No Child Left Behind

No Child Left Behind

There are 80 comments on the NewsTimes.com story from Apr 23, 2008, titled No Child Left Behind. In it, NewsTimes.com reports that:

Not enough students at some Danbury schools are improving fast enough on math and reading tests to satisfy the federal government.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at NewsTimes.com.

colnago80

Falls Church, VA

#35 Nov 21, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text>Pedo Bob can't abide a thread that won't address his favorite "topix" of nude boys, forced boy nudity,bare-assed spanking of boys, and the,sexual abuse of boys. And the coward posts from Dorval (Montreal)Canada under my name with a slight spelling change. He expects that nobody will notice that it's really pusillanimous pussy-hearted Pedo Bob trying yet again to hide while he pursues, again, his brazenly bent homosexual fetish and pedophile fantasies. All Canadians, particularly those with young male children, must feel very fortunate that he lives among them.
Ah gee, another thread hijacked by the Pennsylvania pipsqueak.
MaltaMon

Merchantville, NJ

#36 Nov 21, 2013
colnago80 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah gee, another thread hijacked by the Pennsylvania pipsqueak.
Lol. A very timely remark from the Fa** ggot who loves me. You're truly pathetic, SLC. Why does whatever I do concern you at all? And why the new alias? Everyone knows who you are, knows that you're gay, embittered and alone, knows that you're a fraud. Go back to Rob, or whoever it is who created that all-male child-porn site that you have defended so strongly.
MaltaMon

Cherry Hill, NJ

#39 Nov 22, 2013
More plagiarism from Britain's own insane developmentally arrested, sexually inexperienced sociooath and boy lover, DJW
Phil

Manchester, UK

#42 Nov 23, 2013
dance jump wiggle wrote:
<quoted text>
The Maltamon is watchin each child's BEHIND.
http://www.storiesbygymnopedies.com/developme...
Naked In School
Sexual Development is a Naked In School story. The "Naked in School" stories are a short series of stories connected by a common theme. Each story is entirely self-contained with its own characters and storyline. All of the stories include a teenage boy having to appear naked in some way in a school environment. Other Naked in School stories:
"Sir, he’s still got his underpants on. I thought he was going to take everything off."
"Patience, Jonathan. Patience," the teacher replied, impatiently. "The purpose of today's lesson is to give you an idea of the changes you can expect to see in your bodies over the next few years. We have not gone to all the trouble of setting this up merely so that you, Jonathan, can stare at Darren’s penis. Don’t worry, Darren will remove his briefs shortly and then you will get to see everything, but until then please listen and just maybe you might learn something."
Jonathan fell silent at the rebuke and also received a sharp jabs in the ribs from a smirking Kevin, who was seated on the desk, next to him.
"Before we ask Darren to finish undressing," Mr. Jackson began, "let’s take a good look at his body as a whole. Think for a moment about how Darren’s body is different from your own." He paused for a moment and looked around expectantly.
Good, then I think we are ready to move onto the next stage. Would you like to remove your briefs please, Darren?"
Darren was almost tempted to say, "No, I wouldn’t like to do that." But he’d come this far, he may as well get it over with. In a single, quick motion he pushed down his briefs and stepped out of them, dropping them onto the desk behind him. His hands moved automatically to cover himself and it was only with a great effort of will that he kept them by his side. Nervously he shifted his feet around and tried to avoid looking at any of the boys, but his gaze was drawn to Kevin. His brother, like all of the other boys had his eyes glued to Darren’s groin area, then, just for a moment, he looked up and gave Darren a warm, encouraging smile and a "thumbs up" sign before returning his attention downwards again.
But it seemed that not everyone was so encouraging. From the boy, Jonathan, sitting at the back next to Kevin came a soft snigger.
"What are you laughing at, jerk?" Kevin spoke up, his eyes flashing fire.
Good, then lets pick up where we left off." The man was immediately all calmness and smiles, as if the last few minutes hadn’t happened. "Would you put your hands up behind your head, please Darren. Thank you. Now boys, there is a reason I’ve asked our model to raise his arms. If you look carefully at his armpits, you will see there are a few strands of hair. There’s not much there at the moment, but there will probably be much more as Darren grows older. The armpits are just one of the places where hair will grow. I’m sure you’ve all noticed the hair around Darren’s penis."
The boy tried to think of other things, determined not to blush as attention was once more directed at his groin area.
"You were probably all already aware that hair grows around the penis, but did you know that hair grows around the back as well? If you will please turn around, Darren and bend over the desk."
A tingle, like a mild electric shock had passed through Darren’s body as the man took hold of his penis. It felt good. In spite of the surroundings, the audience of watching preteen boys, his own nervousness at the situation, it felt very good. He held his bottom lip between his teeth as his foreskin was retracted and he knew it wouldn’t take much more touching before he started to get hard.
"...Naked in School stories"

Now it is plain to see what DJW does (looks for) in his spare time, when he is not hanging around the school gates or at the local pool leering at the boys.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#44 Nov 23, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
"...Naked in School stories"
Now it is plain to see what DJW does (looks for) in his spare time, when he is not hanging around the school gates or at the local pool leering at the boys.
It's always been plain. What is surprising is that there actually are web sites filled with stories like this. DJW must have quite a bit of company throughout the English-speaking world, albeit the company of socially ostracized and isolated, sexually dysfunctional loners like himself. What a sad discovery: "Naked on School". So sick. With adult predators like this in society, I fear even more for the safety of children
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#46 Nov 23, 2013
dance jump wiggle wrote:
<quoted text>
I campaign against corruption of the UK youth by sex "educationalists" like yourself. Beware the man from Pittsburgh hanging outside the District playground. Americans protect your second amendment rights and bear arms against the school swimming pools, communal showers and gymnasium weigh in sessions!
Lol. Oh, dear pathetic DJW, surely you must know that your "campaign" isn't worthy of the term--isn't worth the price of one-minute's connection to the internet--and is totally hypocritical. Nobody who is in any position to change anything that you claim to want changed is paying attention, and if they did, would be totally put off by your frequent posting of child pornography and other photos of naked children, as well as of fictional stories of naked kids in school. If anybody of any civil authority in Britain had been paying attention, you would have been arrested by now. Stop kidding yourself. And again, I live as far from Pittsburgh as you do from Edinburgh.
Phil

Manchester, UK

#47 Nov 24, 2013
dance jump wiggle wrote:
<quoted text>
I campaign against corruption of the UK youth by sex "educationalists" like yourself. Beware the man from Pittsburgh hanging outside the District playground. Americans protect your second amendment rights and bear arms against the school swimming pools, communal showers and gymnasium weigh in sessions!
"I campaign against corruption of the UK youth"

How exactly do you campaign?
By posting stories about nude boys on Topix?
Phil

Manchester, UK

#49 Nov 24, 2013
dance jump wiggle wrote:
<quoted text>
By being ever watchful about how "Danbury schools" enforce so called no privacy rules in connecticut. Beware of the "Loco Parentis" rules where school claim they are acting in place of the parent.
the mid-1980s, officials in the school district in Vernonia noticed a precipitous rise in drug use among the students in the Vernonia School District. Disciplinary problems arose in frequency and severity. Student athletes were "the leaders of the drug culture" prevalent among Vernonia's students. At the trial, the Vernonia High School football and wrestling coaches noted they had witnessed injuries attributable to student drug use.
In response, the school district offered special classes, speakers, and presentations to the students intended to deter drug use. It brought in a specially trained dog to detect drugs, but the drug problem continued unabated. After inviting comments from the parents of the district's students, the district adopted a drug testing plan.
The protocol of the random drug testing program the district initiated was straightforward. All student athletes would be required to submit to the program as a condition of participating in athletics. All athletes were tested at the beginning of the season, and 10% of the athletes were selected randomly every week to provide a urine sample. The samples were collected in a manner that preserved the students' modesty. If a student's sample tested positive, the student was given the option of either undergoing counseling and submitting to six weekly drug tests or sitting out the remainder of that season as well as the following season.
New Jersey v. T. L. O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States addressing the constitutionality of a search of a public high school student for contraband after she was caught smoking. A subsequent search of her purse revealed drug paraphernalia, marijuana, and documentation of drug sales. She was charged as a juvenile for the drugs and paraphernalia found in the search. She fought the search, claiming it violated her Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches. The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ruling, held that the search was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment [1]
Majority opinion
Among public school students, athletes have even less of an expectation of privacy. They suit up in locker rooms before practice. They take communal showers afterward. They subject themselves to additional regulation and medical screenings in order to participate in school sports. "Somewhat like adults who choose to participate in a 'closely regulated industry,' students who voluntarily participate in school athletics have reason to expect intrusions upon normal rights and privileges, including privacy."
By contrast, the schools' interest in deterring drug use among students was truly important. Drug use has a more deleterious effect on adolescents than on adults. The "effects of a drug-infested school are visited not just upon the users, but upon the entire student body and faculty, as the educational process is disrupted." Drug use by student athletes, moreover, increases the risk of injury during sporting events themselves. The Vernonia student athletes were the leaders of the drug culture at the school; it was "self-evident" to the Court that "a drug problem largely fueled by the 'role model' effect of athletes' drug use, and of particular danger to athletes, is effectively addressed by making sure that athletes do not use drugs." Acton argued that a less intrusive policy would require some individualized suspicion before testing a student for drugs, but the Court observed that the Fourth Amendment's reasonableness requirement did not demand the use of the least intrusive means to achieve the government's aims.
"By being ever watchful about how "Danbury schools" enforce so called no privacy rules in connecticut"

Is that it?
And then what?
MaltaMon

Trenton, NJ

#50 Nov 24, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
"By being ever watchful about how "Danbury schools" enforce so called no privacy rules in connecticut"
Is that it?
And then what?
So now he's talking about Danbury, Connecticut? In the United States....and in the 1980s? What happened to his "campaign against "
the corruption of UK youth" ?
Regardless of what he says, we all know that DJ's attention and visceral obsession is with that fictional boy (from a collection of sick stories known as "Naked in School") awaiting his physical exam and hoping that the boy of his dreams emerges completely nude from the doctor's office. A very revealing post from DJW..
MaltaMon

Oaklyn, NJ

#52 Nov 25, 2013
dance jump wiggle wrote:
<quoted text>
The campaign in the Uk also means Penisylvanians from the town of the Lebanon taking up arms to protect the 4th amendment right from unreasonable search and seizure including state enforced nudity.
Robbins v. Lower Merion School District is a federal class action lawsuit, brought in February 2010 on behalf of students of two high schools in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania suburbs.[2] In October 2010, the school district agreed to pay $610,000 to settle the Robbins and parallel Hasan lawsuits against it.[1]
The suit alleged that, in what was dubbed the "WebcamGate" scandal, the schools secretly spied on the students while they were in the privacy of their homes.[3][4] School authorities surreptitiously and remotely activated webcams embedded in school-issued laptops the students were using at home.[5][6] After the suit was brought, the school district, of which the two high schools are part, revealed that it had secretly snapped more than 66,000 images.[7][8] The suit charged that in doing so the district infringed on its students' privacy rights.[5][9][10] A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction, ordering the school district to stop its secret webcam monitoring, and ordered the district to pay the plaintiffs' attorney fees.[11][12][13]
The lawsuit was filed after 15-year-old high school sophomore Blake Robbins was disciplined at school, for his behavior in his home.[5][13] The school's "evidence" that triggered his discipline was a photograph that the school had secretly taken of him in his bedroom, via the webcam in his school-issued laptop. Without telling its students, the schools remotely accessed their school-issued laptops to secretly snap pictures of students in their own homes, their chat logs, and records of the websites they visited. The school then transmitted the snapshots to servers at the school, where school authorities reviewed them and shared the snapshots with others.[14] In one widely published photo, the school had photographed Robbins in his bed.[15] The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), U.S. Attorney's Office, and Montgomery County District Attorney all initiated criminal investigations of the matter, which they combined and then closed because they did not find evidence "that would establish beyond a reasonable doubt that anyone involved had criminal intent". In addition, a U.S. Senate Judiciary subcommittee held hearings on the issues raised by the schools' secret surveillance, and Senator Arlen Specter introduced draft legislation in the Senate to protect against it in the future. Parents, media, and academics criticized the schools, and the matter was cited as a cautionary example of how modern technology can be used to infringe on personal privacy.[16]
In July 2010, another student, Jalil Hasan, filed a parallel second suit. Five months later—pursuant to a court order in the Robbins case—it informed Hasan for the first time that it had secretly taken the photographs.[17] The district was put on notice of a third parallel suit that a third student intended to bring against the district, for "improper surveillance of the Lower Merion High School student on his school issued laptop"
I'm very familiar with this case. I'm a graduate of Lower Merion Senior HS (as it was known in the 1970s. My younger son attends Harriton HS, in the same sxhool district. I joined parents who challenged the LMSD. The case was settled, the district's policy banned by state law, the intrusion ended. That was in 2010. More than three years on, the issue is moot. Why can't you live in the present? And why won't you get some help to treat your sexual dysfunction and your obsession with the now-nearly nonexistent practice of required communal nudity of underaged males?
MaltaMon

Oaklyn, NJ

#53 Nov 30, 2013
Glad to see that you're posting less. I guess that by now you have mined all the web sites devoted to pedophiles such as you, DJ.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#56 Nov 30, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> I'm very familiar with this case. I'm a graduate of Lower Merion Senior HS (as it was known in the 1970s. My younger son attends Harriton HS, in the same sxhool district. I joined parents who challenged the LMSD. The case was settled, the district's policy banned by state law, the intrusion ended. That was in 2010. More than three years on, the issue is moot. Why can't you live in the present? And why won't you get some help to treat your sexual dysfunction and your obsession with the now-nearly nonexistent practice of required communal nudity of underaged males?
"My younger son attends Harriton HS, in the same sxhool district."

What's a "sxhool" district?

Is that anything like the "Toronto French Sxhools"?

Hahahahaha!
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#57 Dec 1, 2013
dance jump wiggle wrote:
I may be posting less Molly but our quest for justice goes on through the UK house of parliament, the local councils and the board of school governors until unisex pe kits are introduced and compulsory school showers are banned through the education system.
We will also strive for a ban on paddling through out all of the 50 states of America particularly the confederate south.
I also want gender equality in all Penis-sylvania's 501 school districts.
Let the story of Carrie inspire us, notice the 1976 video had full frontal nudity but not the 2013 film
I didn't notice because I didn't see the remake. And I truly couldn't care less, DJ, but thanks anyway. About any of the above. Go back to your boys' gymnastic sites, or to whatever it is that consumes you this week.
Phil

Faringdon, UK

#58 Dec 2, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> This sexually and socially dysfunctional freak cannot elicit any positive responses to his own pedophilic postings, so he creates and posts his own positive responses
Tragic, isn't it?
Mummy doesn't want him mixing with all those rough boys and those scary girls so he talks to his imaginary friend online.
MaltaMon

Willow Grove, PA

#60 Dec 2, 2013
Delaware Jersey Wyoming wrote:
<quoted text>
At least you have Molly to share you sexual fantasies with. I bet you skype each other nude online from W0-manchester to Penis-sylvania and give each other "Virtual paddlings".
You truly are tragic Phil. The Salford Sadist!
DJ, you are the only one (besides Pedo Bob) who has posted sexual fantasies here. Along with the sick smut involving boys'medical exams which you search for online, wildly preposterous, fictional tales of forced nudity of male school children offered up as fact, pornography--child pornography, mostly--infantile references to "penises" and rectums, and a childishly obsessive fascination with nudity, particularly that of young schoolboys herded together bare-assed in school swimming pools and locker rooms, often with a stern, fully-clothed female adult supervising. You are the sick pedophile pervert, the ageing mama's boy who never has been kissed by a girl, much less had a romantic relationship. That is quite obvious. Where are Phil's sexual fantasies? Where are mine? And you "campaign" for the protection of children's privacy? You campaign against child nudity? You campaign for fairness? Lol! You are delusional. And a sick, developmentally arrested, obsessive fa**ggot pedophile. Whom do you believe you are fooling?
MaltaMon

Willow Grove, PA

#61 Dec 2, 2013
I hate to say this, but my hunch is that you are obese and physically repulsive, DJ. Most of you closeted, gay, pedophile, boy-obsessed, online stalkers are. So repulsive that even otherwise trusting children won't go near you. You have my pity for your physical appearance, which certainly must be grotesque, but you belong in a psychiatric hospital.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#63 Dec 3, 2013
Delaware Jersey Wyoming wrote:
<quoted text>
Molly is going to Malaysia to see no child is left behind by caning their bare behinds!
http://www.corpun.com/counmy.htm
Severe corporal punishment by order of the courts, for males only (and confined until recently to those aged under 50), is routine for many serious offences, notably those involving sex, violence or drugs. This is always combined with a prison sentence (at any rate in adult cases), and takes the form of a specified number of powerful strokes with a big rattan cane, or rotan, across the offender's bare seat.
The punishment is delivered inside prison by specially trained prison officers. It is never administered in public. To the modern western eye it is a rather brutal affair: where more than a few strokes are involved (the maximum, though relatively rare, is 24), blood is often drawn. See these pictures and, if you can bear it, these video clips.
In these and other respects the procedure largely resembles that in Singapore, though the modus operandi differs in detail. It is a development of what was inherited from British colonial days, and has nothing to do with Islamic law.
In a milder version (often a token single stroke of the cane), CP is also an almost invariable part of the sentence on the thousands of illegal immigrants who arrive every year, mostly from Indonesia. However, the government says caning is not used on overstayers, unlike in Singapore.
Juveniles in Malaysia are those under 18 (whereas in Singapore they are those under 16). Males under 18 may be ordered by magistrates to receive up to 10 strokes with a "light cane" under the Child Act 2001. It is unclear how often this actually happens: media coverage of such cases is extremely unusual, so this Jan 2012 news report about a 17-year-old being sentenced to the full 10 strokes for robbery is a rare find.
This June 1996 news item quotes earlier government guidelines for caning in schools. These do not always seem to have been very rigorously enforced. For instance, they say that only boys should receive CP, but in practice there are occasional reports of girls being caned. Anecdotal evidence suggests that girls are normally caned on the hand, while boys are often caned on the buttocks.
Also, in the country as a whole, 9,348 school students were punished for smoking between May and July 1997. It seems reasonable to assume that most of these punishments were canings, since it had been announced earlier that year that CP was being made mandatory for smoking.
http://www.corpun.com/vidsc3.htm
This is a bit of a rarity, a quality videoclip of a solemn and serious (if not particularly severe) instance of proper formal corporal punishment. Four senior secondary lads receive one firm stroke each from a expert discipline master who wields a long cane. The posture adopted is the familiar "hands on the desk" one, the stroke accurately targeted to the student's buttocks in each case.
http://www.corpun.com/vidju2.htm
In the earlier and heavily edited version of this film, only four of the ten strokes were shown. It seemed at the time that the prisoner was taking the punishment remarkably stoically.
Now we have the whole thing, we can see that the prisoner's reactions were edited out. In reality, he is responding strongly to the punishment as it proceeds, moaning after each stroke, and his body appears to be struggling against the frame to which he is tied.
Molly end this abuse of boys/men leave our behinds alone!:-)
You end it, you sick seedy sleazebag.
Phil

Manchester, UK

#64 Dec 3, 2013
Delaware Jersey Wyoming wrote:
<quoted text>
Molly is going to Malaysia to see no child is left behind by caning their bare behinds!
http://www.corpun.com/counmy.htm
Severe corporal punishment by order of the courts, for males only (and confined until recently to those aged under 50), is routine for many serious offences, notably those involving sex, violence or drugs. This is always combined with a prison sentence (at any rate in adult cases), and takes the form of a specified number of powerful strokes with a big rattan cane, or rotan, across the offender's bare seat.
The punishment is delivered inside prison by specially trained prison officers. It is never administered in public. To the modern western eye it is a rather brutal affair: where more than a few strokes are involved (the maximum, though relatively rare, is 24), blood is often drawn. See these pictures and, if you can bear it, these video clips.
In these and other respects the procedure largely resembles that in Singapore, though the modus operandi differs in detail. It is a development of what was inherited from British colonial days, and has nothing to do with Islamic law.
In a milder version (often a token single stroke of the cane), CP is also an almost invariable part of the sentence on the thousands of illegal immigrants who arrive every year, mostly from Indonesia. However, the government says caning is not used on overstayers, unlike in Singapore.
Juveniles in Malaysia are those under 18 (whereas in Singapore they are those under 16). Males under 18 may be ordered by magistrates to receive up to 10 strokes with a "light cane" under the Child Act 2001. It is unclear how often this actually happens: media coverage of such cases is extremely unusual, so this Jan 2012 news report about a 17-year-old being sentenced to the full 10 strokes for robbery is a rare find.
This June 1996 news item quotes earlier government guidelines for caning in schools. These do not always seem to have been very rigorously enforced. For instance, they say that only boys should receive CP, but in practice there are occasional reports of girls being caned. Anecdotal evidence suggests that girls are normally caned on the hand, while boys are often caned on the buttocks.
Also, in the country as a whole, 9,348 school students were punished for smoking between May and July 1997. It seems reasonable to assume that most of these punishments were canings, since it had been announced earlier that year that CP was being made mandatory for smoking.
http://www.corpun.com/vidsc3.htm
This is a bit of a rarity, a quality videoclip of a solemn and serious (if not particularly severe) instance of proper formal corporal punishment. Four senior secondary lads receive one firm stroke each from a expert discipline master who wields a long cane. The posture adopted is the familiar "hands on the desk" one, the stroke accurately targeted to the student's buttocks in each case.
http://www.corpun.com/vidju2.htm
In the earlier and heavily edited version of this film, only four of the ten strokes were shown. It seemed at the time that the prisoner was taking the punishment remarkably stoically.
Now we have the whole thing, we can see that the prisoner's reactions were edited out. In reality, he is responding strongly to the punishment as it proceeds, moaning after each stroke, and his body appears to be struggling against the frame to which he is tied.
Molly end this abuse of boys/men leave our behinds alone!:-)
In short, DJW, not only are you obsessed with what boys wear, or in your case preferably what they don't wear in PE, etc but you obviously also have a fetish for boys being beaten.
You need professional help.
MaltaMon

Reading, PA

#65 Dec 3, 2013
DJW is merely progressing as would any sexually deviant pervert who must satisfy a criminally motivated sexual appetite -that of the child predator-- with pornography and smut. As the shocking images and fantasies of child nudity become commonplace to him over time, his lust becomes more difficult to satisfy, and he turns to increasingly shocking images and fantasies. Naked pubescent boys not enough-? He moves on to medical fantasies with fully clothed doctors and nurses and totally nude pubescent patients receiving prostate exams ( which, of course, never have been routinely administered to schoolchildren as there would never have been any point to giving a young boy a prostate exam... unless he had cancer that originated elsewhere and metastasized) When that no longer turns him on, he fantasizes about groups of pubescent boys together in a locker room totally nude. Then he adds a coach. Then nude swim classes. Then a female swim teacher.Then other women stride in to confer with the teacher and, sure enough, size up the boys, maybe summons a nude boy to speak with them. Then a female peer walks in accidentally and giggles upon seeing her male classmates nude.. Then two. Then a group. Then a hoard of them are permitted by school policy to observe the naked boys' swim class. Eventually, DJ must introduce violence to the nude-boy fantasies. Hence his recent fixation on bullying. And now we have bare-bottomed spanking and paddling and even caning. What's next, John Wayne Gacy? Eventually, he,'ll graduate to Geoffrey Dahmer.
colnago80

Falls Church, VA

#67 Dec 4, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
DJW is merely progressing as would any sexually deviant pervert who must satisfy a criminally motivated sexual appetite -that of the child predator-- with pornography and smut. As the shocking images and fantasies of child nudity become commonplace to him over time, his lust becomes more difficult to satisfy, and he turns to increasingly shocking images and fantasies. Naked pubescent boys not enough-? He moves on to medical fantasies with fully clothed doctors and nurses and totally nude pubescent patients receiving prostate exams ( which, of course, never have been routinely administered to schoolchildren as there would never have been any point to giving a young boy a prostate exam... unless he had cancer that originated elsewhere and metastasized) When that no longer turns him on, he fantasizes about groups of pubescent boys together in a locker room totally nude. Then he adds a coach. Then nude swim classes. Then a female swim teacher.Then other women stride in to confer with the teacher and, sure enough, size up the boys, maybe summons a nude boy to speak with them. Then a female peer walks in accidentally and giggles upon seeing her male classmates nude.. Then two. Then a group. Then a hoard of them are permitted by school policy to observe the naked boys' swim class. Eventually, DJ must introduce violence to the nude-boy fantasies. Hence his recent fixation on bullying. And now we have bare-bottomed spanking and paddling and even caning. What's next, John Wayne Gacy? Eventually, he,'ll graduate to Geoffrey Dahmer.
It's Jeffrey Dahmer putz.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Standardized Testing Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Asian-American discrimination: Is medical schoo... Jul 21 Go Blue Forever 20
News Appalachian School of Law Continues to Struggle Jul 20 Not much hope 13
News Bangert: Awkward! Education reform called out a... Jul 18 Bob 21
News Halton public elementary teachers joining incre... Jul 18 Bob 10
News See What Gym Class Was Like 50 Years Ago Jul 18 Bob 41
News Why the Asian-American Lawsuit Against Harvard ... Jul 16 Ainu 1
News Teacher Starri Hedges speaks out about sex shop... Jul 9 Bob 7
More from around the web