Katie Mellish

UK

#1160 Jan 27, 2013
coyote wrote:
Aw Katie- you describe a very comfortable way to spend a cold winter's night-- enjoy kid !!
To Coyote hello iam doing the same to night it is 20 to 2 here and iam on my second bottle of Old Moores Pear cyder.After i have finished this pint there is another left and when thats gone iam off to bedikins.Takecare Katie xxxxxx.
MaltaMon

Reading, PA

#1161 Jan 27, 2013
Katie Mellish wrote:
<quoted text>To MM hello you are indeed correct there you have hit the nail on the head-Katie xx.
Thanks, Katie.
Katie Mellish

UK

#1162 Jan 27, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Thanks, Katie.
No problem MM.
Katie Mellish

UK

#1163 Jan 27, 2013
Katie Mellish wrote:
<quoted text>To Coyote hello iam doing the same to night it is 20 to 2 here and iam on my second bottle of Old Moores Pear cyder.After i have finished this pint there is another left and when thats gone iam off to bedikins.Takecare Katie xxxxxx.
I mean another pint left not another bottle LOL-Katie xxxxxx.
MaltaMon

Reading, PA

#1164 Jan 27, 2013
Phil wrote:
As I expected.
The usual hot air.
I can see so clearly now why everybody takes you so seriously and believes every word you post.
It's OK Bob, you have absolutely nothing to worry about.
It is all bullshit.
Listen to him, Bob. Phil knows. Don't be concerned that on his part it's all pure conjecture and ill will. Just know that I personally will feel better if you accept Phil at his word and follow his wise counsel. It comes with my enthusiastic endorsement and fondest good wishes.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#1166 Jan 27, 2013
Katie Mellish wrote:
<quoted text>I mean another pint left not another bottle LOL-Katie xxxxxx.
Katie: enjoy your evening (?) heck it is 10.22 pm here-- don't you have to work later on ??
Phil

London, UK

#1167 Jan 28, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Phil, I am not going over that again with you, whether you ask nicely or demand a response, as you just did, regarding matters that do not cencern you in the least. Indeed, you are not entitled to any such information. You have all the old postings between PB and me if you are so very interested. And none of this is new: you and I have had this exchange before. I also said before that I find peculiar your interest in my affairs. Mind your own friggin' business, Phil. And make a mountain of an issue of this molehill of a reply. Let the accustions fly. "This proves that etc etc etc...". It proves only that you are nosy, as you were before, feel entitled to informationthat doesn't concern you, and quite possibly have an agenda of your own. I'm not taking the bait. I have no such interest in your life and affairs. Any objective adult would tell you the same.
"Indeed, you are not entitled to any such information"

You have already divulged this information on a public forum when you accused Bob of raping your son.
Simple question, do you stand by your original allegation?
By confirming as much you are not revealing anything new.
Phil

London, UK

#1168 Jan 28, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Phil, I am not going over that again with you, whether you ask nicely or demand a response, as you just did, regarding matters that do not cencern you in the least. Indeed, you are not entitled to any such information. You have all the old postings between PB and me if you are so very interested. And none of this is new: you and I have had this exchange before. I also said before that I find peculiar your interest in my affairs. Mind your own friggin' business, Phil. And make a mountain of an issue of this molehill of a reply. Let the accustions fly. "This proves that etc etc etc...". It proves only that you are nosy, as you were before, feel entitled to informationthat doesn't concern you, and quite possibly have an agenda of your own. I'm not taking the bait. I have no such interest in your life and affairs. Any objective adult would tell you the same.
"I also said before that I find peculiar your interest in my affairs"

You accuse a poster on here of a serious crime on a public forum and when questioned you hide behind the above.
If you didn't want to provoke interest for want of a better word or to be questioned about 'your affairs' you would not post such items on a forum like this.
Any 'objective adult' would leave it to the professionals, the lawyers, etc.

By the way, how did Scotland Yard respond to your recent whistleblowing, or is that more of your bovine scatology, as one of your countrymen once described it?

You and I really know you are full of it.
Largelanguage

Rhyl, UK

#1169 Jan 28, 2013
Katie Mellish wrote:
<quoted text>Oy gob sh1te now you are talking a load of sh1te bollck brain.
Can you tolerate people with alternate views to you?
Katie Mellish

UK

#1170 Jan 28, 2013
coyote wrote:
<quoted text> Katie: enjoy your evening (?) heck it is 10.22 pm here-- don't you have to work later on ??
To Coyote hello,work iam still on the sick leave at HMP Manchester iam also on maternity leave i will not be back in work for at least another three years.Takecare Coyote Katie Mellish xxxxxx.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#1171 Jan 28, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
"I also said before that I find peculiar your interest in my affairs"
You accuse a poster on here of a serious crime on a public forum and whepn questioned you hide behind the above.
If you didn't want to provoke interest for want of a better word or to be questioned about 'your affairs' you would not post such items on a forum like this.I
Any 'objective adult' would leave it to the professionals, the lawyers, etc.
By the way, how did Scotland Yard respond to your recent whistleblowing, or is that more of your bovine scatology, as one of your countrymen once described it?
You and I really know you are full of it.
In fact, Phil, you and I both know that you "know" nothing about the situation. And your passionate persistent interest with me, personally, is weird. Very weird. Everything you presume is undiluted conjecture. And it comes from a simmering, inexplicable resentment. Indeed, your certainty is born of nothing factual: it's wishful thinking, it's how you FEEL. Well, Phil, feel better.
Largelanguage

Rhyl, UK

#1172 Jan 28, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
"I also said before that I find peculiar your interest in my affairs"
You accuse a poster on here of a serious crime on a public forum and when questioned you hide behind the above.
If you didn't want to provoke interest for want of a better word or to be questioned about 'your affairs' you would not post such items on a forum like this.
Any 'objective adult' would leave it to the professionals, the lawyers, etc.
By the way, how did Scotland Yard respond to your recent whistleblowing, or is that more of your bovine scatology, as one of your countrymen once described it?
You and I really know you are full of it.
You know nothing about this BOY! Stay out of this! MaltaMon has his good reasons, not to be shared, shamed and frightened of me now BOY? Eh BOY? You're the little doggie in the room, BOY!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1173 Jan 28, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you tolerate people with alternate views to you?
Ask yourself that question. You certainly don't tolerate people with alternate views to yours.
Largelanguage

Rhyl, UK

#1174 Jan 28, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Ask yourself that question. You certainly don't tolerate people with alternate views to yours.
I don't tolerate foolish pedophilia. I saw you post today as 40something, trying to gang up on me. You are the same person lol.

Maybe you thought, "I said some stupid things under the username 40something, lets change it to zuiko, and avoid saying stupid stuff" - "Oh no, as zuiko as I said stupid stuff, lets try both usernames instead to try and see who does better and say less stupid stuff, at least under one of the usernames I won't sound stupid".
Largelanguage

Rhyl, UK

#1175 Jan 28, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Ask yourself that question. You certainly don't tolerate people with alternate views to yours.
If you didn't post as fortysomething, then you would have no views in confrontation to mine to say I didn't tolerate. If you were 40something, you would have shared your views with me, and therefore were refering to the views you stated as fortysomething.

Liar liar pants on fire.
Phil

London, UK

#1176 Jan 28, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
You know nothing about this BOY! Stay out of this! MaltaMon has his good reasons, not to be shared, shamed and frightened of me now BOY? Eh BOY? You're the little doggie in the room, BOY!
Grow up, you complete and utter knob.
Phil

London, UK

#1177 Jan 28, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> In fact, Phil, you and I both know that you "know" nothing about the situation. And your passionate persistent interest with me, personally, is weird. Very weird. Everything you presume is undiluted conjecture. And it comes from a simmering, inexplicable resentment. Indeed, your certainty is born of nothing factual: it's wishful thinking, it's how you FEEL. Well, Phil, feel better.
"And your passionate persistent interest with me, personally, is weird"

Don't flatter yourself.
I don't resent you.
I just resent your constant bullshit.
You and I both know you have got nothing, wild allegations with no foundation in fact.
Largelanguage

Rhyl, UK

#1178 Jan 28, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Grow up, you complete and utter knob.
Its none of our business, child! Stay out of this yourself!
Phil

London, UK

#1179 Jan 28, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Its none of our business, child! Stay out of this yourself!
And you are?
Phil

London, UK

#1180 Jan 28, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> In fact, Phil, you and I both know that you "know" nothing about the situation. And your passionate persistent interest with me, personally, is weird. Very weird. Everything you presume is undiluted conjecture. And it comes from a simmering, inexplicable resentment. Indeed, your certainty is born of nothing factual: it's wishful thinking, it's how you FEEL. Well, Phil, feel better.
You didn't answer the simple question re: Scotland Yard and your 'contact' which is probably more bullshit.
Did you report what you said you would report?
By replying to this one you are giving nothing away regarding your 'affairs' or with Bob, the allegation against whom you now seem to be backtracking on.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Cisco PANGNFE 650-756 practice exam & 650-756 q... 4 hr Maltamon 6
News St. Paul schools struggle to meet lofty goals 6 hr Maltamon 12
Can tnmtndude perform (Dec '11) 6 hr Maltamon 33
Survey for Students or Parents who have used tu... 6 hr Maltamon 61
nudity in co-ed contexts (May '14) 6 hr Maltamon 18
Outlaw men teachers! (Jul '14) 19 hr Bob 9
News Colorado Senate OKs Tax Credits For Private Sch... Sat Elise Gingerich 3
More from around the web