'SA not fit for nuclear expansion'

'SA not fit for nuclear expansion'

There are 1 comment on the Mail & Guardian story from Nov 22, 2012, titled 'SA not fit for nuclear expansion'. In it, Mail & Guardian reports that:

From human resources to waste management, South Africa has fallen short of international standards for nuclear expansion, writes Lynley Donnelly.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Mail & Guardian.


Brookline, MA

#1 Nov 23, 2012
Has not London exact enough hardship and suffering from the South Africans?
What standing has a London ragsheet to comment on anyhing South African?
... much less to insist that SouthAfrican serfdom to British Petroleum and AngloDutch Royal Shell shall cotinuein perpetuity?!?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Nuclear Energy Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Nuclear-power plant planned for Piketon (Jun '09) 17 hr Jason H 4
News Loan discussed, deals inked with Medvedev Nov 24 andiliu 1
News Former White House climate change director in T... Nov 13 why sell hydro 1
News Smart Enough to Chart Our Energy Future? Oct '15 Solarman 1
News Can towns near Japan's Fukushima nuclear plant ... Sep '15 BDV 8
News China to help build 2 Pakistan nuclear plants (Oct '08) Sep '15 David 253
News Offshore wind could be a windfall for Hampton R... Sep '15 Solo 1
More from around the web