Was nuclear the right decision for SCE&G?
The blue heavy-lift derrick, one of the two largest cranes in the world, sits between Nuclear Unit No.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Post and Courier.
#1 Jul 7, 2013
No, nuclear probably would not have been a real option were it not for South Carolina's law shifting the up-front costs to customers. Without it, Marsh said,we probably would not have undertaken construction.
There you go.
#2 Jul 7, 2013
Nuclear is certainly like renewables in terms that most costs are 'front loaded'. This makes government loan guarantees a way to encourage or discourage investment.
Add your comments below
|Nuclear waste, anyone? Feds look to willing states||12 hr||warrengraham||1|
|Russia's nuclear nightmare flows down radioacti...||17 hr||warrengraham||3|
|Here's where the US nuclear boom turned into a ...||Jun 23||BDV||2|
|End of California nuclear era: Last plant to cl...||Jun 21||Solarman||1|
|Jack Gibbons: Ontario's misguided love affair w...||Jun 11||BDV||2|
|Consumers deserve a pausea in FPLa s nuclear pl...||May 31||Julie Ann||1|
|Nebraska utility head recommends closing nuclea...||May 28||Melinda Harper||4|
Find what you want!
Search Nuclear Energy Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC