Bob: Were Boys Forced to Attend Schoo...
Censored By T-O-P-I-X-com

Clarksville, TN

#135 Oct 4, 2012
SLC wrote:
If you want to know what Mr. Censored's problem is, go read his comment labeled 99 on page 4 relative to Title IX. It is quite obvious from that comment that Mr. Censored is a male chauvinist pig who hates women.


Why not just repost my full comments, SLC? I stand by every last word and believe fully in what I said. Unlike you, I don't post fantasy fetish fiction. Here it is:

Title IX also has brought many ridiculous excesses which have damaged team sports and little league. Feminist mothers and fathers pushing their daughters to not only play sports, but "be one of the boys" by infiltrating boys teams and forcing their presence as the lone girl on the team.

Having separate girls teams as the law provides for is never enough for radical feminists. As a consequence, now you have girls around the country playing on male football teams, a sport they are NOT physically capable of playing. A sport which will eventually cause great physical injury or death to a girl player.
What will the feminists say when that day comes?

Because of Title IX you also see many women coaching boys basketball and football teams around the country. Clothed female coaches INSIDE boys locker rooms where boys have to shower and undress. Clothed female sports reporters inside mens locker rooms at the college and high school level. Is this invasion of privacy appropriate? In my opinion and most normal peoples it is WRONG.

The opposite, clothed male coaches and clothed male reporters inside female locker rooms while female athletes shower and undress NEVER HAPPENS.

To radical feminists and CFNM fetishists, Title IX is a great victory for clothed female domination. To boys who play sports it's been a disaster.
SLC wrote:
Having disposed of Mr. Censored, I have to say that I have some slight agreement with him relative to the misuse of Title IX. In particular, the decision of Judge Constance Baker Motley in 1978 to allow female reporters into male professional team's locker rooms was atrocious, IMHO.
To add insult to injury, the idiot CFNM fetishist, senior citizen, Mr. SLC calls me a chauvinist and misogynist while AGREEING with my points in the same breath. What a hypocrite you are in addition to being a radical feminist, misandrist and CFNM fetishist. Oh, and you've hardly "disposed" of me.
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#136 Oct 4, 2012
"Didn't happen and never will"

Yes it does in the real world and always will.

"NO evidence exists that CLOTHED women/girls were ever present for NUDE MALE swimming"

Or

"No evidence exists that CLOTHED boys ever "snuck a peak" at nude GIRLS SWIMMING/SHOWERING"

Where did I specifically state that this type of incident occured?

I am beginning to see a pattern here.
Maybe a perversion that is slowly revealing itself.
You talk about nude swimming and showering rather a lot.

Once again your unhealthy obsession is running away with you and clouding your judgement and ability to think, if you ever could.

As regards evidence, it is unlikely to be recorded.
Such things are experienced.
They happen.
Censored By T-O-P-I-X-com

Clarksville, TN

#137 Oct 4, 2012
MaltaMon wrote:
And just WHO is the one who mentioned boys' erections?
You did, you lying, CFNM fetishist:
MaltaMon wrote:
since I was just 14, all that embarrassment caused me to, shall I say, give the appearance of being turned on, at least in one obvious way. And for a while, I did notice more interest from girls who otherwise might never have been interested...lol.
Should I just offically start calling you OlderJock? I'm undecided...
MaltaMon

Emmaus, PA

#138 Oct 4, 2012
Censored By T-O-P-I-X-com wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not just repost my full comments, SLC? I stand by every last word and believe fully in what I said. Unlike you, I don't post fantasy fetish fiction. Here it is:
Title IX also has brought many ridiculous excesses which have damaged team sports and little league. Feminist mothers and fathers pushing their daughters to not only play sports, but "be one of the boys" by infiltrating boys teams and forcing their presence as the lone girl on the team.
Having separate girls teams as the law provides for is never enough for radical feminists. As a consequence, now you have girls around the country playing on male football teams, a sport they are NOT physically capable of playing. A sport which will eventually cause great physical injury or death to a girl player.
What will the feminists say when that day comes?
Because of Title IX you also see many women coaching boys basketball and football teams around the country. Clothed female coaches INSIDE boys locker rooms where boys have to shower and undress. Clothed female sports reporters inside mens locker rooms at the college and high school level. Is this invasion of privacy appropriate? In my opinion and most normal peoples it is WRONG.
The opposite, clothed male coaches and clothed male reporters inside female locker rooms while female athletes shower and undress NEVER HAPPENS.
To radical feminists and CFNM fetishists, Title IX is a great victory for clothed female domination. To boys who play sports it's been a disaster.
<quoted text>
To add insult to injury, the idiot CFNM fetishist, senior citizen, Mr. SLC calls me a chauvinist and misogynist while AGREEING with my points in the same breath. What a hypocrite you are in addition to being a radical feminist, misandrist and CFNM fetishist. Oh, and you'v e hardly "disposed" of me.
WOW. YOU CLEARLY ARE THE ONE WITH AN OBSESSION. CLOTHED FEMALE COACHES IN BOYS' LOCKER ROOMS? DOESN'T HAPPEN, MY FRIEND. TITLE IX OR NOT.
MaltaMon

Emmaus, PA

#139 Oct 4, 2012
Did you have trouble getting the girls to like you back in the day, Censored? Why do you regard women with such obvious contempt?
MaltaMon

Reading, PA

#140 Oct 4, 2012
Censored By T-O-P-I-X-com wrote:
<quoted text>
You did, you lying, CFNM fetishist:
<quoted text>
Should I just offically start calling you OlderJock? I'm undecided...
lol..... Not expressed with the vivid candor that you rely upon in your fetishist remarks. I went out of my way to sanitize it and to render it decidedly UN-tittilating. You write explicitly of boys getting erections . So WHO is the obsessive CFNM guy here?
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#141 Oct 4, 2012
And Censored Sweetie, you may call me whatever yku like, officially or not. Makes no difference to me. At all. My guess is that you weren't terribly good at sports as a kid, were you? Not good with females, not good at,sports. Hmmmm. What could that possibly mean? Now I understand the source of your rage. And why you seem to hate anyone who was a competent athlete AND wo had sex as a teenager.
Censored By T-O-P-I-X-com

Clarksville, TN

#142 Oct 4, 2012
MaltaMon wrote:
CLOTHED FEMALE COACHES IN BOYS' LOCKER ROOMS? DOESN'T HAPPEN, MY FRIEND. TITLE IX OR NOT.
You're under-read, ill-informed, and ignorant in addition to being a CFNM fetishist:

http://www.nj.com/times-opinion/index.ssf/201...
http://www.athleticbusiness.com/articles/arti...
http://scrambies.blogspot.com/2011/03/lake-co...
http://articles.philly.com/2011-02-17/sports/...

If those aren't enough articles for you I can provide hundreds more. Just let me know.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#143 Oct 4, 2012
What I fail to comprehend is how an adult of either sex or of any sexual orientation would rush to the defense of an obvious child predator as Boy Lover Bob of Dorval and Montreal.
SLC

Arlington, VA

#144 Oct 4, 2012
Phil wrote:
"Didn't happen and never will"
Yes it does in the real world and always will.
"NO evidence exists that CLOTHED women/girls were ever present for NUDE MALE swimming"
Or
"No evidence exists that CLOTHED boys ever "snuck a peak" at nude GIRLS SWIMMING/SHOWERING"
Where did I specifically state that this type of incident occured?
I am beginning to see a pattern here.
Maybe a perversion that is slowly revealing itself.
You talk about nude swimming and showering rather a lot.
Once again your unhealthy obsession is running away with you and clouding your judgement and ability to think, if you ever could.
As regards evidence, it is unlikely to be recorded.
Such things are experienced.
They happen.
I think that Mr. Censored has been watching Cathy Lee Crosby in "Coach" too many times. I have a flash for him, it's a fictional movie, not a documentary.

And by the way, I have a another flash for him. Female bodybuilder Bev Francis, who drove Arnold Schwarzenegger out of the bodybuilding business after he went to his gym and saw her bench pressing 400 pounds, could probably beat the crap out of 99.9% of the men in the world, including Mr. Censored.
Censored By T-O-P-I-X-com

Clarksville, TN

#145 Oct 4, 2012
MaltaMon wrote:
What I fail to comprehend is how an adult of either sex or of any sexual orientation would rush to the defense of an obvious child predator as Boy Lover Bob of Dorval and Montreal.
More lies and distortions spewed by you. Not only have I never defended Bob Dorval, I LINKED him with you because you're both proud CFNM fetishists.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#146 Oct 4, 2012
Censored By T-O-P-I-X-com wrote:
<quoted text>
You're under-read, ill-informed, and ignorant in addition to being a CFNM fetishist:
http://www.nj.com/times-opinion/index.ssf/201...
http://www.athleticbusiness.com/articles/arti...
http://scrambies.blogspot.com/2011/03/lake-co...
http://articles.philly.com/2011-02-17/sports/...
If those aren't enough articles for you I can provide hundreds more. Just let me know.
I WANT HUNDREDS MORE
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#147 Oct 4, 2012
Censored By T-O-P-I-X-com wrote:
<quoted text>
More lies and distortions spewed by you. Not only have I never defended Bob Dorval, I LINKED him with you because you're both proud CFNM fetishists.
WELL BY LINKING ME TO MY SON'S RAPIST IS THE ACT OF A MEAN SPIRITED, ENRAGED, AND ENVIOUS RECKLESS SIMPLETON.
SLC

Arlington, VA

#148 Oct 4, 2012
Censored By T-O-P-I-X-com wrote:
<quoted text>
You're under-read, ill-informed, and ignorant in addition to being a CFNM fetishist:
http://www.nj.com/times-opinion/index.ssf/201...
http://www.athleticbusiness.com/articles/arti...
http://scrambies.blogspot.com/2011/03/lake-co...
http://articles.philly.com/2011-02-17/sports/...
If those aren't enough articles for you I can provide hundreds more. Just let me know.
I only look at the first 2 articles but I failed to note where either of them said that the female coach entered the locker room while the players were naked.

I must say that Mr. Censored is being inconsistent. In some comments, he claims that CFNM situations never occur. Then he turns around and says that females coaching boys teams enter the locker rooms and observe naked boys. Which is it?
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#149 Oct 4, 2012
Why are you so full of hatred toward everybody? Nobody whom you attack here seems to care much about what you say about them. What are you doing here? And why all the anger? Somebody must have really shat on you at some point in your past. You're beyond reason or logic.
SLC

Arlington, VA

#150 Oct 4, 2012
MaltaMon wrote:
Why are you so full of hatred toward everybody? Nobody whom you attack here seems to care much about what you say about them. What are you doing here? And why all the anger? Somebody must have really shat on you at some point in your past. You're beyond reason or logic.
I wonder what Mr. Censored thinks about the latest craze in Australia, namely nude rugby? Apparently, there are men's teams that play women's teams with the women wearing standard rugby cloths and the men playing naked. The idea seems to be that, on average, men a bigger, stronger, and faster then women so that the latter are at a considerable disadvantage; thus having the men's teams compete naked is supposed to neutralize that advantage. Well, I always knew that Australians were a little bonkers. And Mr. Censored can't claim that it's fictional because there are video clips on the web showing the competitions.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#151 Oct 4, 2012
Censored By T-O-P-I-X-com wrote:
<quoted text>
More lies and distortions spewed by you. Not only have I never defended Bob Dorval, I LINKED him with you because you're both proud CFNM fetishists.
AND YOU REALLY ARE GIVING YOURSELF AWAY HERE AS THE SEXUAL FETISHIST . How else would my innocent memory of something stupid I did as a kid, or the others' references to their utterly plausible accounts of intrusion (without, I might add, not the slightest hint of sexual tittilation) lead you to read authoritarian sexual fantasy into it? You know the saying about the source of beauty in the eyes of the beholder... Well, the same is true of sexual fantasy. If those remarks turned you on, as mine obviously did, it was YOU who read sexual fantasy into them. My account of a childish mistake turned YOU on. It's only a source of laughter for me--at having set myself up for schoolwide ridicule as a ninth grader. You are the one with the perverted sensibilities, my friend. At reunions, nobody who reminds me of that incident is ever turned on by it. Their children are older than I was then.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#152 Oct 4, 2012
SLC wrote:
<quoted text>
I only look at the first 2 articles but I failed to note where either of them said that the female coach entered the locker room while the players were naked.
I must say that Mr. Censored is being inconsistent. In some comments, he claims that CFNM situations never occur. Then he turns around and says that females coaching boys teams enter the locker rooms and observe naked boys. Which is it?
HE SEEMS TO BE HOPELESSLY PREOCCUPIED BY THAT SCENARIO, DOESN'T HE... OUR WISE, SEXUALLY AND EMOTIONALLY MATURE MR. CENSORED?
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#153 Oct 4, 2012
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> AND YOU REALLY ARE GIVING YOURSELF AWAY HERE AS THE SEXUAL FETISHIST . How else would my innocent memory of something stupid I did as a kid, or the others' references to their utterly plausible accounts of intrusion (without, I might add, not the slightest hint of sexual tittilation) lead you to read authoritarian sexual fantasy into it? You know the saying about the source of beauty in the eyes of the beholder... Well, the same is true of sexual fantasy. If those remarks turned you on, as mine obviously did, it was YOU who read sexual fantasy into them. My account of a childish mistake turned YOU on. It's only a source of laughter for me--at having set myself up for schoolwide ridicule as a ninth grader. You are the one with the perverted sensibilities, my friend. At reunions, nobody who reminds me of that incident is ever turned on by it. Their children are older than I was then.
Gentlemen, I mean of course, "without the slightest hint of sex..." Sorry for the mistake. I'm doing this by voice transcription.
Inquirer

United States

#154 Oct 4, 2012
SLC wrote:
Re Phil and Maltamon

I have to say that I have some slight agreement with him relative to the misuse of Title IX. In particular, the decision of Judge Constance Baker Motley in 1978 to allow female reporters into male professional team's locker rooms was atrocious, IMHO. Even more atrocious was the cowardice of professional team owners to not appeal the decision, which was never contemplated by the authors of the law.
In the early 1970s I lobbied for passage of Title IX and can confirm what you wrote above ~ the law did NOT contemplate any such thing as Judge Motley's decision. The law as it was written was GENDER NEUTRAL and was intended to insure that there would always be access and funding for both genders in all programs receiving Federal dollars.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
SAP certification C_HANAIMP_11 training material 45 min study guides 1
Examunion MB2-710 exam questions Dynamics CRM M... 52 min MB2-710 exam 1
C9020-567 IBM Enterprise Storage Sales V5 quest... 2 hr freetestexam 1
C9020-560 IBM Midrange Storage Sales V3 questions 2 hr freetestexam 1
IBM P8010-004 Dumps Updated 2016 Quick Tips to ... 13 hr Zuiko 2
The state of nature at Sumerhill? (Apr '14) 13 hr Zuiko 27
News Let them volunteer 13 hr Zuiko 1
More from around the web