HIgh School homework woes
MaltaMon

Merchantville, NJ

#129 Aug 29, 2013
As for the "joke", you shouldn't be trying to laugh about any of this. There is nothing funny at all in any of this. That you think what you've done is humorous is your great character flaw, Bob. Men don't find humor in the sex talk, the cyber-bullying, the online stalking, the identity theft to talk sex trash when an adult is doing it all to a minor. Adults who have any conscience at all don't treat children as you have treated Elena. And even those without a conscience are aware that treating a child a you have treated Elena, even online, is criminal . That means you're quite alone out there., Bob .
Bob-arian

Rawdon, Canada

#130 Aug 30, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Wrong. It's easier to contact the Canadian authorities directly .They have always taken my calls. They will call local police here to check out the person registering the complaint. You should have shut up long ago. Your postings here on this thread, including those in which you pose as your victim speak for themselves.. As do mine, Phil's, DJW's and "coyote" 's. Let's let the police determine who the obscene, abusive, child-stalking, cyber-bullying trouble-maker is.
Seems like the police have taking a long time to determine who the troublemaker is.
This is just a different version of your tired old refrain of "the local and federal are closing in", "you will be arrested any day now", or "soon", "you can be tracked and you are".
That story ran out of gas over a year ago.
But hey, if you'd rather push a broken down car up a hill just to have it roll back down each night, be my guest.

In fact, bring your old jalopy to Montreal: coyote and I will sit on the terrasse of Le Massilia on Park , and watch with binocs as you try to push your gasless car up to the summit of Mount Royal.
We'll bet shots as to where your car rolls down hill again.

Hahahaha!
Duty Justice Willpower

Southampton, UK

#131 Aug 30, 2013
Music And Movement I remember in junior school we did something called music and movement. We had to do it in our underwear in the main hall. We had to. Mime to different styles of music and stand like statues when the music stopped.
674 Views
Written on March 25th, 2012
morgana76 We did this in just underpants, girls wore vest and pants. I forgot about the statues thing. We all got undressed together and thought nothing about it. i do remember my feet being filthy afterwards and mum always putting me straight into the bath when i got home after PE at school.

Jun 5 1 like Reply
oneofnine I remember Music and Movement too, though I am not sure any of us did it in underwear. I do not even remember PE kit, but we must have had something for gym and games.

DANNYBHOY66 I remember music and movement so well from my middle school days. Would have been about 1974, and I was 8.:-)

pj70 I lasted well because I remember it it 77 when I was 7. It was still done in underpants only as well. How I hated it
DebbieDaydream You're lucky! When I was at Infant School in the 1960's the boys were allowed to keep their shorts or trousers on. All they had to take off was their shirt. All the girls had to do it in their pants and vest so whenever we had this or PE all skirts, dresses and blouses or jumpers had to be removed as well as our petticoats, which most girls wore in those days. if you wore a shortie, you might get away with tucking it in your pants, but ususally the teacher would catch you and make you take it off. I often went home with dusty knickers from the hall floor! Only in Junior school could the girls wear shorts which we could put on under our skirts or dresses to protect our modesty but petticoats still had to be removed.

Apr 9, 2012 1 like Reply
] Octane That was rough for, and doesn't seem fair. It was usually the boys who didn't have their modesty respected in situations when I was at school.

DebbieDaydream In those days, nobody worried too much about the modesty of little girls. Strange how the boys could gawp at your knickers in a PE class, yet could be punished if cught lifting your dress!

Apr 10, 2012 1 like Reply
JennyBee So did the girls wear shorts or just their normal clothes? I seem to remember pants and vest only also.

Apr 11, 2012 1 like Reply
Octane I agree that isn't fair. There were many situations when I was younger where I now feel that my modesty was not protected, but that is how it was then.

Apr 11, 2012 1 like Reply
yfronts36 I remember it too. It came as a BBC Radio programme called "Let's Move!" and we did it in our vests and pants.

Mar 25, 2012 1 like Reply
Perspicares I don't recall any undressing in infant's or junior school (up until 1963 for me), except for football kit for us boys. I've a vague idea we took our shirts off in the infant's school. I do recall the Music & Movement exercises though, although I don't remember the programme's actual title.

There were many school broadcasts then - all been thrown away by the bean-counters and education-theorists I suppose.

Maltamon and Phil are Guilty!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#132 Aug 30, 2013
phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how a grown man is always drawn like flies on shit to any mention of child abuse, school locker rooms and children showering.
Then you must be the biggest shit fly of them all, since the School Showers topic is full of your posts. And you are always reading and commenting on DJW's posts about child abuse.
Funny how you have become an even bigger projectionist than MM, which shows in all your posts, no wonder you have become his biggest supporter.
Bob

Canada

#133 Aug 30, 2013
Speaking of shit, Phil is phull of it.
Enema

Canada

#134 Aug 30, 2013
Damn! Am I the only one who hates long ass-ignments where I have that tube and nozzle shoved up my bum-bum, etc.? Wonder what sense does it make to do all that. Please suggest a way out.
MaltoMon

Dorval, Canada

#135 Aug 31, 2013
Having enemas can be fun. My son loves having enemas. I have been giving him weekly enemas since 2004.
After I force him to swim nude in our back yard pool in Pittsburgh, I then make him shower while I watch.
If he doesn't let me give him an enema, I give him a bare bottom spanking.
The little rascal often "pretends" not to want an enema, just so he gets the spanking.
We have a large picture window in the living room, which faces the road. I have taken to giving my son bare bottom spankings in the living room with the drapes open, so passersby can see, and participate in the erotic humiliation.
What is very cool, is to give the spankings at night, with the drapes open, and the lights on. This way, my son can't see the street and who may be watching. This adds to the mystery and excitement. I suspect that on these evenings his bottom tingles just a little bit more after the spanking.
I know mine does.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#136 Sep 1, 2013
Bob wrote:
Speaking of shit, Phil is phull of it.
Once again Phil fails to answer when faced with the facts about himself and his perversions. See my post above. Does this remind you of someone who is now Phil's biggest friend? No wonder they are now banding together to save face.
Phil

Manchester, UK

#137 Sep 1, 2013
Zuiko.
Do the world a favour.
Go find a vet and have yourself put down.
You are so dull and tedious, endlessly repeating the same drivel.
Go and buy yourself some wit, intelligence and imagination.
And maturity.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#138 Sep 1, 2013
Phil wrote:
Zuiko.
Do the world a favour.
Go find a vet and have yourself put down.
You are so dull and tedious, endlessly repeating the same drivel.
Go and buy yourself some wit, intelligence and imagination.
And maturity.
A typical puerile answer from dull, desperate Phil.
Bob

Canada

#140 Sep 1, 2013
And once again, Philthy Phil, who describes Topix forums as nothing but garbage, and not worth reading or responded to, visits Topix to read and reply to posts.

Go back and look at how many forums he has responded to, and how many posts on each, in the last 48 hours. In many cases, he actually posts more than those he is responding to.

Yet when you point this out to him, he visits even more often, and posts even more replies.
And none of his replies are funny, witty, interesting, or controversial: they're all just dull and boring.
Phil

Manchester, UK

#141 Sep 1, 2013
Bob wrote:
And once again, Philthy Phil, who describes Topix forums as nothing but garbage, and not worth reading or responded to, visits Topix to read and reply to posts.
Go back and look at how many forums he has responded to, and how many posts on each, in the last 48 hours. In many cases, he actually posts more than those he is responding to.
Yet when you point this out to him, he visits even more often, and posts even more replies.
And none of his replies are funny, witty, interesting, or controversial: they're all just dull and boring.
"And none of his replies are funny, witty, interesting..."

Bob's regular posts about spanking nude boys are all of the above, but only to him and his fellow pedo's on here, like Zuiko, Coyote and DJW.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#142 Sep 1, 2013
On the When "Zuiko Was Sir Arthur" thread, I've posted more of what Zuiko would regard as "proof" that it isn't the nudity of naked boys that interests him about the naked boys who interest him. Ahem.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#143 Sep 1, 2013
I feel it is absolute projection to state Zuiko was Sir Arthur and although you may refer to a post Zuik says he was Sir Art I can easily accept that as a foil. Therefore; I fail to understand why you keep going way back to a time ,when Sir Art and Katie were the interesting posters (due to their humour), and rehashing those posts---they are meaningless to any pertinent info. You have not made any attempt to prove Sir Art was banned from topix other than quote something Zuiko, likely in jest ,posted to Katie. Just wondering WHY !!
phil

Manchester, UK

#144 Sep 1, 2013
coyote wrote:
I feel it is absolute projection to state Zuiko was Sir Arthur and although you may refer to a post Zuik says he was Sir Art I can easily accept that as a foil. Therefore; I fail to understand why you keep going way back to a time ,when Sir Art and Katie were the interesting posters (due to their humour), and rehashing those posts---they are meaningless to any pertinent info. You have not made any attempt to prove Sir Art was banned from topix other than quote something Zuiko, likely in jest ,posted to Katie. Just wondering WHY !!
Twice you claimed I was a supporter of Linedazzle and have yet to provide any evidence.
WHY?
Is it because (a) you are a liar or (b) because you are stupid?
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#145 Sep 1, 2013
Rag on nerd- rag on ! "Stupid"- u r likely correct; "liar"- well, sometimes bend the truth as do most normal folks. You know, to call a person a liar over the internet is definitely cowardly and I am certain you would regret or avoid saying that in my company. To me you have exposed your poor character ...
MaltaMon

Schnecksville, PA

#146 Sep 1, 2013
Zuiko has defended his posts as Sir Arthur recently. Please, coyote, cut the nonsense. This is more along the lines of that BH bullshit. Zuiko never disputed that claim. And if he ever does, he knows I'll unearth the evidence from this summer. You know it; I know it; everybody knows it. Cut the nonsense. I won't respond to any more of it on this topic. It's a waste of time. I'd say that you're lying, but it seems that this and the BH bullshit is some sort of joke for you. You're the only one laughing, I presume, even though nobody is falling for it. Take care.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#147 Sep 1, 2013
really malta ! a couple of comments : my point was I have not seen YOUR "evidence" of Zuiko being Sir Art or Sir Art banned from Topix other than the comments made to KM. If that is your undisputed evidence- fine I guess (lol), The BH nonsense- well- at least there is some factual stuff in the stories vs the incessant ramblings you have concocted re a crime you have not substantiated and the filthy accusations you direct at anyone who just does not buy your tale. I am not laughing but do smile at your insecurity in having to post such nonsense as the one preceeding this. Don't forget tho-- z-man is real !!!!
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#148 Sep 1, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
"And none of his replies are funny, witty, interesting..."
Bob's regular posts about spanking nude boys are all of the above, but only to him and his fellow pedo's on here, like Zuiko, Coyote and DJW.
And once again, Philthy Phil reads and responds to a thread and a poster he deems not worthy of responding to.
Proves what a hypocritical pathetic little turd he is.
And he'll respond quickly to this post just to prove me right.
phil

Manchester, UK

#149 Sep 2, 2013
coyote wrote:
Rag on nerd- rag on ! "Stupid"- u r likely correct; "liar"- well, sometimes bend the truth as do most normal folks. You know, to call a person a liar over the internet is definitely cowardly and I am certain you would regret or avoid saying that in my company. To me you have exposed your poor character ...
You again fail to provide evidence to back up your claim and have the nerve to question my character!
And why would I regret calling you the liar that you are?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The "Real Nude Swimming in School People" (Jun '13) 1 hr MichaelN 10
Nigeria Police Acedemy list of successful candi... 2 hr Bobatunde Watusi 3
Did You Swim Nude In High School? (Dec '12) 2 hr Bob 1,875
FUTA 1st batch 2015/16 Admission list is Out ca... 3 hr Mr James 1
UNIPORT Post Utme Result 2015/2016 Out. Call:_0... 3 hr Akindele Emmanuel 1
UDUSOK Post Utme Result 2015/2016 Out. Call:_09... 4 hr Akindele Emmanuel 1
NSUK Post Utme Result 2015/2016 Out. Call:_0903... 4 hr Akindele Emmanuel 1
More from around the web