Wales Assembly Returns The School Sho...

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1045 Apr 30, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Hey, Zuiko, you screwed up again. You forgot that D-J-W ALWAYS POSTS HIS SCREEN NAME IN CAPITAL LETTERS. First you forget to keep his statements within character--even referring to me as "Molly" on Saturday, and now this. You were too angry to maintain his persona, and now, by forgetting to hit the upper-case key because Phil has you all upset, you misrepresent his name. You truly are an idiot.
You two idiots can never upset me, Molly, especially when you post an idiotic post such as this, which is typical of you.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1046 Apr 30, 2013
Phili wrote:
<quoted text>
Your comments are irrelevant.
By your criteria, by the 'rules' you have applied to me and my posts you have posted child pornography.
Child pornography is when it has sexual content in it, such as the ones you posted and described.
I also never posted multiple links such as you have, which were completely off topic. I only posted a single link to a scholarly article about the history of nude swimming, which happened to have an old Time/Life photo with nothing expliciton it, and that was about the topic being discussed.
I also never filled whole pages on every page on topics about boys swimming nude and showering with my posts, such as you have.
Btw, it was not me who made the 'rules', but you, since you started it with your vile comments about some comments I made on a dead and long forgotten thread. I would not have replied and uncovered your hypocricy if you didn't make those comments.
Phili

Dunfermline, UK

#1047 Apr 30, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Child pornography is when it has sexual content in it, such as the ones you posted and described.
I also never posted multiple links such as you have, which were completely off topic. I only posted a single link to a scholarly article about the history of nude swimming, which happened to have an old Time/Life photo with nothing expliciton it, and that was about the topic being discussed.
I also never filled whole pages on every page on topics about boys swimming nude and showering with my posts, such as you have.
Btw, it was not me who made the 'rules', but you, since you started it with your vile comments about some comments I made on a dead and long forgotten thread. I would not have replied and uncovered your hypocricy if you didn't make those comments.
Child pornography is images of nude boys in showers.
That has no place in, nor has anything to do with scholarly articles.
You are no doubt relieved that the thread is long forgotten but you and I remember the very detailed questions you asked about boys and nudity
MaltaMon

Mullica Hill, NJ

#1048 Apr 30, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
You two idiots can never upset me, Molly, especially when you post an idiotic post such as this, which is typical of you.
Yes, it IS typical. I am constantly exposing your lies, your frauds, your infantile temperament, your complete lack of originality, your wholesale theft of others'ideas, your homosexuality, your sexual obsession with young boys, and your multiple identities. Yes, all of that is very typical of me. Thanks for pointing that out, Zuiko/D-J-W/FortySomething/Sir Arthur.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1049 Apr 30, 2013
Phili wrote:
<quoted text>
Child pornography is images of nude boys in showers.
That has no place in, nor has anything to do with scholarly articles.
You are no doubt relieved that the thread is long forgotten but you and I remember the very detailed questions you asked about boys and nudity
If that was the subject being discussed asking questions is part of a normal discussion. You also asked many questions in this topic and other similar topics, so again you are being a hypocrite and setting the rules which condemn you.
I also rarely entered such discussions, unlike you who has been continually obsessed with this subject of boys and nudity. So once again you are pointing the finger at yourself when you try to point it at me.
MaltaMon

Mullica Hill, NJ

#1050 Apr 30, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Child pornography is when it has sexual content in it, such as the ones you posted and described.
I also never posted multiple links such as you have, which were completely off topic. I only posted a single link to a scholarly article about the history of nude swimming, which happened to have an old Time/Life photo with nothing expliciton it, and that was about the topic being discussed.
I also never filled whole pages on every page on topics about boys swimming nude and showering with my posts, such as you have.
Btw, it was not me who made the 'rules', but you, since you started it with your vile comments about some comments I made on a dead and long forgotten thread. I would not have replied and uncovered your hypocricy if you didn't make those comments.
Changes in laws nearly everywhere over the past decade have redefined child pornography to include all photos of minors either nude or partially nude. Hence the arrest in late 2011 of an Arizona couple who were reported for ordering a print of a photo of their daughters wrapped in towels, from their shoulders to their lower calves, taken after their bath. Not nude at all, but regarded by the police, prosecutors and the courts as child porn for over a year, during which the state removed the girls from their home and retained custody of them... Until the girls finally convinced a court that their parents took the photos of them innocently. The girls were nowhere near nude; they'd have been far more exposed had they worn bathing suits or shorts and tee shirts. But they weren't dressed. Had the photo been taken by anyone other than their parents, or had someone other than the parents attempted to make a copy of it or had e-mailed it, that person would have been convicted and imprisoned. You're wrong, jackass. You're living in a fantasy world. A world of child sexual fantasies, that is

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1051 Apr 30, 2013
As far as I know there was never any issue between us, or even a conversation, before you made that vile comment about me out of the blue, with which you only dropped the stone on your toes.
MaltaMon

Mullica Hill, NJ

#1052 Apr 30, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
As far as I know there was never any issue between us, or even a conversation, before you made that vile comment about me out of the blue, with which you only dropped the stone on your toes.
I assume you're talking to Phil.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1053 Apr 30, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> I assume you're talking to Phil.
Yes I am.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1054 Apr 30, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Changes in laws nearly everywhere over the past decade have redefined child pornography to include all photos of minors either nude or partially nude. Hence the arrest in late 2011 of an Arizona couple who were reported for ordering a print of a photo of their daughters wrapped in towels, from their shoulders to their lower calves, taken after their bath. Not nude at all, but regarded by the police, prosecutors and the courts as child porn for over a year, during which the state removed the girls from their home and retained custody of them... Until the girls finally convinced a court that their parents took the photos of them innocently. The girls were nowhere near nude; they'd have been far more exposed had they worn bathing suits or shorts and tee shirts. But they weren't dressed. Had the photo been taken by anyone other than their parents, or had someone other than the parents attempted to make a copy of it or had e-mailed it, that person would have been convicted and imprisoned. You're wrong, jackass. You're living in a fantasy world. A world of child sexual fantasies, that is
It is you who is obsessed with nude boys, not me, pervert idiot. You even started a thread about Boys Swimming Nude At School, which is still running with over a thousand posts, and you are the biggest poster on it.
And to make you an even bigger idiot and lying pervert, after this long speech of the illegality of taking pictures of nude children, may I remind you that you said that it was "preposterous" for the law not to allow parents to take nude photos of children. I will post the link if you deny it.
MaltaMon

Conshohocken, PA

#1055 Apr 30, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
It is you who is obsessed with nude boys, not me, pervert idiot. You even started a thread about Boys Swimming Nude At School, which is still running with over a thousand posts, and you are the biggest poster on it.
And to make you an even bigger idiot and lying pervert, after this long speech of the illegality of taking pictures of nude children, may I remind you that you said that it was "preposterous" for the law not to allow parents to take nude photos of children. I will post the link if you deny it.
I identify child-porn enthusiasts like you online in the US. You have posted links to child pornography here on topix. I have outed you. you know it and I know it. and so does everyone else who has been paying attention. Cut the bull,,Zuiko/D-J-W.
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#1056 Apr 30, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
If that was the subject being discussed asking questions is part of a normal discussion. You also asked many questions in this topic and other similar topics, so again you are being a hypocrite and setting the rules which condemn you.
I also rarely entered such discussions, unlike you who has been continually obsessed with this subject of boys and nudity. So once again you are pointing the finger at yourself when you try to point it at me.
Were you engaging in scholarly research when you asked, and not for the first time who saw the boys naked while showering and being examined, or while asking for a link about a book on male nudity?
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#1057 May 1, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Child pornography is when it has sexual content in it, such as the ones you posted and described.
I also never posted multiple links such as you have, which were completely off topic. I only posted a single link to a scholarly article about the history of nude swimming, which happened to have an old Time/Life photo with nothing expliciton it, and that was about the topic being discussed.
I also never filled whole pages on every page on topics about boys swimming nude and showering with my posts, such as you have.
Btw, it was not me who made the 'rules', but you, since you started it with your vile comments about some comments I made on a dead and long forgotten thread. I would not have replied and uncovered your hypocricy if you didn't make those comments.
" the film was very explicit, involving not only the adults having graphic sex but also showing the children's physical development in a way that would probable be unthinkable now."

So that is your evidence?
This is classed as child porn in that strange planet you live on?
Remember what I said about looking stupid?
You really haven't had much of a life, have you?
Are you married?
Children?
I doubt it.

"......filled whole pages on every page on topics about boys swimming nude and showering with my posts, such as you have"

We've been through this. Few posts were on-topic.

"...never posted multiple links such as you have"

Again, we have been through this.
Three links in one post and two links in one more post.
Links to reputable websites.
Not cheap 'scholarly' websites thrown together like yours.
The one link you did post was most revealing, in more ways than one, that of the image of nude boys in the shower and the link you requested was for a book on male nudity.
All while you were involved in scholarly research about nude swimming and 'investigating' who saw boys naked in showers and examination rooms.
Very educational during your long and lonely nights, I'm sure.
I am not embarrassed in the slightest but if I was you I would be
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#1058 May 1, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Child pornography is when it has sexual content in it, such as the ones you posted and described.
I also never posted multiple links such as you have, which were completely off topic. I only posted a single link to a scholarly article about the history of nude swimming, which happened to have an old Time/Life photo with nothing expliciton it, and that was about the topic being discussed.
I also never filled whole pages on every page on topics about boys swimming nude and showering with my posts, such as you have.
Btw, it was not me who made the 'rules', but you, since you started it with your vile comments about some comments I made on a dead and long forgotten thread. I would not have replied and uncovered your hypocricy if you didn't make those comments.
"Nothing explicit"??!!?? LoL!!! You are insane! All of the children in the photos are entirely nude!! By today's statutes and standards, that is child pornography. you sick sick sick bastard.
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#1059 May 1, 2013
And the "rules" punish pederasts and child pornographers like you, Zuiko/D-J-W. You've posted hundreds and hundreds of naked photos of young boys and hundreds more of prepubescent lads in skimpy underwear, posed erotically to help you to satisfy your sick sexual desire. In this country, EACH INDIVIDUAL PHOTO CONSTITUTES A SEPARATE COUNT OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY. If you were posting your disgusting photos from here, you sick, depraved sexual predator, you would spend the rest of your life behind bars.
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#1060 May 1, 2013
You did less harm years ago by stripping yourself nude for crowds of old gay leathermen and spreading your bare buttocks on their faces for tips. No innocent kids were forced to remove all their clothing and be photographed for your sexual pleasure.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1061 May 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> I identify child-porn enthusiasts like you online in the US. You have posted links to child pornography here on topix. I have outed you. you know it and I know it. and so does everyone else who has been paying attention. Cut the bull,,Zuiko/D-J-W.
Lying idiot, where have I posted child porn? You should be arrested for suggesting that people should take nude photos of children.
Phili

UK

#1062 May 1, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Lying idiot, where have I posted child porn? You should be arrested for suggesting that people should take nude photos of children.
Strange.
I don't recall anybody 'suggesting' anybody takes nude photos of children.
Is English your first language?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1063 May 1, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
" the film was very explicit, involving not only the adults having graphic sex but also showing the children's physical development in a way that would probable be unthinkable now."
So that is your evidence?
This is classed as child porn in that strange planet you live on?
Remember what I said about looking stupid?
You really haven't had much of a life, have you?
Are you married?
Children?
I doubt it.
"......filled whole pages on every page on topics about boys swimming nude and showering with my posts, such as you have"
We've been through this. Few posts were on-topic.
"...never posted multiple links such as you have"
Again, we have been through this.
Three links in one post and two links in one more post.
Links to reputable websites.
Not cheap 'scholarly' websites thrown together like yours.
The one link you did post was most revealing, in more ways than one, that of the image of nude boys in the shower and the link you requested was for a book on male nudity.
All while you were involved in scholarly research about nude swimming and 'investigating' who saw boys naked in showers and examination rooms.
Very educational during your long and lonely nights, I'm sure.
I am not embarrassed in the slightest but if I was you I would be
Not embarrassed? You should be after all these revelations about you. I have nothing to be embarrassed about.
Your lies, denialism and lame arguments are really pitiful.
As for asking questions, have a look at the first page of this topic and you can see that your very first post was asking in which other places these nude school showers take place. Then you go on page after page showing your perverted interests in the subject, including posting links to sex education films and describing enthusiastically the pornographic films that you saw with adults performing swxual acts in front of children as sex education, when this subject didn't even have anything to do with showers at school. I could go on and on to shame you, which even other posters did by calling you a sexual pervert, including the hypocrite Molly.
Do you see any of my posts on this topic? It is FULL of your posts, and useless to lie that they are not on the subject of nude showers at school, not only are they on this subject but you go even further and mention sex education films and other links "to titillate yourself" according to your friend Molly among others.
As for your laughable accusations, the link to the book I requested was about adult males physical checkups and nothing to do with your obsession of naked boys. Also the only link I posted was about the history of swimming, and this after Molly asked me to post the link to prove something he denied on the subject being discussed. You can go back to that page and see. I am not a liar like you. You at first denied that you posted multiple links about nude boys swimming and showering until I showed them to you.
I could go on and fill whole pages about your perverted obsession and lies.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1064 May 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
You did less harm years ago by stripping yourself nude for crowds of old gay leathermen and spreading your bare buttocks on their faces for tips. No innocent kids were forced to remove all their clothing and be photographed for your sexual pleasure.
The usual Mollylies, and another of his projections. It is obvious that you are talking about yourself and your usual homosexual fantasies. You think you are kidding anyone?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Should illegal immigrants get tuition breaks? (Apr '09) 8 hr Trump is Right 3,830
Beware LisaBarron threads! 18 hr Lisa Baron Trump 2
Passcert boys' underwear 18 hr Whitehouse Calm Now 3
bennettkallas and boys' underwear. 18 hr Fear Bennett Inst... 1
Finding the 'spank' in public education Sat Bear Botham 1
All JohnThompson1 threads internet scam! Sat John Thomas 2
News Wisconsin students demand free tuition for blac... Sat Sean Spicer 4
More from around the web