Was nuclear the right decision for SC...

Was nuclear the right decision for SCE&G?

There are 2 comments on the Post and Courier story from Jul 7, 2013, titled Was nuclear the right decision for SCE&G?. In it, Post and Courier reports that:

The blue heavy-lift derrick, one of the two largest cranes in the world, sits between Nuclear Unit No.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Post and Courier.


Humble, TX

#1 Jul 7, 2013
No, nuclear probably would not have been a real option were it not for South Carolina's law shifting the up-front costs to customers. Without it, Marsh said,“we probably would not have undertaken construction.”

There you go.

Etobicoke, Canada

#2 Jul 7, 2013
Nuclear is certainly like renewables in terms that most costs are 'front loaded'. This makes government loan guarantees a way to encourage or discourage investment.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Nuclear Energy Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Nuclear waste, anyone? Feds look to willing states 12 hr warrengraham 1
News Russia's nuclear nightmare flows down radioacti... 17 hr warrengraham 3
News Here's where the US nuclear boom turned into a ... Jun 23 BDV 2
News End of California nuclear era: Last plant to cl... Jun 21 Solarman 1
News Jack Gibbons: Ontario's misguided love affair w... Jun 11 BDV 2
News Consumers deserve a pausea in FPLa s nuclear pl... May 31 Julie Ann 1
News Nebraska utility head recommends closing nuclea... May 28 Melinda Harper 4
More from around the web