Consequences-fuel loaded reactor idle-unreliable neutron flux instrumentation
Posted in the Nuclear Energy Forum
#1 Jun 23, 2013
In a Nuclear Power Plant being commissioned, the control system gets tripped because of spurious signals in the instrumentation cables from neutron flux detector. The Nuclear fuel was loaded in the VVER-1000 type PWR reactor long back by Oct 2, 2012 in the reactor. However, this was done even before ensuring that the neutron flux instrumentation works reliably, which is a pre-requisite as per IAEA standards. Similarly the passive heat removal system was not working properly because some of the valves were not working properly. What will be the consequences of having the nuclear fuel loaded and the reactor remaining idle without the issue solved in the neutron flux instrumentation? What would be the possible course of action that can be taken giving highest priority to safety?
Add your comments below
|NDP only Ontario party opposed to siting nuclea...||22 hr||nuke drain of yer...||1|
|Keeping the Pickering nuclear plant open until ...||May 21||Tritium eh||1|
|Municipality amends DGR agreement with OPG||May 21||Tritium eh||1|
|Bruce Power Inc.Bruce Power releases 2017 Annua...||May 21||Tritium eh||1|
|Bruce Power Inc.Council of the Great Lakes Regi...||May 21||Tritium eh||1|
|Ontario's long-awaited new nuclear emergency pl...||May 19||Bunkie||1|
|Ballot initiative could shut down Phoenix-area ...||May 19||Solarman||1|
Find what you want!
Search Nuclear Energy Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC