'SA not fit for nuclear expansion'

'SA not fit for nuclear expansion'

There are 1 comment on the Mail & Guardian story from Nov 22, 2012, titled 'SA not fit for nuclear expansion'. In it, Mail & Guardian reports that:

From human resources to waste management, South Africa has fallen short of international standards for nuclear expansion, writes Lynley Donnelly.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Mail & Guardian.


Brighton, MA

#1 Nov 23, 2012
Has not London exact enough hardship and suffering from the South Africans?
What standing has a London ragsheet to comment on anyhing South African?
... much less to insist that SouthAfrican serfdom to British Petroleum and AngloDutch Royal Shell shall cotinuein perpetuity?!?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Nuclear Energy Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Odd bedfellows fight Trump move on coal, nuclear Oct 12 BDV 2
News Multiple challenges remain to Fukushima nuclear... Oct 6 BDV 2
News Energy Secretary Rick Perry Orders Regulators t... Oct 3 Solarman 1
News U.S. energy chief urges incentives to help coal... Sep 29 Solarman 1
News Duke Energy nixes nuclear plant, will invest $6... Sep '17 Solarman 1
News Trump administration's nuclear energy plans han... Sep '17 Bdv 3
News Feds accept new info on planned nuclear-waste b... Jun '17 HealthRanger 2
More from around the web