Groups raising bar to tackle climate change

Mar 5, 2014 Full story: Oxford Times 47

Buy this photo TIMELY: A flash mob raises concerns about climate change with a demonstration at flooded Abingdon Road, Oxford, last month EXPERTS and green groups in Oxfordshire hope this will be the time when the world finally stands up and takes notice of their predictions before disaster strikes.

Full Story
Big Chief Gore Bottom

UK

#26 Mar 9, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>hahaha
Your English is all wet; are you back to the island?
Listen to the Q!
I see you are coming to the help of your gay Redskin chum? and the above sentence is quite meaningless. But can't Little Plum answer for himself?
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#27 Mar 9, 2014
Big Chief Gore Bottom wrote:
<quoted text>I see you are coming to the help of your gay Redskin chum? and the above sentence is quite meaningless. But can't Little Plum answer for himself?
You are gored!

Look at your chosen name. So scram.
BDV

Decatur, GA

#28 Mar 10, 2014
Insults, the only recourse of BigOil's resident stooge. How droll.

Since: Mar 13

Sequim, WA

#29 Mar 10, 2014
BDV wrote:
What does this have to do with Nuclear Power?
Nuclear power is the only available, reliable, scaleable, safe and cost effective source of energy to replace the high carbon sources.
BDV

Atlanta, GA

#30 Mar 11, 2014
KitemanSA wrote:
<quoted text> Nuclear power is the only available, reliable, scaleable, safe and cost effective source of energy to replace the high carbon sources.
Obviously, that's why it's such a relentless propaganda attack, while coal and oilkeep poisoning us unabated and unconcerned of enrironazi histrionics..
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#31 Mar 11, 2014
Nuclear power is the only [NO]

available, NO
reliable, NO
scaleable, NO
safe, NO
cost effective source of energy, NO

to replace the high carbon sources.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#32 Mar 11, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
Nuclear power is the only [NO]
available, NO
reliable, NO
scaleable, NO
safe, NO
cost effective source of energy, NO
to replace the high carbon sources.
solar panels disturb the birds and can result in their deaths
wind turbines disturb cattle & wildlife and can result in their deaths
what are the chances tidal energy isn't so pretty either
back to playing with atoms then
DJ Jones

Waynesboro, TN

#33 Mar 12, 2014
Velvet MJK wrote:
<quoted text>
solar panels disturb the birds and can result in their deaths
wind turbines disturb cattle & wildlife and can result in their deaths
what are the chances tidal energy isn't so pretty either
back to playing with atoms then
So do aircraft,buildings,highways. and radio towers to name a few. Lets get rid of them all by your thinking. Any more bullshit?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#34 Mar 12, 2014
DJ Jones wrote:
<quoted text>So do aircraft,buildings,highways. and radio towers to name a few. Lets get rid of them all by your thinking. Any more bullshit?
any more? we'll see

yes they do, just not in the correlated numbers that the turbines and panels do

Since: Mar 13

Sequim, WA

#35 Mar 13, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
Nuclear power is the only [NO]
available, NO
reliable, NO
scaleable, NO
safe, NO
cost effective source of energy, NO
to replace the high carbon sources.
SB reveals his mental deficiency in this ridiculous statement.
Nuclear power is the only [NO] TBD.
available, NO .... Of course it is available. And it is sustainable for millions of years.
reliable, NO ..... Of course it is reliable. It has the highest reliability factor of ALL sources.
scaleable, NO ... Of course it is scaleable. It is the only one to have demonstrated the real growth needed to reduce carbon emissions by the desired amounts.
safe, NO ........Of course it is safe. Any way you want to measure it, it is the SAFEST available.
cost effective source of energy, NO All energy systems that are allowed to plan and execute their own energy mix show nuclear just barely more expensive than hydro. That is why it is growing as quickly as it is.
Your silly statements of "NO" behind each of my characteristics is reminiscent of a two year old, and shows about as much knowledge on the subject.
Given that all the characteristics are in fact "yes", and nuclear is the sole possessor of that condition, then I guess it has Been Determined that nuclear is the only... YES.

Since: Mar 13

Sequim, WA

#36 Mar 13, 2014
BDV wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously, that's why it's such a relentless propaganda attack, while coal and oilkeep poisoning us unabated and unconcerned of enrironazi histrionics..
Yup, it seems that the fossil cartel spends a lot of money to keep the anti-nuke cabal spewing their 10(?) standard lies.

Since: Mar 13

Sequim, WA

#37 Mar 13, 2014
DJ Jones wrote:
<quoted text>So do aircraft,buildings,highways. and radio towers to name a few. Lets get rid of them all by your thinking. Any more bullshit?
But not to the degree, and it is much easier to prevent it with the ones you mention. The unreliables are unneeded, so slaughtering all those nature's creatures for something so unneeded seems a bit of a disgusting thing to do.

Since: Mar 13

Sequim, WA

#38 Mar 13, 2014
Velvet MJK wrote:
<quoted text>
any more? we'll see
yes they do, just not in the correlated numbers that the turbines and panels do
And don't forget the solar power towers fricasseeing all those birds.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#39 Mar 14, 2014
KitemanSA wrote:
<quoted text> SB reveals his mental deficiency in this ridiculous statement.
Nuclear power is the only [NO] TBD.
available, NO .... Of course it is available. And it is sustainable for millions of years.
reliable, NO ..... Of course it is reliable. It has the highest reliability factor of ALL sources.
scaleable, NO ... Of course it is scaleable. It is the only one to have demonstrated the real growth needed to reduce carbon emissions by the desired amounts.
safe, NO ........Of course it is safe. Any way you want to measure it, it is the SAFEST available.
cost effective source of energy, NO All energy systems that are allowed to plan and execute their own energy mix show nuclear just barely more expensive than hydro. That is why it is growing as quickly as it is.
Your silly statements of "NO" behind each of my characteristics is reminiscent of a two year old, and shows about as much knowledge on the subject.
Given that all the characteristics are in fact "yes", and nuclear is the sole possessor of that condition, then I guess it has Been Determined that nuclear is the only... YES.
The silliest post of the year. It is all incorrect.

You can't fool the public with this trash.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#40 Mar 14, 2014
KitemanSA wrote:
<quoted text> And don't forget the solar power towers fricasseeing all those birds.
Remember Fukushima, etc.

Since: Mar 13

Sequim, WA

#41 Mar 14, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>The silliest post of the year. It is all incorrect.
You can't fool the public with this trash.
Your ignorance is exceeded only by your foolishness.

Since: Mar 13

Sequim, WA

#42 Mar 14, 2014
I do remember Fukushima. But I remember what ACTUALLY happened, not the FUD induced hysteria that you seem to imagine.

Show me ONE report of animals dying due to Fukushima (other than the rat that bit into that electrical cable :D ). You can't, because it hasn't happened. Fukushima, like Chernobyl before it, seems to really help the local wild-life. It keeps FUD-sodden humans away.

The un-reliables flat out KILL wild life in significant quantities. Nuclear does not. Just the facts.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#43 Mar 14, 2014
Namecalling does not change the failures of the nukists! Have a heart for the people, duh.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#44 Mar 14, 2014
See animal deaths..

http://search.yahoo.com/search...

Search for more for animal deaths or animals dying due to Fukushima..
Emawi

Plano, TX

#45 Mar 14, 2014
You know how we can minimize global warming?
Reverse civilization!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Alternative Energy Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Expert: We must act fast on warming (Sep '08) 32 min One way or another 27,713
California flips the switch on the world's larg... 1 hr Solarman 1
Geothermal pitched as alternative to Site C dam 22 hr get er done 1
Regulators approve PNM solar plan Thu Solarman 1
Renewable Energy Will Never Work, But Can Nuclear? Thu SpaceBlues 18
Matched 'hybrid' systems may hold key to wider ... Wed Solarman 1
Energy and tech butting heads over $5.2B Texas ... Nov 25 Solarman 1

Alternative Energy People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE