Expert: We must act fast on warming

Expert: We must act fast on warming

There are 28465 comments on the Kansas.com story from Sep 24, 2008, titled Expert: We must act fast on warming. In it, Kansas.com reports that:

Droughts, melting ice caps and glaciers, rising sea levels and mass extinctions will all be a reality unless the U.S. and the world cut back on carbon emissions dramatically, said James Hansen, director of ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Kansas.com.

ObamaSUX

Calgary, Canada

#26317 Dec 29, 2012
It's always fun to watch the AGW'er CULT.

How clueless can they get?

By now, everybody should understand that AGW is a pure fantasy, totally devoid of any reality.

That's why these AGW CULTISTS can't produce even ONE single measurement, EVER, in the history of mankind, where a COLD object (like the Earth's atmosphere) can HEAT-UP a much WARMER EARTH SURFACE.

It simply cannot, and NEVER, EVER has happened.

Yet, these AGW IDIOTS still claim that CO2 in the average -20 deg C Atmosphere can HEAT-UP a Earth Surface with an average temperature that is +15 deg C !!!

Hell, even a 4 year old child knows that COLD OBJECTS will COOL YOU, not HEAT YOU.

----------
If there ever was a group of STUPID people on this planet, it is the AGW'ers.

Just ask them to produce an ACTUAL MEASUREMENT EVER DONE where the COLD ATMOSPHERE HEATS-UP a much, much WARMER EARTH SURFACE and they all RUN FOR THE HILLS!

You can point to the "CRAP AGW SCIENCE" in the IPCC AR4 report where they describe IN DETAIL how a COLD ATMOSPHERE is HEATING a WARMER EARTH.

Here are the QUOTES DIRECTLY FROM THE IPCC AR4 REPORT so you can see the TRUTH for yourself:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...

Are there any measurements to back-up these obvious LIES?

No!...Not even ONE MEASUREMENT, EVER, in the history of mankind !!!

That's why, whenever I post the FACTS, the AGW'ers ALWAYS change the subject, which is typical for the LYING AGW A-HOLES.
----------
Instead of dealing with REALITY they turn to the only defences they have:

1) They will AVOID ANY DISCUSSION about ACTUAL MEASUREMENTS and LAWS OF SCIENCE.

2) They will call me every name under the Sun, including RACIST.

3) They will ALWAYS RUN FOR THE HILLS and LIE when I challenge them with the TRUTH.

It's really funny watching these AGW IDIOTS in action.

You will see it right here, on this forum.

Watch and LEARN.

What a HOOT!

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#26318 Dec 29, 2012
bend over northie wrote:
<quoted text> there is a good chance 'phd', they are creating their own records.
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/11/18...
More than a good chance. Read the useless babble put out there by "pinheadlitesout".

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#26319 Dec 29, 2012
bend over litesong wrote:
<quoted text> new paper published in the European Geosciences Union journal Biogeosciences reconstructs sea ice coverage in the Beaufort Sea of the Canadian Arctic over the past 150 years and finds modern sea ice coverage [9.4 months per year] is significantly greater than during the period from ~ 1887-1945 [8.3 months per year]. Figure 4 of the paper shows modern sea ice coverage is amongst the highest levels of the entire 150 year record. The authors find that the reduced sea ice coverage from ~1887-1945 corresponded with reconstructed sea surface temperatures that were up to 3C warmer from 1885-1935 in comparison to the average modern temperature. According to the paper, sea ice coverage was dominated by natural variation from the Pacific Decadal Oscillation [PDO] and Arctic Oscillation [AO].
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2012/12/new...
How do you get from...
The sediment core was collected as part of the Malina Program in an attempt to provide a paleoenvironmental perspective on the recent climatic evolution in the Beaufort Sea coastal region, which has experienced a drastic reduction of both area and thickness of sea ice cover over the last few decades (Barber and Hanesiak, 2004).
to...
New paper finds modern sea ice coverage in Canadian Arctic near highest levels of past 150 years.
?

Ah, yes, you look at a graph of months per year sea ice cover.

Either dumb or disingenuous, certainly self deceiving.

As the paper says:
The PDO mode seems to dominate the climatic variations at multi-annual to decadal timescales in the western Canadian Arctic and Beaufort Sea areas.
Nothing here to say that AGW isn't causing the multi-decadal trend in ice loss which the paper which the paper calls "drastic".

Deniers are dumb.

Deniers are liars.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#26320 Dec 29, 2012
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>More than a good chance. Read the useless babble put out there by "pinheadlitesout".
The useless babble here is yours, troll.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#26321 Dec 29, 2012
ObamaSUX wrote:
It's always fun to watch the AGW'er CULT.
How clueless can they get?
By now, everybody should understand that AGW is a pure fantasy, totally devoid of any reality.
That's why these AGW CULTISTS can't produce even ONE single measurement, EVER, in the history of mankind, where a COLD object (like the Earth's atmosphere) can HEAT-UP a much WARMER EARTH SURFACE.
It simply cannot, and NEVER, EVER has happened.
Yet, these AGW IDIOTS still claim that CO2 in the average -20 deg C Atmosphere can HEAT-UP a Earth Surface with an average temperature that is +15 deg C !!!
Hell, even a 4 year old child knows that COLD OBJECTS will COOL YOU, not HEAT YOU.
----------
If there ever was a group of STUPID people on this planet, it is the AGW'ers.
Just ask them to produce an ACTUAL MEASUREMENT EVER DONE where the COLD ATMOSPHERE HEATS-UP a much, much WARMER EARTH SURFACE and they all RUN FOR THE HILLS!
You can point to the "CRAP AGW SCIENCE" in the IPCC AR4 report where they describe IN DETAIL how a COLD ATMOSPHERE is HEATING a WARMER EARTH.
Here are the QUOTES DIRECTLY FROM THE IPCC AR4 REPORT so you can see the TRUTH for yourself:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
Are there any measurements to back-up these obvious LIES?
No!...Not even ONE MEASUREMENT, EVER, in the history of mankind !!!
That's why, whenever I post the FACTS, the AGW'ers ALWAYS change the subject, which is typical for the LYING AGW A-HOLES.
----------
Instead of dealing with REALITY they turn to the only defences they have:
1) They will AVOID ANY DISCUSSION about ACTUAL MEASUREMENTS and LAWS OF SCIENCE.
2) They will call me every name under the Sun, including RACIST.
3) They will ALWAYS RUN FOR THE HILLS and LIE when I challenge them with the TRUTH.
It's really funny watching these AGW IDIOTS in action.
You will see it right here, on this forum.
Watch and LEARN.
What a HOOT!
Cuckoo! Cuckoo!

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#26322 Dec 29, 2012
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
The useless babble here is yours, troll.
Not as much as your useless babble trollet.
its nature

Belfair, WA

#26323 Dec 30, 2012
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you get from...
<quoted text>
to...
<quoted text>?
Ah, yes, you look at a graph of months per year sea ice cover.
Either dumb or disingenuous, certainly self deceiving.
As the paper says:
<quoted text>
Nothing here to say that AGW isn't causing the multi-decadal trend in ice loss which the paper which the paper calls "drastic".
Deniers are dumb.
Deniers are liars.
all of the real experts agree 'fair game', that the totally made up problems of global warming caused by man is worse than we thought, unprecedented false solutions to imaginary problems, paid for with taxpayers money in the form of government grants is not sound science

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/62904...
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#26324 Dec 30, 2012
its nature wrote:
<quoted text> all of the real experts agree 'fair game', that the totally made up problems of global warming caused by man is worse than we thought, unprecedented false solutions to imaginary problems, paid for with taxpayers money in the form of government grants is not sound science
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/62904...
Are you a real expert?

You must be a friend of ph'd:

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#26325 Dec 30, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Are you a real expert?
You must be a friend of ph'd:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
The real question is you a real expert. You provide nothing but cut and paste. You must be a friend of well I can't imagine you actually having friends.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#26326 Dec 30, 2012
Fair Game wrote:
The naysayers like earthling have been using the same excuse since the beginning of human civilisation: why clean up the filth? Let it sit in the street as it's always done.
Carbon dioxide is neither filthy, solid or visible...

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#26327 Dec 31, 2012
its nature wrote:
<quoted text> all of the real experts agree 'fair game', that the totally made up problems of global warming caused by man is worse than we thought, unprecedented false solutions to imaginary problems, paid for with taxpayers money in the form of government grants is not sound science
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/62904...
We have records of sea ice extent from the 40s, idiot, and the low point then was *nothing* compared to the decline of the last few decades.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/HistSumm...

The experts you refer to seem to be a few crackpots on the fringe of science. Well, they certainly fooled you.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#26328 Dec 31, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Carbon dioxide is neither filthy, solid or visible...
Neither is radiation, so by that logic*, you wouldn't mind if the reactor in your town started leaking it.

*The logic of an idiot.

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#26329 Jan 1, 2013
Idiots expect government to solve "Climate Change". Government is the biggest poluter.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#26330 Jan 2, 2013
Actually "pinheadlitesout" would be the biggest poluter. All the hot gassss it spreads. And now the "pinheadlitesout" is on AMW.
litesong

Everett, WA

#26331 Jan 2, 2013
steenking piddling diddling middling mudling mudsliinger brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver wrote:
Carbon dioxide is neither filthy, solid or visible...
"steenking piddling diddling middling mudling mudsliinger brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver" believes CO2 should be 1000+ppm atmospherically & that interior structures would be OK at 4000 to 6000ppm.

& "steenking piddling diddling middling mudling mudsliinger brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver" doesn't mind the other pollutants that are created with man-made CO2, since he is NOT downwind from major smokestacks that are often placed upwind from the dwellings of poor people.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#26332 Jan 3, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
Neither is radiation, so by that logic*, you wouldn't mind if the reactor in your town started leaking it.*The logic of an idiot.
I made an observation; CO2 isn't filthy as F.G. claimed in an earlier post. I wrote nothing about radiation; those are F.G.'s conclusions; not mine.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#26333 Jan 3, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Neither is radiation, so by that logic*, you wouldn't mind if the reactor in your town started leaking it.
*The logic of an idiot.
Funny, but have you ever considered that above that same town, there is a huge nuclear reaction called the sun. In fact you tend to receive more radation flying than standing next to a nuclear reactor.

Also, I have yet to find a example of a nuclear reactor now operating inside the limits of a town or city.

http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php...
SpaceBlues

Hockley, TX

#26334 Jan 3, 2013
Oh look at tina's cut and paste. LOL.

Hey tina sun is not a nuclear reaction. You demonstrate how you know no science so readily.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#26335 Jan 3, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
Oh look at tina's cut and paste. LOL.
Hey tina sun is not a nuclear reaction. You demonstrate how you know no science so readily.
Yes, to a university web page on the sun and how it is a nuclear reaction. Corrnel University and I seem to be on one side and on the other is Space Blues and ??? Looks like you lost again,
SpaceBlues

Hockley, TX

#26336 Jan 3, 2013
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, to a university web page on the sun and how it is a nuclear reaction. Corrnel University and I seem to be on one side and on the other is Space Blues and ??? Looks like you lost again,
Show us where it says "sun is a nuclear reaction?"

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Alternative Energy Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Portland's commitment to 100 percent renewable ... Thu Solarman 1
News First Solar wins 241 MW module supply contract ... Wed Solarman 1
News Water Department to use solar power Wed Solarman 1
News The Solar Energy Fraud Tue Solarman 1
News Solar eclipse impacting solar energy Tue Solarman 1
News Sierra Club sues U.S. Energy Department over po... Tue Solarman 2
News In Tucson, Competing Interests Fight for Solar ... Aug 13 Solarman 1
More from around the web