HIgh School homework woes
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#61 Aug 26, 2013
Meanwhile, Bob can continue to demonstrate that he's a dangerous, delusional psychopath and sociopath by posting his thoughts on my typographical errors when the issues are his own cyber-bullying, stalking, sexual abuse of an American minor, and posing as that minor in his unceasing effort to bully, stalk and,abuse her.
Bob at Tim Hortons

Rawdon, Canada

#62 Aug 27, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
And, frankly, as,an American, I'm relieved that none of these pedophile cyber-bullying stalkers is from my country. Young Elena should be, too. But if that makes it more difficult to seek justice for her, it means I'll have to be more determined and more,resourceful in my effort to help her and stop them. But inasmuch as one of the cyber-stalking sexually abusive bullies is British, you, Phil, can help immeasurably in that effort. Send this thread to the police in DJW's community or to Scotland Yard. My wife is Canadian. She'll work the Bob and coyote end of this.
So now MaltaMon has a wife? First a non-existent son, and now a non-existent wife!

If you had a wife, moron, she wouldn't be working the Bob and coyote end of this, she'd be working the south side of town!
Hahahahaha!
phil

UK

#63 Aug 27, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Coyote, a direct question.
Was what Bob and DJW posted on Elena's thread acceptable?
A simple yes or no will suffice.
Was the question too difficult for you?
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#64 Aug 27, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Coyote, a direct question.
Was what Bob and DJW posted on Elena's thread acceptable?
A simple yes or no will suffice.
only nerds reply "yes" "no"- good try phil. I do not feel Bob was using great judgement in even responding to the lady BUT he did not use filthy language such as your MM in the "many" posts included--MM loves it boy. For goodness sakes read over the topix- Quite frankly if you overheard a (?)man talking to your son or daughter in the sick manner MM has responded to this lady would you not alter his jaw line. It is obviously his(MM's) delight is sweet talking this lady into his trust and care---woweee- I expect her pa would be more inclined to report MM to Utah authorities. He is so obviously a child predator it is self evident. Re- read the topix (I have not read it entirely as molly's filthy insinuations just do not cut it) I agree we should not even be responding to the original post but others felt different (none of my business)- it is obvious which poster is the pervert---your wannabe molly. there- a response and I simply do not care how you feel about it as your thought process is fixated on pleasing the pedo of philly....
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#65 Aug 27, 2013
coyote wrote:
<quoted text> only nerds reply "yes" "no"- good try phil. I do not feel Bob was using great judgement in even responding to the lady BUT he did not use filthy language such as your MM in the "many" posts included--MM loves it boy. For goodness sakes read over the topix- Quite frankly if you overheard a (?)man talking to your son or daughter in the sick manner MM has responded to this lady would you not alter his jaw line. It is obviously his(MM's) delight is sweet talking this lady into his trust and care---woweee- I expect her pa would be more inclined to report MM to Utah authorities. He is so obviously a child predator it is self evident. Re- read the topix (I have not read it entirely as molly's filthy insinuations just do not cut it) I agree we should not even be responding to the original post but others felt different (none of my business)- it is obvious which poster is the pervert---your wannabe molly. there- a response and I simply do not care how you feel about it as your thought process is fixated on pleasing the pedo of philly....
In other words, "I refuse to answer on the grounds that , depending on which way I would respond, either Bob and DJW (whom he does not even mention) will be upset with me or I will incriminate myself." "Only nerds"? Is that a serious justification for his refusal to answer a simple question? And to change the subject? And to lie? Very sad spectacle, this: an insecure, lonely, frightened old queen up there in Halifax who will not condemn the brutal, concerted online abuse of a child, but who eagerly, dishonestly, and without a shred of evidence to support it attributes to my efforts to defend the child the same sexual perversion of which he approves coming from Bob and DJW, and which they very blatantly, directly, have perpetrated upon this child . This is the most cowardly and most evil statement that "coyote" has ever posted.
phil

UK

#66 Aug 27, 2013
coyote wrote:
<quoted text> only nerds reply "yes" "no"- good try phil. I do not feel Bob was using great judgement in even responding to the lady BUT he did not use filthy language such as your MM in the "many" posts included--MM loves it boy. For goodness sakes read over the topix- Quite frankly if you overheard a (?)man talking to your son or daughter in the sick manner MM has responded to this lady would you not alter his jaw line. It is obviously his(MM's) delight is sweet talking this lady into his trust and care---woweee- I expect her pa would be more inclined to report MM to Utah authorities. He is so obviously a child predator it is self evident. Re- read the topix (I have not read it entirely as molly's filthy insinuations just do not cut it) I agree we should not even be responding to the original post but others felt different (none of my business)- it is obvious which poster is the pervert---your wannabe molly. there- a response and I simply do not care how you feel about it as your thought process is fixated on pleasing the pedo of philly....
No, only grown men with morals and a backbone would answer yes.
As long as we are clear.
The fact Bob and DJW didn't use bad language it is ok in your eyes to post such things in response to a young girl.
At least we know where you stand, or rather what fence you sit on.
You are a weak man.
phil

UK

#67 Aug 27, 2013
phil wrote:
<quoted text>
No, only grown men with morals and a backbone would answer yes.
As long as we are clear.
The fact Bob and DJW didn't use bad language it is ok in your eyes to post such things in response to a young girl.
At least we know where you stand, or rather what fence you sit on.
You are a weak man.
Or rather would answer 'no'.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#68 Aug 27, 2013
grow up phil--- molly is converting you to becoming a child predator. You are a weak man.
phil

UK

#69 Aug 27, 2013
coyote wrote:
grow up phil--- molly is converting you to becoming a child predator. You are a weak man.
I am confused.
You are comfortable with grown men making suggestive comments to a young girl and I am the child predator?
Amazing.
Like your morals and your spine your logic is missing.
phil

UK

#70 Aug 27, 2013
coyote wrote:
grow up phil--- molly is converting you to becoming a child predator. You are a weak man.
When are you going to grow a pair and tell Bob and DJW to grow up.
As I said, you are weak.
Bob

Canada

#71 Aug 27, 2013
Hey Molly, where's your old lap dog these days? Now that Phil is your new sex puppy, what did you do with LineDazzle, take him out behind the barn and shoot him?
Bob

Canada

#72 Aug 27, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> "Delusional"? I am afraid, coyote, that you are the very delusional man here. First, you endorse the disgustingly sexual things which those pervert said to Elena--sent directly to her in response to her request for advice about homework-- and then you joked about it. Meanwhile, this has absolutely nothing to do with "junior" as you call him. This is about cyber-bullying,,which is a felony, and the sexual abuse and stalking of a minor online--also felonies-- entirely circumscribed by the parameters of this single thread, which the child initiated for a clearly advertised wholesome and innocent purpose. You are out of line by suggesting that it is anything else or by implicating, through lies, distortions, and fantasy, anyone else. What I say to her on this thread is very clear. As is what you say here. Now shut up. Have you no sense of decency, at long last? Your conduct here is reprehensible. And it may very well be criminal. What Bob and DJW have written is certainly criminal. Cyber bullying. Online stalking of a minor. Sexual abuse. And I hadn't posted a word on here until Bob engaged in all of that. Are you so obsessed with me that your obsession justifies crossing the line with this innocent young girl? Are you that reckless?
Are you that consumed with hatred for me that you don't care about this little girl and her right to be protected from stocking, sexual abuse, and cyberbullying online? She is now your victim. Just as she is Bob's and DJW's. Why would an elderly "gent" like you want to weigh in here? Why would one who claims to be a father of adult sons have anything other than condemnation for what Bob and DJW have done to her, unprompted, on her own thread? What is your motivation? Take your disgusting, infantile, sexually perverted trash talk onto the Bob threads. I'm going to assist the police in this effort. And I wouldn't mind at all if they notify their counterparts in Nova Scotia.
"I'm going to assist the police in this effort."

But I thought you already WERE assisting the police, moron, or did you forget?

Is that a "typo", or just another lie from PinoccioMon?

I'll go with you being a liar, that's ironically more believable.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#73 Aug 27, 2013
phil wrote:
<quoted text>
When are you going to grow a pair and tell Bob and DJW to grow up.
As I said, you are weak.
really ! is it like you are the general and coyote is your sub ? should I ask them politely, tell them it is nerd's command or outright "order" them to grow up ? Please , oh please, general nerd- do not insist I employ the MM child predator lines which you seem to favor ! Gosh, I do not think they would listen to me anyway if they knew the instructions came from fetish fil........jest sayin'...... lol
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#74 Aug 27, 2013
coyote wrote:
<quoted text> only nerds reply "yes" "no"- good try phil. I do not feel Bob was using great judgement in even responding to the lady BUT he did not use filthy language such as your MM in the "many" posts included--MM loves it boy. For goodness sakes read over the topix- Quite frankly if you overheard a (?)man talking to your son or daughter in the sick manner MM has responded to this lady would you not alter his jaw line. It is obviously his(MM's) delight is sweet talking this lady into his trust and care---woweee- I expect her pa would be more inclined to report MM to Utah authorities. He is so obviously a child predator it is self evident. Re- read the topix (I have not read it entirely as molly's filthy insinuations just do not cut it) I agree we should not even be responding to the original post but others felt different (none of my business)- it is obvious which poster is the pervert---your wannabe molly. there- a response and I simply do not care how you feel about it as your thought process is fixated on pleasing the pedo of philly....
Amazing. You have no morals, no scruples. You will say absolutely anything, even lie like this, to change the subject and dodge the question. Where is all of this "filthy language" you accuse me of using on this thread to Elena or anyone else? Just hit "reply" on my posts above that contain the "filthy language" to which you refer so we can see it as I allegedly posted it.. Of course, this will never happen, coyote. You can't prove the veracity of a lie. And I repeat: this post, in which you, "coyote", confirm your support for Bob and DJW and their perverted posts to a child on this child's thread and attempt to anoint as the real abuser of this child the guy who actually answered her question with real advice and concern, and then encouraged her to report Bob and DJW (and, after you had decided to join them, you) to her parents and to the police, is the most cowardly and most evil statement that you have ever posted. I can't understand how, or why, in this situation any adult who does not hate children or otherwise wish them ill would have had anything to post here other than to condemn Bob and,DJW for their online abuse of this innocent young girl.
phil

Manchester, UK

#75 Aug 27, 2013
coyote wrote:
<quoted text> really ! is it like you are the general and coyote is your sub ? should I ask them politely, tell them it is nerd's command or outright "order" them to grow up ? Please , oh please, general nerd- do not insist I employ the MM child predator lines which you seem to favor ! Gosh, I do not think they would listen to me anyway if they knew the instructions came from fetish fil........jest sayin'...... lol
Weak and gutless.
At least we are absolutely clear and there is no room for doubt.
Coyote is comfortable with, finds amusing and by default supports, condones, whatever word you want to use, the online bullying, harrassment and abuse of a young girl.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#78 Aug 27, 2013
Go to "learn to read" kipper !!!! Then "earn to understand" !!! I know kippers are dumb but you are an absolute extreme !!
Dougs jugs women

Bradford-on-avon, UK

#79 Aug 27, 2013
AMBRIDGE, Penisylvania -- A boys high school basketball coach is facing charges for allegedly bringing his team into a locker room while the girls from another school were taking their showers and otherwise walking around totally in the nude.
Here's the story link from The PittsburghChannel.com .
The coach is in question is Doug Biega. I did a search for his name on the net to see if I could find some more news article. Does anyone know if this is the same Doug Biega who is now the editor of Stripzine magazine? If so, maybe he was just scouting for some fresh, young talent.
Also, please read about another true story on how a California school official lifted up dozens of high school girls skirts, pulled down their tops, exposing them as boys, other males gawked in amazement.
"They just lifted the skirt over my head," said a totally humiliated Stephanie Olson, an 11th grader at Rancho Bernardo High School.
"Everyone saw everything," said Kim Teal. "It was a big peep show."
Stephanie Stewart was wearing a thong and was sent home, but not before male students and others saw exactly what was under her skirt.
"We were in front of the entire class, school officials were around, and even two on-campus cops," the blushing, embarrassed girl told ABC News' Good Morning America.
Poor girls!
Read about their whole humiliating story!
Philly
phil

Manchester, UK

#80 Aug 27, 2013
coyote wrote:
Go to "learn to read" kipper !!!! Then "earn to understand" !!! I know kippers are dumb but you are an absolute extreme !!
More hot air and bullshit in a failed attempt to cover up the blatantly obvious fact you are a sad excuse for a man.
When you become a grown up you have to make choices and stand up for what is right.
The weak sit on the fence.
You must have splinters in you ass.
You are a joke.
phil

Manchester, UK

#81 Aug 27, 2013
Dougs jugs women wrote:
AMBRIDGE, Penisylvania -- A boys high school basketball coach is facing charges for allegedly bringing his team into a locker room while the girls from another school were taking their showers and otherwise walking around totally in the nude.
Here's the story link from The PittsburghChannel.com .
The coach is in question is Doug Biega. I did a search for his name on the net to see if I could find some more news article. Does anyone know if this is the same Doug Biega who is now the editor of Stripzine magazine? If so, maybe he was just scouting for some fresh, young talent.
Also, please read about another true story on how a California school official lifted up dozens of high school girls skirts, pulled down their tops, exposing them as boys, other males gawked in amazement.
"They just lifted the skirt over my head," said a totally humiliated Stephanie Olson, an 11th grader at Rancho Bernardo High School.
"Everyone saw everything," said Kim Teal. "It was a big peep show."
Stephanie Stewart was wearing a thong and was sent home, but not before male students and others saw exactly what was under her skirt.
"We were in front of the entire class, school officials were around, and even two on-campus cops," the blushing, embarrassed girl told ABC News' Good Morning America.
Poor girls!
Read about their whole humiliating story!
Philly
Hope you cleaned yourself up with tissues after reading that, DJW.
You are big enough to do that now.
Don't leave it for your mummy to do.
MaltaMon

Mount Wolf, PA

#82 Aug 27, 2013
coyote wrote:
Go to "learn to read" kipper !!!! Then "earn to understand" !!! I know kippers are dumb but you are an absolute extreme !!
No shame. Absolutely none. This elderly "father of two grown sons" (chuckle) offers no apologies for his open endorsement of the perverted sexual filth which Bob and DJW directed toward this innocent fifteen year-old on her own thread. He prefers to attack Phil, prefers to attack me, seeks to recast us and others as the true sexual criminals when all he's done here is abuse this young girl further by stating, in his own infantile manner, that there is nothing at all wrong with the sexually abusive replies which Bob and DJW offered up to Elena to her request for advice--to their continued cyber-bullying and stalking, to Bob's posing as her to contribute a filthy, sexually-charged comment as if Elena herself had posted it...which is the most criminal of the activities here, the most egregeous evidence of stalking, sexual abuse and cyber-bullying, an adult male fraudulently posing as the underaged female victim herself and sullying her reputation with demented sexual talk--an act which alone would have had him arrested already had he posted it from any of the fifty US states rather than from the cowardly safety of the other side of an international border) That is what "coyote" of Halifax, Nova Scotia stands for. This is the sort of filth he supports. And then he attributes to my own reply to her homework inquiry, and to my subsequent advice to her to report the comments of these stalking pedophiles to the police and to her parents, the ambiguous "filthy language of MaltaMon". Everyone reading this thread knows now, if they hadn't already, what sort of "man" this "coyote" of Halifax is. "Coward" is only one element of his amoral character. He, himself, is an enthusiastic supporter and practitioner of overt online pedophilia, of cyber-bullying of a child, of sexual harassment, of online stalking of a minor. He's got to be removed from this site. That he sees nothing wrong with continuing to shoot his mouth off here with the most disgraceful, child-hating, child-endangering statements is proof that this his a very sick, disturbed (and disturbing) sociopath's character. As for Bob and DJW, there is no need to elaborate on either of them: their own statements prove beyond the slightest doubt the validity of mine and of Phil's.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barefoot PE (Mar '14) 13 hr Welts Never Chafe 117
News Teacher: What happened when my studentsa behavi... 13 hr Wheely Nice Chubby 6
Ask LineDazzle 20 hr LineDazzle 13
News Teacher arrested for possession of child porn 20 hr Phil 2
Should I Spank my Sons over the pants,over the ... (Apr '14) 20 hr LibeDazzle 41
Spanking new! (Aug '14) 20 hr Bob 27
should spanking be brought back to schools ? (Apr '12) 20 hr Phil Salford 281
More from around the web