Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311496 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#244057 Jun 16, 2012
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
CD, Lynne's given all the proof necessary. She refuses to post the words "I do not have the same SS# and DNA as the poster PCers know as Lynne D."
All she'd have to do is post that under her lil Lilly name, and I'd drop it.
I think she's just milking the attention. Why wouldn't she just lie about it?
STO

Vallejo, CA

#244058 Jun 16, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Your posts disappeared last night, STO. I was replying to one, got distracted and was afk for a few, came back and was sent to the main page. Then as I went to hunt it down and reply, all your posts were gone. And yes, I saw where you'd mentioned the warning against using profanity. I got those a couple weeks ago when all I did was copy and paste (not a single cuss word in sight either). Now I dunno what happened last night, but this morning, your posts were still gone.
But hey, if that makes me a liar in LyinLynne D's eyes, more power to her.
OH. No kidding?

I wouldn't know my posts we're pulled because I can still see them. Must've been the ones where I called Lynne a hussy and a trollop and a TDS.

I believe Lynne didn't report me, as she said. She likes those posts. Gets all googly eyed. Gotta throw the ol'girl a bone once in a while.

Did you see her wagging her tail?
Katie

Tacoma, WA

#244059 Jun 16, 2012
Brilliant_Chicky wrote:
<quoted text>
That's right!! You either lick Lynnes boots or she starts telling you why you should be licking her boots and why you are bad, bad, for not licking her boots.
You did try to be nice to her. I remember warning you about her, in the beginning, and you told me you would make up your own mind.(That's when I fell in love with you! ;-)) You were so fair and awesome, and tried to gain an understanding of her. Same with Lala! She and La were cool as long as La did not object to LynneD exploiting her personal information. Once I pointed out that every time LynneD got in the weeds she'd trot out Lalas personal experiences. Once Lala decided to put a stop to that shit, suddenly La was her enemy, and shes had it out for her ever since. Same with STO. Lynnie had a wild crush on my STO until STO challenged her. I have the link to that whole dabacle. Then, STO was no longer her fantansy romance.
Lynnie is a narcissitic mental case.
Ohhoho! I wanna see the link with STO! Refresh my memory and have a few laughs. What say you and he? You are dead on right, too, Chicky. I remember the La debacle. Obviously LyinLynne D hasn't forgiven her yet.

(i'm just dropping the whole lily pretense since it bugs her enough to "correct" me about her make-believe name in her make-believe life online)

(hmmm. she just shoulda called herself lady elaine from the land of make believe)
Katie

Tacoma, WA

#244060 Jun 16, 2012
Brilliant_Chicky wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, Katie, these extreme anti choicers stubborn, willful, ignorance is no reflection on you. I know how you feel about continuing it. Its difficult to let their ignorant bullshit stand unchallenged, especially when they start lying outright about what we have said. Or twisting what we have said to suit their straw man arguments. It doesn't seem to matter that what we have stated and linked and explained is all right there in writing to disprove their deceptive claims.
It is not about saving the fetuses. Its about the power the get when they dream about being able to force their will on others against their own will. The men want to control women who they see as inferior. The women want to control other women they way the men in their lives, or their religions, or their own choices in life, control them. Its almost pitiful. It is definitely contemptible.
Both pitiful and contemptible, imo. Again, Chicky, you are spot on.(and you know that's why i love you!! you ah sooo smaht!! fer realz tew!!)

xo <3 xo

pupsilicious

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#244061 Jun 16, 2012
LadiLulu wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry, but I never open your links. They are probably infected from the filth of the hovel you live in.
You wasted your time, Nit.
Your hunka luv must be embarrassing , go drink another Schlitz and pretend its a Yuengling.
Katie

Tacoma, WA

#244062 Jun 16, 2012
LadiLulu wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't realize she pulled that crap on poor katie and STO, as well.
<scooting over and patting the space next to me>
Welcome to the "Lynne D Hates Us Club"!!

xo <3 xo

Brilliant_Chicky

“mama & baby”

Since: Oct 10

Pro Choice is Pro Life!

#244063 Jun 16, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
You only proved you're idiots who have no intelligence.
Chicky: "I never said born."
Brilliant_Chicky wrote:
<quoted text>
~"That viability means able to [live without assistance]. That [preemies born] at the threshold of viability are given assistance to [reach viability] where no assistance is needed. A full term healthy newborn is born viable."~
I see the word "born" there.
<quoted text>
I didn't lie about your position. Your position has always been that "viability" is about born and surviving [without] medical assistance. What kind of stupidity are you trying to pull now? lol.
Here comes the little twists and turns trying to baffle with bullshit and lie about what's said, Chicky, "Are you claiming that viability only happens at the moment of birth? "
No, I'm not claiming that at all. Never claimed it, never will claim it since viability is about a FETUS before birth, and about its [potential] to survive once born, with or without medical aid.
YOU are the one who claimed viability is "able to [live without assistance]. That [preemies born] at the threshold of viability are given assistance to [reach viability] where no assistance is needed."
You were wrong then and still wrong now, and no, I haven't lied about your position at all.
Epic fail.
Where is the link, liar? You could be making this up.

You are truly effed in the head.

That was a discussion regarding preemies BORN at the THRESHOLD of viability, you desperate old hag. Thats why I said BORN. We were talking about BORN PREEMIES.

I wonder why you didn't link the post where I explained, that viability did NOT mean BORN, directly TO YOU?? That post not convenient to your pack of lies??

You even JUST ADMITTED I DID NOT SAY BORN. Now, suddenly, after I pointed out what a POS liar you are, for claiming I did, you are claiming I DID say born??

Liar Lily wrote:
"What? lol. You never "said" born? Maybe not right out, but what else would, "surviving without medical assistance" which is your claim, mean, you pea brain?"

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...

Which is it, liar?

So, once again for the dumb liar,

Viability means being able to live normally. That ability is achieved BEFORE BIRTH, you blithering dumbass. Otherwise ALL born infants would require assistance and NONE would be born viable.

See how fncking stupid you are? I LOVE when idiots keep talking. Proof the D in Lynne D means DUH.

A fetus does not have to be born to be viable. I keep saying this over and over and yet YOU keep claiming that I said something I did not say.

You seem to be getting a little desperate, Lynnie.

Wonder why.

:D

Brilliant_Chicky

“mama & baby”

Since: Oct 10

Pro Choice is Pro Life!

#244066 Jun 16, 2012
Wow. EIGHT frantic LyinLily posts on page 11505.

Just like Lynne D used to do when she could no longer control her psychosis.

But they are NOT the same posters.

LMAO.

Brilliant_Chicky

“mama & baby”

Since: Oct 10

Pro Choice is Pro Life!

#244068 Jun 16, 2012
pupsilicious wrote:
<quoted text> Who does your mullet? The hairdresser at Wal-mart? You should get your money back.
Oh no, dear, thats LillyLynne. You shouldnt make fun of your soul sisters!
STO

Vallejo, CA

#244069 Jun 16, 2012
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>I think she's just milking the attention. Why wouldn't she just lie about it?
Because she knows it would be a lie she can't justify away in her own addled head.

For example, she's supporting sjm's accusation that I bashed/mocked young abused girls. Neither one can prove it. So lil Lynne tries to make the argument that my picking on her while she is in her late 50s is abusing any girl who might read those posts. To her it's indirect abuse, so she can believe her bullshit.

OTOH, she knows she posted as Lynne D, so has the same SS# and DNA as Lynne D. She can't justify that fact away. So, she won't deny it. She basically won't tell a lie she can't even believe.

She'll ignore posts where PCers have corrected her. When she knows she's wrong. Another example, she claimed that I said frozen embryos are viable. I didn't. I showed her where she went wrong. And I haven't heard a peep from her about it, since.

Brilliant_Chicky

“mama & baby”

Since: Oct 10

Pro Choice is Pro Life!

#244070 Jun 16, 2012
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
"STO claims he's not guilty of certain things; PLers prove he is and that his denials are lies."
You haven't proven anything, EXcept that I was telling the truth. That's makes you the liar.
I think the voices in LyinLilLynnes head tell her the definition of liar is "everybody but me. No matter how many lies I tell, its always the truth.".
STO

Vallejo, CA

#244071 Jun 16, 2012
Brilliant_Chicky wrote:
<quoted text>
That's right!! You either lick Lynnes boots or she starts telling you why you should be licking her boots and why you are bad, bad, for not licking her boots.
You did try to be nice to her. I remember warning you about her, in the beginning, and you told me you would make up your own mind.(That's when I fell in love with you! ;-)) You were so fair and awesome, and tried to gain an understanding of her. Same with Lala! She and La were cool as long as La did not object to LynneD exploiting her personal information. Once I pointed out that every time LynneD got in the weeds she'd trot out Lalas personal experiences. Once Lala decided to put a stop to that shit, suddenly La was her enemy, and shes had it out for her ever since. Same with STO. Lynnie had a wild crush on my STO until STO challenged her. I have the link to that whole dabacle. Then, STO was no longer her fantansy romance.
Lynnie is a narcissitic mental case.
ah, the good ol'days.

I was very polite, civil when I challenged Lynne. Remember what she told me? She said I shouldn't challenge her on more than one thread at a time, because she was being "attacked" by the PCers. It wasn't fair, dammit! Why should she be treated like everybody else? Ain't she, uh..special, or somethin'?

Brilliant_Chicky

“mama & baby”

Since: Oct 10

Pro Choice is Pro Life!

#244072 Jun 16, 2012
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
CD, Lynne's given all the proof necessary. She refuses to post the words "I do not have the same SS# and DNA as the poster PCers know as Lynne D."
All she'd have to do is post that under her lil Lilly name, and I'd drop it.
She also REFUSES to admit that a 13, 14, or 15 year old girl having sex with a grown man is being molested.

Isn't that a strange thing to refuse to answer? Who can't answer that question? She told me it was not a pertinent question.

Well, of course she did kinda touch on the topic when it suited her agenda of calling Foo names, and everyone on line a stranger and a freak. BUT when I asked her again in relation to that discussion she dodged it AGAIN.

Things that make ya go hmmmmmmmm.......
Katie

Tacoma, WA

#244073 Jun 16, 2012
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
OH. No kidding?
I wouldn't know my posts we're pulled because I can still see them. Must've been the ones where I called Lynne a hussy and a trollop and a TDS.
I believe Lynne didn't report me, as she said. She likes those posts. Gets all googly eyed. Gotta throw the ol'girl a bone once in a while.
Did you see her wagging her tail?
LOL She's a wagging away!

All kidding aside, STO, is post #243875 one of yours?'Cause it's not there on my end.

Brilliant_Chicky

“mama & baby”

Since: Oct 10

Pro Choice is Pro Life!

#244074 Jun 16, 2012
pupsilicious wrote:
<quoted text>Admit its you.
I think its probably representative of what your barren womb could not produce. Poor dear.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#244075 Jun 16, 2012
Brilliant_Chicky wrote:
<quoted text>
She also REFUSES to admit that a 13, 14, or 15 year old girl having sex with a grown man is being molested.
Isn't that a strange thing to refuse to answer? Who can't answer that question? She told me it was not a pertinent question.
Well, of course she did kinda touch on the topic when it suited her agenda of calling Foo names, and everyone on line a stranger and a freak. BUT when I asked her again in relation to that discussion she dodged it AGAIN.
Things that make ya go hmmmmmmmm.......
We know why she won't answer. She thinks it was okay for her as a 15 year old to hook up with a guy in his mid twenties. If she answers your question, even the ACers would have to back away slowly. She can't say it's not okay because she thinks it was a normal, healthy choice for her and for him. Only a real loser would go after young teens. He obviously couldn't deal with his peer group. So he preyed on Lynne. She doesn't want to see herself as a victim in that relationship..but, she was.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#244076 Jun 16, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL She's a wagging away!
All kidding aside, STO, is post #243875 one of yours?'Cause it's not there on my end.
I don't see it. It wasn't mine. I didn't post yesterday.

pupsilicious

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#244077 Jun 16, 2012
Brilliant_Chicky wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh no, dear, thats LillyLynne. You shouldnt make fun of your soul sisters!
No, thats Ladi and you've been hittin' the Schlitz I see.

“GO BLACKHAWKS!!”

Since: Dec 07

Home of Lord Stanley!

#244078 Jun 16, 2012
pupsilicious wrote:
<quoted text> Is this your best bud? Does he do your daughter?
Only a filthy low classed scumbag would say something like this about someone's kid. What I find amusing is that you sit on your high horse and constantly judge who's a Christian or not and then you post things like this? You should be ashamed of yourself.

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#244079 Jun 16, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
<scooting over and patting the space next to me>
Welcome to the "Lynne D Hates Us Club"!!
xo <3 xo
You realize that that means she really and truly wuvs us?

ewwww

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Entertainment Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News San Antonio celebrities compete in Wingstop-eat... 2 hr anonymous 1
News Expect more barricades, security checks at Loll... 2 hr 3rd base hoagie 1
News Obama: Clinton More Qualified Than Me, Bill to ... 4 hr Cordwainer Trout 2
News Clooney's restraining order 5 hr Here is what I 28
News The Latest: First lady calls out Trump, - hatefula 6 hr WelbyMD 59
News Star Trek Discovery needs to push boundaries wi... 6 hr Thats Right 12
News Dev Hynes following 'school of Bowie and Prince... 7 hr Pope Ben Out To P... 3
More from around the web