coyote

Dartmouth, Canada

#1036 Jan 22, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Forgot to ask: How will the alleged disclosure of this name cause damage? To whom? That is important. Thx.
word was/is crodenizer (u understand that one rite MM) Bigtalk it "good be" you "reallu" should answer your american idol B4 he gets impatient with you..... dont'cha think ! When your parrot gets off work have it read the application of the word from the forum for you. Then- proceed with what you MUST do- even call your queen or pm--gee whiz- do something ! You are acting more as a sick sardine than a demented kipper--- answer MM RITE AWAY son ! I am trying to help you in your relationship with MM large mouth.... what goes.. that is a bass not a sardine or kipper-----'splain bigtalk !
MaltaMon

Emmaus, PA

#1037 Jan 22, 2013
coyote wrote:
<quoted text> word was/is crodenizer (u understand that one rite MM) Bigtalk it "good be" you "reallu" should answer your american idol B4 he gets impatient with you..... dont'cha think ! When your parrot gets off work have it read the application of the word from the forum for you. Then- proceed with what you MUST do- even call your queen or pm--gee whiz- do something ! You are acting more as a sick sardine than a demented kipper--- answer MM RITE AWAY son ! I am trying to help you in your relationship with MM large mouth.... what goes.. that is a bass not a sardine or kipper-----'splain bigtalk !
I haven't checked--can't on the mobile version--but I hope that you have,awarded me more of my favorite trinity of those dreaded if awfully adorable symbols of JUDGEMENT: peanuts, dead lightbulbs, and mean mran yellow faces. "Please, Sir, may I have some more?"
coyote

Dartmouth, Canada

#1038 Jan 22, 2013
"mran yellow faces" ?... sorry..unable to interpret ..... oh well, "good be" bigtalk can help if he "reallu" tries..... all the best..

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1039 Jan 22, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Zuiko/SixtySomething, I have stated many times, including tin a reply to you two days ago, why I am on here. You have chosen to ignore repeatedly my question to you regarding the reasons for your prrsence on the very same threads. To pose the same questjon to me after I have explained my presence is a waste of time. But when it comes to my time, despite your choice to ignore my previous answer to that as well, I devote, at most, fifteen minutes to these threads on any given day--any 24-hour period. If you find that impossible to comprehend, that is perhaps because as one who clearly fancies himself as the most intelligent guy in the room, you cannot imagine that anybody who has the ability to read and write with far greater allacrity than you could possibly be in the same room as you. I'm a published author, professional writer, and consultant. What I punch out here on my tiny smartphone touch-screen keyboard or otherwise on my IPAD and computer are words that I would never submit for publication: there isn't time to go over it, and I punch it out too quickly (often resulting in those typos that you have criticised...lol..of course, I consider the source of that criticism) Now, answer my friggin' question or direct your shifty attention and your sophomoric commentary and endless repetition of the same stupid already-answered questions elsewhere.
This post establishes you as a liar, among other things. Not that any proof was needed.
How can you post 15 mins. a day when your posts appear continuously all day long, and you immediately answer every poster that posts here soon after their posts appear?
You're not fooling anyone, especially Zuiko.
MaltaMon

Reading, PA

#1040 Jan 22, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
This post establishes you as a liar, among other things. Not that any proof was needed.
How can you post 15 mins. a day when your posts appear continuously all day long, and you immediately answer every poster that posts here soon after their posts appear?
You're not fooling anyone, especially Zuiko.
Zuiko, checking postings and responding to them on a site I keep on in a window while working hardly requires the degree of attention or persistence that you envision, no doubt because you cannot imagine yourself being able to do it with anything less. Ever have the notion of total time explained to you? I devote a total of fifteen minutes or less of each day to reading posts on this site,and responding to them. Now, how is that a lie? You know, I feel strongly that you are much too stupid to be able to understand just how stupid you are. That you believe these flash posts require all day and one's undivided attention is proof enough.
MaltaMon

Reading, PA

#1041 Jan 22, 2013
Lol..And that you feel that your posts warrant that sort of devotion--that your dozens of postings since you first appeared on the nude-boy threads as Zuiko three days ago has made a difference in my own presence here--is preposterous and serves only to prove my characterization of you as a narcissist without much intelligence.
MaltaMon

Reading, PA

#1042 Jan 22, 2013
coyote wrote:
<quoted text> word was/is crodenizer (u understand that one rite MM) Bigtalk it "good be" you "reallu" should answer your american idol B4 he gets impatient with you..... dont'cha think ! When your parrot gets off work have it read the application of the word from the forum for you. Then- proceed with what you MUST do- even call your queen or pm--gee whiz- do something ! You are acting more as a sick sardine than a demented kipper--- answer MM RITE AWAY son ! I am trying to help you in your relationship with MM large mouth.... what goes.. that is a bass not a sardine or kipper-----'splain bigtalk !
Never mind, coyote. I will await the reply of the individual to whom I directed the question.
coyote

Dartmouth, Canada

#1043 Jan 22, 2013
U do not have much choice do you ? But c'mon- he does not know what a crodenizer is and surely you do so help him out, do not leave 1/2 your supporters to perish in the trenches MM !
MaltaMon

Reading, PA

#1044 Jan 22, 2013
coyote wrote:
U do not have much choice do you ? But c'mon- he does not know what a crodenizer is and surely you do so help him out, do not leave 1/2 your supporters to perish in the trenches MM !
You don't seem to understand,,you poor bastard, that I am not here for "supporters". Why must you understand everyone's motivations only in terms of one who follows others? You've been here long enough to know why I'm here (yes, of course, coyote, go ahead and use that as a lead-in to another of your gratuitous, unfounded, silly, preposterous accusations; it would be a shame to change your style at this juncture, and besides, I would be disappointed if you let that opportunity pass) I suppose, however, that your understanding of people is based on what you need. Take care, pal.
coyote

Dartmouth, Canada

#1045 Jan 22, 2013
your not here for supporters ? HA!! It sure SEEMS you are and the target was "Bob" and solely because he played devil's advocate to try and get some critical but light bantering going on--- you were possibly envious of his crazy posts (I am sure he would have and still would concede they were crazy) and immediately cook up a "pedo bob" attack and when he scoffed you added what is surely a story about a son being molested- sick ! You knew that would be considered a repulsive criminal deed and rightly so but it is probable (from your postings) it is a made up story and anyone (I think) would know not an issue for this venue but you persisted..... lots of projection but with pretty clear diligence....
MaltaMon

Reading, PA

#1046 Jan 22, 2013
Sorry, coyote, but there isn't any accuracy in what you say. And almost nothing with a foundation in fact. It is pure conjecture. Nice try, though. It's fun to see you attempt to patronize, but I'm immune to it. Ciao.
MaltaMon

Riverside, NJ

#1047 Jan 22, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
This post establishes you as a liar, among other things. Not that any proof was needed.
How can you post 15 mins. a day when your posts appear continuously all day long, and you immediately answer every poster that posts here soon after their posts appear?
You're not fooling anyone, especially Zuiko.
"... ESPECIALLY ZUIKO." I GOTTA love a guy who refers to himself in the third person... Could there be a problem with his Ego Regulator? And you are correct about one thing, Zitto: I'm not fooling anyone because I'm not trying to fool anyone. Why are you frequenting these nude-boy threads again? Can't recall your answer. G'night, Laddie. Ye may continue to take the low road.("PS. Note to MaltaMon: The Committee were convened by Zuiko/SixtySomething to review your alleged account of your alleged son's alleged rape in the alleged Canada in alleged 2004, for which you of course did not and should not provide publicly any details as it is still under investigation, and have determined that, allegedly, it 'does not hold water'." Yes, yes, of course. No water. MaltaMon understands. Particularly in the face of all the hard conjecture that you fellows and cross-dressers on the Committee, and Zuiko/SixtySomething in particular, have at your command)
Largelanguage

Rhyl, UK

#1048 Jan 23, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> I don't see the context to this disclosure. Why is that name important? Why did he disclose it? I want to help if I can, but I don't want to report anything that I am unable to explain. And if coyote is no more than a nasty piece of work, there is nothing criminal in that. And he is subject to the laws of Canada and , I presume, the province of Nova Scotia. What am I missing, Large? Is there more history, greater context to this incident beyond coyote's recent exchange with you? I will do it if convinced that he must be stopped. But only then. Thanks.
I probably have seen less of coyote/bob than you have, and I probably don't know them as well as you do. It is simply that I am a little suspicious because on topix I've seen threads where someone discloses someones name and publicizes the person speaking trash about them. If coyote continues far beyond simply mentioning the name, then its going to be a serious issue though.
Largelanguage

Rhyl, UK

#1049 Jan 23, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
This thread should be renamed the MaltaMoron Topic.
He doesn't even realize what a fool he is making of himself.
I suspect that he is living in a mental asylum which allows him to type all day 24/7 at a computer as a form of therapy and keep his deranged mind occupied.
There is no other explanation. Nobody in their right mind would be so obsessed and spend their whole time typing on a computer all day on two topics about naked boys.
I'm sure you have years of experience in a mental institute, you should know shouldn't you?
Largelanguage

Rhyl, UK

#1050 Jan 23, 2013
coyote wrote:
U do not have much choice do you ? But c'mon- he does not know what a crodenizer is and surely you do so help him out, do not leave 1/2 your supporters to perish in the trenches MM !
I've googled the name, and by the looks of it, crodenizer doesn't seem to exist, since it only appeared twice on the search engine. The first result was one that linked to this exact same thread, in other words, linked to the thread based on what you said about this invicible person. The second thread was some sort of ancestor searching site, where someone searches for their ancestors, and their family history. Those 2 searches were pretty much it.

To sum it up, Crodenizer doesn't even exist, no such thing as crodenizer, except from an ancient person possibly, and on the page he was mostly named rhodenizer, not crodenizer.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1051 Jan 23, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure you have years of experience in a mental institute, you should know shouldn't you?
It is time to wake up your deranged master to continue with his crusade. He is probably exhausted with all that typing.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#1053 Jan 23, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
I probably have seen less of coyote/bob than you have, and I probably don't know them as well as you do. It is simply that I am a little suspicious because on topix I've seen threads where someone discloses someones name and publicizes the person speaking trash about them. If coyote continues far beyond simply mentioning the name, then its going to be a serious issue though.
Yes, it would be if he were outing someone or otherwise exposing him (or her) to that individual's detriment or damage that would otherwise not become an issue. That is why, despite the temptation, I have never so much as hinted here at Pedo Bob's real name or identity. In some respects it would provide pleasure to disclose it and watch him initially explode at me then ultimately run and hide, perhsps back to "Toronno" or Malta, whence he used to pontificate on Topix nude-boy threads. But it wouldn't serve my purpose at allall, and besides, it would be gratuitous. I have offered here a few irresistable swipes at his physical appearance,, also gratuitous, but they alone would never distinguish him among Canadians, among anglophone Quebeckers, or middle-aged pedophiles who prefer boys. In principle, it is wrong to violate the understood pact among us all with regard to anonymity. As for coyote, I don't know him personally. I possibly could have him identified within a day or less, but to make that request might elicit questions regarding my motives. And my quarry is Pedo Bob.
Largelanguage

Rhyl, UK

#1054 Jan 23, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Yes, it would be if he were outing someone or otherwise exposing him (or her) to that individual's detriment or damage that would otherwise not become an issue. That is why, despite the temptation, I have never so much as hinted here at Pedo Bob's real name or identity. In some respects it would provide pleasure to disclose it and watch him initially explode at me then ultimately run and hide, perhsps back to "Toronno" or Malta, whence he used to pontificate on Topix nude-boy threads. But it wouldn't serve my purpose at allall, and besides, it would be gratuitous. I have offered here a few irresistable swipes at his physical appearance,, also gratuitous, but they alone would never distinguish him among Canadians, among anglophone Quebeckers, or middle-aged pedophiles who prefer boys. In principle, it is wrong to violate the understood pact among us all with regard to anonymity. As for coyote, I don't know him personally. I possibly could have him identified within a day or less, but to make that request might elicit questions regarding my motives. And my quarry is Pedo Bob.
How do you manage to identify them, if it isn't all hush hush that is?
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#1055 Jan 23, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you manage to identify them, if it isn't all hush hush that is?
Through the site and Internet Provider.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#1056 Jan 23, 2013
And Bob, I'll say now that you will react by calling me s "moron". Having so stipulated, I think that it would be repetitious of you, at best, to weigh in yet again with your weary epithet. As always, Pedo Baby, you remain in our thoughts and prayers.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Group Says Breaking Up VA Best Way To Serve Vet... 4 hr VET for VETERANS 1
Did You Swim Nude In High School? (Dec '12) 9 hr Phil 1,392
Can tnmtndude perform (Dec '11) 15 hr Maltamon 41
News We already know what it takes to train great te... 23 hr freealan 1
News St. Paul schools struggle to meet lofty goals Tue bob 17
nudity in co-ed contexts (May '14) Mon bob 23
Survey for Students or Parents who have used tu... Mon bob 65
More from around the web