Comments
1,101 - 1,120 of 2,220 Comments Last updated Feb 25, 2014
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1181
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
And you are?
I am staying out of his business. I don't demand anything personal from him.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1182
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't answer the simple question re: Scotland Yard and your 'contact' which is probably more bullshit.
Did you report what you said you would report?
By replying to this one you are giving nothing away regarding your 'affairs' or with Bob, the allegation against whom you now seem to be backtracking on.
He has proof of his own, so shut up!
MaltaMon

Lancaster, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1183
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
"And your passionate persistent interest with me, personally, is weird"
Don't flatter yourself.
I don't resent you.
I just resent your constant bullshit.
You and I both know you have got nothing, wild allegations with no foundation in fact.
Phil, When it comes to my son and mr, you "know" exactly nothing. Your persistent fixation with my boy's rape in 2004 is rather QUEER, wouldn't you say? And as for Scotland Yard, the link you provided for the reporting of criminal activity was good only for submissions from within the UK. So I did speak with my friend at Scotland Yard. Result: Have you seen DJW or his child pornography on these threads since the New Year? His offense had nothing to do with me personally, but it's not "whistle-blowing": we don't work together. I reported the illegal posting on this thread of a link to a site devoted to child pornography. Was there something WRONG with that, Phil? What kept you from doing it? You didn't see anything wrong with those disgusting images of sexually exploited children? You say that you have kids of your own, that you are a father of boys. Why was YOUR effort limited to sending ME a useless, unusable link to British police? Why this very queer obsession with me? Clearly, it isn't restricted to my son's rape. It obviously goes beyond that. Very, very weird--weird, strange, and unsettling behavior from a middle-aged Englishman who has children, boys, of his own. Very, very queer..
Phil

Manchester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1184
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Phil, When it comes to my son and mr, you "know" exactly nothing. Your persistent fixation with my boy's rape in 2004 is rather QUEER, wouldn't you say? And as for Scotland Yard, the link you provided for the reporting of criminal activity was good only for submissions from within the UK. So I did speak with my friend at Scotland Yard. Result: Have you seen DJW or his child pornography on these threads since the New Year? His offense had nothing to do with me personally, but it's not "whistle-blowing": we don't work together. I reported the illegal posting on this thread of a link to a site devoted to child pornography. Was there something WRONG with that, Phil? What kept you from doing it? You didn't see anything wrong with those disgusting images of sexually exploited children? You say that you have kids of your own, that you are a father of boys. Why was YOUR effort limited to sending ME a useless, unusable link to British police? Why this very queer obsession with me? Clearly, it isn't restricted to my son's rape. It obviously goes beyond that. Very, very weird--weird, strange, and unsettling behavior from a middle-aged Englishman who has children, boys, of his own. Very, very queer..
Yet more hot air, more bluff and bluster from a windbag and a failed attempt to divert attention from your persitent bullshit with your usual 'obsession' tactic.
Some on here are easily fooled.
Phil

Manchester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1185
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Phil, When it comes to my son and mr, you "know" exactly nothing. Your persistent fixation with my boy's rape in 2004 is rather QUEER, wouldn't you say? And as for Scotland Yard, the link you provided for the reporting of criminal activity was good only for submissions from within the UK. So I did speak with my friend at Scotland Yard. Result: Have you seen DJW or his child pornography on these threads since the New Year? His offense had nothing to do with me personally, but it's not "whistle-blowing": we don't work together. I reported the illegal posting on this thread of a link to a site devoted to child pornography. Was there something WRONG with that, Phil? What kept you from doing it? You didn't see anything wrong with those disgusting images of sexually exploited children? You say that you have kids of your own, that you are a father of boys. Why was YOUR effort limited to sending ME a useless, unusable link to British police? Why this very queer obsession with me? Clearly, it isn't restricted to my son's rape. It obviously goes beyond that. Very, very weird--weird, strange, and unsettling behavior from a middle-aged Englishman who has children, boys, of his own. Very, very queer..
"I reported the illegal posting on this thread of a link to a site devoted to child pornography. Was there something WRONG with that, Phil? What kept you from doing it? You didn't see anything wrong with those disgusting images of sexually exploited children?"

I didn't look at those pictures which you described so vividly.
Several times.
If I though there was nothing wrong with such posts I wouldn't have supplied a link for you to report it while you laboured under the misapprehension that UK police all shut up shop at Christmas but I had no idea the link wouldn't work outside the UK.
MaltaMon

Lancaster, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1186
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet more hot air, more bluff and bluster from a windbag and a failed attempt to divert attention from your persitent bullshit with your usual 'obsession' tactic.
Some on here are easily fooled.
You have an enormous bug up you behind, a weird, unhealthy obsessive fixation on me that you see as a license to say anything, regardless of the total absence of any real facts or information on whichvto base it. Thid is clearly personal on your part. But not on mine. You will have noted that I haven't challenged anythingvyou have said about your personal life--that you're married, a father of teenaged boys, I question only your motive when it comes to your unfounded attacks on me, which have acquired a whining, raging quality more intensive that that of mere emotionsl outbursts. And I ask again: what kept you from reporting DJW for posting a link here to child pornography? Why the charade of the concerned contributor sending me a link, ostensibly to facilitate my effort to alert the authoritirs, that you knew I would not be permitted to use from outside Britain? Why the bullshit there, Pgil? Why would you act to prevent someone from reporting a distributor of child pornography who posts from your own country? Indeed, why did you perpetrate a fraud designed expressly to protect a fellow Brit who was promoting childtt pornography, and thereby the sexual abuse of children, on a web site to which you yourself contribute? I submit that once again you will ignore that question--a question that probes your motived, your very moral makeup as a father and a British citizen--and will reply merely with another blustery charge of "bullshit" and more angry, resentful, blatantly unfounded personal attacks on me . An honest answer would elicit justified indignation, even palpable rage of their own, from fathers and mothers from throughout your land and mine, would, indeed, bring shame and disgrace upon you. No, Phil, you should not respond to my qyestions. Just carry on with your blustery conjecture, with your impassioned personal assaults upon me. It's all you have. The alternative would reveal more about you as a man, a husband ans a father than you could possibly tolerate.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1187
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> You have an enormous bug up you behind, a weird, unhealthy obsessive fixation on me that you see as a license to say anything, regardless of the total absence of any real facts or information on whichvto base it. Thid is clearly personal on your part. But not on mine. You will have noted that I haven't challenged anythingvyou have said about your personal life--that you're married, a father of teenaged boys, I question only your motive when it comes to your unfounded attacks on me, which have acquired a whining, raging quality more intensive that that of mere emotionsl outbursts. And I ask again: what kept you from reporting DJW for posting a link here to child pornography? Why the charade of the concerned contributor sending me a link, ostensibly to facilitate my effort to alert the authoritirs, that you knew I would not be permitted to use from outside Britain? Why the bullshit there, Pgil? Why would you act to prevent someone from reporting a distributor of child pornography who posts from your own country? Indeed, why did you perpetrate a fraud designed expressly to protect a fellow Brit who was promoting childtt pornography, and thereby the sexual abuse of children, on a web site to which you yourself contribute? I submit that once again you will ignore that question--a question that probes your motived, your very moral makeup as a father and a British citizen--and will reply merely with another blustery charge of "bullshit" and more angry, resentful, blatantly unfounded personal attacks on me . An honest answer would elicit justified indignation, even palpable rage of their own, from fathers and mothers from throughout your land and mine, would, indeed, bring shame and disgrace upon you. No, Phil, you should not respond to my qyestions. Just carry on with your blustery conjecture, with your impassioned personal assaults upon me. It's all you have. The alternative would reveal more about you as a man, a husband ans a father than you could possibly tolerate.
Draw the line, cross the boundaries, MaltaMon.
Phil

Manchester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1188
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> You have an enormous bug up you behind, a weird, unhealthy obsessive fixation on me that you see as a license to say anything, regardless of the total absence of any real facts or information on whichvto base it. Thid is clearly personal on your part. But not on mine. You will have noted that I haven't challenged anythingvyou have said about your personal life--that you're married, a father of teenaged boys, I question only your motive when it comes to your unfounded attacks on me, which have acquired a whining, raging quality more intensive that that of mere emotionsl outbursts. And I ask again: what kept you from reporting DJW for posting a link here to child pornography? Why the charade of the concerned contributor sending me a link, ostensibly to facilitate my effort to alert the authoritirs, that you knew I would not be permitted to use from outside Britain? Why the bullshit there, Pgil? Why would you act to prevent someone from reporting a distributor of child pornography who posts from your own country? Indeed, why did you perpetrate a fraud designed expressly to protect a fellow Brit who was promoting childtt pornography, and thereby the sexual abuse of children, on a web site to which you yourself contribute? I submit that once again you will ignore that question--a question that probes your motived, your very moral makeup as a father and a British citizen--and will reply merely with another blustery charge of "bullshit" and more angry, resentful, blatantly unfounded personal attacks on me . An honest answer would elicit justified indignation, even palpable rage of their own, from fathers and mothers from throughout your land and mine, would, indeed, bring shame and disgrace upon you. No, Phil, you should not respond to my qyestions. Just carry on with your blustery conjecture, with your impassioned personal assaults upon me. It's all you have. The alternative would reveal more about you as a man, a husband ans a father than you could possibly tolerate.
"And I ask again: what kept you from reporting DJW for posting a link here to child pornography? Why the charade of the concerned contributor sending me a link, ostensibly to facilitate my effort to alert the authoritirs, that you knew I would not be permitted to use from outside Britain"

Like I said I didn't know the link wouldn't work and like I said I didn't follow DJW's link or look at the pics.
You were making enough noise about them for all of us.

All this from a man who accuses a poster on a public forum of raping his son, a crime that was committed many years ago and yet somehow you just happened to corner the attacker on here, and then after throwing wild accusations you decide it might not be him after all.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1189
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

c'mon bigtalk-- mm is confused enough.... R U now taking on the role of his cornerman ? Call 'enry and he will tell you to toss in the towel as the KO damage is alarming to spectators and by trying to prop him up U R being rather uncivilized to your (I dunno)-hero or latest flame(no offense).. whatever...send him a drink such as described by Zuiko or KM - it may settle down his anxieties...just maybe....
MaltaMon

Lancaster, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1190
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
"And I ask again: what kept you from reporting DJW for posting a link here to child pornography? Why the charade of the concerned contributor sending me a link, ostensibly to facilitate my effort to alert the authoritirs, that you knew I would not be permitted to use from outside Britain"
Like I said I didn't know the link wouldn't work and like I said I didn't follow DJW's link or look at the pics.
You were making enough noise about them for all of us.
All this from a man who accuses a poster on a public forum of raping his son, a crime that was committed many years ago and yet somehow you just happened to corner the attacker on here, and then after throwing wild accusations you decide might not be him after all.
Right, right, right. You "didn't know". Now who's the liar? It states clearly, unequivocally, in boldface on the first page that the site is for submissions from within the United Kingdom only. And then you never said another word about it when I informed you of that...Why the subsequent silence-? Because, quite understandably, you KNEW that it was a ruse, a charade, a practical joke. And you felt that I was " making enough noise for all of us"? THAT is why you left it to me to report from the other side of the Atlantic a crime t hat was committed in your own country while you, yourself, did nothing about it? THAT is your answer, your justification for perpetrating a charade to delay or prevent the crime from being reported? That is very strange talk coming from a devoted father of sons. No objective interpretation would possibly, ever, let you off the hook. Meanwhile, I DID report it to the ppropriate British authtorities from the United States. An American.. My GOD, what complete and utter nonsense. It's monumental.
MaltaMon

Lancaster, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1191
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Your fixation with me is nearly as queer and unsettling as your casual indifference to child pornography in yiur midst. You have a sinister agenda, and it absolutely stinks of that sexually perverted undercurrent I mentioned in my post yesterday. "Yeah, you were making enough noise from overseas about the posting from MY country to a site that I frequent of a link to child pornography--hundreds of nude images of young boys, of captive young boys forced to strip nd don the skimpiest of underwear briefs and posed erotically for the pornographer's camera." That hit a nerve, I suspect.
MaltaMon

Lancaster, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1192
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

** Yeah, I was making enough noise from abroad that you didn't feel the need to act against the promotion of child porn on a site that you frequent. "I know what I'll do," you thought to yourself, "I will send this guy a link to a site that he won't be able to use--that, by definition, won't work for anyone outside this country--to really stick it to him, to slow or stop his effort to report the posting of child porn from this-my-country, while letting everyone believe that I'm as outraged by it as he is, whereas I really am not. And then I will come back on the same site and accuse him, without any knowledge or hard information at all, of having done nothing...although that effort may prove difficult to sustain, and surely is a challenge to credulity, inasmuch as the one who posted the link to child porn, DJW appears, indeed, to have vanished from these Topix threads.
MaltaMon

Lancaster, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1193
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Go back to your kids, Phil, and explain to them the disgraceful effort of their dad to protect this promotion from within their own country of illegal child pornography. Look your sons in the eye--and their mother--and justify to them your clever charade. Think they'll be proud, Phil? Think they will ever look at you again with the same high regard? Without wondering why?
coyote

Halifax, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1194
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

you have been told, Phil ! Wow- 4 posts and about 40 lines just to "instruct" you to have a chat with your wife and kids ! Not a word about any traveling abroad- could anyone forward him some more brochures - maybe John Kerry will find use for such a worldly man - he would be a great wmd reporter.... gads, maybe he was in GW's admin.!!....
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1195
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

MaltaMon wrote:
Go back to your kids, Phil, and explain to them the disgraceful effort of their dad to protect this promotion from within their own country of illegal child pornography. Look your sons in the eye--and their mother--and justify to them your clever charade. Think they'll be proud, Phil? Think they will ever look at you again with the same high regard? Without wondering why?
Now you are talking!
Phil

Manchester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1196
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Do you really think anybody buys into this fake moral indignation that is yet another failed smokescreen to hide the fact that you stupidly accused a poster on here of attacking your son and now realise what a monumental screw up that was, but you are not man enough to accept that and express any sort of regret, instead you try to bluff and bluster your way through it in your time honoured fashion because you cannot bear the thought you are in the wrong or (god forbid) you made a mistake.
All this suggestion that I am somehow shielding a pornographer is laughable.
A lot like you in fact.

"to slow or stop his effort to report the posting of child porn"

You don't really believe that.
Please tell me you are not that stupid.
The words barrel, scraping and the bottom of spring to mind.
And desperate.

"hundreds of nude images of young boys, of captive young boys forced to strip and don the skimpiest of underwear briefs and posed erotically for the pornographer's camera"

There's that detailed description again which only you provide. Frequently.
Talk about a hidden agenda.
MaltaMon

Kutztown, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1197
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

As I predicted, you refuse to address the issue. You have no choice, I suppose, because the truth is too disgraceful. You are pitiful, Phil. Simply pitiful. One can only infer from this that you approve of child pornography, of child sexual abuse, of the pedophiles whom you defend on this thread. And that leads one to wonder about YOUR life. Not that I am interested, mind you....lol.. But what a load of shit you've dumped here. You are fixated with me (quite possible, if not probably, it's a deviantly sexual obsession... BTW, i'm not interested in THAT sort of thing, Phil, although between consenting adults, there is nothing wrong with it) But your sons' safety now becomes an issue, a concern. Seriously, now, if their father condones child pornography and child sexual abuse that takes place in their country, they should be informed.
MaltaMon

Kutztown, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1198
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Phil wrote:
Do you really think anybody buys into this fake moral indignation that is yet another failed smokescreen to hide the fact that you stupidly accused a poster on here of attacking your son and now realise what a monumental screw up that was, but you are not man enough to accept that and express any sort of regret, instead you try to bluff and bluster your way through it in your time honoured fashion because you cannot bear the thought you are in the wrong or (god forbid) you made a mistake.
All this suggestion that I am somehow shielding a pornographer is laughable.
A lot like you in fact.
"to slow or stop his effort to report the posting of child porn"
You don't really believe that.

Please tell me you are not that stupid.
The words barrel, scraping and the bottom of spring to mind.
And desperate.
"hundreds of nude images of young boys, of captive young boys forced to strip and don the skimpiest of underwear briefs and posed erotically for the pornographer's camera"
There's that detailed description again which only you provide. Frequently.
Talk about a hidden agenda.
And Hey, Fill, I got rid of the child-porn promoter posting on here from your country while you did nothing. You could have taken care of it far more easily, and you wouldn't have had to go through the red tape that I did--the requisite check with the State Dept, and the rest--to register my complaint. You would have been a fellow citizen alerting your own nation's authorities of the presence of an online promoter of child pornography. But you did not. Why, Phil, why, why? You won't say, will you? The truth--the reality and its implications on your personal life--is shameful and poses a risk to your family's serenity.
MaltaMon

Kutztown, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1199
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Phil, the evidence is there: I outed the child pornographer. I reported it to Scotland Yard. He has been gone from these networks ever since. You posted, in a phony bid to assist me in reporting this British criminal--this abuser of children--a link to a web site that you advised me I could use to expedite my report. "You don't have to wait until your contact returns (to Scotland Yard)," you said. I could do it directly, you advised me, by using the site to which you provided the link--a site that you knew I would be unable to use because it is useless to anyone outside the United Kingdom. And when I pointed this out to you, you failed to follow up. You proceded to do exactly nothing about this threat to children within your own country. You left it to an American--one whom you clearly dislike. Why would you do that, Phil? What was your intention?.
MaltaMon

Kutztown, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1200
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Phil, stay the heck out of my business. Your opinion on my situation regarding my son and your new pal is uninformed, speculative, and, ultimately, born of a festering resentment toward me. Perhaps you wouldn't have felt so bad if I hadn't criticized you last fall for being stupid and uneducated. Maybe that was all it took to set off this personal crusade--this vendetta of yours. Never mind. Say what you want. Make this, as is your wont and your style, into an argument against my credibility. At this stage, now that I am convinced of your deeply personal motive for this bellicose barrage of bullshit, I couldn't care less. And be more selective about the company you keep, even online. Your choices do not reflect well on you at all. Am happy to know from living for three years in your wonderful country that most of your fellow Brits are not so embittered.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

10 Users are viewing the Education Forum right now

Search the Education Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
CompTIA Security+ SY0-401 practice test 3 hr passexam 1
Aruba ACCP-v6.2 exam dumps 3 hr passexam 1
Cisco 700-280 exam practice test 3 hr passexam 1
Riverbed 599-01 exam dumps 4 hr passexam 1
Apple 9L0-415 exam questions 4 hr passexam 1
Avaya 6103 exam dumps 4 hr passexam 1
Poor teens' health may benefit from top schools 14 hr MaltaMon 9
•••
•••