MaltaMon

Easton, PA

#956 Jan 18, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Bob, you obviously lost.
PedoPedo Bob always loses. He lives on lies and the sordid manipulation of children. Not really a formula for success, is it?
MaltaMon

Reading, PA

#957 Jan 18, 2013
coyote wrote:
"good be "
What did I tell you? Just look at his comment. This is Pedo Bob's valet and water boy.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#958 Jan 18, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Still he avoids any challenge on the substance of your message, Large. He's still fixated on a typographical error. Isn't that manly of him? Anybody who has matured beyond the age at which his mental and emotional development was arrested--in other words, the age of those to whom he relates best, the age of his pubescent victims--poses an insurmountable challenge for him. So he just picks on the sort of inadvertent mechanical error that all of us commit from time to time, and that supposedly renders him intellectually and morally superior. It's transparent as hell. And, by definition considering the source, childish
I have issued many challenges to you to prove yourself, and everytime you weasel out of it with some pathetic excuse, such as "having to protect an ongoing police investigation", etc.
You claim to have been in Montreal, but never issued an offer to meet me from Montreal, which would have proved your presence.
If you know who I am, post my name, my phone number, something to indicate that you are "on to me". But I know you won't, because you can't. All of your puffed up threats and posturing are as ephemeral and vapid as the tinsel on Hollywood.
If I raped your son, file the complaint, and let the police act. But you've been rattling your sabre and making empty threats for a year now, and here I am, still waiting for the (hahaha!) "local and federal" to show up. You said I would be arrested "soon", and "any day now", but looks like you use a different definition of these words. In your little fantasy world,'soon' and 'any day now' mean 'never' and 'possibly sometime if at all'.
Hahahahaha!
Moron.
MaltaMon

Reading, PA

#959 Jan 18, 2013
Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
I have issued many challenges to you to prove yourself, and everytime you weasel out of it with some pathetic excuse, such as "having to protect an ongoing police investigation", etc.
You claim to have been in Montreal, but never issued an offer to meet me from Montreal, which would have proved your presence.
If you know who I am, post my name, my phone number, something to indicate that you are "on to me". But I know you won't, because you can't. All of your puffed up threats and posturing are as ephemeral and vapid as the tinsel on Hollywood.
If I raped your son, file the complaint, and let the police act. But you've been rattling your sabre and making empty threats for a year now, and here I am, still waiting for the (hahaha!) "local and federal" to show up. You said I would be arrested "soon", and "any day now", but looks like you use a different definition of these words. In your little fantasy world,'soon' and 'any day now' mean 'never' and 'possibly sometime if at all'.
Hahahahaha!
Moron.
Pedo Bob, you know that I offered twice last August to meet you at any bar or cafe on St Denis, but you flatly turned me down both times, claiming that I would follow you home after any such meeting in Montreal. You know that that is exactly what happened--where, indeed, would you otherwise have got the idea of meeting face to face in Montreal--but you cannot help lying about it. You are, indeed, a pathological prevaricator. You just wing it, hoping that nobody will remember, counting on them not to check. As I said, your life is based on--driven by--lies. There's no point in arguing with someone who denies the exchange we had just five months ago, and wgich remains on record. Nothing that a committed pathological liar says is worthy of serious consideration.
MaltaMon

Conshohocken, PA

#960 Jan 18, 2013
And just a few days ago you posted another of your pedophile fantasies under my name. That became old back in the days when you were posting your filth under Phil's name. Fundamentally, pathologically, a liar. You simply can't seem to control it. To paraphrase an old schoolyard joke (chosen to facilitate your comprehension): How can you tell when Pedo Bob is lying? He's posting on TOPIX.
MaltaMon

Conshohocken, PA

#961 Jan 18, 2013
Check it out. On Jan 13, Pedo Bob posted a nude-boy fantasy involving child sexual abuse under my name, but originating from, "Montreal, Canada"
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#962 Jan 18, 2013
you must be joking- right !!! MM you have slacked off on this forum as only 40% of the posts are from MaltaMon-- that is still a fair no. and u xpect someone to notice 1 of those 100's is from PQ ? jan13=??
MaltaMon

Bethlehem, PA

#963 Jan 18, 2013
coyote wrote:
you must be joking- right !!! MM you have slacked off on this forum as only 40% of the posts are from MaltaMon-- that is still a fair no. and u xpect someone to notice 1 of those 100's is from PQ ? jan13=??
FORTY per cent, eh? Didn't know you were keeping score. What is your percentage? Neanmoins, mon vieux, I give the date of Pedo Bob's post under our name. It figures that one who can count up all of the nearly 900 messages on this thread and determine that forty per cent of them are mine would have difficulty locating one message originating from "Montreal, Canada" as "MaltaMon" on January 13. Why the games, bro?
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#964 Jan 18, 2013
40% is a guess but for you I would be only too happy s'il vous plait ! However; we only have lights in this part of the country 15 days/mo.(they say it is similar to n. korea-dunno !) so at your request will do it in Feb.--U are such a nice agreeable chap it "good be" OK !!......
MaltaMon

Bethlehem, PA

#965 Jan 18, 2013
coyote wrote:
40% is a guess but for you I would be only too happy s'il vous plait ! However; we only have lights in this part of the country 15 days/mo.(they say it is similar to n. korea-dunno !) so at your request will do it in Feb.--U are such a nice agreeable chap it "good be" OK !!......
Fifteen days per month? In HALIFAX? C'mon, coyote. Why the lie? In fact, it's so blatantly untrue-so easy to disprove factually--that I wouldn't even call it a lie. It's a game. So why the game, then? What's in it for you? How old are you, anyway? Your posts are childish.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#966 Jan 18, 2013
Okay- tried to make it sound better than it really is--would you accept 11 days ?? I recall my dad told me I was born in 1907 and fact I got my grade school diploma in 1969 led my grandma to state I was childish . What is your reason ??
Largelanguage

Rhyl, UK

#967 Jan 19, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Still he avoids any challenge on the substance of your message, Large. He's still fixated on a typographical error. Isn't that manly of him? Anybody who has matured beyond the age at which his mental and emotional development was arrested--in other words, the age of those to whom he relates best, the age of his pubescent victims--poses an insurmountable challenge for him. So he just picks on the sort of inadvertent mechanical error that all of us commit from time to time, and that supposedly renders him intellectually and morally superior. It's transparent as hell. And, by definition considering the source, childish
Good Thinking! Does the fact that I'm 59 intimidate him? He must be very insecure!
Largelanguage

Rhyl, UK

#968 Jan 19, 2013
coyote wrote:
Okay- tried to make it sound better than it really is--would you accept 11 days ?? I recall my dad told me I was born in 1907 and fact I got my grade school diploma in 1969 led my grandma to state I was childish . What is your reason ??
I'm surprised you had the maturity to attend coyote. Yes, surprised you have the maturity for simple things.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#969 Jan 19, 2013
As I have said before, coyote is Pedo Bob's valet. There isn't an original thought in gis head. But if he's telling the truth about completing high school in 1969, he's about 61-62 years old. And Halifax is without lights for twenty of this month's thirty-one days. Which suggests thrat he will say anything when defending Pedo Bob isn't required. Bit to answervyour questipn, I would have to say yes, a man who is 59 y/o and does not suffer from arrested mental and emotional development probably would intimidate him.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#970 Jan 19, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm surprised you had the maturity to attend coyote. Yes, surprised you have the maturity for simple things.
"good be"- actually I am sure you can accept I did not really attend but forged a diploma for grandma's sake as she was getting on and of her 71 grandkids she always wanted at least one of 'em to get a grade school diploma. Lost track of most but your posting habits make me....well heck- is your last name Crodenizer ?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#971 Jan 20, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Still he avoids any challenge on the substance of your message, Large. He's still fixated on a typographical error. Isn't that manly of him? Anybody who has matured beyond the age at which his mental and emotional development was arrested--in other words, the age of those to whom he relates best, the age of his pubescent victims--poses an insurmountable challenge for him. So he just picks on the sort of inadvertent mechanical error that all of us commit from time to time, and that supposedly renders him intellectually and morally superior. It's transparent as hell. And, by definition considering the source, childish
You are speaking for yourself and projecting yourself.
Isn't it childish of you to start a topic to attack another person, as the title shows?
You have also lost the argument of your intention on the subject. You are obviously backward, not to use the proper insulting word, being the only person not to believe that boys swam nude in American High Schools.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#972 Jan 20, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
You are speaking for yourself and projecting yourself.
Isn't it childish of you to start a topic to attack another person, as the title shows?
You have also lost the argument of your intention on the subject. You are obviously backward, not to use the proper insulting word, being the only person not to believe that boys swam nude in American High Schools.
Projecting myself? How am I doing that? And upon whom? "Obvously backward"? Hmmm. And please, tell me how I have "lost the argument". It would appear that you haven't paid much attention to the discussion as it has evolved. It is far from where it began. And the purpose of this thread at the outset was ro elicit more anger and lying testimony from Pedo Bob. The topic itself was a pretext. I can't expect you to know any of that if you haven't been sitting in the stands while Bob and I have fought this out. But how did you ever miss the fact that the REAL topic is pedophilia? And no, my friend, on that I have not "lost the argument". You should pay attention to a discussion--know what it's about--before weighing in with a personal attack on one of the participants. Don't go about it ass "backward", mate.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#973 Jan 20, 2013
Could Zuiko, with his hidden location and very swift judgement of my reply to him as "nuts", in fact be the same individual who bills himself as FortySomething? My vote is "yes".
MaltaMon

York, PA

#974 Jan 20, 2013
Ah, Zuiko. Your membership dates to only last Sunday, January 13. A week ago. You are only the second member on these nude-boy threads to withhold your location--a cowardly act, indeed, especially inasmuch as we all disguise our identities behind screen names. The only other such coward is SixtySomething, whose commentary is remarkably similar to yours. And your rush to post your judgements of my reply to you as "nuts", "clueless" and the rest gave away your identity, if not your location. This time, wait more than a moment to judge this posting. We all know you you are. And the 'nuts','clueless' and other negative judgements are what we all expect of you. It's utterly predictable and, thus, unremarkable. Cheers, OLD man!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#975 Jan 20, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Projecting myself? How am I doing that? And upon whom? "Obvously backward"? Hmmm. And please, tell me how I have "lost the argument". It would appear that you haven't paid much attention to the discussion as it has evolved. It is far from where it began. And the purpose of this thread at the outset was ro elicit more anger and lying testimony from Pedo Bob. The topic itself was a pretext. I can't expect you to know any of that if you haven't been sitting in the stands while Bob and I have fought this out. But how did you ever miss the fact that the REAL topic is pedophilia? And no, my friend, on that I have not "lost the argument". You should pay attention to a discussion--know what it's about--before weighing in with a personal attack on one of the participants. Don't go about it ass "backward", mate.
You have lost the argument because you have proved nothing of all you said, with your constant name calling and personal attacks, backed up by your valet from the UK.
This is clearly a thread, filled by your posts, with a personal agenda against one person. There is no other subject in it, except as an excuse for the main agenda. If you want to discuss the subject of pedophilia concerning forced nude swimming in schools you should take this on a broader issue. But then I don't think that you believe that this ever happened.
So grow up and post something intelligent. Only young schoolboys play these games of name calling.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Amity High School To Present Play About Survivo... Fri Frank 13
Christmas Re-Branded Fri Phil 19
HIgh School homework woes (Aug '13) Thu Vanesa Strom 247
Avaya certification 3203 exam training materials Wed vcp550dexams 1
Diversity Perversity (Apr '11) Wed Dayton Taxpayer 6
More from around the web