debate served to clarify the bill’s intent and assure us that it is not targeted at Roe v. Wade or a woman’s right to choose.”

For those who may doubt partisan records, the Republican committee report is backed by an Associated Press article that documented the 6-4 vote on the amended version of the bill.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercool...

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

#6 Jul 6, 2012
The laughing liberal wrote:
Mother Knows Best:
Obama Voted for Infanticide several times as an Illinois Senator. When Obama was caught, he LIED about these votes claiming the language was different but the documentation proved otherwise.
Obama basically said he wanted babies that survived an abortion attempt to be slaughtered like a pig or a least left to DIE cold and alone in a broom closet somewhere.
What FILTH!
LIAR!

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Truth to Power!”

Since: Apr 07

United States

#7 Jul 6, 2012

Obama's Infanticide Lie

By Amanda Carpenter

Newly discovered documents from the Illinois state archives prove Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has lied about his opposition as an Illinois state senator to legislation requiring health officials to provide care to babies who survived abortion.

Obama has repeatedly claimed he would have voted for Illinois’ version of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act (BAIPA) had it included language to protect abortion rights guaranteed by Roe v. Wade, as the federal version of the bill did, which sailed through the U.S. Senate 98-0. Contrary to what Obama has said, forgotten records from the Illinois Senate archives show Obama did vote against a BAIPA bill that included such a neutrality clause virtually identical to the federal bill.


Even pigs like Boxer and Kennedy voted for the BAIPA which Bush signed into Law but Not Barack Baby Killer Hussein. No, He Voted Against It several times then LIED about the Votes when uncovered!

Obama wanted these survivors to DIE So Badly that the Pig actually went on the Floor of the Illinois Senate and gave a shocking speech advocating the Denial of First Aid to these living breathing babies!


This is one of the discoveries I made while an Obama Supporter in 2007. I was shocked and disgusted by Obama. The more I researched from that point, the more disgusting facts I found against the Charlatan Obama.


What FILTH!



http://townhall.com/columnists/amandacarpente...

http://townhall.com/columnists/amandacarpente...

“i hope we can change this!”

Since: Aug 08

usa

#8 Jul 6, 2012
her thoughts are just as stupid and insipid as her son's...

but, the media think's brad's a genius, and mom's a loon.

who could've seen THAT coming?
Bringmedinner

San Jose, CA

#9 Jul 6, 2012
Robert wrote:
Enough already, these trubo-christians need to take their gay hatred and ideas on abortion the the pulpit and leave them out of politics we have a country to run.
How are you going to "run it", when revenue is down because you've slaughtered 57 Million innocent human beings for no other reasons than lasciviousness, convenience and illegal drug use, all of which are responsible for the rise in other deviance also? Surly, this can not be your vision for America.

“Truth to Power!”

Since: Apr 07

United States

#10 Jul 6, 2012
Read Carefully...

Politi-Fact found Obama LIED too but went to great lengths writing a very convoluted explanation claiming they didn't know Obama's "Motive" for Voting Against Saving Babies.

That's the argument they used to say he was not guilty of Infanticide even though Obama's Actions stated just the Opposite.


What Filth!!

“Truth to Power!”

Since: Apr 07

United States

#11 Jul 6, 2012


“The Senate Health and Human Services Committee rejected a bill that declares any fetus with a beating heart or muscle movement outside the womb as ‘born alive,’” reporter Kristy Hessman’s AP story said. Her article was filed from Springfield, Ill., and dated the same day as the Republican committee report, removing any doubt she may have been reporting on any other measure.“The measure is in response to a rare abortion procedure in which labor is induced and the fetus sometimes survives, possibly for hours,” Hessman wrote.“The sponsor, Sen. Rick Winkel, R-Champaign, said the bill is modeled after a recent federal policy that defines a ‘born-alive’ infant. But critics said defining when a fetus is ‘alive’ could require doctors to provide care and might expose them to legal action if they don’t, even if there was no way the fetus could survive outside the womb. Winkel’s bill got four ‘yes’ votes and six ‘no’ votes.”

Journalist David Freddoso said these documents are “absolute proof ” Obama has distorted his position on the Born Alive Infant Protection Act.

“Obama said he would have voted for that bill if it had been like the federal bill when, in fact, he voted against it when it was like the federal bill,” Freddoso said.“So he’s been lying about it the whole time.”



http://townhall.com/columnists/amandacarpente...

“Truth to Power!”

Since: Apr 07

United States

#12 Jul 6, 2012
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>LIAR!



COWARD!



I've presented the indisputable evidence 100's of times yet you have such a small mind, you can't handle it! LMAO!







THE COVER-UP

Researchers and journalists have had difficulty reporting this committee vote on this bill largely because of the Illinois Senate’s method of marking the bill as “held” in the Health and Human Services Committee. This led most people examining Obama’s voting record to believe the “held” marking meant the bill simply languished in committee and was never called for a vote. As previously mentioned, archived committee staff reports of the bill and an AP story show it was killed by a 6-4 party-line vote. The Senate’s online archives do not show those details.

Furthermore, when Obama’s BAIPA voting record is discussed, commentators often refer to full floor votes on the bill, not his vote on the amended bill as committee chairman. Conveniently enough, the floor votes are the only votes Obama has openly discussed.

History shows Obama voted on different versions of BAIPA at three different times—including the time as committee chairman—as an Illinois state senator. The first two times Obama voted on the bill, it did not contain the neutrality clause.

On the very first vote, he voted “present” in accordance to a strategy Planned Parenthood takes credit for orchestrating.“We worked on the ‘present’ vote strategy with Obama” Pam Sutherland, chief lobbyist of the Illinois branch of Planned Parenthood told Washington Post “fact checker” Michael Dobbs earlier this year. Sutherland said Obama would have preferred to vote “no,” but she pressured him to vote “present” because other liberal senators “were worried about direct-mail pieces against them. The more senators voted present, the harder it was to mount an issues campaign against the senator.”

The second time BAIPA came up for a floor vote, he voted “no” because, according to Obama,“it would essentially bar abortions.”

In a speech delivered on the Illinois state Senate floor before that second vote, Obama said:“Whenever we define a pre-viable fetus as a person that is protected by the Equal Protection Clause or the other elements in the Constitution, what we’re really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a child, a 9-month-old child, that was delivered to term. That determination then, essentially, if it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place. I mean, it, it would essentially bar abortions, because the Equal Protection Clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an anti-abortion statute.”

Obama mentioned his votes against BAIPA in his best-selling book “Audacity of Hope.” The way Obama describes it, the reader is led to believe Obama never voted on a “neutral” version of the bill. On page 132 of the book, Obama wrote he expected the GOP to attack him during his 2004 race for the U.S. Senate because of his opposition to “a bill sponsored by anti-abortion activists” that “extended ‘personhood’ to pre-viable fetuses, thereby effectively overturning Roe v. Wade.”

He lamented the fact “I was said to have ‘voted to deny life-saving treatment to babies born alive.’” He did indeed vote this way.


http://townhall.com/columnists/amandacarpente...


“Proud To Be An American”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#13 Jul 6, 2012
And what's worse? The lord marshal b. h. obama is a self-serving marxist a-hole...And what's worse? Moron votes turned that marxist a-hole into the POTUS. It's an obamanation!

“Truth to Power!”

Since: Apr 07

United States

#14 Jul 6, 2012

Home • Articles • Obama and ‘Infanticide’
Obama and ‘Infanticide’
The facts about Obama's votes against 'Born Alive' bills in Illinois.
Posted on August 25, 2008
Bookmark and Share
Summary

Anti-abortion activists accuse Obama of "supporting infanticide," and the National Right to Life Committee says he’s conducted a "four-year effort to cover up his full role in killing legislation to protect born-alive survivors of abortions." Obama says they’re "lying."

At issue is Obama’s opposition to Illinois legislation in 2001, 2002 and 2003 that would have defined any aborted fetus that showed signs of life as a "born alive infant" entitled to legal protection, even if doctors believe it could not survive.


FACT #1:
Obama opposed the 2001 and 2002 "born alive" bills.

Obama claimed these bills were "backdoor attacks" on a woman’s legal right to abortion, but he says he would have been "fully in support" of a similar federal bill that President Bush had signed in 2002, because it contained protections for Roe v. Wade.

FACT #2:
We find that, as the NRLC said in a recent statement, Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committee’s 2003 mark-up session.



Who’s "Lying?"


Obama is Lying. HE Voted Against the Bills everytime.





http://www.factcheck.org/2008/08/obama-and-in...



Here's the mealymouth explanation of Obama's Infanticide Votes:


"Obama’s critics are free to speculate on his motives for voting against the bills, and postulate a lack of concern for babies’ welfare. But his stated reasons for opposing "born-alive" bills have to do with preserving abortion rights, a position he is known to support and has never hidden."

In Other words, Obama VOTED AGAINST Givign Babies Medical Attention but claimed it was because he wanted them to die in the womb and it didn't matter if they survived. These babies were to DIE No Matter What!


Obama is a PIG.

“Truth to Power!”

Since: Apr 07

United States

#15 Jul 6, 2012



Obama IS the Greatest EVIL.



Who else besides maybe Hitler would go out of his way to make sure babies DIED?



WHO ELSE?




What FILTH!




“Truth to Power!”

Since: Apr 07

United States

#16 Jul 6, 2012



Would anyone but the PIG Obama just stand there and gleefully watch a newborn baby DIE?

Watch in delight as the tiny baby Suffered without even the most basic First Aid? Obama Voted to Do just That!



This is the POS you elected.

“Truth to Power!”

Since: Apr 07

United States

#17 Jul 6, 2012
Robert wrote:
Enough already, these trubo-christians need to take their gay hatred and ideas on abortion the the pulpit and leave them out of politics we have a country to run.




I'm not a religious person Robert but that doesn't mean I would stand by and Watch Newborn Babies DIE or would prevent even the most Basic First AID to them after they survived a chemical attack on their life.

Would you Vote to Prevent even the most basic First Aid to a newborn baby?


Would YOU?

Claiming it's some religious fanatic argument falls far short of truthful.
Mothra

Mesa, AZ

#18 Jul 6, 2012
The laughing liberal wrote:
Read Carefully...
Politi-Fact found Obama LIED too but went to great lengths writing a very convoluted explanation claiming they didn't know Obama's "Motive" for Voting Against Saving Babies.
That's the argument they used to say he was not guilty of Infanticide even though Obama's Actions stated just the Opposite.
What Filth!!
Speaking of fact-checking...

The Vast Left-Wing Wonk Machine

Fact-checkers are at it again. They are calling it a myth that ObamaCare is the biggest tax increase in history. But let's see how these great fact-checkers work....

Follow the data trail: useless Treasury predictions, a Treasury report compiling those predictions, Mother Jones and Politicfact glomming onto that report, an economist blogger graphing that data, Ezra Klein reporting that graph in the Washington Post, and Bloomberg citing Ezra Klein to debunk a "myth."

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/07/the_va...

A informative read.

“Truth to Power!”

Since: Apr 07

Raleigh, NC

#19 Jul 6, 2012



What kind of SUB-HUMAN would Say that Doctors Should NOT provide First Aid or Any Medical Attention to a New Born Baby?


Obama is that SUB-HUMAN.



“Truth to Power!”

Since: Apr 07

Raleigh, NC

#20 Jul 6, 2012
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of fact-checking...
The Vast Left-Wing Wonk Machine
Fact-checkers are at it again. They are calling it a myth that ObamaCare is the biggest tax increase in history. But let's see how these great fact-checkers work....
Follow the data trail: useless Treasury predictions, a Treasury report compiling those predictions, Mother Jones and Politicfact glomming onto that report, an economist blogger graphing that data, Ezra Klein reporting that graph in the Washington Post, and Bloomberg citing Ezra Klein to debunk a "myth."
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/07/the_va...
A informative read.



Agree. The media will continue blocking the truth and flat out lying for the person they voted for. It's disgusting but a simple fact.


Obama's Health Care TAX will cost the middle class $1.76 TRILLION Dollars and wreck & Ration out Health care.

“Truth to Power!”

Since: Apr 07

Raleigh, NC

#21 Jul 6, 2012


Brad Pitt's Mom is simply stating the FACTS that Obama was FOR KILLING THE UNBORN AND EVEN THE BORN!


Obama is the Greatest Evil.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 28
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Entertainment Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Former Trump aide Bannon had ties to Harvey Wei... 6 min Julia 55
News 5 living ex-presidents to attend hurricane reli... 29 min Laredo 2
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 1 hr Choicerocks 318,367
News The View excoriates Trump over disrespect for m... 2 hr Fate Of The World 4
News Hollywood sex scandal just got juicier 3 hr Fate Of The World 21
News Harvey Weinstein scandal: 'New Yorker' publishe... 3 hr Fate Of The World 2
News UC Berkeley students threaten to sue over Ann C... (Apr '17) 4 hr RecoveringRacist 4
More from around the web