Letter: When discussing nuclear energy, consider greenhouse effect of alternatives
There are 2 comments on the Tri-cityherald.com story from May 7, 2013, titled Letter: When discussing nuclear energy, consider greenhouse effect of alternatives. In it, Tri-cityherald.com reports that:
Isn't there something missing in the April 25th front page article about closing the Columbia Generating Station? There is lots of talk about nuclear power cost, replacement power costs, vent modification and fuel costs? But I thought the big issue of the day for all those pushing for social responsibility was the impending disaster of global ... (more)
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Tri-cityherald.com.
#1 May 7, 2013
No. One stupid fearmongering whopper does not excuse another fearmongering whopper.
#2 May 8, 2013
Add your comments below
|PG&E announces $85M deal over Diablo Canyon clo...||Nov 29||Solarman||1|
|China to help build 2 Pakistan nuclear plants (Oct '08)||Nov 26||KIA||254|
|Nuclear fusion project leader laments 'uncontro...||Nov 15||Stephany McDowell||3|
|Steve Levy: A tale of two Cuomos and two nuke b...||Nov 8||BDV||2|
|Scientists predicted nuclear disaster in Easter...||Oct '16||BDV||3|
|Malaysia, Indonesia sign science-tech MoUs (Jul '08)||Oct '16||Boy Andromeda||402|
|Concerns about nuclear waste dump start locally... (Jan '14)||Oct '16||NoTrumptardationN...||3|
Find what you want!
Search Nuclear Energy Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC