Bob: Were Boys Forced to Attend Schoo...

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1485 Feb 23, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
I have never raped anybody.
So say you, but the evidence shows the contrary. You are a dangerous pervert.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1486 Feb 23, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
But bob must have raped children to know the feeling and the want to put a boy on your belly while raping him so you don't look at his face out of shame.
Also, Bob has given evidence about himself that apparently meets maltamon's description.
Either way, we have the right to be suspicious. And while we're at it, I bet Bob will continue with more nude boy nonsense and back paddling back to school crap again in his silly hope that it will somehow convince the goverment to bring the paddle back again, as well as nude boys being forced to swim nude.
His only excuse for it is apparently boys being forced to swim nude under female instructors will somehow strengthen their character and will be more economic! HAHAHAHAHA! He's mad!
More self-projections from a dangerous lunatic.
Bill Brown

Cathedral City, CA

#1487 Feb 23, 2013
Do you people have any idea how stupid you sound? No wonder these discussions get shut down. None of you have anything at all to say about the topic.
SLC

Arlington, VA

#1488 Feb 24, 2013
Bill Brown wrote:
Do you people have any idea how stupid you sound? No wonder these discussions get shut down. None of you have anything at all to say about the topic.
I entirely agree with Mr. Brown. The name calling here and charges of criminal conduct are absolutely appalling. Some of these commentors are acting like 2 year olds.
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#1489 Feb 24, 2013
Well, at least one charge of criminal conduct that O know of is entirely legitimate and is factual--mine against the Canadian fellow who calls himself "Bob". That is the only reason for my presence here (along with that of some friends who post under my screen name): to keep track of him. Some of the others consist of purely groundless projection or speculation, or worse, are born of the manifest rage and resentment resulting from, perhaps, hormonal imbalances, pathological obsessions or psychoses--or just plain persistent disagreeability or meanness-- of frightened, self-loathing deviants toward those adult men who have managed to establish and to maintain loving relationships with adults of the opposite sex and to produce and to raise children. But as I said, only some of the others. Certainly not all of them.
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#1490 Feb 24, 2013
***-"that I know of"... Damned minuscule touch-screen clavier. Anyway, I now await the reaction of at least one of those unoriginal deviants to post that by "deviant" I have described myself. And that will underscore my point about the projection, the utterly baseless and speculative accusations, the rage and resentment, the guilt and self-loathing of these creatures.
Largelanguage

Chester, UK

#1491 Feb 25, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
This shows that you are in favour of raping women, along with the other evidence of starting a topic about fathers bathing their teenage daughters.
Nothing original. I am the one who accused you of favouring mothers who bath teenage boys over fathers bathing teenage girls.
coyote

Chester, UK

#1492 Feb 25, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
***-"that I know of"... Damned minuscule touch-screen clavier. Anyway, I now await the reaction of at least one of those unoriginal deviants to post that by "deviant" I have described myself. And that will underscore my point about the projection, the utterly baseless and speculative accusations, the rage and resentment, the guilt and self-loathing of these creatures.
you are deviant, because that is a description of yourself(For no apparent reason).
Largelanguage

Chester, UK

#1493 Feb 25, 2013
lol.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1494 Feb 25, 2013
coyote wrote:
<quoted text>
you are deviant, because that is a description of yourself(For no apparent reason).
These two are getting more insane and gibberish with each post.
As for being deviant there is no doubt about it, especially LL.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#1495 Feb 25, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
These two are getting more insane and gibberish with each post.
As for being deviant there is no doubt about it, especially LL.
LOL!!!
MaltaMon

Lancaster, PA

#1496 Feb 25, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
These two are getting more insane and gibberish with each post.
As for being deviant there is no doubt about it, especially LL.
Hey, ZuikiSomething, he isn't the one who posted a link to photos of stark-naked young boys. Is THAT your standard for what defines one as "deviant"--that he doesn't know where to find examples of child pornography, that he cannot share in,a public forum an online stash of child pornography?
MaltaMon

Lancaster, PA

#1497 Feb 25, 2013
By your own standard, ZuikiSomething, one is a normal adult only if he defends pornographic images of children as "not offensive". By your standard, only "lunatics" and "people who are ignorant" would find child pornography disgusting, offensive, and criminal. By your standard, the only adults, the only "men", who are normal are those who collect or otherwise enjoy child pornography. That is one hell of a way to define the parameters of normal behavior in civilized, mature men in society.
MaltaMon

Lancaster, PA

#1498 Feb 25, 2013
And if you insist on this line of demented reasoning, one can only conclude that you pose a danger to innocent children Have you seen your pal DJW around since shortly after HE posted a link on these threads to child pornography--a posting which you, then as FortySomething, defended morally and legally (and on both instances, eroneously) as just fine with you because "some" of the pornographic images of young boys that DJW's site contained were "obviously photo-shopped" ?
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#1499 Feb 25, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
And if you insist on this line of demented reasoning, one can only conclude that you pose a danger to innocent children Have you seen your pal DJW around since shortly after HE posted a link on these threads to child pornography--a posting which you, then as FortySomething, defended morally and legally (and on both instances, eroneously) as just fine with you because "some" of the pornographic images of young boys that DJW's site contained were "obviously photo-shopped" ?
And why is both coyote and bob in similar locations? I know they are different people(Probably anyway), but why do they live in the same place?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1500 Feb 25, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Hey, ZuikiSomething, he isn't the one who posted a link to photos of stark-naked young boys. Is THAT your standard for what defines one as "deviant"--that he doesn't know where to find examples of child pornography, that he cannot share in,a public forum an online stash of child pornography?
More gibberish and insanity. I never posted as Something, I never posted any links to pornography or naked boys. It is you and your other deviant friend who keep starting new threads about nude boys, always talking about nude boys, and mentioning MAMBLA and your other deviant sites and magazines. But then we are used to your self-projection posts, which makes it all so amusing.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#1501 Feb 25, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
More gibberish and insanity. I never posted as Something, I never posted any links to pornography or naked boys. It is you and your other deviant friend who keep starting new threads about nude boys, always talking about nude boys, and mentioning MAMBLA and your other deviant sites and magazines. But then we are used to your self-projection posts, which makes it all so amusing.
We mentioned NAMBLA before zuiko came. How did you know, without observing before as fortysomething?
MaltaMon

Lancaster, PA

#1502 Feb 25, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
More gibberish and insanity. I never posted as Something, I never posted any links to pornography or naked boys. It is you and your other deviant friend who keep starting new threads about nude boys, always talking about nude boys, and mentioning MAMBLA and your other deviant sites and magazines. But then we are used to your self-projection posts, which makes it all so amusing.
Jesus Christ! You deny posting the link that you posted just last week to a site that displays photos of boys who are stark naked???!!!??? Are you friggin' serious, ZuikoSomething? The site that we all discussed after you'd posted it on these threads AND which you defended earlier today as "historic" (sic)? You ARE a liar! 
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#1503 Feb 25, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Jesus Christ! You deny posting the link that you posted just last week to a site that displays photos of boys who are stark naked???!!!??? Are you friggin' serious, ZuikoSomething? The site that we all discussed after you'd posted it on these threads AND which you defended earlier today as "historic" (sic)? You ARE a liar! 
He's really desperate! And in his cell, one hopes there is a toilet!
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#1504 Feb 25, 2013
We know Zuiko is not the liar here and I hope he does not feel it necessary to respond to your lunacy !!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
400-351 CCIE Wireless practice questions, 400-3... 2 hr addisonjhon 3
How to Pass WISECURE 300-375 Exam with New 300-... 2 hr addisonjhon 2
300-370 Exam Dumps Find Out Latest 300-370 WITS... 2 hr addisonjhon 2
Valid ARCH 300-320 Dumps and Solutions to Pass ... 2 hr addisonjhon 2
400-151 Examcollection VCE 3 hr addisonjhon 1
Examunion 400-051 Cisco CCIE exam dumps questions 3 hr addisonjhon 4
SIMOS 300-209 Dumps to Get Desired Results in 3... 3 hr alton007 2
More from around the web