How severe weather impacts global foo...

How severe weather impacts global food supply

There are 34 comments on the WKBT story from Dec 5, 2012, titled How severe weather impacts global food supply. In it, WKBT reports that:

Sometimes Jaria Faraj Ali is so hungry that she ties a scarf tight around her waist to make her feel more comfortable.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at WKBT.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
SpaceBlues

Cypress, TX

#22 Feb 16, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Start by calling names again. No I said I don't accept scientific science fiction from NASA.
So funny!

Nasa must be informed asap.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#23 Feb 16, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not too bright, are ya -- on MANY levels.
I have another quote from you here. Saved it.
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
Can you connect the dots, dear?
ha ha ha
Your dots were connected long ago when they released you from that half way house. It is time for your reevaluation and send you back. No it’s not a laughing matter you need to be locked up before you hurt someone or your----self.
SA Kiteman

Alexandria, VA

#25 Feb 17, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry I don't except info from wikipedia. I do thank you for your effort and keeping your response civil.
I did give you a continuation source. If you are very interested, the Energy from Thorium Foundation has basically ALL the ORNL reports available. They are the principle source.

And the wiki article on LFTRs is actually quite good. You might chance making an exception in this case.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#26 Feb 18, 2013
SA Kiteman wrote:
<quoted text> I did give you a continuation source. If you are very interested, the Energy from Thorium Foundation has basically ALL the ORNL reports available. They are the principle source.
And the wiki article on LFTRs is actually quite good. You might chance making an exception in this case.
Thanks again for the info. Very interested in any science but I do take issue with scientific science fiction.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#27 Feb 18, 2013
You read it? Not if you're using the scientific science fiction phrase again....

You admitted "scientific science fiction" is a meaningless phrase == just a frivolous nothing...remember???
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>
Never said anybody’s statement was wrong ,,,. I do say its scientific science fiction.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#28 Feb 18, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
You read it? Not if you're using the scientific science fiction phrase again....
You admitted "scientific science fiction" is a meaningless phrase == just a frivolous nothing...remember???
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
They only garbage that is tossed on the other side is your scientific science fiction Bull S. degree answers you post all day. You don't have a lick of character to assassinate. All see that you’re grasping at straws again and again.
SA Kiteman

Alexandria, VA

#29 Feb 18, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks again for the info. Very interested in any science but I do take issue with scientific science fiction.
In truth, I have no idea what you mean by this. I see there is ongoing sniping between you and others. I am not part of that. My sole desire is to be sure that folks are aware of the options before making generalized statements. My posts to you were to provide the info needed for you to become more aware.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#30 Feb 18, 2013
SA Kiteman wrote:
<quoted text> In truth, I have no idea what you mean by this. I see there is ongoing sniping between you and others. I am not part of that. My sole desire is to be sure that folks are aware of the options before making generalized statements. My posts to you were to provide the info needed for you to become more aware.
Looks great. Found this, if you are interested.

&li st=PL9p3Ws-jomR7zQTPXQGksLFNBh MnAtmPU

thorium is 4X more common than uranium on the Earth;

I wonder what the cost difference is.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#31 Feb 18, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks great. Found this, if you are interested.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =N2vzotsvvkwXX&list=PL9p3W s-jomR7zQTPXQGksLFNBhMnAtmPU
thorium is 4X more common than uranium on the Earth;
I wonder what the cost difference is.
You can’t even be original Commander TROLL!!!! See that Bull S. degree again got you walloped and in the crapper. That Ha HA you hear is the void between your ears called an echo.
Your wrong you don't have a character to insult.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#32 Feb 18, 2013
SA Kiteman wrote:
<quoted text> In truth, I have no idea what you mean by this. I see there is ongoing sniping between you and others. I am not part of that. My sole desire is to be sure that folks are aware of the options before making generalized statements. My posts to you were to provide the info needed for you to become more aware.
You will do fine until you post a neutral position with the wallop10 AKA walloped again and again and the spaced out spacedoutblues. Do disagree with their scientific science fiction and they will snipe and call you names like everyone else that disagrees with their method of non thinking. With those two it’s their way or the highway.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#33 Feb 18, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>You will do fine until you post a neutral position with the wallop10 AKA walloped again and again and the spaced out spacedoutblues. Do disagree with their scientific science fiction and they will snipe and call you names like everyone else that disagrees with their method of non thinking. With those two it’s their way or the highway.
We're talking about thorium.

You haven't consulted your right wing gods what your position should be on that yet?

LOL
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#34 Feb 18, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
We're talking about thorium.
You haven't consulted your right wing gods what your position should be on that yet?
LOL
You are the RIGHT GOD of BULL S. waiting for more of your scientific science fiction that would allow a position on anything you post.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#35 Feb 18, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>You are the RIGHT GOD of BULL S. waiting for more of your scientific science fiction that would allow a position on anything you post.
Why don't you answer the science question here ...
If you think you can handle it.

You think you are fooling anyone using constants character insults as a SMOKE SCREEN??????????

I've already shown you I won't make fun of you for trying.
There's no political ideology here. Thorium looks pretty cool.
The lecturer is from NASA... maybe that makes you automatically suspicious...
SA Kiteman

Arlington, VA

#36 Feb 19, 2013
By the way, if you are interested in watching videos of presentations at technical conferences, try:

http://www.thoriumenergyalliance.com/ThoriumS...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Alternative Energy Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News California Wastes Tons Of Wind And Solar Power ... 17 hr Solarman 1
News The hollow promise of renewable energy 17 hr Solarman 3
News You'll Never Guess Which State Is Building a Re... Sun Solarman 1
News Boulder hopes to move Xcel off long-term commit... Sun litesong 2
News Solar projects can't save the forest for the tr... Sat Solarman 1
News Bush to Say 'America Is Addicted to Oil' in Talk (Feb '06) Sat swedenforever 12
News Utahns' enthusiastic embrace of solar power cou... Fri Solarman 1
More from around the web