Bob: Were Boys Forced to Attend School Swim Lessons Completely Nude?

[Phil]

MaltaMon wrote:

<quoted text> You will never elicit an answer to that question. It has always been the elephant in the room, but you won't get a reasonable approximation of a legitimately responsive statement. Or, indeed, anything remotely honest. Just a comeback at best. Then again, I suspect that you don't really anticipate a responsive replyto your inquiry. But it was good to ask, to identify the huge beast in the room. You know, of course, that my take on their motive begins with keeping their own sexual orientation a secret. They all fail to see how obvious that is.

Notice yet again the lack of any acknowlegement or condemnation of Large's pedo fantasies and yet this apology for a man actually believes still that he is fit to judge others.

[Phil]

LargeLanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Bob does, not us.
Why does it concern you?
Speak up!

Maltamon does.
Frequently.
Again, what's with the us business.
Maltamon doesn't give a toss about you.

[LargeLanguage]

Phil wrote:

<quoted text>
Maltamon does.
Frequently.
Again, what's with the us business.
Maltamon doesn't give a toss about you.

I don't care if he doesn't. I don't have exceptations to receive something in return, little boy!

What is wrong with fantasizing about naked girls, as long as I don't rape them?

[Phil]

LargeLanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't care if he doesn't. I don't have exceptations to receive something in return, little boy!
What is wrong with fantasizing about naked girls, as long as I don't rape them?

Is that a serious question?
What is wrong with fantasising about naked 13 year old girls?
By the same token, what is wrong with Bob fantasising about 13 year old boys (assuming he does)?
What is the diffetence?

[LargeLanguage]

Phil wrote:

<quoted text>
Is that a serious question?
What is wrong with fantasising about naked 13 year old girls?
By the same token, what is wrong with Bob fantasising about 13 year old boys (assuming he does)?
What is the diffetence?

Bob actually rapes children, that is the difference.

[Phil]

LargeLanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Bob actually rapes children, that is the difference.

Are you always this stupid or do you just help out when they are busy?
Again, what evidence have you seen that would stand up in court that proves Bob rapes children?
Please don't say his jokes on here are evidence.
That would simply prove that you are clinically brain dead.

[LargeLanguage]

Phil wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you always this stupid or do you just help out when they are busy?
Again, what evidence have you seen that would stand up in court that proves Bob rapes children?
Please don't say his jokes on here are evidence.
That would simply prove that you are clinically brain dead.

MaltaMon said that his son's rapists tone, his anger, his frustration, matched bobs. His jokes were about a raped boy. He even showed paedophilic interest in his posts.

[Zuiko]

MaltaMon wrote:

<quoted text> hi zuiko. You seem obsessed with raising these topics--you keep mentioning these children in blatantly sexual terms, which is a symptom of your paedophilia. You can't mention the word "boy" without the word "naked". Always undressing children in his posts as if they were so many cheap gay leather-bar strippers like you. Get some help, you sick freak.

Perfect projectionist post, as usual.
It is YOU who has started multiple threads about nude swimming boys, continuous talk of boys being raped, nude boys, gay boys, gay bars, which all smell of pedophilia and homosexuality.
Do you think you are taunting anyone by projecting your own perversions on me and others? You're not fooling anyone, except your other pervert supporter LL.

[Phil]

LargeLanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
MaltaMon said that his son's rapists tone, his anger, his frustration, matched bobs. His jokes were about a raped boy. He even showed paedophilic interest in his posts.

Yes, you are completely brain dead.

[Zuiko]

Phil wrote:

<quoted text>
Notice yet again the lack of any acknowlegement or condemnation of Large's pedo fantasies and yet this apology for a man actually believes still that he is fit to judge others.

He will do anything to avoid the subject of his support for girl rape and other criminal perversions. Total silence and evasions from a hypocrite of the worst kind.

[Zuiko]

LargeLanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't care if he doesn't. I don't have exceptations to receive something in return, little boy!
What is wrong with fantasizing about naked girls, as long as I don't rape them?

But you have talked about raping them. With full approval from Malmon.

[LargeLanguage]

Phil wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, you are completely brain dead.

Wow, I'm terribly convinced.

[LargeLanguage]

Zuiko wrote:

<quoted text>
He will do anything to avoid the subject of his support for girl rape and other criminal perversions. Total silence and evasions from a hypocrite of the worst kind.

If condone means tolerate, can you prove it, BOY? No, eh BOY?

[Zuiko]

LargeLanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Bob actually rapes children, that is the difference.

And you don't?

[LargeLanguage]

Zuiko wrote:

<quoted text>
And you don't?

Correct, I don't, BOY!

[Zuiko]

Phil wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you always this stupid or do you just help out when they are busy?
Again, what evidence have you seen that would stand up in court that proves Bob rapes children?
Please don't say his jokes on here are evidence.
That would simply prove that you are clinically brain dead.

When we see the evidence from Malmon that Bob raped his son then we will say that Bob was not joking. But nothing so far.

[coyote]

I would like to see MM present the`case to Judge Judy and have the "son" scream the "F-word" to Bird. I would then humbly concede a son exists .

[MaltaMon]

Who the hell gives a damn what you would or would not concede? About anything? It changes nothing. Get lost, will ya?

[coyote]

Poor baby--the "jab damage to-date" will not repair, BUT, if you would simply read the posts and , cease your boring rhetorical posting then ,after a cooling down period, you may secure some remission and be a happy (?). Your humorous little tantrums are becoming a concern to little Large .....Stay well so you can shriek at Sir Paul--he will be stymied about your excessive infatuation.... oh well !

[LargeLanguage]

Zuiko wrote:

<quoted text>
When we see the evidence from Malmon that Bob raped his son then we will say that Bob was not joking. But nothing so far.

A decent person would not joke like bob does.