Wales Assembly Returns The School Sho...
MaltaMon

Conshohocken, PA

#925 Apr 25, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep making the same denialisms as Molly by saying that there is no evidence about your obsession with nude boys, when it is in front of everyone to see.
Take this very same thread here about School Showers. Again you are one of the first to post, right on page one and continuously on every page, just like the Boys Swimming Nude thread, showing your unnatural interest in the subject. And what is your very first post on this topic? Curious to know where it happened! Talk about questions, you dirty hypocrite.
Phil
Salford, UK
Post#8
Jun 14, 2012
"but from the next academic year in Wales, many larger schools must return to the school shower as part of the PE curriculum"
I've seen no evidence of this.
Where did you see this?
What are "denialisms" ParaZuikiNoid? The opposite of "admissionisms"? Did you order a "hamburgerism" for lunch? Maybe a couple of slice-isms of pizzaism? Well, I just returned from a runnism and must take one of those showerisms. And no, there will not be any mannism or womanism, boyism or girlism, with or without clotheisms, to watch me take one-ism. End of postism.
MaltaMon

Conshohocken, PA

#926 Apr 25, 2013
Correction: should be "lunchism," I think.
MaltaMon

Conshohocken, PA

#927 Apr 25, 2013
These, of course, are all Zuiko-isms. "This-ism, That-ism, ism-ism-ism." - John Lennon, 1969

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#928 Apr 25, 2013
Phil's denialism of his obsession and interest in nude boys is further proved here. I took a page at random from this topic and lo! Here is Phil talking about "boys dangling bits", other posters pointing to his several links about nude boys and his pedophile obsession. There is even a poster who started posting as Dangling Bits after Phil's comments, whom I assume to be Maltomon, who is now agreeing with everything that Phil says. These two clowns and perverts must be revealed for what they are, from their own posts. Following on next post, because they don't even fit all in one post.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#929 Apr 25, 2013
Phil
Manchester, UK
|#232
Nov 4, 2012
"All boys must wear swimming trunks or separate underpants beneath their games shorts when doing PE or games"
This is simply to provide some protection and support for the boy's dangly bits while they are running around.
Phil
Manchester, UK
|#248
Nov 7, 2012
To paraphrase the opening to a classic English novel, the past was a foreign country. They did things differently then.
I also recall seeing a sex education film years ago. Granted it was a European effort where there was a different attitude to children's modesty and as a consequence the film was very explicit, involving not only the adults having graphic sex but also showing the children's physical development in a way that would probable be unthinkable now.
Censored By T-O-P-I-X-com
Kingsport, TN
|#250
Nov 7, 2012
Phil wrote:
the film was very explicit, involving not only the adults having graphic sex but also showing the children's physical development in a way that would probable be unthinkable now.
Why doesn't this ADMISSION from Phil surprise me?
He who falsely accuses others of having "collections of CFNM" probably has one of the most extensive illegal porn collections known to the UK.
Post 258
Phil wrote:
"no women ever entered the locker room"
I am sure it is a rare event but as I may have said before it happened to me once at school and once to my son at the local pool but the nothing was on show, so to speak.
There was a case in the UK recently where a disabled boy smelled somewhat and two teachers stripped him off and put him through the shower.
Of course there was uproar.
More CFNM boyhood fantasies by Phil the Pill.
Censored By T-O-P-I-X-com
Erwin, TN
|#264
Nov 9, 2012
MaltaMon Oracle wrote:
What a horrible story, Phil. I agree with the comment to the effect that to undress this kid against his will constituted assault. Just awful. But what does this have to do with showering after Phys Ed?
It has nothing to do with showering after Phys Ed. except that Phil the Pill is trying to inject clothed females into stories of males showering, as the CFNM fetishist he is.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#930 Apr 25, 2013
Maltamon Oracle
|#267
Nov 10, 2012

Phil wrote:
Censored, can you tell us all where in the article it says there were clothed females present?

Sorry, Phil, but wasn't your point about women entering boys' locker rooms? That is the context of your post. I had just said that in all my years in school, no women ever entered our locker room. So if is not to counter with evidence of the presence of women, what IS the point of directing attention to a sad story about the abuse of a disabled 14 y.o. male who was forcibly stripped naked against his will in 2006?

Post 268 Nov.10 2012
Exactly. The Pill has no other agenda here besides CFNM.

He's just more direct about it than that other UK moron, djw, who for some reason has an obsession with American schoolboys locker/shower habits, of course with the SUGGESTION they're being monitored by clothed women.

Phils Dangly Bits
Allentown, PA
|#340
Nov 12, 2012 Phil, It wss you who raised the issue of the number of postings. All I did was explain why my msgs are split into multiple postings. Also, it makes them conform to your maximum attention span. Later, Sweetheart.

Phils Dangly Bits
Philadelphia, PA
|#350
Nov 13, 2012
Evidence of what, Phil? I said that I only read your postings up to the first inane comment, react to that, then ignore the rest. You said yesterday that I ignored most of what you'd said. What need is there for evidence? You're not merely a sexual pervert: you're a lunatic.

Phil
Salford, UK
|#356
Nov 14, 2012
"no return to communal showering in Welsh schools"

Only in Welsh schools?

Phils Dangly Bits
Prospect Park, PA
|#373
Nov 14, 2012
I don't profess to have supporters on this thread. And let's face it, your appeal is for critics, who by definition would be your supporters, Phil. So where are they? Moreover, those on this thread are unlikely to know what you are referring to. They aren't obsessed, as you are. It is their indifference to all of that which you hear. And it is music to my ears.



Phils Dangly Bits
Lancaster, PA
|#399
Nov 16, 2012 To those kids and adults to whom showering naked is somehow erotic, professional therapy should be offered. Nudity is our natural state. In civilized society, we don't wander around naked, but that is mostly for protection from the elements, from injury, and from infection. But to have kids shower with bathing suits on seems completely unnecessary. The protection afforded there is of whatever inhibiting phobia is present--not of the individual's well-being.

Phils Dangly Bits
Lancaster, PA
|#401
Nov 16, 2012 C'mon, Phil and DJW. Would like to see how you will refute what I've said. Will you at least admit that there is an element of sexual titillation for you in the authoritarian scenarios that you offer?

Phils Dangly Bitsj
Philadelphia, PA
|#420

You want to get rid of me so that you can pass off your child-abuse erotica as serious, thoughtful and mature contributions to discussions over issues? Not a chance. Btw Bob isn't gone. You believe that he is simply because YOU have declared him gone? Phil, you need to find a level of self-importance that is sufficiently modest to be at all realistic.

Censored By T-O-P-I-X-com
Erwin, TN
|#424
Nov 16, 2012

Phils Dangly Bitsj wrote:
pass off your child-abuse erotica as serious, thoughtful and mature contributions to discussions over issues?
I think in this one paragraph you've hit upon the crux of DJW, Phil le Pill, Mr. SMellish and the whole lot's purpose here.

Phils Dangly Bits
Philadelphia, PA
|#430
Nov 17, 2012 Phil wrote:
"I refuse to get into a pissing contest with you to prove that you have said what you have said"
Because, quite simply, you can't,
Nah. As I said, I simply don't want to. Your posts are all there. I couldn't care less what you think. Look at them yourself. Simply, of course.
MaltaMon

Conshohocken, PA

#931 Apr 25, 2013
Not a bad body of research. Selective, of course, and as such, hardly an argument that settles anything. You post very few of Phil's own comments. Your portfolio here features mostly my attacks upon Phil, and a few of Censored by TOPIX. It proves only that I attacked Phil, which neither I nor anyone else, including Phil, has denied. There is no comment from you to explain your point. And let us not forget (as you seem to) that your comments about naked boys and your interest in them are, from this evidence, far more extensive, spanning several years and aliases you've used, and far more compelling. You need to compare your comments with his. As for me, my comments that you feature speak for themselves. I don't regard as sexy or interesting in any way other than for reasons of good health, cleanliness of the school environment , and courtesy to all in the school community the requirement that students shower after sports and PE before returning to class or heading to lunch. Nothing sexy: boys and girls have their respective, single-sex showers and changing areas. But you--you maintained (as Sir Arthur) that all BOYS (and only boys) should be required to SWIM nude, even when clothed women and suited female peers are in attendance. That is where you need to begin.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#932 Apr 25, 2013
So MM & phil-e prefer to shower with guys yet most normal guys would prefer to shower with the girls-----what is new ????
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#933 Apr 25, 2013
coyote wrote:
So MM & phil-e prefer to shower with guys yet most normal guys would prefer to shower with the girls-----what is new ????
I was talking about schoolchildren, but you know that. You're just an asshole. And no, it isn't appropriate to have coed locker rooms and coed showers. But you know that. You're just a childishly provocative queer asshole. And no, straight men of any age don't want to shower with women, have women observe them wash themselves of sweat and dirt--nor would grown men who are heterosexual want to be in a room full of women scrubbing themselves clean. They'd want to shower with a woman only if it's intimate, private and romantic. But you WOULDN'T know that. You're not heterosexual. Then again, even gay men know that much if they have straight friends of both sexes. Obviously, you do not if you don't know that much at your advanced age.
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#934 Apr 25, 2013
Your presumption, because you have been celibate for so long, is that a boy or man taking a shower to clean his body with soap and water is sexual. It has nothing to do with sex. But you,Tinkerbell--a sex-deprived old gay man who regards the very image of naked boys as a sexual turn-on, even when they're cleaning themselves off with soap and water after sports--are unable to regard it as non-sexual, even when we're talking about kids. Or, I should say, especially when we're talking about kids.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#935 Apr 26, 2013
coyote wrote:
So MM & phil-e prefer to shower with guys yet most normal guys would prefer to shower with the girls-----what is new ????
Molly and Philly prefer to shower with other guys and boys because they are both pedo-gays, as their multiple and continuous posts about the subject which I have posted show.
And these are only a fraction of their self-revealing posts. I only read a few pages from this topic alone, which runs to over 800 posts, most of them by these two perverts who are obsessed with nude boys.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#936 Apr 26, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Your presumption, because you have been celibate for so long, is that a boy or man taking a shower to clean his body with soap and water is sexual. It has nothing to do with sex. But you,Tinkerbell--a sex-deprived old gay man who regards the very image of naked boys as a sexual turn-on, even when they're cleaning themselves off with soap and water after sports--are unable to regard it as non-sexual, even when we're talking about kids. Or, I should say, especially when we're talking about kids.
Molly, you don't talk about anything except nude boys, gay rape, and homosexual descriptions. So your projectionist drivel about these subjects does not fool anyone.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#937 Apr 26, 2013
Pedo Phil is too ashamed to reply when faced with his own perverted posts.
Forum

Winchester, UK

#938 Apr 26, 2013
Lets introduce a right to privacy in all english schools preventing teachers or other pupils viewing each others private parts. Keep Britain safe
Largelanguage

Chester, UK

#939 Apr 26, 2013
Forum wrote:
Lets introduce a right to privacy in all english schools preventing teachers or other pupils viewing each others private parts. Keep Britain safe
Please just post on the "prove there is a god" thread, like you usually do.
Phili

UK

#940 Apr 26, 2013
coyote wrote:
So MM & phil-e prefer to shower with guys yet most normal guys would prefer to shower with the girls-----what is new ????
Actually no.
I prefer to shower alone.
I doubt, in fact that most 'normal' guys would want to shower with anybody, period, as they say in the US.
Phili

UK

#941 Apr 26, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
Pedo Phil is too ashamed to reply when faced with his own perverted posts.
I can't be bothered.
Again you have proven nothing.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#942 Apr 26, 2013
Phili wrote:
<quoted text>
I can't be bothered.
Again you have proven nothing.
Why are you arguing with Zuiko? Not that there is anything wrong with that, as you are a useful tool, and are able to be used limitedly. But why are you continuing this thing with Zuiko, anyway?

Are you just interested in all the drama? If so, don't post if you can't respect people as people, instead of objects for drama.
Phili

UK

#943 Apr 26, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
Maltamon Oracle
|#267
Nov 10, 2012
Phil wrote:
Censored, can you tell us all where in the article it says there were clothed females present?
Sorry, Phil, but wasn't your point about women entering boys' locker rooms? That is the context iof your post. I had just said that in all my years in school, no women ever entered our locker room. So if is not to counter with evidence of the presence of women, what IS the point of directing attention to a sad story about the abuse of a disabled 14 y.o. male who was forcibly stripped naked against his will in 2006?
Post 268 Nov.10 2012
Exactly. The Pill has no other agenda here besides CFNM.
He's just more direct about it than that other UK moron, djw, who for some reason has an obsession with American schoolboys locker/shower habits, of course with the SUGGESTION they're being monitored by clothed women.
Phils Dangly Bits
Allentown, PA
|#340
Nov 12, 2012 Phil, It wss you who raised the issue of the number of postings. All I did was explain why my msgs are split into multiple postings. Also, it makes them conform to your maximum attention span. Later, Sweetheart.
Phils Dangly Bits
Philadelphia, PA
|#350
Nov 13, 2012
Evidence of what, Phil? I said that I only read your postings up to the first inane comment, react to that, then ignore the rest. You said yesterday that I ignored most of what you'd said. What need is there for evidence? You're not merely a sexual pervert: you're a lunatic.
Phil
Salford, UK
|#356
Nov 14, 2012
"no return to communal showering in Welsh schools"
Only in Welsh schools?
Phils Dangly Bits
Prospect Park, PA
|#373
Nov 14, 2012
I don't profess to have supporters on this thread. And let's face it, your appeal is for critics, who by definition would be your supporters, Phil. So where are they? Moreover, those on this thread are unlikely to know what you are referring to. They aren't obsessed, as you are. It is their indifference to all of that which you hear. And it is music to my ears.
Phils Dangly Bits
Lancaster, PA
|#399
Nov 16, 2012 To those kids and adults to whom showering naked is somehow erotic, professional therapy should be offered. Nudity is our natural state. In civilized society, we don't wander around naked, but that is mostly for protection from the elements, from injury, and from infection. But to have kids shower with bathing suits on seems completely unnecessary. The protection afforded there is of whatever inhibiting phobia is present--not of the individual's well-being.
Phils Dangly Bits
Lancaster, PA
|#401
Nov 16, 2012 C'mon, Phil and DJW. Would like to see how you will refute what I've said. Will you at least admit that there is an element of sexual titillation for you in the authoritarian scenarios that you offer?
Phils Dangly Bitsj
Philadelphia, PA
|#420
You want to get rid of me so that you can pass off your child-abuse erotica as serious, thoughtful and mature contributions to discussions over issues? Not a chance. Btw Bob isn't gone. You believe that he is simply because YOU have declared him gone? Phil, you need to find a level of self-importance that is sufficiently modest to be at all realistic.
Censored By T-O-P-I-X-com
Erwin, TN
|#424
Nov 16, 2012
Phils Dangly Bitsj wrote:
pass off your child-abuse erotica as serious, thoughtful and mature contributions to discussions over issues?
I think in this one paragraph you've hit upon the crux of DJW, Phil le Pill, Mr. SMellish and the whole lot's purpose here.
Phils Dangly Bits
Philadelphia, PA
|#430
Nov 17, 2012 Phil wrote:
"I refuse to get into a pissing contest with you to prove that you have said what you have said"
Because, quite simply, you can't,
Nah. As I said, I simply don't want to. Your posts are all there. I couldn't care less what you think. Look at them yourself. Simply, of course.
If you are going to all that trouble why not quote me in context then someone might bother to read what you post.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#944 Apr 26, 2013
Phili wrote:
<quoted text>
If you are going to all that trouble why not quote me in context then someone might bother to read what you post.
I believe you too are a paedophile.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
ExamUnion 70-697 Configuring Windows 10 Devices... 3 hr 70-697 Microsoft 1
MCSA: Windows 10 70-697 Configuring Windows Dev... 4 hr freetestexam 2
MCSA: Microsoft Office 365 70-346 practice test 5 hr freetestexam 2
Our Current Education System And The Major Issu... 5 hr Bren 14
Dropping or completing classes late (Jan '14) 8 hr MichaelNice 67
Veritas University Abuja 2nd, 3rd/ 4th Batch Ad... 12 hr Registrar Office 1
ABUAD 3rd, 4th and Supplementary Batch Admissio... 13 hr Registrar Office 1
More from around the web