Bob: Were Boys Forced to Attend School Swim Lessons Completely Nude?

[Zuiko]

MaltaMon wrote:

<quoted text> Still he avoids any challenge on the substance of your message, Large. He's still fixated on a typographical error. Isn't that manly of him? Anybody who has matured beyond the age at which his mental and emotional development was arrested--in other words, the age of those to whom he relates best, the age of his pubescent victims--poses an insurmountable challenge for him. So he just picks on the sort of inadvertent mechanical error that all of us commit from time to time, and that supposedly renders him intellectually and morally superior. It's transparent as hell. And, by definition considering the source, childish

You are speaking for yourself and projecting yourself.
Isn't it childish of you to start a topic to attack another person, as the title shows?
You have also lost the argument of your intention on the subject. You are obviously backward, not to use the proper insulting word, being the only person not to believe that boys swam nude in American High Schools.

[MaltaMon]

Zuiko wrote:

<quoted text>
You are speaking for yourself and projecting yourself.
Isn't it childish of you to start a topic to attack another person, as the title shows?
You have also lost the argument of your intention on the subject. You are obviously backward, not to use the proper insulting word, being the only person not to believe that boys swam nude in American High Schools.

Projecting myself? How am I doing that? And upon whom? "Obvously backward"? Hmmm. And please, tell me how I have "lost the argument". It would appear that you haven't paid much attention to the discussion as it has evolved. It is far from where it began. And the purpose of this thread at the outset was ro elicit more anger and lying testimony from Pedo Bob. The topic itself was a pretext. I can't expect you to know any of that if you haven't been sitting in the stands while Bob and I have fought this out. But how did you ever miss the fact that the REAL topic is pedophilia? And no, my friend, on that I have not "lost the argument". You should pay attention to a discussion--know what it's about--before weighing in with a personal attack on one of the participants. Don't go about it ass "backward", mate.

[MaltaMon]

Could Zuiko, with his hidden location and very swift judgement of my reply to him as "nuts", in fact be the same individual who bills himself as FortySomething? My vote is "yes".

[MaltaMon]

Ah, Zuiko. Your membership dates to only last Sunday, January 13. A week ago. You are only the second member on these nude-boy threads to withhold your location--a cowardly act, indeed, especially inasmuch as we all disguise our identities behind screen names. The only other such coward is SixtySomething, whose commentary is remarkably similar to yours. And your rush to post your judgements of my reply to you as "nuts", "clueless" and the rest gave away your identity, if not your location. This time, wait more than a moment to judge this posting. We all know you you are. And the 'nuts','clueless' and other negative judgements are what we all expect of you. It's utterly predictable and, thus, unremarkable. Cheers, OLD man!

[Zuiko]

MaltaMon wrote:

<quoted text> Projecting myself? How am I doing that? And upon whom? "Obvously backward"? Hmmm. And please, tell me how I have "lost the argument". It would appear that you haven't paid much attention to the discussion as it has evolved. It is far from where it began. And the purpose of this thread at the outset was ro elicit more anger and lying testimony from Pedo Bob. The topic itself was a pretext. I can't expect you to know any of that if you haven't been sitting in the stands while Bob and I have fought this out. But how did you ever miss the fact that the REAL topic is pedophilia? And no, my friend, on that I have not "lost the argument". You should pay attention to a discussion--know what it's about--before weighing in with a personal attack on one of the participants. Don't go about it ass "backward", mate.

You have lost the argument because you have proved nothing of all you said, with your constant name calling and personal attacks, backed up by your valet from the UK.
This is clearly a thread, filled by your posts, with a personal agenda against one person. There is no other subject in it, except as an excuse for the main agenda. If you want to discuss the subject of pedophilia concerning forced nude swimming in schools you should take this on a broader issue. But then I don't think that you believe that this ever happened.
So grow up and post something intelligent. Only young schoolboys play these games of name calling.

[Zuiko]

MaltaMon wrote:

Ah, Zuiko. Your membership dates to only last Sunday, January 13. A week ago. You are only the second member on these nude-boy threads to withhold your location--a cowardly act, indeed, especially inasmuch as we all disguise our identities behind screen names. The only other such coward is SixtySomething, whose commentary is remarkably similar to yours. And your rush to post your judgements of my reply to you as "nuts", "clueless" and the rest gave away your identity, if not your location. This time, wait more than a moment to judge this posting. We all know you you are. And the 'nuts','clueless' and other negative judgements are what we all expect of you. It's utterly predictable and, thus, unremarkable. Cheers, OLD man!

The name and location has nothing to do with my comments, or anyone's comments. This is just an excuse to avoid answering the arguments, which is another sign of childishness, cowardice and malignancy on your part.

[coyote]

I think even CaDad would say "you nailed it !" Well done Zuiko !

[MaltaMon]

Zuiko wrote:

<quoted text>
The name and location has nothing to do with my comments, or anyone's comments. This is just an excuse to avoid answering the arguments, which is another sign of childishness, cowardice and malignancy on your part.

v So you deny that you are FortySomething? Talk about cowardice! Moreover, did YOU respond to any of MY questions? Of course not. Cut the nonsensse, you queer swinging little old parasite.

[MaltaMon]

coyote wrote:

I think even CaDad would say "you nailed it !" Well done Zuiko !

Always the water boy, eh, coyote? Never the guy who calls upon the water boy. And oh so eager to please,: 60Something didn't even snap his fingers, but you ran to his aid anyway. You must give good bow jobs.

[MaltaMon]

(that last bit was censored, of course)

[coyote]

MaltaMon wrote:

(that last bit was censored, of course)

of course- I understand mm- I do not understand why you continue with your cowardly projectionist manners , but hey.... that seems 2 b u ....no prob.....

[MaltaMon]

coyote wrote:

<quoted text> of course- I understand mm- I do not understand why you continue with your cowardly projectionist manners , but hey.... that seems 2 b u ....no prob.....

Cowardly Projectionist manners? A class of manners unto itself, I suspect. I won't dispute the "cowardly" part as it is a subjective statement, and you are entitled to your opinion. But you are obligated to demonstrate with hard evidence, as opposed to conjecture or simple queer-minded bitchy spite, that, in the first place, I am projecting, and in the second place, what it is about myself that I project onto others. Hard evidence. Credible evidence. Problem is, you cannot serve it up because there is none. Clearly, there is sufficient evidence of your obsequious water-boy tendencies. You will rush to the loins of anyone who looks as if he may want to take me on. But when left on your own, well, I'm just a projectionist and whatever has been said of me by another most recently..

[MaltaMon]

Why on earth can a man of your age not have learned to think for himself? You are a human echo chamber, coyote.

[MaltaMon]

Zuiko wrote:

<quoted text>
You have lost the argument because you have proved nothing of all you said, with your constant name calling and personal attacks, backed up by your valet from the UK.
This is clearly a thread, filled by your posts, with a personal agenda against one person. There is no other subject in it, except as an excuse for the main agenda. If you want to discuss the subject of pedophilia concerning forced nude swimming in schools you should take this on a broader issue. But then I don't think that you believe that this ever happened.
So grow up and post something intelligent. Only young schoolboys play these games of name calling.

Oh, so now you've read some of the posts before shooting your mouth off. Can't say that I agree with your take on anything, but you nonetheless seem to be doing better than when you charged me with"losing the argument" over whether or not boys swam nude in school decades ago. Now, of course, I have "a personal agenda against one person". I don't know if agendas themselves are ever "against" anyone or anything, per se, although all agendas are personal, particularly when attributed to an individual. Perhaps you mean, "a vendetta". Or perhaps you are the one with the agenda, Z-man. Why, indeed, would any man , having been roundly discredited on this forum, feel the urgency and need to create another name to facilitate a continuation of his very personal, mean-spirited, angry attacks on another participant?

[coyote]

"obligated to demonstrate w....." now why would you expect others to do something you are unable to do yourself ? Take the count, get some rest !!

[MaltaMon]

Now, FortySomething/Zuiko, don't let us waste time on discussing whether or not you are one, the other, or both. The answer is obvious from Zuiko's first entry, and is manifested unequivocally by your subsequent postings. Whichever you use, we all know that it's just you. At least have the courage to acknowledge that much if nothing else. Ciao.

[MaltaMon rt]

coyote wrote:

"obligated to demonstrate w....." now why would you expect others to do something you are unable to do yourself ? Take the count, get some rest !!

Why don't you ever say anything that isn't RE-active? All you do is react. You never contribute anything that speings from your own thoughts or experience, or that is otherwise original. And here again, you rush to the protruding loins of one whom you sense may be under attack.

[MaltaMon rt]

Coyote, Peel me a grape.

[MaltaMon rt]

Zuiko wrote:

<quoted text>
You have lost the argument because you have proved nothing of all you said, with your constant name calling and personal attacks, backed up by your valet from the UK.
This is clearly a thread, filled by your posts, with a personal agenda against one person. There is no other subject in it, except as an excuse for the main agenda. If you want to discuss the subject of pedophilia concerning forced nude swimming in schools you should take this on a broader issue. But then I don't think that you believe that this ever happened.
So grow up and post something intelligent. Only young schoolboys play these games of name calling.

It is, after all, a thread that I originated. If you don't like it, you don't have to contribute under any name. If you don't liKe me, you can, as have said before you would, always ignire me. Nobody, least of all I, has a gun to your head.

[MaltaMon rt]

Just one thing, Zuiko/FortySomething, why are you here on this thread? You debuted your new identity with a personal attack on me--yes, on Zuiko's inaugural post(!) So what IS your agenda, my friend?