MaltaSon Speaks
Phil

Manchester, UK

#82 Mar 14, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
See what I mean Large? Note the characterization of Bob's child-rape scenarios as "Bob's jokes", and that the only problem with them is that the Phlit thinks that not all of "Bob's jokes" are funny. It's clear what their mindset is. Bob's many graphic depictions of the violent anal rape of children are no more than "jokes". And as such, harmless. It's a perspective that has no secure place among civilized people of any age. It's depraved, abhorrent, and indicative of a terribly frightening presence on this web site.
And where exactly do Large's views on pubescent girls and children who are different sit in a civilised society.
Are his comments funny, or harmless?
Once more Maltamon attempts to take the moral high ground are laughable.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#83 Mar 14, 2013
Phil wrote:
While you raise the topic of sociopaths lets take a minute to discuss what one looks, or indeed behaves like.
Common features of a sociopath are:
Impulsive, with a lack of self control and no sense of personal boundaries.
Feelings of rage and a total lack of empathy for their victims with no remorse or guilt.
Totally callous.
Physical punishments and verbal outbursts are the norm.
Strange sexual behaviour...
Ring any bells?
Yes,indeed. Quite. To the accurate charge that the only thing he finds wrong with the lurid fantasies of a child rapist, in which children are depicted in all their forced starkness, penetrated anally, abused and permanently damaged psychologically and emotionally, is that some of these scenes are "not funny", he replies, "Well, what about THAT OTHER guy?" As any run-of-the-mill sociopath (to the extent that a sociopath can ever be "run of the mill"), he ignores that of which he is guilty and impulsively turns the tables on someone else--an individual who has criticized those violent boy-rape scenarios. Of the four paedophile-philes on here, including all three members of that disgraceful, repugnant online jerking circle, this one is the worst. Why? Because he is an admitted PARENT who tolerates and promotes the "mocking" (if that is truly all it is; I feel very strongly that it is far worse than mere "mocking") of a brand of violence against children that has no equal in modern civilization. It is the tolerance of a mentality that is incapable of feelings (other than the purely sexual or those that wish to degrade) toward innocent children. The attitude of this "father" is, "That's okay, Bob. My only objection is that some of those stories aren't all that funny. You should try to make your satirical accounts of sexual violence and of the destruction of children's bodys, minds and souls--and those of the adults they will become--more funny. Please, Bob. We want to laugh at these children." What can any man or woman, much less any parent or child, say to a guy like this? I'm not even going to try. He's dead to me from this moment. And he must be removed from this site. His presence encourages sexual violence against children. And that renders his presence here dangerous.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#84 Mar 14, 2013
Bob's jokes aren't funny, many of his comments are inappropriate and if he is guilty he should be put in a room with all the parents of any children he has wronged.
-- The "Late" (Dead to Me) PHLIT

This should is the Phlit's epitaph. In life, this "father" saw nothing wrong with what Pedo Bob has done here on line. He didn't think that Pedo Bob 'wronged' any children by "mocking" the sexual violence that have destroyed the lives of so many innocent kids... and, thanks to the collective nod of approval by the Phlit's old jerking-and-sroking circle, will continue to destroy the lives of so many innocent kids. What mattered to him is that I "failed to condemn" the remarks that Large made on threads that I don't frequent--that he never made in real time during any discussion of which I was a participant. He saw that as far worse than his acceptance of Pedo Bob's graphic scenarios as "jokes"--and not merely, I suspect, because Pedo Bob characterized them as "jokes". As for the room to which he'd said he would have consigned Pedo Bob: There is no room on earth that could hold all of those parents whose childrens' violent sexual abuse he has "mocked" with his ongoing serial of mere "jokes". Or that could house this guy's capacity for self-delusion. It's a good thing that he's gone. The Phlit was a dangerous influence on these threads. Good riddance. I'm glad he's dead to me.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#85 Mar 14, 2013
I offer his son my condolences. Not so much for the loss of his father, but for the life of his father. I'm sorry, young man, but that's an honest reaction to having seen what evil lay within your dad's heart and mind. I don't know you, son, but you deserved better. Every boy and girl does. My hope is that you were an exception to his depraved indifference toward the destruction of childrens' lives. My hope is that he cared about you, that he loved you, that he respected you not only as a child but for all your potential, your hopes and dreams. I would be somewhat relieved to know that much about him. All the very best to you.
Phil

UK

#86 Mar 14, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes,indeed. Quite. To the accurate charge that the only thing he finds wrong with the lurid fantasies of a child rapist, in which children are depicted in all their forced starkness, penetrated anally, abused and permanently damaged psychologically and emotionally, is that some of these scenes are "not funny", he replies, "Well, what about THAT OTHER guy?" As any run-of-the-mill sociopath (to the extent that a sociopath can ever be "run of the mill"), he ignores that of which he is guilty and impulsively turns the tables on someone else--an individual who has criticized those violent boy-rape scenarios. Of the four paedophile-philes on here, including all three members of that disgraceful, repugnant online jerking circle, this one is the worst. Why? Because he is an admitted PARENT who tolerates and promotes the "mocking" (if that is truly all it is; I feel very strongly that it is far worse than mere "mocking") of a brand of violence against children that has no equal in modern civilization. It is the tolerance of a mentality that is incapable of feelings (other than the purely sexual or those that wish to degrade) toward innocent children. The attitude of this "father" is, "That's okay, Bob. My only objection is that some of those stories aren't all that funny. You should try to make your satirical accounts of sexual violence and of the destruction of children's bodys, minds and souls--and those of the adults they will become--more funny. Please, Bob. We want to laugh at these children." What can any man or woman, much less any parent or child, say to a guy like this? I'm not even going to try. He's dead to me from this moment. And he must be removed from this site. His presence encourages sexual violence against children. And that renders his presence here dangerous.
This from a parent who tolerates the abuse of pubescent girls and gay children with not one single word of condemnation and who makes yet another attempt to divert attention from his abject failure to grow a spine with yet another pointless essay.
His hypocrisy is breathtaking.
Phil

UK

#87 Mar 14, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
I offer his son my condolences. Not so much for the loss of his father, but for the life of his father. I'm sorry, young man, but that's an honest reaction to having seen what evil lay within your dad's heart and mind. I don't know you, son, but you deserved better. Every boy and girl does. My hope is that you were an exception to his depraved indifference toward the destruction of childrens' lives. My hope is that he cared about you, that he loved you, that he respected you not only as a child but for all your potential, your hopes and dreams. I would be somewhat relieved to know that much about him. All the very best to you.
Yawn
Phil

UK

#88 Mar 14, 2013
Of course I will cry myself to sleep knowing that Maltamon is no longet going to obsess about me but he will no doubt continue to associate on a public forum with a pedofile, a racist, a homophobe and a sociopath whose approval he craves and with whom he feels a certain kinship.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#89 Mar 14, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, what is this us business.
If Maltamon had an ounce of integrity he would run a mile from you.
Integrity? Such a low scum as Malmon? Just look at his posts, he is a lot worse than Large.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#90 Mar 14, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Fear of being outed as flami*g homosexu*l, resentf*l, me*n, horomon*l, b*y-lovi*g chi*d-rapi*g p*gs is what motivates their every posting. And their guilt-by-association line, which all three are towing equally, is more appropriately applied to these sickly, swinging, parasititic paedophi*e child-rapist-defending, nasty fa****-assed, freak naked-boy eroticists than it is to Bush and Cheny. What one says, they all say. And when their Supreme Leader, Pedo Bob, joins in, one hears his psychopathic ranting in quadrophonic sound. Not one of them--not one--has condemned Pedo Bob's violent boy-rape scenarios. Rather, they insist that these scened of the anal rape of young boys are "funny", the products of Pedo Bob's sense of humor and, mu favorite, "not about child rape" at all. They all say the same things, defend, deny or rationalize the same sordid crimes, and worship the same pedo-god. And they all with unfailingly simple-minded predictability turn criticisms on themselves immediately back on their critics.
Coming from someone who condones and tolerates the rape of young girls and the killing of gay boys, not very convincing is it?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#91 Mar 14, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Well it's certainly not me who frequently talks about anal rape and nude boys and penises and talks in graphic detail about the images he deliberately sought out by following posted links.
Normal people don't do things like that.
He is certainly obsessed with naked boys and homosexuals, because it is the only thing he talks about. His excuse of having a raped son is really laughable. The perv thinks he is fooling anyone, except a simpleton like LL.
Phil

UK

#92 Mar 15, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Integrity? Such a low scum as Malmon? Just look at his posts, he is a lot worse than Large.
He is plainly irritated that nobody is falling for his bullshit and that he has been seen for what he is.
Largelanguage

Chester, UK

#93 Mar 15, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
He is certainly obsessed with naked boys and homosexuals, because it is the only thing he talks about. His excuse of having a raped son is really laughable. The perv thinks he is fooling anyone, except a simpleton like LL.
LOOOOLLLL!!!!
MaltaMon

Newark, DE

#94 Mar 15, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Integrity? Such a low scum as Malmon? Just look at his posts, he is a lot worse than Large.
"Such a low scum" Lol..
Largelanguage

Chester, UK

#95 Mar 15, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> "Such a low scum" Lol..
LOL.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#96 Mar 15, 2013
Just askin'- Large, do you speak with a lisp due to that rascally (but wiser than you) parrot biting your tongue and severing a bit of it away ? I assume so as your preferred letter seems to be L and assume that is because it rolls off easier....jest projectin'...
Largelanguage

Chester, UK

#97 Mar 15, 2013
coyote wrote:
Just askin'- Large, do you speak with a lisp due to that rascally (but wiser than you) parrot biting your tongue and severing a bit of it away ? I assume so as your preferred letter seems to be L and assume that is because it rolls off easier....jest projectin'...
...Jest projecting? Lol. For once you admit you only project, queer.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#98 Mar 15, 2013
coyote wrote:
Just askin'- Large, do you speak with a lisp due to that rascally (but wiser than you) parrot biting your tongue and severing a bit of it away ? I assume so as your preferred letter seems to be L and assume that is because it rolls off easier....jest projectin'...
Considering his limited vocabulary and language it is ironic that he calls himself LargeLanguage.
MaltaMon

Newark, DE

#99 Mar 15, 2013
Limited vocabulary?" Compared to whose? That of "such a low scum" as ZuikiSweet and his Low Scum of High-Heeled Boys?
MaltaMon

Newark, DE

#100 Mar 15, 2013
I suppose that thoss with a slightly richer vocabulary would be Medium Scum.
MaltaMon

Newark, DE

#101 Mar 15, 2013
** those

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Did You Swim Nude In High School? (Dec '12) 7 hr Maltamon 1,710
News A year after VA scandal, number of veterans wai... 17 hr barefoot2626 30
Bob: Were Boys Forced to Attend School Swim Les... (Sep '12) Jun 30 Bob 2,198
News Teacher Starri Hedges speaks out about sex shop... Jun 29 targaryen3 1
Blog About Universities Jun 29 WorldWide 1
News Home school no longer just for the deeply relig... (Sep '13) Jun 27 Ronald 22
N*ked Swimming At School (Jul '12) Jun 26 BlueTrain 48
More from around the web