Nuclear fusion is the 'perfect energy...

Nuclear fusion is the 'perfect energy source'

There are 9 comments on the CNN story from Mar 12, 2013, titled Nuclear fusion is the 'perfect energy source'. In it, CNN reports that:

Will this fusion facility being built in southern France help solve our energy problems in the years ahead? Scientists like Steven Cowley, director of the UK's Culham Center for Fusion Energy, think that research at ITER could result in abundant, low-carbon energy in the future.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CNN.

SpaceBlues

United States

#1 Mar 13, 2013
No it isn't. Besides it would take at least 30 years to penetrate by one percent the electricity market upon availability.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#2 Mar 14, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
No it isn't. Besides it would take at least 30 years to penetrate by one percent the electricity market upon availability.
Yo, spacedoutblues would that be the same NASA that made the USA space hitchhikers??
sheila

Crescent City, CA

#3 Mar 14, 2013
Oil is much more than energy, it's food, transportation, clothing, heating, cooling, fertilizers, pesticides, drugs, paint, plastics, etc etc etc.

Fusion will always be in the future and no combination of alternatives to cheap oil can replace it's decline.

Without cheap abundant oil, our population would only be about 1 billion thanks to land degradation and resource depletion.

Fusion will let us starve with the lights on, temporarily.
Oil will still be required to maintain the machines.

We are dumb as YEAST! And toast.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#4 Mar 15, 2013
sheila wrote:
Oil is much more than energy, it's food, transportation, clothing, heating, cooling, fertilizers, pesticides, drugs, paint, plastics, etc etc etc.
Fusion will always be in the future and no combination of alternatives to cheap oil can replace it's decline.
Without cheap abundant oil, our population would only be about 1 billion thanks to land degradation and resource depletion.
Fusion will let us starve with the lights on, temporarily.
Oil will still be required to maintain the machines.
We are dumb as YEAST! And toast.
Hold on to that we thing. The only one that qualifies for that term would be spacedoutblues and the "pinheadlitesout".
SpaceBlues

United States

#5 Mar 17, 2013
If it were available, fusion physics would give only very low energy density at unsafe and highly radioactive manner. So fusion energy is the perfect energy 'nonesource' you could push for.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#6 Mar 18, 2013
Yo, spacedoutblues would that be the same NASA that made the USA space hitchhikers??
SpaceBlues

United States

#7 Mar 19, 2013
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#8 Mar 19, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
Yo, spacedoutblues would that be the same NASA that made the USA space hitchhikers??
SpaceBlues

United States

#9 Mar 19, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Yo, spacedoutblues would that be the same NASA that made the USA space hitchhikers??
No, wrong.

You are dismissed again.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Nuclear Energy Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Town divided over plan to store nuclear waste n... Dec 3 maybe not 4 long 1
News More Than Lower Rates and Refunds in Proposed E... Dec 3 stan 1
News Mike Flynn's Promotion of Nuclear-Plant Project... Dec 1 yidfellas own flynn 1
News Nuclear waste bunker decision not about 'money ... Nov 27 next 1
News The problem with subsidizing nuclear power and ... Nov 19 Solarman 2
News SCE&G announces rate cut, gas-fired plant purch... Nov 16 Solarman 1
News Piketon fights construction of radioactive wast... Nov '17 Guest 2
More from around the web