MaltaMon

Newark, DE

#102 Mar 15, 2013
Wait a second. Since ZuikiHeels has endowed his expression with singularity--"a low scum" I suppose that the grammatically proper term for more than one "scum" (whether low, medium, high, or even very high) would have to be "scums". "SCUMS". As in, "such low scums as...". Something new every day, eh? Even when it comes to English grammar and vocabulary, however limited.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#103 Mar 15, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
I suppose that thoss with a slightly richer vocabulary would be Medium Scum.
Being a scum, like you, has nothing to do with vocabulary, even though most of your vocabulary is highly erratic. But at least I'm glad that I have increased your vocabulary considerably by constantly copying my words and phrases, including this one when I called you scum. I don't think anyone has any doubt about this, all your posts show that you are scum. So it's no use trying to project it onto others after copying it and other phrases from me.
Largelanguage

Chester, UK

#104 Mar 15, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Being a scum, like you, has nothing to do with vocabulary, even though most of your vocabulary is highly erratic. But at least I'm glad that I have increased your vocabulary considerably by constantly copying my words and phrases, including this one when I called you scum. I don't think anyone has any doubt about this, all your posts show that you are scum. So it's no use trying to project it onto others after copying it and other phrases from me.
LOL! Accusing others of what you are accused of! Not very original, copycat! And you borrowed that "...hahaha..." off me didn't you?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#105 Mar 15, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! Accusing others of what you are accused of! Not very original, copycat! And you borrowed that "...hahaha..." off me didn't you?
Really?
Well, I suppose "hahaha" is part of a large vocabulary.
But I am being careful not to use the word LOL so as not to be accused of copying you.
But surely one is allowed to say...hahaha...after reading hilarious posts such as yours and Malmaniac's.
Largelanguage

Chester, UK

#106 Mar 15, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?
Well, I suppose "hahaha" is part of a large vocabulary.
But I am being careful not to use the word LOL so as not to be accused of copying you.
But surely one is allowed to say...hahaha...after reading hilarious posts such as yours and Malmaniac's.
You are trying to avoid saying lol to look original. But you don't have any or vocabulary up your arsenal other than what you repeated from us. What a shame. Can never escape yourself and your problems can you? You are who you are, the nutjob.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#107 Mar 15, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Wait a second. Since ZuikiHeels has endowed his expression with singularity--"a low scum" I suppose that the grammatically proper term for more than one "scum" (whether low, medium, high, or even very high) would have to be "scums". "SCUMS". As in, "such low scums as...". Something new every day, eh? Even when it comes to English grammar and vocabulary, however limited.
Apart from this gibberish, do you have anything to say about your friend's racist comments on this topic, here on Educaation?

http://www.topix.com/forum/education/T8UQB1M6...
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#108 Mar 15, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
...Jest projecting? Lol. For once you admit you only project, queer.
Close il....said "will project" not "only project"-yawn...I think your leader should check out the malta cult member in (?) hamsburg, pa.-- that woman sure 'pears to be a "weak link" compared to "thoss" others what with her meaningless posts full of grammatical folly and then (U won't believe this) she mocks Zuiko's poifect employment of proper english. What's with the "queer" thing-you having a hard time finding actual fault so stoop to throwing whatever momma puts on your spoon. That is a recipe for "not good", lL so better pack it in !)
MaltaMon

Newark, DE

#109 Mar 15, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Apart from this gibberish, do you have anything to say about your friend's racist comments on this topic, here on Educaation?
http://www.topix.com/forum/education/T8UQB1M6...
Do you have any words of condemnation for your friend's child-rape scenarios or his comments about my son having stretch marks on his mouth from your friend's having forced his penis into the boy's mouth when he was just twelve uears old... And which, apart from the "marks" he attributed to my son's beautiful face, actually happened? Any comments that a normal, well-adjusted, caring, non-sociopathic man would have? Or are you going to adhere to your ,original interpretation of that story and hos other chilf-rape scenarios as "funny"
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#110 Mar 15, 2013
The "weak link" is Harrisburg, Il. for sure. Lookit scorned woman- B 4 Zuiko replies (if he does to such a dumb, stupid, idiotic question) I am puzzled as how anyone could seriously condemn one who uses whatever he feels like to besmear the totally false sick accusations made against Bob. Like- at best- Bob's crude replys pale in comparison to your totally despicable pedo motivated false accusation and your cult member lLarge's plea for depravity against your own son(well-Molly's fictional son) and his kind, plus grave intrusion to Molly's daughter and death to the Pres. of USA. The malta cult condones these actions so why would Zuiko even consider a reply to such a creepy cult. In his park....not yours.
MaltaMon

Riverton, NJ

#111 Mar 16, 2013
coyote wrote:
The "weak link" is Harrisburg, Il. for sure. Lookit scorned woman- B 4 Zuiko replies (if he does to such a dumb, stupid, idiotic question) I am puzzled as how anyone could seriously condemn one who uses whatever he feels like to besmear the totally false sick accusations made against Bob. Like- at best- Bob's crude replys pale in comparison to your totally despicable pedo motivated false accusation and your cult member lLarge's plea for depravity against your own son(well-Molly's fictional son) and his kind, plus grave intrusion to Molly'POs daughter and death to the Pres. of USA. The malta cult condones these actions so why would Zuiko even consider a reply to such a creepy cult. In his park....not yours.
Oh, don't be silly, Tink. The lies are so idiotic. Post a link to where I said I condone all of that. Cut out the silliness. You're muchvtoo old to be playing such childish games. I know you won't provide us with a link. None of us from any MM location ever posted anything condoning that shit. Man up.
MaltaMon

Riverton, NJ

#112 Mar 16, 2013
The State Dept thing was even dumber. Don't you have any self-respect ?=You lie like a rug, man.
MaltaMon

Mount Wolf, PA

#113 Mar 16, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Integrity? Such a low scum as Malmon? Just look at his posts, he is a lot worse than Large.
Yes, indeed, a LOT worse. Glad that I'm getting to you. By your distinguished estimate, I must be "a" VERY LOW SCUM!!! LOL!!! What a riot. And now I learn that you were a stripper in a gay bar, a gay prostitute, and currently entertain the leathered masses in the same bar with your impersonations of Carol Channing singing "Diamonds Are a Girl's Best Friend". You've got no room to say anything to anyone about anybody. Taking your clothes off in a leather bar for a bunch of old queens, and taking their cash to dance on their faces, isn't exactly a profession for any "man" who claims decency as one of his virtues. You're a pig, ZuikiSomething.
Phil

UK

#114 Mar 16, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Oh, don't be silly, Tink. The lies are so idiotic. Post a link to where I said I condone all of that. Cut out the silliness. You're muchvtoo old to be playing such childish games. I know you won't provide us with a link. None of us from any MM location ever posted anything condoning that shit. Man up.
Maltamon wants it both ways. He doesn't explicitly condone Large's pedophile fantasies involving underage girls or his views on gay children which Large admits to but he fails to condemn Large outright which is just as bad in my book but at the same time he wants us to condemn Bob's supposed pedo fantasies while we only have Maltamon's word (and we all know what that is worth) that they are anything other than sick jokes.
Someone explain this to me because I am struggling with it.
Largelanguage

Chester, UK

#115 Mar 16, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Maltamon wants it both ways. He doesn't explicitly condone Large's pedophile fantasies involving underage girls or his views on gay children which Large admits to but he fails to condemn Large outright which is just as bad in my book but at the same time he wants us to condemn Bob's supposed pedo fantasies while we only have Maltamon's word (and we all know what that is worth) that they are anything other than sick jokes.
Someone explain this to me because I am struggling with it.
Actually, MaltaMon is condemning Bob for joking about the rape bob actually committed. Now that is sick.
Phil

UK

#116 Mar 16, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, MaltaMon is condemning Bob for joking about the rape bob actually committed. Now that is sick.
And how do you know for sure Bob is guilty?
What evidence have you seen?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#117 Mar 16, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Yes, indeed, a LOT worse. Glad that I'm getting to you. By your distinguished estimate, I must be "a" VERY LOW SCUM!!! LOL!!! What a riot. And now I learn that you were a stripper in a gay bar, a gay prostitute, and currently entertain the leathered masses in the same bar with your impersonations of Carol Channing singing "Diamonds Are a Girl's Best Friend". You've got no room to say anything to anyone about anybody. Taking your clothes off in a leather bar for a bunch of old queens, and taking their cash to dance on their faces, isn't exactly a profession for any "man" who claims decency as one of his virtues. You're a pig, ZuikiSomething.
You seem to know these gay bars very well. Only one who frequents them can describe them so accurately. The more you post the more you give yourself in. Not that we didn't know that you are a homosexual, but you are confirming it right here. It's no use trying to project yourself on me and on other posters. You ARE a pig and a pervert, to use your own words. You have no defence left now, cornered and desperate. These are posts of a desperate person who will resort to anything, including fantasist lies and projectons, to avoid the spotlight on him and his perversions.
Rush

Columbus, NE

#118 Mar 16, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
You are trying to avoid saying lol to look original. But you don't have any or vocabulary up your arsenal other than what you repeated from us. What a shame. Can never escape yourself and your problems can you? You are who you are, the nutjob.
Now up your arsenal is from ratface and clunk, and you know nutjob is my pet name for you! Now, why dont you explain to everyone, how you think a video game rat is going to come to life, and be Jesus or somthing. Or you are going to be in the video game? Are there any black people in that game?
Rush

Columbus, NE

#119 Mar 16, 2013
Also Large, could you explain to everyone how kids are turned gay?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#120 Mar 16, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Oh, don't be silly, Tink. The lies are so idiotic. Post a link to where I said I condone all of that. Cut out the silliness. You're muchvtoo old to be playing such childish games. I know you won't provide us with a link. None of us from any MM location ever posted anything condoning that shit. Man up.
Yes, lies are idiotic, another of your projections. Your own friend Large has confirmed that you said that you condone them. So either call him a liar, or more likely yourself. In fact your posts contain nothing but lies. You are a pervert of the worst kind to condone such acts. At least Large is honest about it, but you are a double face.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#121 Mar 16, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Maltamon wants it both ways. He doesn't explicitly condone Large's pedophile fantasies involving underage girls or his views on gay children which Large admits to but he fails to condemn Large outright which is just as bad in my book but at the same time he wants us to condemn Bob's supposed pedo fantasies while we only have Maltamon's word (and we all know what that is worth) that they are anything other than sick jokes.
Someone explain this to me because I am struggling with it.
Because he is a double face, that's why.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Group Says Breaking Up VA Best Way To Serve Vet... 14 hr Duke 2
Did You Swim Nude In High School? (Dec '12) Wed Phil 1,392
Can tnmtndude perform (Dec '11) Tue Maltamon 41
News We already know what it takes to train great te... Tue freealan 1
News St. Paul schools struggle to meet lofty goals Tue bob 17
nudity in co-ed contexts (May '14) Mon bob 23
Survey for Students or Parents who have used tu... Mar 30 bob 65
More from around the web