When "Zuiko" was "Sir Arthur", He Ins...
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#126 Jul 19, 2013
Zuiko/DJW: Pollute your own British culture with your self-evident lust for young boys, and let your fellow citizens deal with you. I would hope that they'd seek to protect their kids from your leering gaze and would give you the 21st Century equivalent of the old tar-and-feather treatment. Or worse. You don't deserve to walk the streets of any civilized nation. And we don't want you or your filth here in the US.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#127 Jul 20, 2013
http://www.topix.com/forum/education/T0E4M563...

Zuiko

Since: Jan 13

1,287

Location hidden
Please wait... Reply »
|Report Abuse |Judge it!|#27 Feb 22, 2013
Judged:
1
1
1
People who speak in absolutes is a sign of ignorance. Saying that something NEVER happened without doing any research is ostrich denialism.
There is documented evidence that it was no big deal for boys swimming classes to have female instructors.
Also plenty of evidence that boys, and sometimes even men, regularly swam nude in public places in the presence of clothed or swimsuited women and girls up to the early and mid 20th century.
I will post a link to such a documented site in my next post.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#128 Jul 20, 2013
This is Zuiko's original post containing the link to the "google-endorsed" (chuckle) child
"non-child-pornography " site. The link works. Check out the phony "google"disclaimer and the "stories". The photos are of completely nude young underaged schoolboys--the perfect age and type for Zuiko's sexual tastes.

Zuiko

Since: Jan 13

1,287

Location hidden
Please wait... Reply »
|Report Abuse |Judge it!|#31 Feb 22, 2013
Judged:
1
1
1
Here is the documented historical evidence. Other pages on the same site show actual original photos from magazines and reputable photographers of that era showing boys swimming nude in public places like parks and beaches.

https://sites.google.com/site/historicarchive ...
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#129 Jul 20, 2013
(he phony "historical" justification for a site that contains child pornography and the fake--yes, FAKE--disclaimer allegedly from Google on the site to which Zuiko provides a link. Access to the sections of this site, and thus to the material contained therein, is an acknowledgement that it isn't pornography. Lol. Right. As long as you access the site, what you see isn't what you think it is, and you acknowledge by accessing that site that what you you see won't be what you think it is, even though you still may think it is.

DISCLAIMER AND AGREEMENT TO ACCESS THIS SITE

All documents and materials we have within this site are deemed to be authentic. We have authenticated almost all of them by locating their original source on the Internet or established, well known archives. However, there are a few that were not traceable through the Internet and thus cannot be verified. This is probably due to their provider not scanning the documents with Optical Character Recognition (OCR) technology then making them available to search engines, and although millions of documents are available through Internet searches, millions still remain out of reach. Many publications have been scanned but are copyright protected and only retrievable through purchasing access to search a specific publication's archives. Although we did purchase some such services (such as NewspaperArchives.com ), we did not do it in all cases. In those instances where authenticity may be in question, we clearly make the disclaimer, and, we ask for your help in being able to notify us of any knowledge you have of their origins, or alternatively, can provide evidence as to why they are not authentic (please note - we are looking only for factual evidence, not opinions unless you happen to be a professional, credentialed document reviewer). Regardless, we present it all and encourage you to read through the plethora of materials on this site and draw your own conclusion.

To assist you in assisting us in verification of documentation as well as providing new material for us to use, we provide you with our Research Resources page. Should you know of or discover through research any materials or documentation that could augment the pages of this website with added historic insight, we would gratefully appreciate your notifying us of such potential contributions. If you attach them as an email, we would appreciate the link to the site where they were found. We can be emailed here: Historic Archives - Nude Male Swimming

This website is hosted by Google and is compliant to their Terms of Service, including content displayed. Upon accessing any of the sub-pages of this website, your are acknowledging that this site is not a source for the sharing of pornographic or erotic material depicting sexual acts of any kind, and, that any and all pictorial, artistic and video materials that display nudity ("Materials") are presented for historic importance and education and not for the purpose of sexual arousal. We have made an attempt to only present Materials that were provided through documents released to the general public by established publishers or government, and/or are depicting scenes of people in public venues conducting themselves in a legal and socially accepted manner typical of the era and local customs in which they were created. Although famous artwork and historic archival photographs of public nudity may include depictions of minors at play while in the nude, they are presented solely for historical reference and not for any erotic purpose. The creators of this site vehemently condemn use of pictorial documentation of underage children for any erotic purpose, and prohibit this site for being used for any such interests. Further, upon our learning of any use of this site for such a purpose by anyone, the perpetrator will be reported to the proper authorities immediately.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#130 Jul 20, 2013
These people are sick. Let's get rid of them. We don't want child sexual predators like Zuiko/DJW/Sir Arthur on these threads. Brits, please report your fellow countryman here and let him face the consequences of his prurient interest in your children.
MaltaMonI

Merchantville, NJ

#131 Jul 20, 2013
You Simply HAVE to Love The Threat At The End : These Photos Of Completely Naked Underaged Children Are NOT To Be Looked Upon As Eroti Somehoe, Some Way, Someday HowEver,Just Happen to find Out, THOur Photos Are Giving You An Erection, Even Though we're ThE Ones Responsible For Curating The Exhibit Of Nude Young boys And Presenting ThEm Via This Site To Everyone And Anyone Who Wants To See Them, We Will Contact The "Authorities" Oh, Yeah, that's multi-billion-Dollar Google, All Right!
MaltaMonI

Merchantville, NJ

#132 Jul 20, 2013
the voice transcription is screwing up again. I said that you said we have to love the threat at the end of the disclaimer: although we, the site managers, have curated this exhibit of naked children for you, including photos, paintings, Prints, and lurid sexual stories about Naked children, and have made them easily available to anyone of any age, you are not to view them erotically. indeed, if we find out that any of our exhibits, or even a single photograph of a naked boy, has given you an erection, we will report you and your erection to the proper authorities. Oh, Yeah, I'm certain that that is Google speaking. Lol.
MaltaMon

Merchantville, NJ

#133 Jul 20, 2013
That site is illegal. It is for the enjoyment of sick sociopathic pedophiles like Zuiko, who feel that children exist for their sexual satisfaction. Those who created the site clearly understand this. There is no reasonable justification to post photos of naked children for free and unrestricted access by the general public. It should be removed from the internet immediately, and the perpetrators of this crime should be arrested and prosecuted. Anyone who defends this horrific and heartbreaking display of naked children should also be investigated. Childhood is sacred. It must not be the stuff of pornography or the object of sexual interest of sociopaths.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#134 Jul 20, 2013
Looks like MaltaMon is going to re-post every post written by Zuiko.
Why? And how does he find the time?

Someone obviously has WAY too much time on his hands.
MaltaMon

Cherry Hill, NJ

#135 Jul 20, 2013
Nah. It doesn't take long at all, Pedo Baby. I'm going to continue until he's gone. And his little coyote, too.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#136 Jul 20, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Nah. It doesn't take long at all, Pedo Baby. I'm going to continue until he's gone. And his little coyote, too.
When will they be gone, MaltaMon? Soon? Any day now?

When will that time come?

Hahahahahaha!

Moron.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#137 Jul 20, 2013
Bob wrote:
Looks like MaltaMon is going to re-post every post written by Zuiko.
Why? And how does he find the time?
Someone obviously has WAY too much time on his hands.
The poor, obsessed pervert thinks he is impressing anyone with his blabbering posts. I must say I am honored that he spends all his time looking for my posts from years ago, and even confusing me with other posters.
I wish I had the time to repost all the posts in which everyone made a fool of him, including Katie who called him an idiot and a pervert. At least everyone, with few exceptions like Large, seem to agree on this assertion of him as an idiot and a pervert.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#138 Jul 20, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
That site is illegal. It is for the enjoyment of sick sociopathic pedophiles like Zuiko, who feel that children exist for their sexual satisfaction. Those who created the site clearly understand this. There is no reasonable justification to post photos of naked children for free and unrestricted access by the general public. It should be removed from the internet immediately, and the perpetrators of this crime should be arrested and prosecuted. Anyone who defends this horrific and heartbreaking display of naked children should also be investigated. Childhood is sacred. It must not be the stuff of pornography or the object of sexual interest of sociopaths.
Blabbering idiot, you still haven't proved that the site is illegal in any way. But like all the blabbering posts you post you can't expect anyone to take you seriously.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#139 Jul 20, 2013
I suspect that MaltaMon prints out every post, every day, from Topix, and has been doing so for at least four years. This way he has a copy of every post, including those that are deleted.
When he's not down at the pool watching children, or trying on ladies' underwear at WalMart, he sits at home reading and re-reading Topix posts.
What a sad wasted life.
MaltaMon

Oaklyn, NJ

#140 Jul 20, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Blabbering idiot, you still haven't proved that the site is illegal in any way. But like all the blabbering posts you post you can't expect anyone to take you seriously.
That's it, keep on defending your posting if all those totally naked young boys and those perverted "stories". All those nude little boys. And you have the nuts to call ME a pervert! You are a very sick, demented old fa**ggot who's in denial. The proof is in the law. It's illegal in the US. The only ones who don't agree are those who are interested in looking at boys in the nude, as you yourself have admitted you do.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#141 Jul 21, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> That's it, keep on defending your posting if all those totally naked young boys and those perverted "stories". All those nude little boys. And you have the nuts to call ME a pervert! You are a very sick, demented old fa**ggot who's in denial. The proof is in the law. It's illegal in the US. The only ones who don't agree are those who are interested in looking at boys in the nude, as you yourself have admitted you do.
"The proof is in the law. It's illegal in the US."

Then why does google allow it on one of it's sites, idiot? You obviously don't know anything about the law and what is legal or not, retard.

"The only ones who don't agree are those who are interested in looking at boys in the nude, as you yourself have admitted you do."

It was you who said that boys who do not want to be seen naked by other males must have psychological problems, not me, pervert.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#142 Jul 21, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
"The proof is in the law. It's illegal in the US."
Then why does google allow it on one of it's sites, idiot? You obviously don't know anything about the law and what is legal or not, retard.
"The only ones who don't agree are those who are interested in looking at boys in the nude, as you yourself have admitted you do."
It was you who said that boys who do not want to be seen naked by other males must have psychological problems, not me, pervert.
YOU ARE DUMBER THAN YOU LOOK. Lol. Google hasn't approved or sanctioned the site, much less sponsored it. That disclaimer, as I have demonstrated, is fraudulent. Google would never insist that upon entering the site, one agrees by that act of access that the actual photographic and literary content, which isn't known to the individual without his first accessing it, isn't pornographic. Google wouldn't threaten to contact the authorities if one looks at the content and is turned on sexually. Google wouldn't sponsor those phony, sick fictional CFNM fantasies--really, Clothed Female-Naked Male CHILD fantasies--posted under "stories". So cut the nonsense. If yku don't know better, even with your clearly limited intelligence, you surely know that you're posting gratuitous photos of naked children. And those modern photos of naked children, of naked boys, of VERY YOUNG NAKED BOYS, have no "historical" value whatsoever, so if no other sign that the Google-Historical claims are fraudulent manages to resonate with you, the modern photos of naked boys should. And it only takes one photo, my sick, bent friend, to render the site illegal..As for accessing porn via Google without its approval, most porn is accessible via Google, the internet's largest, most universal search engine--ALL of with without Google's sponsorship. You still think you're fooling everybody? Want to post some more photos of naked young boys, Mr. Heterosexual Man?
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#143 Jul 21, 2013
For the edification of those who believe Zuiko and the others that the site he posted is "Historical" in nature and is "Sponsored by Google". What follows is an entry from the site's "Stories"
section. These are but the opening paragraphs of a story that is too sick a fantasy to post here. But you'll get the idea. Nothing is edited from the original or otherwise taken out of order:

Mother Uses Nephew to Educate Her Girls on Boys' Anatomy
Told by Talon (Tim S.) on Visual Sensations 4 Women Forum

I'm from the old school having grown up in the 1940s and 1950s, and probably older than most of you. I couldn't care less whether you believe these stories such as the one Alan told or not, but what is clear to me is that the world we live in today is quite different than when I was growing up in the northwest. The issue about "double-standard" has to be taken in context. I remember talking with my grandmother when she lamented about not being able to vote because she was a woman, even though she was a single parent raising three children. And her drunkard good-for-nothing husband had taken all the money forcing her to have two jobs - doing laundry and cleaning floors for wealthy families. Yet society felt he had the right to vote whereas she did not. But if that fact had not been so documented, many of you would never believe such double standards happened, and, that it cut both ways.

My story growing up was that I had two brothers and a sister. I remember being naked constantly as a child parading about in all my glory, as were my brothers. Those were simpler times. If I wanted to wear clothes, I had to put them on myself, and as I got older I did. The school I went to did not have a swimming pool, and I can't think of any schools in my community that did. But I do remember a situation similar to the article in Dear Abby posted in this forum wherein the mom felt "boys shouldn't keep secrets kept from girls" and that is was "proper" for girls to see what boys looked like naked while concurrently believing it was very "improper" for boys to know what girls looked like nude. In my experience, it was not terribly uncommon for a mother to use the nudity of a boy to allow her girls to get an education on boys' anatomy while at the same time denying the boys the same opportunity they desperately wanted. I know this because I personally experienced it.

My specific experience happened when I went to stay with my cousins for a few days during my summer break from school. My aunt had large place out in the country and four daughters. They ranged in age from about 8 to 14 at the time, and I was around 13 or so, if I remember correctly. For a couple of days all I can remember was how hot and humid it was, and the aunt constantly promising to take us swimming if we behaved and did our chores. Finally, the day came wherein she kept her promise and took the four of us to a lake about 30 minutes away. When we got there I observed a few families with their blankets spread out. We walked past them, and down a dirt trail until we came to a bank on a river that fed into the lake, the thick brush assured us we had some privacy. My aunt spread out the blanket and when the girls took off their shirts and pants I then realized they had all worn their swimsuits on underneath. But the mom never forewarned me about wearing a swimsuit, so all I had on under my shorts was just my briefs.

(continued on next post)
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#144 Jul 21, 2013
(Note: Sick, pervted story from the site that Zuiko posted and which he maintains is of an "historical" nature. You know, for scholars and such. Here are the rest of just the opening paragraphs of just ONE story from this site)
her about it and argued it wasn't fair that I had to be naked when the girls weren't. But she said that girls are different than boys, and she didn't want me to have wet underpants for the drive back as it would ruin the car seats, and she didn't have a bathing suit for me. At that age, you are required to relinquish to older folks and not question their authority or whether they are right, but instead to simply have faith that they are always right and comply with their demands, so this is exactly what I did even though I dreaded doing it. I ended up dutifully obeying her and nervously removing my underwear.
I remember being absolutely humiliated. For a brief moment I stood there completely stark naked while the four girls stopped splashing about and turned looking at me with a wide-eyed look of intense interest and pleasure in seeing me naked, which heightened my embarrassment and prompted me to immediately hide my genitals with my hands. I believe their seeing my embarrassment of my predicament only increased their interest in my awkward exposure. I realize now that they probably had never seen a naked boy, particularly since they had no brothers. Given I was attempting to prevent them from seeing my genitals, it no doubt piqued their curiosity and interest all the more in being able to see what I was hiding underneath my hands. As I looked at my aunt, she was looking at me no doubt recognizing my embarrassment as I stood theRe hiding my privates from her and the girls, yet a slight smile on her face told me she was now content that I had obeyed her instructions to strip completely naked. For me, it was clear she was not only unconcerned about how my predicament had made me feel, but maybe a bit amused by it.
quickly ran in and we splashed about in the water for a while while I kept my bottom half well below water level until it was time to go. When my aunt said it was time to leave, at a moment when I knew the girls weren't looking I raced out of the water covering my genitals and grabbed an available towel to cover myself. I dried off and slipped quickly into my underwear relieve the ordeal was over. The double standard became even more obvious when the aunt wanted the girls to remove their suits, dry off and dress for the trip back home. She had them do this behind some thick bushes while turning to me and telling me to walk a away a bit, and when I did turn briefly to see them obscured by the bushes, the girls complained I was looking wherein my aunt turned around and angrily told me to turn around and not peek or I would get into trouble. This wasn't the only time I had experienced the double standard, as in the following days when I inadvertently walked in on the two younger girls while they were dressing and still in their underwear. My aunt scolded me that I should never walk into the rooms without knocking first. A bit baffled, I asked what the big deal was and she responded that boys should never be in the presence of girls unless they are completely dressed, which again gets back to the issue of it being improper for boys to ever see girls in any other way. To that end, she made sure the modesty of the girls were always protected during my entire stay with my never once seeing even the youngest in any manner than fully clothed.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#145 Jul 21, 2013
(And finally, a few more of the opening paragraphs of this one story from Zuiko's "historical" site all about the forced nudity of young boys. I won't post the photos, of course, and I won't post the rest of this disgusting "historical account", which, of course, is nothing but Clothed-Female/Naked Male Child sexual-abuse fantasy, which Zuiko thinks is "Perfectly Normal" for mature, heterosexual men to post and to discuss)

Although all of this seemed puzzling to me, it did not affect me as intensely as my next experience during my stay. A few days later we again made the trip to the lake. What happened occurred in such a matter-of-fact like situation by the girls' mother that I never realized what may have been going on at the time, and by today's standards, would not be considered a very strange and inappropriate thing. As with the first time, I was again expected to swim in the nude, but this time it was a bit less intimidating having already done so previously. Knowing what to expect, I undressed behind a tree while still trying to avoid their inquisitive eyes by hiding my genitals when on land and kept my waist below the water level. But things were about to change.

At one point, the youngest girl walked a bit up the bank to look at a squirrel climbing around on a tree, which drew our attention. The rest of the girls left the water to see, and too curious to stay in, I followed them up onto the banks standing a few feet behind the girls still covering my privates while thinking they would not pay attention to me standing immediately behind them and now completely out of the water.

I remember distinctly the youngest saying "it's a boy squirrel, you can tell because it has tickles". I had no idea what she meant, but the oldest girl laughed as did the mom, who was sitting about 50 feet away reading a book. The oldest said "you mean testicles!- boys have testicles!" and laughed. The youngest seemed to be puzzled by the terminology she was using, so the oldest turned to me and said "You see Tim is a boy, and he has testicles too!" And they all turned to look at me as I stood there stark naked in their full view from my head to feet but still covering my genitals. All of a sudden my abject shyness turned to panic - they were now not only taking an intense notice of me, but also the subject of their conversation was my genitals as their curiosity resulted in their wanting to sneak a peek at them. I'm sure my face was beet red with embarrassment and I didn't say anything hoping the conversation would change and we'd be right back in the water again. But I then heard the dreaded words from the oldest sister with her smiling widely as she said "go on Tim - show Maggie your testicles."

.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Did You Swim Nude In High School? (Dec '12) 9 min Bob 1,750
PE kit (Feb '13) 1 hr MichaelN 96
Bob: Were Boys Forced to Attend School Swim Les... (Sep '12) 5 hr Bob 2,200
N*ked Swimming At School (Jul '12) 5 hr MichaelN 50
Barefoot PE (Mar '14) 5 hr MichaelN 19
News Teacher Starri Hedges speaks out about sex shop... 5 hr Phil 4
News Home school no longer just for the deeply relig... (Sep '13) Sat Independence Dee Jay 23
More from around the web