What to do with nuclear waste?

What to do with nuclear waste?

There are 5 comments on the Salem News story from Feb 12, 2011, titled What to do with nuclear waste?. In it, Salem News reports that:

President Barack Obama admits nuclear power needs to be part of the nation's energy mix.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Salem News.

Sustainable Future

Istanbul, Turkey

#1 Feb 13, 2011
The US should build many Thorium fueled nuclear reactors like India and China. The US has a lot of Thorium reserves and in these reactors depleted Uranium (nuclear waste) can be re-used. Mankind will learn, that there is no waste and everything including nuclear waste is nothing else than precious raw material. This is article is nothing else than another roadblock to non-fossil fuel alternatives. If the US continues like this, it will be dependent not only for fossil fuels, but also for alternative technology from China and India. If there was such a resistance against air pollution during industrial revolution like there is currently against alternative energy, there would be no internet, no cars, no planes, probably we would be discussing the effects of the transcontinental railroad on turtle life and if this railroad should be built or not.

Albuquerque, NM

#2 Feb 16, 2011
Here is a video about using thorium instead of uranium and how a liquid fluoride thorium reactor (LFTR) can burn, as fuel, our present nuclear waste:


Espanola, NM

#3 Feb 7, 2013
Thorium alpha decay, safer, not hardly...
Thorium-232 has a half-life of about 14.05 billion years.
Uranium-235 has a half-life of 703.8 million years.
Caesium-137 has a half-life of about 30.17 years.

Albuquerque, NM

#4 Feb 7, 2013
@ NoThorium,

It doesn't matter what the half life of thorium, or uranium isotopes is. They can all be destroyed in the LFTR.

The radioactive elements that cannot be destroyed by the LFTR are a problem, but not a serious one. Their half-lives are such that after only a few hundred years they are no longer radioactive enough to matter and their volume is low anyway.

Decatur, GA

#5 Feb 7, 2013
Of course, for a given amount of atoms (i.e energy recovered), the radioactivity is inversely proportional to the half life. That's why Cesium and Strontium are potential problems, Iodine is an ACTUAL problem, and lantanides (and all after them) are no problem whatsoever.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Nuclear Energy Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Russia's nuclear nightmare flows down radioacti... 5 hr RUSSIA in DECLINE 1
News Jellyfish wave shuts down Swedish nuke reactor (Oct '13) Apr 21 DILF 37
News Energy reform: no easy path Apr 14 vex 2
News Entergy officials to meet with NRC in April to ... Apr 13 Luna Bonita 1
News Police: Man found with 1,428 bags of heroin in ... Apr 2 markey fife 4
News Japan regulators OK costly ice wall at Fukushim... Apr '16 Fla 1
News FEATURE-Japan's nuclear refugees face bleak ret... Mar '16 APEFARANGUMINDEBD... 2
More from around the web