When "Zuiko" was "Sir Arthur", He Ins...
MaltaMon

Swedesboro, NJ

#355 Aug 22, 2013
Sir Art wrote:
<quoted text> does seem you have no evidence Sir Art was banned but simply are trying to deflect you were "taken"...... maybe the sky is falling molly !
Nah. Rather, it seems that you like to waste time--mine and yours--with games. You're a dishonest, exceedingly childish old coot. F--- off, will ya?
mulehead

Halifax, Canada

#356 Aug 22, 2013
well molly- let us see the evidence you crow about. not just something Sir Art may have said to Katie- show me some "truth" to your statement Sir Art was banned from Topix...... you have been blatting about it for some time so put up or F---off, will ya ?
MaltaMon

Medford, NJ

#357 Aug 22, 2013
mulehead wrote:
well molly- let us see the evidence you crow about. not just something Sir Art may have said to Katie- show me some "truth" to your statement Sir Art was banned from Topix...... you have been blatting about it for some time so put up or F---off, will ya ?
f*** off coyote . this isn't your fight.
MaltaMon

Medford, NJ

#358 Aug 22, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
(from "Did You Swim Nude in High School?")
Zuiko's confession that he is also "Sir Arthur"
Jan 22, 2013
Judged:
2
2
1
.
Zuiko writes:
Hello Katie, how are you, my sweet. Between us I'm your old Sir Arthur. My previous account was either banned or lost. But good to have a word with you again. Busy these days?
Right, right. "No evidence"
phil

UK

#359 Aug 23, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
NOTE: THIS is what DJW posted on a thread created this week by a high-school student who sought advice with her school's writing requirements. I responded to her after Pedo Bob of Montreal posted a disgusting reply to her laced with pedophilia, and DJW just now posted a response to my reply to the student. Here are the entire texts of my post and DJW's:
Dicks Jocks Willies
Weston-super-mare, UK
Reply ยป
|Report Abuse |Judge it!|#5 33 min ago
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Writing essays is, in fact, a great exercise to prepare you for the college-admissions process. The most significant element of your applications over which you will have any control is the written statement (or statements, depending upon what the school requires). The other elements--transcripts, school reports and teacher recommendations--are, apart from earning the grades themselves, really out of your hands.
Check out the Common Application website
( https://www.commonapp.org/Login ) register for it (it's free), then go to the section on written statements, or writing. You'll find a selection of questions, one of which you will have to answer. Many schools, in addition to the "Common App", require completion and sumbission of their own "supplements", which usually include an additional written statement from the applicant. Writing is also an important element of the SAT and the ACT (most schools require the ACT with writing). Just remember that all this work is to prepare you for admission to colleges. How well a student expresses himself or herself in written form is enormously important to determining his or her suitability for admission. It is perhaps second to the combination of the transcript and test scores. Superb counselor and teacher recommendations will not offset a poorly-executed "essay" on the student's application. It's your final opportunity to present yourself in the best possible manner.(Ignore, please, the nasty, inappropriate commetns of the idiot from Montreal who uses a name similar to mine, as well as my response to him. Ignore as well anything further that he posts. He has proven that he is not one to respond to any request for help from a young person, or otherwise to encourage young people in anything wholesome that matters to them) Get back to me (from the same location) if you have any questions. I insist on the same location because the guy in Montreal and one or two others on here will have no qualms whatsoever about posting something ridiculous under your name. They are amoral, especially when it comes to schoolchildren.
DJW writes:
Elena, Molly has one simple rule all homework must be done in the nude. As soon as the pupil steps through the door the clothes are put in the washing machine.
Followed by a shower in the doorless bathroom.
Sat at the table starkers no supper until Molly is satisfied task is done.
Off to bed in the nude with no bed sheets for modesty.
Back to school with no underwear on.
Failure by teacher leads to 1,000 naked press ups in back yard.
That is the Maltamom man-i-festo Paedophiladelphia style!
DJW it is clear to anybody that anything to do with children, their locker rooms, showers and what they wear or don't wear is a fetish of yours and nobody else.
Dicks Jocks Willies

New Milton, UK

#360 Aug 23, 2013
phil wrote:
<quoted text>
DJW it is clear to anybody that anything to do with children, their locker rooms, showers and what they wear or don't wear is a fetish of yours and nobody else.
Contraceptive Phil it is clear to any mancinian that anything to do with grammar school skinny dipping, bare-chested pe in the gym and no underwear on the rugby pitch is a fetish of the Salford Sadist and nobody else!

Lock up Molly- truth in sentencing- Dont Jail Winkers.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#361 Aug 23, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Right, right. "No evidence"
you call that Evidence???? it may not be my fight but sure seems obvious you have been "taken" !....'pears so....

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#362 Aug 23, 2013
It appears that m blabbery is nothing but confusion, fabricated lies and empty insinuations. He hasn't even answered my last post above which proves him to be a liar and an obsessed gay pedophile in disguise. The perverted idiot thinks that he is fooling anyone.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#363 Aug 23, 2013
MM is so rude to keep saying the esteemed Sir Arthur is/was banned from Topix--- Why oh why does molly spread such nasty things ?...go figure....
MaltaMon

Oxford, PA

#364 Aug 23, 2013
coyote wrote:
<quoted text> you call that Evidence???? it may not be my fight but sure seems obvious you have been "taken" !....'pears so....
Right, right. In other words, "Everything that Zuiko ever said that incriminates him is a "joke". He simply didn't mean any of what he put into all those self-incriminating posts. Just a joke. Every one of them. Of course, in many of the posts he becomes very annoyed with those who challenge the veracity of these put-ons. He gets into name-calling, "you gay child molester", "projections", etc. But that's all a joke, too. It would have to be. No, he didn't mean any of it. So let's not take a word he says seriously. Not ever." That's some defense, coyote. Simply brilliant. And utterly plausible.
phil

Dunfermline, UK

#365 Aug 23, 2013
Dicks Jocks Willies wrote:
<quoted text>
Contraceptive Phil it is clear to any mancinian that anything to do with grammar school skinny dipping, bare-chested pe in the gym and no underwear on the rugby pitch is a fetish of the Salford Sadist and nobody else!
Lock up Molly- truth in sentencing- Dont Jail Winkers.
It isn't me who continuously posts about children and what they wear or in your fantasies, don't wear.
No normal healthy male does such things.
You need professional help and maybe the company of a woman but then again a female above school age would probably scare you and laugh at you.
Bob

Toronto, Canada

#366 Aug 23, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
These are men in late middle age who post under a variety of names and pretend to carry on dialogues among those names. Physical age has got them by the throat (and elsewhere), but maturity, common sense and courage have passed them by.
MaltaMon is a man in late middle age who posts from a variety of locations and pretends to carry on dialogues with the alleged rapist of his non-existent son. Maturity, common sense and courage have passed him by.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#367 Aug 23, 2013
Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
MaltaMon is a man in late middle age who posts from a variety of locations and pretends to carry on dialogues with the alleged rapist of his non-existent son. Maturity, common sense and courage have passed him by.
Cut out the bullshit, Bob. And stop stalking that high-school girl on her own thread and posting to her your disgusting, perverted thoughts and fantasies. This time, we'll get you. You sexually harassed a child online, you sick, amoral, evil bastard. Leave her alone.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#368 Aug 23, 2013
phil wrote:
<quoted text>
It isn't me who continuously posts about children and what they wear or in your fantasies, don't wear.
No normal healthy male does such things.
You need professional help and maybe the company of a woman but then again a female above school age would probably scare you and laugh at you.
Phil, the bastard is sicker than that. He's dangerous. You've read what he posted to the high-school girl on her own thread, but you may have missed what Bob of Dorval/Montreal posted. And he returned to add to it. These are two perverts who are dangerous. Anyone who would post that demented sexual shit to a child, without tge slightest prompting from that child, has no sane regard for children and their safety. Now if only that senile old faggggotcoyote would just stop encouraging them with his blind support of whatever these pedophiles post.
phil

Dunfermline, UK

#369 Aug 23, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Phil, the bastard is sicker than that. He's dangerous. You've read what he posted to the high-school girl on her own thread, but you may have missed what Bob of Dorval/Montreal posted. And he returned to add to it. These are two perverts who are dangerous. Anyone who would post that demented sexual shit to a child, without tge slightest prompting from that child, has no sane regard for children and their safety. Now if only that senile old faggggotcoyote would just stop encouraging them with his blind support of whatever these pedophiles post.
I bet all females of any age think DJW is a creep.
Probably why he has so much time on his hands to indulge in his fetish.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#370 Aug 24, 2013
Their sick sexual comments to the American high school girl place both DJW and Bob of Montreal/Dorval in a category that far exceeds that of "fetishists". They have revealed themselves as sexual predators of children. Sociopaths. I've been saying that all along. Now each has made his greatest mistake, and perhaps his most consequential, by directing his perversion expressly at an innocent minor. I shall never understand any man's sexual preoccupation with, and sexual abuse of, children. They both must now be removed from this site. Everyone who reads what they have posted to her over the past two days must recognize that. Frankly, I see as beside the point what women think of either of these predatory bastards. What matters is that a schoolgirl's innocent request for advice about writing assignments, on her own clearly identified thread, from contributors to an educational forum elicited from each of them a disgusting, amoral display of sexual self-indulgence directed overtly toward a child. Their heinous, repulsive behavior must not be tolerated. They are uncivilized, dangerous, and not morally suited to interact with kids in any format.
MaltaMonI

Marcus Hook, PA

#371 Aug 24, 2013
What, indeed, would attract a man like Bob of Montreal to be the first individual to post on a thread entitled "High School Homework Woes"? Worse, what inspires such a man to post something disgustingly sexual to the young girl who created the thread?
MaltaMon

Marcus Hook, PA

#372 Aug 24, 2013
This middle-aged man, Bob of Montreal (Dorval), Canada responds to a schoolgirl's question about homework with a suggestion that she volunteer to supervise the boys' showers in her school, and adds that if she's "lucky", she'll get to administer "bare-bottomed spankings" to her male classmates. This is what Bob first thinks of when a schoolgirl asks for advice about writing assignments on an online educational forum. This is how this man in his fifties chooses to interact with a girl who can't be more than fifteen or sixteen years old. With Bob, such repulsively inappropriate trash talk is instinct when it comes to addressing the legitimate, wholesome, routine concerns of schoolchildren. He's just doing what comes naturally. And that makes him dangerous to children.
MaltaMon

Marcus Hook, PA

#373 Aug 24, 2013
And Britain's King of Comedy, DJW (posting under the depraved monicker, "Dicks Jocks and Willies"), advised this same schoolgirl to do all of her homework in the nude. Guys, after all your sick pedophile postings, you have finally done something utterly reckless. You've crossed the line and have given yourselves away. Exposed yourselves as criminally-minded predators of innocent children. You're finished.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#374 Aug 24, 2013
oh ,oh---sounds like the end of bob and djw this time-- or might it be another childish statement from Philly's Prince of Pedos !....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Fortinet Network Security Professional NSE4 dumps 3 hr Helen 1
1V0-642 VCA6-Network Virtualization v6.2 Exam q... 3 hr Helen 1
LPIC-2 certification 201-400 exam questions 3 hr Helen 1
Has updated the Fortinet NSE5 exam dumps 4 hr howtopassexams 1
1Z0-898 Test Questions Practice Exam Dumps (Jun '16) 4 hr 1z0-898 braindumps 2
C_AR_P2P_13 dumps, C_AR_P2P_13 Fragen deutsch 7 hr itpruefungende 1
QV_Developer_01 Fragen und antworten, QV_Develo... 8 hr itpruefungende 1
More from around the web