Wales Assembly Returns The School Sho...

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1065 May 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
And the "rules" punish pederasts and child pornographers like you, Zuiko/D-J-W. You've posted hundreds and hundreds of naked photos of young boys and hundreds more of prepubescent lads in skimpy underwear, posed erotically to help you to satisfy your sick sexual desire. In this country, EACH INDIVIDUAL PHOTO CONSTITUTES A SEPARATE COUNT OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY. If you were posting your disgusting photos from here, you sick, depraved sexual predator, you would spend the rest of your life behind bars.
More of Mollylies and ridiculous insinuations. You still haven't proved that I ever posted as DJW, so attributing his posts to me is another of your dirty tricks. The best thing for you to do is to shut up or own up to your lies and idiocy.
Phili

UK

#1066 May 1, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Not embarrassed? You should be after all these revelations about you. I have nothing to be embarrassed about.
Your lies, denialism and lame arguments are really pitiful.
As for asking questions, have a look at the first page of this topic and you can see that your very first post was asking in which other places these nude school showers take place. Then you go on page after page showing your perverted interests in the subject, including posting links to sex education films and describing enthusiastically the pornographic films that you saw with adults performing swxual acts in front of children as sex education, when this subject didn't even have anything to do with showers at school. I could go on and on to shame you, which even other posters did by calling you a sexual pervert, including the hypocrite Molly.
Do you see any of my posts on this topic? It is FULL of your posts, and useless to lie that they are not on the subject of nude showers at school, not only are they on this subject but you go even further and mention sex education films and other links "to titillate yourself" according to your friend Molly among others.
As for your laughable accusations, the link to the book I requested was about adult males physical checkups and nothing to do with your obsession of naked boys. Also the only link I posted was about the history of swimming, and this after Molly asked me to post the link to prove something he denied on the subject being discussed. You can go back to that page and see. I am not a liar like you. You at first denied that you posted multiple links about nude boys swimming and showering until I showed them to you.
I could go on and fill whole pages about your perverted obsession and lies.
Some points to prove not only are you thick but you are a liar.
Firstly at no point ever did I ask at which other schools nude showers took place.
If you are going to quote me do it properly.
Secondly, at no time did I talk 'enthusiastically' about or post links to sex education films that contained adults performing sexual acts IN FRONT OF CHILDREN.
Check your facts.
Thirdly, I have never posted 'multiple links' about 'nude boys showering'.
As regards the boys swimming I posted links to reputable sources to prove such activities once took place at a top school in Manchester in response to a poster who claimed such things never happened.
Hardly an obsession.
You couldn't shame me.
Not even close.
However the pattern to your fetish is clear to a blind man.
Why the interest in nude male physical examinations, nude swimming and who was with boys while they showered or were medically examined?
People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, as the saying goes.
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#1067 May 1, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Lying idiot, where have I posted child porn? You should be arrested for suggesting that people should take nude photos of children.
Lol. I never said that, Poor Baby. You are out of control with desperation. Your words and reactions--your entire current disposition--are those of a guilty man, albeit one who, while in advanced middle age, identifies with children, as opposed to his contemporaries, and thud thinks, responds and behaves like a child.
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#1068 May 1, 2013
**Thus
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#1069 May 1, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Lying idiot, where have I posted child porn? You should be arrested for suggesting that people should take nude photos of children.
No question about the content of the above caption !!!!
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#1070 May 1, 2013
coyote wrote:
<quoted text> No question about the content of the above caption !!!!
Does he douche before you bury your face in his behind?
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#1071 May 1, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
It is you who is obsessed with nude boys, not me, pervert idiot. You even started a thread about Boys Swimming Nude At School, which is still running with over a thousand posts, and you are the biggest poster on it.
And to make you an even bigger idiot and lying pervert, after this long speech of the illegality of taking pictures of nude children, may I remind you that you said that it was "preposterous" for the law not to allow parents to take nude photos of children. I will post the link if you deny it.
That's not what you have been saying. You've been posting here that I advocated photographing of nude children. It seems to me that the omission of the news story, about which I said that it was preposterous to accuse these parents of taking pornographic photos of their own daughters, who were fully covered by bath towels and thus not nude. I said it was preposterous to charge the parents and remove the kids from their home for over a year. A far different scenario. But since your modus operandi is to lie, I'm not surprised at all that this gross distortion of what I said is how you choose to present it. Indeed, I would be saddened if you posted an honest statement on any topic. As I have said elsewhere, it would be a shame for you to develop some integrity and good character at this late stage of your life. The stress of so dramatic a reversal could kill you. And yes, post the link to what I said.
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#1072 May 1, 2013
And while you're at it, post that link to the child pornography you have been accusing me of having posted. That one isn't even a distortion: it's a total fabrication. So go ahead and post it. You won't, of course, because you can't fabricate a posting that was never made. Lol. Damn, you're a liar!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1073 May 2, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
And while you're at it, post that link to the child pornography you have been accusing me of having posted. That one isn't even a distortion: it's a total fabrication. So go ahead and post it. You won't, of course, because you can't fabricate a posting that was never made. Lol. Damn, you're a liar!
Isn't inventing a gay son who was raped by someone in Canada child pornography? Just like your pornographic descriptions of homosexual acts? It is obvious, in spite of your double face, that you are a pedo-gay.
Phili

UK

#1074 May 2, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't inventing a gay son who was raped by someone in Canada child pornography? Just like your pornographic descriptions of homosexual acts? It is obvious, in spite of your double face, that you are a pedo-gay.
The fact you pose such a question shows your stupidity.
You are obviously very innocent and very naive.
And it's two-faced, not double face.
MaltaMon

Conshohocken, PA

#1075 May 2, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't inventing a gay son who was raped by someone in Canada child pornography? Just like your pornographic descriptions of homosexual acts? It is obvious, in spite of your double face, that you are a pedo-gay.
First, I didn't invent my son, although his mother and I had a hand in bringing him into our lives. Only a non-heterosexual man would ever make that sort of statement to another man. Incidentally, it always has interested me that you people, The Three Castrati, must insist not merely that Bob didn't rape my son, but that my son doesn't exist at all. The first could be made by anyone who believes that Bob is innocent of that charge. The second could be made only by a childless, lonely, embittered, self-loathing homosexual man who resents all straight men, and in particular those who are fathers. Fathers tend to be inclined to protect their sons from paedophiles ,. It's classic behavior for a "man" such as you..
MaltaMon

Conshohocken, PA

#1076 May 2, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't inventing a gay son who was raped by someone in Canada child pornography? Just like your pornographic descriptions of homosexual acts? It is obvious, in spite of your double face, that you are a pedo-gay.
And I knew you wouldn't post that link. You can't.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1077 May 2, 2013
Phili wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact you pose such a question shows your stupidity.
You are obviously very innocent and very naive.
And it's two-faced, not double face.
Oh, the poodle Phllli immedidaely comes to Molly's rescue. You are such an idiot that you don't even know what we are talking about,or pretend not to. You are trying to play the innocent after continuously challenging Molly to prove that Bob raped his son, if he exists at all, and innocently don't know the many homosexual act dscriptions that Molly posted. Very convenient of course, after all Molly is also now defending you after he called you a sexual pervert. You two are really double-faced clowns, which is the right expression, idiot.
MaltaMon

Conshohocken, PA

#1078 May 2, 2013
Phili wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact you pose such a question shows your stupidity.
You are obviously very innocent and very naive.
And it's two-faced, not double face.
You are much too generous toward Zuiko/DJW. He's not innocent at all. Indeed, he knows that he's been caught red-handed posting child pornography. He has no defense, so he's scrambling. First he denies that the photos on the site he posted constitute child porn, a statement belied by all modern statutes regarding child porn (along with every boy and girl who has been charged with trafficking in child pornography and corrupting the morals of a minor by sexting a photo of himself or herself to a friend). Then he establishes a far more rigorous standard for child porn that encompasses posted statements--one that would easily land him in prison if it were legitimate. The fact is that child pornography is a photographic or video image of a naked or inappropriately or insufficiently clad minor of either sex. He knows that. And that is why he endeavors irrationally to redefine child pornography. Irrational because he pays little or no attention to whether or not he indicts himself with his new definition or, conversely, attempts to portray as "scholarly" what the law regards as child pornography.
Phili

Dunfermline, UK

#1079 May 2, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> You are much too generous toward Zuiko/DJW. He's not innocent at all. Indeed, he knows that he's been caught red-handed posting child pornography. He has no defense, so he's scrambling. First he denies that the photos on the site he posted constitute child porn, a statement belied by all modern statutes regarding child porn (along with every boy and girl who has been charged with trafficking in child pornography and corrupting the morals of a minor by sexting a photo of himself or herself to a friend). Then he establishes a far more rigorous standard for child porn that encompasses posted statements--one that would easily land him in prison if it were legitimate. The fact is that child pornography is a photographic or video image of a naked or inappropriately or insufficiently clad minor of either sex. He knows that. And that is why he endeavors irrationally to redefine child pornography. Irrational because he pays little or no attention to whether or not he indicts himself with his new definition or, conversely, attempts to portray as "scholarly" what the law regards as child pornography.
The word scholarly assumes intelligence.
That's Zuiko stuffed, then.
MaltaMon

Conshohocken, PA

#1080 May 2, 2013
Incidentally, Zuiko/DJW is not naive, either. That is a strategy intended to portray his motive as innocent. If he did not knowingly post child porn, how can he be prosecuted. Well, nothing can change what he has already done. Moreover, all of his many, many posted statements which demonstrate unequivocally his prurient interest in young boys belies that facade of naivete that he has endeavored so incompetently to establish.
MaltaMon

Conshohocken, PA

#1081 May 2, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
The usual Mollylies, and another of his projections. It is obvious that you are talking about yourself and your usual homosexual fantasies. You think you are kidding anyone?
You mean I'm wrong about how your stripping and dancing nude in a gay leather bar, and letting old patrons rim your bum in public for tips, didn't involve children? I wasn't lying, ZuikiBoysBareBums,I just assumed that kids were not present. Obviously, I was wrong, and your depraved sociopathic abuse of children started when you yourself were young.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#1082 May 2, 2013
Chief Zog's comment after glancing at molly's recent posts: " hmmm, filthy tongue, evidence empty drum makes most noise !" Ph.d.-WTF !!
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#1083 May 2, 2013
coyote wrote:
Chief Zog's comment after glancing at molly's recent posts: " hmmm, filthy tongue, evidence empty drum makes most noise !" Ph.d.-WTF !!
Had to stop reading at "Chief Zog". I have no idea who that is, of course, and inasmuch as it's another CoyFag inside joke with himself, I'm not interested in finding out. If you wish to be read and understood, you need to drop the infantile patter.
Phili

Dunfermline, UK

#1084 May 3, 2013
coyote wrote:
Chief Zog's comment after glancing at molly's recent posts: " hmmm, filthy tongue, evidence empty drum makes most noise !" Ph.d.-WTF !!
Coyote's posts.
WTF indeed.
Or WTP (what's the point)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
C2150-606 IBM Security Guardium V10.0 Administr... 7 hr bonnieyaker 1
70-765 Provisioning SQL Databases practice test 7 hr bonnieyaker 1
Did You Swim Nude In High School? (Dec '12) 17 hr Mister Coach 2,717
Latest Microsoft 70-410 Exam Braindumps Fri deenanna 1
Cisco CCIE Wireless 400-351 CCIE Wireless train... Fri Arnulfo 1
E20-624 VMAX Family Specialist Exam for Platfor... Fri bonnieyaker 1
IBM Security QRadar SIEM C2150-612 dumps Fri bonnieyaker 1
More from around the web