Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310231 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#251298 Aug 5, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
He uses slightly different wordings, flat-out denials, and the hope people won't bother to find the posts in question.
Bullshit. I welcome people going back and finding the posts in question. I URGE them to. Ask Katie.
I must say your work in going back almost 3 months to find a post to try and prove Doc wrong....was exemplary. Katie could take a page outta your book. She's too busy to look though.

I got a good laugh out of he recent use of the term "per se". LMAO!
Did you look it up and now know what it means ? You can thank me for improving your vocabulary.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251299 Aug 5, 2012
pupsee wrote:
<quoted text>
Little House on the Prairie is probably X rated in her eyes ..
I think a good couple chapters of that book would do knit a world of good .. Look out Mr. Knitty .. ROFLMAO
You see how so many of those fire and brimstone fundie preachers end up having affairs and hidden closet perversions, so I wouldn't take her complaints very seriously. She's just doing what her church masters tell her to do. Baa baa baa goes the sheep.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#251300 Aug 5, 2012
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
How many times have you been banned now?
Chickensh*t loves to make things up, she is not in Colorado at all.

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#251301 Aug 5, 2012
Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
It is YOU that has advocated for rapists. You would prefer that woman do NOT report their rape because of hardships they may endure as part of the American judicial process. You would prefer that rapists remain free to continue to ply their trade on more innocent unsuspecting victims. You are a rapists best friend. More women are vulnerable and potential victims because of you.
Doc on the other hand would prefer to see all rapes reported and all scumbag rapists prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
You are a rapist's dream.
You are vile.
LIAR.

You are delusional.

You want to FORCE a child to go to court to PROVE her rape (which was your ORIGINAL SCENARIO until you were shamed into changing it, with no admission of err on your part, of course, you just pretended you felt this way all along) in order for her to get a pass for an abortion that was already obtained, or else the VICTIM would have been PENALIZED in some unnamed way (since you are too much of a coward to admit your err) IF the rape could not be proven, as many can NOT.

You felt ALL of this originally, you VILE SCUM.

ANYONE who thinks the way you did ORIGINALLY (PENALIZE the RAPE VICTIM) is a sick pile of feces. I don't care if you changed your story, clearly you saw NOTHING WRONG with SUBJECTING a CHILD to PUNISHMENT for being raped yet unable to prove it.

You make me SICK.

Makes one wonder how many rapists are in your family, and what other nasty secrets you are hiding. I hope you don't have a daughter. I can only imagine what she has been subject to in your dark household.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251302 Aug 5, 2012
pupsee wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL !! Everyone also knows that it doesn't stay on the shelves very long either .. You are such a prude, knit .. ;)
What a shame Knit doesn't work up this kind of outrage over priests raping children. Nope, no outrage for that...but a book she didn't even read? She'll complain about that for awhile.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#251303 Aug 5, 2012
Badaxe wrote:
<quoted text>WTF are you talking about? Where did I say R v W gave rights to fetuses? I never said that, I was talking about the fact that you got banned again, dumbass, nice dodge, and lie, again.
I can vouch that you never argued for fetal rights.
Katie laughably tried to provide proof that you did and all she did was reiterate what RvW said. She's almost as stupid as chicky.
Almost.

Also, remember dicky's continued insistence that we provide the cut and paste where RVW established the definition of viability....and when we did she ridiculously tried to claim that it was in the discussion and not their ruling....and therefore was not legal precedent ?
Does stupid reach a higher level than that ?

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#251304 Aug 5, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Grey is the devil's favorite color"?
You didn't read the book. You got your info fed to you from some Catholic propaganda site. Your opinion stands at being meaningless. I won't take the opinion of someone who didn't even read the content of the book.
*You clearly show that you don't thoroughly research things and then form your own opinion.
*You clearly don't think for yourself.
*You clearly show that you just go by what is spoonfed to you by your religious leaders.
Unless you actually read the book, which you didn't, then your opinion means nothing.
Actually I skimmed through the book, not my type a book, filthy and disgusting and the book IS PORN. Any woman who buys that book is supporting the porn business which degrades women.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251305 Aug 5, 2012
pupsee wrote:
<quoted text>
First she hijacks my name on here (pups) then she is letting on she lives near Chicky ?! Chicky and I should be impressed ..
@@ Whoo hoo .. she loves us, she loves us not !!
Then she's a fool (which we already know) because she had to type the name in, which is why her location is in black and Chicky's real location is in blue.

She's been on other threads talking to herself using the name "Husker". She's still fouling the air over Nebraska...Colorado is safe.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251306 Aug 5, 2012
LadiLulu wrote:
<quoted text>
He would love it if she became a little sex kitten!
Yeah, then he wouldn't have to waste his money on hookers.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251307 Aug 5, 2012
tomtom wrote:
<quoted text>
She is a homophobe, pagaqn. Maybe you are one too. How do you feel about men driving down the hershey highway? How about taking a load to the face? What about playing the skin flute?
If you have ANY PROBLEM WITH ANY OF THESE YOU MAY BE A HOMOPHIBRE TOO!
Then by your own admission YOU are a homophobe.

Are you really and truly this stupid?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251309 Aug 5, 2012
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Pups reads that booking in the confessional and passes it off as her own sins. The priests love it. She's very popular at the rectory.
You mean they wouldn't recognize her confessions from having read their own copies?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251310 Aug 5, 2012
Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
Wait a second ! you don't get to call something I wrote bullshit and then delete it. The fact is you accused me of evading you and that this was the "3rd time" you attempted to get a resposnse, yet you subsequently admitted that you didn't have time to look for the response that DID exist. You don't get to contradict yourself and then claim the proof of your contradiction is bullshit.
(The rest of your post was deleted because its bullshit )
You mean your little "per se" ditty? I was right, I made my point, and it was clear enough even you could understand it. Your explanation was lame. It's not worth rehashing for a year.

Now, where is that post you claim you wrote acknowledging my answer to your abortion question?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251311 Aug 5, 2012
Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
Doc's not above admitting he was wrong. I guess I did call you a homophobe. And in hindsight and based on what you've said, looks like my accusation was dead on balls accurate.
Homophobe.
I accept your apology. However, your accusation was bullshit. Maybe you'd like to explain how anything I've written makes me a "homophobe"? The floor is yours....

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251312 Aug 5, 2012
Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
Got me again. You're absolutely right.....I did not respond to that post.
And I was right.....I did NOT ask you your postion on abortion. I already know your position on abortion and RvW.
What I was asking was if that position you held on abortion was based on a woman's right to personal autonomy. You did not give me a straight answer. Your answer was simply more paranoia regarding your perception that I was trying to get you to say you aupported abortion.
Now if you give me a straight answer, I'll respond.
You not liking the answer I gave doesn't mean I didn't give you an answer.

You asked...Doc Degall wrote: <quoted text>

"I just wanna get a sense of where you stand.
So your support of legal abortion is not based at all on a woman's right to personal autonomy?"

Where I stand? On what? Picking oranges? The price of peanuts? We are talking abortion correct? You get that, right?

YOU interjected that I "support"... "legal abortion". I never said that at all, did I? YOU followed your question with some presumptions on what I supposedly support, true? Or do I need to show you the question you wrote again? The one full of your own personal assumptions?

I believe I told you that I don't like abortion and would not choose to have one and that I support other women having the ability to make their own choice.

I also know that I have stated to before that we live in a country of laws and nobody has 100% personal autonomy in anything. Not you, not me, not anyone. I can drink alcohol all I want but I can't then go drive my car. I've said all this before, more than once.

Your argument that a woman can't get an abortion right up to before birth is meaningless. If a woman wants an abortion she has a certain number of months to obtain one. Nobody has 100% autonomy in anything...nobody. That doesn't just apply to abortion, and you know that too.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251313 Aug 5, 2012
Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
Bullshit. I welcome people going back and finding the posts in question. I URGE them to. Ask Katie.
I must say your work in going back almost 3 months to find a post to try and prove Doc wrong....was exemplary. Katie could take a page outta your book. She's too busy to look though.
<quoted text>
Did you look it up and now know what it means ? You can thank me for improving your vocabulary.
Yes, as a matter of fact I did look up the meaning of the term "per se" to be certain I really knew what it meant.

adverb
"by, of, for, or in itself; intrinsically: This candidate is not a pacifist per se, but he is in favor of peaceful solutions when practicable. Synonyms: innately, inherently, indigenously, fundamentally."

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/per+se

You wrote..."I was waiting for the first homophobe to take the bait. Thought for sure it would've been PBFA and not you."

http://www.topix.com/forum/ncaa/basketball/T8...

And then you wrote..."It wasn't bait per se. But as soon as I wrote it I knew it would be fodder for any tru homophobe."

So you were waiting for the first homophobe to "take the bait", but it wasn't "bate per se"???

Which is it then Doc?

Have you had enough yet Doc?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251314 Aug 5, 2012
bait, not "bate"

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#251315 Aug 5, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
You not liking the answer I gave doesn't mean I didn't give you an answer.
You asked...Doc Degall wrote: <quoted text>
"I just wanna get a sense of where you stand.
So your support of legal abortion is not based at all on a woman's right to personal autonomy?"
Where I stand? On what? Picking oranges? The price of peanuts? We are talking abortion correct? You get that, right?
YOU interjected that I "support"... "legal abortion". I never said that at all, did I? YOU followed your question with some presumptions on what I supposedly support, true? Or do I need to show you the question you wrote again? The one full of your own personal assumptions?
I believe I told you that I don't like abortion and would not choose to have one and that I support other women having the ability to make their own choice.
I also know that I have stated to before that we live in a country of laws and nobody has 100% personal autonomy in anything. Not you, not me, not anyone. I can drink alcohol all I want but I can't then go drive my car. I've said all this before, more than once.
Your argument that a woman can't get an abortion right up to before birth is meaningless. If a woman wants an abortion she has a certain number of months to obtain one. Nobody has 100% autonomy in anything...nobody. That doesn't just apply to abortion, and you know that too.
How antichoice of you.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251316 Aug 5, 2012
I wanted be sire BOTH links were available.

DOC wrote..."I was waiting for the first homophobe to take the bait. Thought for sure it would've been PBFA and not you."

http://www.topix.com/forum/ncaa/basketball/T8 ...

And then DOC wrote..."It wasn't bait per se. But as soon as I wrote it I knew it would be fodder for any tru homophobe."

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251317 Aug 5, 2012
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
How antichoice of you.
Perhaps you should support your statement with some kind of actual argument to counter what I had written...? What do you have to say then?

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#251318 Aug 5, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you should support your statement with some kind of actual argument to counter what I had written...? What do you have to say then?
"If a woman wants an abortion she has a certain number of months to obtain one."

Why would you punish a woman just because she didn't have an abortion within the timeframes that you support?

"Nobody has 100% autonomy in anything...nobody."

Good point, except that that is exactly what pro"choicers" demand.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Entertainment Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Extreme Makeover: Home Edition Looks for Anothe... (Apr '11) 6 hr Mrs Fern 91
topix chat room about anything (Jan '08) 11 hr BORED 617
News Kim Kardashian: I post selfies because they emp... 15 hr BORED 5
News Univision reporter removed from Trump news conf... 23 hr Responsibiility 33
News Josh Duggar in rehab after admitting to pornogr... 23 hr BORED 2
News Tila Tequila Kicked Off CBB For Hitler Praise 23 hr BORED 3
News Cecil and Caitlyn heat up the Halloween costume... 23 hr BORED 1
More from around the web