Even green energy is vulnerable to global warming

There are 7 comments on the The Daily Caller story from Mar 14, 2014, titled Even green energy is vulnerable to global warming. In it, The Daily Caller reports that:

Democrats asked the Government Accountability Office to evaluate the impact global warming will have on U.S. energy infrastructure, such as pipelines and power lines.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Daily Caller.

SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#1 Mar 14, 2014
The bottom line is our choices to adapt to climate change while slowing it down intentionally.

Read the report if you can. This article is a misrepresentation of it, especially:

Luckily for the U.S., only a small portion of its electricity comes from renewable energy — most comes from coal and natural gas. According to the Energy Information Administration, renewable energy — including hydropower — made up 12 percent of the country’s power generation in 2012. Wind and solar, however, only made up 3.46 percent and 0.11 percent of energy generation in 2012, respectively.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/13/even-green-...

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#2 Mar 15, 2014
Most people can't stomach the "new-speak" that hydro is "renewable". Yes, it has been claimed by the "back to the Middle Ages technology" cabal, but it is big, industrial energy, not diffuse, distributed energy.

When most people think "renewable" they are actually thinking about the unreliables... wind and solar.
Alison Young

Gold, India

#3 May 20, 2014
That's a true green energy is very important to vulnerable to global warming because that According to the Energy Information renewable energy including hydro power.

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#4 May 26, 2014
If you want true green energy, nothing beats Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors.
Cordwainer Trout

Leitchfield, KY

#5 May 26, 2014
Alarmist Paul Ehrlich Predicts Need to ‘Eat the Bodies of Your Dead’
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/sean-long/2014/0...

Maybe the AGW numbnuts should be eathing Paul Ehrlich, or at least his brain.

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#6 Jun 12, 2014
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
Maybe the AGW numbnuts should be eathing Paul Ehrlich, or at least his brain.
I suspect it would be as devoid of nutritive value as it is of predictive power.
Alison Young

Gold, India

#7 Jun 18, 2014
It is good for global warming because it is convert solar energy in renewable energy and it is used in different places.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Alternative Energy Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News In wake of flu epidemic a century ago, Alaska's... 6 hr tom wingo 1
News Is It Time to End Ethanol Vehicle Fuel Mandates? (Apr '13) 17 hr litesong 6
News Tesla Is Not The Only Player In Energy Storage Sat Solarman 1
News Tesla CEO Elon Musk Unveils Home Battery; Is $3... Sat Solarman 1
News Sunrun And Tesla Collaborate To Offer Consumers... Sat Solarman 1
News Salt water turned into drinking water using sol... Sat Solarman 1
News Wind energy is cheaper, but interest in buildin... Apr 30 Solarman 14
More from around the web