Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 330524 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#282015 Feb 4, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Bathe less.
Musta worked......3-2 win.
grumpy

Stony Point, NY

#282016 Feb 4, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
There is more then enough evidence.
There is even more then that to me. A guy who went from not believing in God at all, into believe whole heartedly in God.
I thought religion is just what folks did.
I thought Heaven and Hell (if it was real) was only a matter of good or bad.
I thought (and many "christians "think if your good works outweigh your bad, then you go to Heaven.
If your bad works are more then good, then Hell.
Many who go to church now believe this method.
After the night I was woken up by God -it was HE that straightened me out.
I had tried cleaning up this or that before, but could never reach a point that I felt good enough.
I know believe, as God says all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
If you have ever told a lie, then you are a liar.
Asking forgiveness doesn't erase the lie.
Like killing someone, asking forgiveness will not bring the other person back, nor will it erase the fact that they are a murderer.
Only having Gods grace applied to ones life will erase all.
Jesus died for all sin -past, present, future.
A christian asks for forgiveness to restore fellowship with God.
Sonship is done by the blood of God (Jesus Christ) being applied to ones soul.
Many died having faith for His comming.
I will die having faith in His comming.
"christian asks for forgiveness to restore fellowship with God.
Sonship is done by the blood of God (Jesus Christ) being applied to ones soul."

This is what Christians believe. It doesn't say anything about good works. Emotionally you wish it did, but it doesn't.
Degall says he posts here as an act of good works. He never argues pro-religion. Is he doomed to hell?

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282017 Feb 4, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>You're ranting. Wipe the virtual foam from your virtual mouth and settle down, bruja vieja.
:-D
Your little smile face doesn't mask the fact that my posts get to you. Good, lol. You haven't got anything reasonable to rebut what I've posted, and your little game here is to try to insult posters and act like you're laughing at them.

You haven't got the intelligence or the skills to deflect from what's in the posts of PLers, or to deflect from the many lies from PCers.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#282018 Feb 4, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Nope. The BORN child has a legal right to be supported by both parents unless parental responsibility has been waived. Paying support does not affect the father's medical and physical risks.
<quoted text>
You're a moron Tink. He wasn't arguing what is legal. We all know what's legal ( except maybe for you and the Constitution). He said "if" and what "would" be fair. And if in fact all it came down to was choice then what he said was not only relevant......it made perfect sense.
You're a blowhard. A blowhard who's also a coward. How does it feel ?
Gtown71

United States

#282019 Feb 4, 2013
Forum wrote:
<quoted text>
Believing in Jesus is eternal life. We live in heaven with him
here on earth. He is here with us. I heard his voice. Why do you want to die?
I was just stating that I will die, or go to my death believing what I wrote, but yes you are right, our eternal life is now.

One day we shall lay down this body of death.

Yet there is work to be done, since God chooses to use men (people) to carry out His plan.

The fields are white, and it is getting darker and darker.
This thread reminds me of that.

I'm only 42, and can see just how much the world has changed in my life for the worse in most cases.
But I also remember when I was like many are now, when it couldn't change fast enough for me.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#282020 Feb 4, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Elise: "Who said I'm trying to fool anyone about anything? "
Your schooling, your nursing career, things you do for others in life...all stated by you here without being asked about it, and all stated by someone who's too insecure to keep it all to herself. You post about it because you need people to see you a certain way.
You're the one trying to create an "image" of yourself here. Yet you accuse others of it.
You're an ignorant buffoon like the rest of the PC here, and you're not fooling any intelligent person of anything other than that.
I don't need to create an image of myself. Everything I write about myself is true. Necessary to your fragile ego, you forget that I have posted comments on abortion as a person with a medical background, which happens to be nursing. My profession is relevant to the topic. There's nothing wrong with telling people about myself. Apparently, you feel the need to be secretive about your life. Not me. I'm comfortable with myself. If you don't like me, ignore me. I don't think you are capable of that, given your compulsive disorder. I'm sorry that you react in such a visceral way to anyone who challenges your sense of self. I wish you could control yourself. Have you ever tried?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282021 Feb 4, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, you're so full of shit, and here's how easy it is to prove it, liar. When caught your lies become more elaborate.
You used the photo for your avatar, and the only thing to do that is to copy a photo to a file on our computer, then "browse" our photos and click on it. Which is what you had to do to use it as your avatar photo. You copied it off the internet and put it in a file on your computer.
Next; you didn't tell people to go see the image supposedly photographed by Lynne on the internet, so "Photobucket" and "public viewing" obviously wasn't your objective. I'M the one who told people to go to Google and Yahoo search and they'd see the photo you put up, claiming it was taken by Lynne, when it wasn't. After you responded to my posts about that, which means you knew you had gotten caught, you removed the photo. No coincidence there.
And...
The photo is still there. You did not take it down, because I still see it. I know exactly which image you used, and I can copy it myself and pull it up, which anyone who was here and saw the image you tried to attribute to Lynne is the same one. The photo has this on it:
"Cedar Posts and Barbed Wire Fences: Stephen King's Home Meets a ...cedarposts.blogspot.com - 1150 1600 - More sizes
Visit page
View original image
Image details
Image may be subject to copyright."
"Subject to copyright", and you typed, "copyright Lynne D" on this image when you used it as your avatar.
You're outta your league, liar. You post lie on top of lie.
***sighs*** Lynne, you wear "STUPID" like a second skin.

AGAIN, how do you think images end up on Google?

Answer: Becasue people post them in a PUBLIC MANNER.

**I** didn't tell anyone to go anywhere to see it, because I posted it HERE you moron.

ALL my pics from photobucket are on google you moron. Clearly you dont know how google GETS their images and opens them up to use by the public.

I removed the pic simply because its purpose was done, nothing more, nothing less.

ROFLMAOOOOOOO!!!

But far be it from ME to try to stop you from making up some HUGE complicated conspiracy theory to justify your stupidity!!

OMG This is HYSTERICAL!

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#282022 Feb 4, 2013
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
You are like a little kid in school. Raises hand. Teacher, teacher! I use Durex!
What is Durex? Why did you feel the need to mention that?
Pay attention. She told me to stock up on condoms. My telling her what brand I use was my way of telling her I already do. Get it birdbrain ?

Her comment had absolutely NOTHING to do with RCC and their position on the fetus being a "person". Your "why would you feel the need to mention that" crack would have been much more appropriately directed at her.... ya dimwit ya.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282023 Feb 4, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Your snicker is chidlike, as everything you do is.
I've already posted why your claim that you put that photo on Google didn't make sense.
Except I AT NO TIME claimed that **I** put the photo on Google you MORON! ROFLMAO!
You don't need to post it on Google to put it as your avatar photo,
BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!! I never claimed I did!
and you weren't the one telling people to go see it on Google, I did.
I didn't tell people to "go" anywhere to see it, since it was on my avitar for ALL to see.

LOL You are SERIOUSLY determined to show exactly how stupid you are!
You also claimed it's no longer there, and it is.
Now you're just making shit up. I never claimed any such thing.
Your lies are crumbling before your eyes and you still post more lies which are becoming more and more ridiculous and senseless. Funny stuff.
ROFLMAO No, the FUNNY STUFF is you making up flat out lies and trying to attribute them to me!

Lets see if we can dumb this down for you.

NOBODY "puts images on Google".

Google TAKES images that are in the public domain - from sites such as photobucket when they are marked PUBLIC.

I dont keep pictures on my computer, as they take up way too much memory.

99% of all of my pictures are on photobucket, including the one's you sent me. 70% if them are in PUBLIC albums. ALL of those 70% are in google images, and can be found if one knows how to look for them - something you CLEARLY dont have a clue how to do - and you never will since you dont know how I filed them in photobucket. FURTHER once they're on there, they're effectively free game for ANYONE to use, or to abuse.

Once google takes an image, nobody can easily remove them - google makes it a very complicated process to get stuff removed. Remember when MM's kids pictures showed up here? They were part of the public domain (and still are) which is how they were able to be used, because he didn't have his website properly protected, and most of his pictures were on google as well. Many still are. Fortunately, he learned how to protect his site, something I did years ago myself.

Perhaps you'd like to see your house as my avitar next Lynne? You know, the one with the cathedral ceiling looking at the beautiful view?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282024 Feb 4, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
As I said, I just Googled and found the very image you tried to claim was a photo taken by Lynne. I copied it off the internet and will be leaving it up so people can Google it for themselves if they want, to see you're a liar. I just copied it put it in a file on my computer and used it as my avatar...and you made this post FIVE hours ago, as of now, claiming you took it off the internet.
Now what? You'll be claiming you put it back up? lol
I never claimed I took it off the internet you MORON, I simply said I'd removed it as my AVITAR. Something normal people figured out themselves.

Good for you to use the pic you took! Its a good shot, you SHOULD use it! LOL!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282025 Feb 4, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
Foo, you can't even claim I have the photo because I'm Lynne, because as I said, it's on GOOGLE. People just have to go to Google and even Yahoo search and find it there, just like I did.
Psssssst......stupid..... I gave you the title of what to google TO find it ya dope. Remember? I put "king's gate" and "copyright Lynne D". Of COURSE its on google, ITS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN YOU IDIOT!

You're an imbecile Lynne LOLOLOLOL!!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282026 Feb 4, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>You have to admit, LLL raises making a mountain out of a molehill to an art form. Extraneous bullshit is her speciality.
Isn't it great?? LOL She's performing better than a trained seal! LOL!

It doesn't take much bait to get her going either! ROFLMAO!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282027 Feb 4, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
dont doubt when Foo sees the photo is still on Yahoo and Google that she'll come back with yet another lie as to why it's still there, even after she claimed she removed it. And she will be so pissed off that her lie was exposed and so easily, that she'll be plotting vengence and try to get back by making more threats of posting something personal about Lynne.
Mental case doesn't begin to describe Foo behavior. Anyone who would pass off her behavior as not a big deal, or a molehill being made into a mountain is also a nutcase.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA A!!!

AGAIN for the stupid girl: At NO TIME did I EVER claim I removed the picture from the internet. I dont have that power once I put it into the public domain YOU IDIOT!

You're nucking futs Lynne. Truly. And its HYSTERICAL to watch you melt down EVERY time!

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282028 Feb 4, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
***sighs*** Lynne, you wear "STUPID" like a second skin.
AGAIN, how do you think images end up on Google?
Answer: Becasue people post them in a PUBLIC MANNER.
**I** didn't tell anyone to go anywhere to see it, because I posted it HERE you moron.
ALL my pics from photobucket are on google you moron. Clearly you dont know how google GETS their images and opens them up to use by the public.
I removed the pic simply because its purpose was done, nothing more, nothing less.
ROFLMAOOOOOOO!!!
But far be it from ME to try to stop you from making up some HUGE complicated conspiracy theory to justify your stupidity!!
OMG This is HYSTERICAL!
Foo: "**I** didn't tell anyone to go anywhere to see it, because I posted it HERE you moron."

If you were capable of seeing things logically you'd be able to see that logically, that doesn't make sense. There would be no need for you to place that photo anywhere publicly if your only purpose was to use it as an avatar here, Dummy. The photo online that you used, IF it was a photo taken by Lynne, would have been recognized as such ON the photo online to be put there by you. But it wasn't. Unless you're going to claim you're the one who has it under "fascinationwithfearblogs pot", and "cedarpostsblogspot" , Toots. lol

The photo was posted by someone else, and not you, on Google and Yahoo for public use.
Epic fail on trying to sound truthful, Liar.

You took someone else's photo and claimed it as one you got from Lynne that you supposedly put online yourself. That lie is as obvious as all the other lies you've told here.

Here's the thing that you're missing; posting a photo Lynne suppodely took doesn't prove anything about the "mutual abuse" claim you made. NO ONE CARES whether or not you and Lynne e-mailed, it's irrelevant, you ignorant buffoon. You've posted with her here, we know it because we've seen the links, and you LIED about what she posted here. What the hell makes you think any person with integrity in discussion gives a shit about photos Lynne did or didn't share with you in e-mails?

You're an irrational mental case, and a pathological liar.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pathol...
"pathological liar
noun
a person who tells lies frequently, with no rational motive for doing so. "

^^^That part was for your kiss up, Ayakaneo.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#282029 Feb 4, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>Isn't it great?? LOL She's performing better than a trained seal! LOL!
It doesn't take much bait to get her going either! ROFLMAO!
Yeah, it's not much of a challenge. She's her own worst enemy. Her OCD rules her. She's helpless against it.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282030 Feb 4, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Except I AT NO TIME claimed that **I** put the photo on Google you MORON! ROFLMAO!
<quoted text>
BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!! I never claimed I did!
<quoted text>
I didn't tell people to "go" anywhere to see it, since it was on my avitar for ALL to see.
LOL You are SERIOUSLY determined to show exactly how stupid you are!
<quoted text>
Now you're just making shit up. I never claimed any such thing.
<quoted text>
ROFLMAO No, the FUNNY STUFF is you making up flat out lies and trying to attribute them to me!
Lets see if we can dumb this down for you.
NOBODY "puts images on Google".
Google TAKES images that are in the public domain - from sites such as photobucket when they are marked PUBLIC.
I dont keep pictures on my computer, as they take up way too much memory.
99% of all of my pictures are on photobucket, including the one's you sent me. 70% if them are in PUBLIC albums. ALL of those 70% are in google images, and can be found if one knows how to look for them - something you CLEARLY dont have a clue how to do - and you never will since you dont know how I filed them in photobucket. FURTHER once they're on there, they're effectively free game for ANYONE to use, or to abuse.
Once google takes an image, nobody can easily remove them - google makes it a very complicated process to get stuff removed. Remember when MM's kids pictures showed up here? They were part of the public domain (and still are) which is how they were able to be used, because he didn't have his website properly protected, and most of his pictures were on google as well. Many still are. Fortunately, he learned how to protect his site, something I did years ago myself.
Perhaps you'd like to see your house as my avitar next Lynne? You know, the one with the cathedral ceiling looking at the beautiful view?


LOL

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...

post 282004 I posted 1 hour ago.

"dont doubt when Foo sees the photo is still on Yahoo and Google that she'll come back with yet another lie as to why it's still there, even after she claimed she removed it. And she will be so pissed off that her lie was exposed and so easily, that she'll be plotting vengence and try to get back by making more threats of posting something personal about Lynne.

Mental case doesn't begin to describe Foo behavior. Anyone who would pass off her behavior as not a big deal, or a molehill being made into a mountain is also a nutcase. "

Foo : "Perhaps you'd like to see your house as my avitar next Lynne? You know, the one with the cathedral ceiling looking at the beautiful view?"

LOL. What's posting a pic of her house going to prove except that you do exactly as we'd expect a mental case to do when caught in lies? Try to deflect with impotent childlike threats of posting more personal things about someone. How's that going to deflect from or prove the LIE in the claim of "mutual abuse"? It won't.

I don't know why you think it';s necessary to prove you e=-mailed with Lynne, when it doesn't matter one way or the other.

All that mattered, Toots, was you proving your claim of mutual abuse, which supposedly justifies your attacks on this woman's life. Proof you claimed was also on the threads.

You're full of shit, your little threats are impotent and you're only displaying what an irrational mental case and liar you are.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282031 Feb 4, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
I never claimed I took it off the internet you MORON, I simply said I'd removed it as my AVITAR. Something normal people figured out themselves.
Good for you to use the pic you took! Its a good shot, you SHOULD use it! LOL!
I didn't take it and won't take credit for it. Someone else did and you're taking credit for using their pic off the internet. You have no integrity at all.
grumpy

Stony Point, NY

#282032 Feb 4, 2013
Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll say this for ya grumpster, your sense of humor may me cringingly bad. But at least you didn't ask that stupid viability question again.
Do you EVER have a point?
I'm just trying to find the point in the reproduction process where you fight for human life. There are many here who are anti-birth control against whom you never argue. That gives me the impression that you agree with them.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282033 Feb 4, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Psssssst......stupid..... I gave you the title of what to google TO find it ya dope. Remember? I put "king's gate" and "copyright Lynne D". Of COURSE its on google, ITS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN YOU IDIOT!
You're an imbecile Lynne LOLOLOLOL!!
LOL, anybody can figure out it was KING'S GATE from looking at the photo, you moron. It's pretty obvious what the photo is.

Your "proof" is STUPID.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282034 Feb 4, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA A!!!
AGAIN for the stupid girl: At NO TIME did I EVER claim I removed the picture from the internet. I dont have that power once I put it into the public domain YOU IDIOT!
You're nucking futs Lynne. Truly. And its HYSTERICAL to watch you melt down EVERY time!
"BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA AAAAAAA!!!"

^^"You're nucking futs "

You sure are.

You took a photo from a Google or Yahoo search engine and claimed it as being the photo Lynne took.

What you think is proof of anything other than that you're a mental case is funny stuff.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Entertainment Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News 'Teen Mom 2's' David Eason fired by MTV after a... 10 min Ex Senator Santpo... 5
News Top Disney Executive for Broadway Accused of Se... 2 hr LarryGee 1
News Burke Ramsey Sues Forensic Pathologist for $150... (Oct '16) 3 hr Pickle 17
News Geraldo Rivera talks weapons age-limits with Trump 5 hr Even Seventeen 1
News The Police to play final show in NYC (May '08) 6 hr FU baldie 27
News Game Night Is the Comedy Knockout We've Been Wa... 9 hr rfghj 1
News Pelosi speaks for record 8 hours in favor of 'D... 10 hr Concerned White 3
More from around the web