Join the discussion below, or Read more at Orlando Sentinel.
#21 May 5, 2007
I wholly agree with not worrying about titles. That's not what it's about for me. I couldn't care one way or the other what title I get. It't more the principle of it. Things ARE backwards. That and the fact that not being officially named valedictorian causes me to not be eligible for a $4000 scholarship from USF, in which case I would have to fill out some kind of national valedictorian form. Can't fill that out if it's not "true."
#22 May 7, 2007
I agree...He deserves the recognition from his grades not the ACT or SAT Test!!
#23 May 7, 2007
I think it is a STUPID rule. This ruling should be made from student's grades NOT the ACT or SAT Test.
#24 Feb 1, 2012
I think that the rule the school board is enforcing is utter nonsense and should be removed A.S.A.P.
If you know or have seen Adam in school lately, you can tell he's extremely depressed from this whole thing.
Add your comments below
|Kassebaum Baker no fan of No Child (Apr '06)||14 hr||Phil||3|
|Our Opinion: School budget cuts will cause pain...||14 hr||Maltamon||5|
|St. Ben's tops Fraser Institute's ranking of lo...||Apr 25||another view||1|
|Former educators found guilty in Atlanta school...||Apr 25||Phil||13|
|St. Paul schools struggle to meet lofty goals||Apr 24||Phil||28|
|The Shake Shack summit that saved the education...||Apr 19||barefoot2626||2|
|Lawmakers Push Playtime as Schools Try to Figur... (Aug '08)||Apr 17||bob||23|
Find what you want!
Search Standardized Testing Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC