Phil

Manchester, UK

#1167 May 11, 2013
d-j-w wrote:
PDF]Shelley Collegehome.shelleycollege.org/force_download... HD1 2NF..... any other supplier will not be allowed in school and will have to be replaced ... No t-shirt or vest can be worn under the polo shirt. No ...
As usual Phil and Maltamom you have no answer to the no underwear rules that apply to the St cyres Penarth school and the Shelley college Huddersfield school. Just your normal homophobic and transphobic diatribe!
The rules prevent any t-shirt or vest being worn under the school polo shirt even if it is plain white or the same colour of the polo shirt ie red in Penarth or blue in Huddersfield.
It claims to be "gender nuetral because the rules apply to boys and girls alike but girls can wear bras so it is not non-sexist.
Boys nipples will be exposed when they change for PE and the school fails to take into account the British Isles are cold.
I wore a vest to school and during PE. Lets end this uniform "Fascism" of bare chests and forced showers!
I have no answer?
What was the question?
I had no idea I had any influence over each school's uniform policy but I do know you need professional help.
d-j-w

Yelverton, UK

#1168 May 11, 2013
No Pill school Governor need professional help their school policies say they dont discriminate on grounds of sex or orientation but their PE policies contradict this.

You have not disproved this fact. ie Reversible shirts, white shorts, boys wear swimming briefs not bermuda shorts, boys wear trunks under shorts, boys more likely to endure change of underwear or showers after games, boys not given the option of wearing jogging bottoms, or compulsory sports trousers for girls but shorts for boys not to mention football boots for boys trainers for girls.

Also rugby, football, cross country & basket ball for boys

Netball, hockey,gymnastics & dance for girls.

If this is not state Mysandry I dont know what is Phil-ia.

But then you've been brainwashed by Manchester Grammar School into accepting nude push ups forced skinny dipping and communal showers not to forget "skins versus shirts outside and bare chests with no underwear inside in your day!
MaltaMon

Cherry Hill, NJ

#1169 May 11, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no answer?
What was the question?
I had no idea I had any influence over each school's uniform policy but I do know you need professional help.
You realize, don't you, that it's Zweako? He keeps forgetting that DJW doesn't use "Molly". That's just a manifestation of the Three Gay Tenors' late-middle aged homosexuality. It's their own mutually satisfying fagtalk. Circumstantial evidence, perhaps, but convincing nonetheless. And of the three, only Zweako is in the UK. Case closed.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1170 May 11, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> You realize, don't you, that it's Zweako? He keeps forgetting that DJW doesn't use "Molly". That's just a manifestation of the Three Gay Tenors' late-middle aged homosexuality. It's their own mutually satisfying fagtalk. Circumstantial evidence, perhaps, but convincing nonetheless. And of the three, only Zweako is in the UK. Case closed.
More gibberish from Mollyfagtalk.
MaltaMon

Cherry Hill, NJ

#1171 May 11, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
More gibberish from Mollyfagtalk.
I accuse him of "fagtalk", and now he uses the expression on me. A dearth of creativity and of genuine self-respect--never mind all the very bitchy, effeminate bluster--among the Three Gay Tenors.
MaltaMon

Cherry Hill, NJ

#1172 May 11, 2013
Lol. I wonder why, after Zweako took us all through his pointless, transparent charade of actually texting himself on several different threads Sunday evening (as Zweako to DJW), he never bothered to reply or even to acknowledge those texts (as DJW back to Zweako). My hunch is thst he's simply careless, as he was by havong DJW refer to me ad "Molly", which is decidedly un-DJW-like. Remember, Zweako, to remain in character when posting as one psychotic whack job or the other. When you allow the character and speech of one to taint the other, you give your little faerie-queen self away.
MaltaMon

Cherry Hill, NJ

#1173 May 11, 2013
* having (Yeah, yeah, Zweaktit, it's all a big bunch of "denialisms" and "blabbery" Lol..
Phil

Manchester, UK

#1174 May 11, 2013
d-j-w wrote:
No Pill school Governor need professional help their school policies say they dont discriminate on grounds of sex or orientation but their PE policies contradict this.
You have not disproved this fact. ie Reversible shirts, white shorts, boys wear swimming briefs not bermuda shorts, boys wear trunks under shorts, boys more likely to endure change of underwear or showers after games, boys not given the option of wearing jogging bottoms, or compulsory sports trousers for girls but shorts for boys not to mention football boots for boys trainers for girls.
Also rugby, football, cross country & basket ball for boys
Netball, hockey,gymnastics & dance for girls.
If this is not state Mysandry I dont know what is Phil-ia.
But then you've been brainwashed by Manchester Grammar School into accepting nude push ups forced skinny dipping and communal showers not to forget "skins versus shirts outside and bare chests with no underwear inside in your day!
I haven't disproved it because I'm not intetested.
This is your fetish, not mine.
Again, I didn't go to MGS but I am pretty sure nude push ups were not part of the syllabus.
In your (wet) dreams, maybe.
Phil

Manchester, UK

#1175 May 11, 2013
Interested
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#1176 May 11, 2013
Note, too, the concurrent absence of Zweako whenever DJW goes on his posting binge.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#1177 May 11, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
The two perverts probably text each other all the time about boys dangly bits.
I suspect they also dangle each other about boys' texty bits...

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1178 May 11, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Lol. I wonder why, after Zweako took us all through his pointless, transparent charade of actually texting himself on several different threads Sunday evening (as Zweako to DJW), he never bothered to reply or even to acknowledge those texts (as DJW back to Zweako). My hunch is thst he's simply careless, as he was by havong DJW refer to me ad "Molly", which is decidedly un-DJW-like. Remember, Zweako, to remain in character when posting as one psychotic whack job or the other. When you allow the character and speech of one to taint the other, you give your little faerie-queen self away.
More blabbery and gibberish from Mollyfag.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#1179 May 11, 2013
"...effeminate... lonely old fa**ot around here... whining queer crusade ... old Canadian queen... lame little-laddy posts...transvestite tart...ex-stripper queen... ya little bottom rimmer..."

And once again the father who allegedly has a gay son that he loves and supports uses crude sexual epithets to insult those who disagree with him on an internet forum.
What a moron.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#1180 May 11, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> I accuse him of "fagtalk", and now he uses the expression on me. A dearth of creativity and of genuine self-respect--never mind all the very bitchy, effeminate bluster--among the Three Gay Tenors.
MaltaMon has admitted that his gay raped son is nothing but "nasty fagtalk", proving once and for all: no son, no rape, no Pedo Bob.
I stand vindicated.

I am still innocent, and MaltaMon is still a moron.
The more things change, the more they remain the same.
Hahahahahaha!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1181 May 11, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Lol. I wonder why, after Zweako took us all through his pointless, transparent charade of actually texting himself on several different threads Sunday evening (as Zweako to DJW), he never bothered to reply or even to acknowledge those texts (as DJW back to Zweako). My hunch is thst he's simply careless, as he was by havong DJW refer to me ad "Molly", which is decidedly un-DJW-like. Remember, Zweako, to remain in character when posting as one psychotic whack job or the other. When you allow the character and speech of one to taint the other, you give your little faerie-queen self away.
Faerie-queen?...poor Molly...I really do enjoy your projectionist posts when you are in fits. Keep on blabbering, faerie-queen Molly. Your obsession with me is really amusing.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#1182 May 11, 2013
"Your lives are lived among anonymous "friends" whom you shall never meet, much less ever know."

How nasty and cynical. But what would you expect from someone who is as nasty and cynical as MaltaMon.

I admit, I don't know Sir Arthur, Katie, coyote, D-J-W, Zuiko, Older Jock, et al.
And due to distance and financial constraints will probably never meet them. But I would gladly sit down in a pub and have a pint with any one of them, because the conversation would be lively, intelligent, and interesting.
Sitting down and having a beer with CaDad, iamwhoiam, tnmtndude, Phil, LargeLanguage, and especially MaltaMon, would be an absolute waste of time, and beer.
"Every man is my superior in that I may learn from him." I always thought this was good advice, but I draw the line at drinking with morons.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1183 May 11, 2013
Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
MaltaMon has admitted that his gay raped son is nothing but "nasty fagtalk", proving once and for all: no son, no rape, no Pedo Bob.
I stand vindicated.
I am still innocent, and MaltaMon is still a moron.
The more things change, the more they remain the same.
Hahahahahaha!
Gay expressions is the only language that gay Mollyfag knows, but it is interesting that someone who claims that he has a gay son would use such language to try to insult others. Which is proof enough that his gay raped son is another of his gay fantasies.
d-j-w

Yelverton, UK

#1184 May 11, 2013
A student at Green Mountain College is suing the school because her dorm had only coed bathrooms — which reminds me of the year I showered with dudes.
According to Scott Jaschik of Inside Higher Ed, freshman Jennifer Weiler's suit says all the buildings in her college should have separate bathrooms for men and women. When she first complained about the coed facilities, Green Mountain designated a women's bathroom in her dorm — but men kept using it. The bathrooms had shower curtains and stall doors, but according to Weiler, men often disregarded these partitions. Says her dad, "The men just disrobe in the middle of the room." Jaschik writes that transgender students have argued in favor of coed bathrooms, but Williams alum Wendy Shalit has complained about the "forced proximity" of male bodies, and even linked coed bathrooms to "the decline of traditional dating." And while I can't say I know much about traditional dating or its decline — I suspect the idea that people always loved,, or hooked up in a certain way is total bs— I do know something about coed bathrooms.
When I was a junior, I lived in a co-op with a giant, communal, coed shower. There was an individual shower stall downstairs, but it was mainly for the purpose of Americans with Disabilities Act compliance, and I didn't know anyone who used it. Instead, everybody observed a certain basic etiquette — you were supposed to knock on the shower door, and the occupant had the opportunity to ask you not to come in. No one ever did this, and I sort of got the impression that it was bad form. On the other hand, people tended not look each other directly while showering, and there was an unspoken rule that you should face the showerhead at all times. Even so, I saw a lot of dicks in my time at the co-op, and every male resident there at some point saw me naked.
The story of my communal showering year tends to surprise people, especially women, to the point that it may actually be the most shocking thing I did in college. On the one hand, I don't totally understand what the fuss is about, since I got used to it pretty quickly. The general line on the shower, and on the co-op's pro-nudity policy in general, was that being naked didn't have to be sexual — and it's true that while shower sex was, in other dorms, a go-to solution to the roommate problem, I never saw or heard of anyone f-ing in the communal shower. Nobody ever came onto me or made me uncomfortable, and I was generally relatively at peace with the whole thing. In fact, the experience so desexualized the cleansing process for me that I didn't shower with a boyfriend for years after that, mostly because it didn't even occur to me.
On the other hand, I did know several women in the house who were uncomfortable with the arrangement. Unlike Shalit, they weren't bothered by the proximity of dick. Rather, they felt that coed nudity was inherently unequal, that being seen naked would always be different for a woman than for a man. In a way, I agree with this. Women are disproportionately the victims of sexual violence and stalking, and the male gaze is much more frequently threatening to women than the female gaze is to men. Still, I remember the day when I came back from my appendectomy with strict instructions not to face a showerhead directly for three weeks. I prepared myself to explain to everyone why I appeared to be showing them my bloody abdomen in violation of all shower protocol. When the first guy entered the shower with me, I mumbled something like, "Sorry-I'm-not-trying-to- show-you-my-tits-I-just-have-a ll-these-stitches-and-I-can't- get-water-in-them." Rather than razzing me or, probably worse, turning away shamefacedly himself, he smiled and pointed to his own appendectomy scar. The moment was so innocent and relaxed that it made the shower feel like — cheesy but accurate — a safe space.
d-j-w

Yelverton, UK

#1185 May 11, 2013
Dylan Johns wrote:
They have been a staple of many older generations, and have slowly diminished in recent times, but from the next academic year in Wales, many larger schools must return to the school shower as part of the PE curriculum. This should not be a problem as almost all still have the facility to do so even though a lot have not been used. During summer holiday time, many will be simply refurbished up to standard for daily use again.
I don't think anyone should be forced, either by lack of alternate facilities or by social pressure, to use a coed bathroom. And I do think communal showering poses problems, especially if it provides opportunities for harassment. But I will say that I briefly experienced what the hippies hoped for when they built the shower in the first place — a breakdown of the woman-as-sex-object-man-as-pre dator dichotomy, an instant when I was a human being with a (slightly broken) body, and not an image to be evaluated for attractiveness. And I wonder if allowing young men and women to p*s and s*t and shower together (if not, perhaps, as close together as I experienced), might help them view each other as a little more fully human.
A Bathroom Of Her Own [Inside Higher Ed]
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#1186 May 11, 2013
May I have the phone number of this school, please?
I want to pass it on to CaDad, so he can call them.
Thanks.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News A Republican Slap In The Face To Latinos and Hi... Sun Who Guessed it 6
News Robert Smith out as MTA administrator for secon... Sun FursMon 8
News St. Ben's tops Fraser Institute's ranking of lo... Apr 25 another view 1
what education should a teenager get (Nov '06) Apr 25 Phil 13
Did You Swim Nude In High School? (Dec '12) Apr 25 Phil 1,439
News Former educators found guilty in Atlanta school... Apr 25 Phil 13
News Is Homework Helpful or Harmful? (Sep '08) Apr 25 Phil Farringdon 370
More from around the web