Pedo Bob, Wherefore art thou?
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#69 Apr 1, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Balls out, indeed.
Zuiko likes the ide of them being out if ladies are present, especially if young boys are involved.
idea
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#70 Apr 1, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Balls out, indeed.
Zuiko likes the ide of them being out if ladies are present, especially if young boys are involved.
Well, on this much, I have to say that I'm in full agreement with you. It's very clear from his statements where his interests lie, what his agenda is, and, when called out on it, that his rage and phony-baloney denials are a reaction to his own reckless self-promotion. Little boys--naked little boys--are his preoccupation. Hence the shower photos of young boys on the site that he's posted, which have nothing to do with the nude swimming that is ostensibly the purpose of that disguised child-porn site, and the posting of which in these parts is today a criminal offense. In your part of the world, too.
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#71 Apr 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> If this really is Largelanguage and not an imposter (the location isn't the same, after all), please provide me a link to those posts as I have not seen them. You and I never engaged in any such discussion; all I know of them is what the faggots have said about them, challenging me to condemn you for having said such things. If you are Large and did, indeed, "advocate nude teenage (sic) girls being spanked and stripped naked" (a phrase that makes no sense if you read it....), I would find it appalling. I have been consistent and forceful in my advocacy of child safety, and that goes for all individuals of either sex to the age of 18. What was the context of these statements? Why would you have advocated taking "naked teenage girls" and "stripping them naked"? Why spank them? What's the friggin' point? Nobody but a parent, sibling or friend should lay a hand on a teenaged girl, and that hand should be loving--not violent. But again, I haven't seen any of your posts to that effect, if, indeed, you are Largelanguage.(and to the faggots: I didn't respond earlier because I WASN'T FU**ING ON LINE!!! It was a holiday--time for family) Large, it won't matter what I say, anyway. The faggots here will find some reason for objection or to otherwise to question my sincerity. Notice that they still have not disowned Pedo Bob's advocacy of child rape. They find it "funny". That's much worse, as far as I'm concerned, and they have no business challenging me. But if Zuiko's involved, I welcome it, because he's so much fun to insult. His balls-out attack on Phil yesterday was worth the price of admission
There have been plenty of references to his posts recently and you were sufficiently online to post both during and after but by the same token I don't recall seeing any of Bob's post 'advocating' child rape.
I did see some comments in bad taste (jokes, but certainly not funny ones) and you know I have condemned him for them.
Largelanguage

Wem, UK

#72 Apr 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> If this really is Largelanguage and not an imposter (the location isn't the same, after all), please provide me a link to those posts as I have not seen them. You and I never engaged in any such discussion; all I know of them is what the faggots have said about them, challenging me to condemn you for having said such things. If you are Large and did, indeed, "advocate nude teenage (sic) girls being spanked and stripped naked" (a phrase that makes no sense if you read it....), I would find it appalling. I have been consistent and forceful in my advocacy of child safety, and that goes for all individuals of either sex to the age of 18. What was the context of these statements? Why would you have advocated taking "naked teenage girls" and "stripping them naked"? Why spank them? What's the friggin' point? Nobody but a parent, sibling or friend should lay a hand on a teenaged girl, and that hand should be loving--not violent. But again, I haven't seen any of your posts to that effect, if, indeed, you are Largelanguage.(and to the faggots: I didn't respond earlier because I WASN'T FU**ING ON LINE!!! It was a holiday--time for family) Large, it won't matter what I say, anyway. The faggots here will find some reason for objection or to otherwise to question my sincerity. Notice that they still have not disowned Pedo Bob's advocacy of child rape. They find it "funny". That's much worse, as far as I'm concerned, and they have no business challenging me. But if Zuiko's involved, I welcome it, because he's so much fun to insult. His balls-out attack on Phil yesterday was worth the price of admission
I did advocate it, but I only support the idea of it being allowed in a stable society, where the girls don't feel forced, ect. I would never at all do it with this society. I would never break the law. And I certainly would never do it if they didn't want it, don't equate my views on it with the likes of zuikosomething.
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#73 Apr 1, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
I did advocate it, but I only support the idea of it being allowed in a stable society, where the girls don't feel forced, ect. I would never at all do it with this society. I would never break the law. And I certainly would never do it if they didn't want it, don't equate my views on it with the likes of zuikosomething.
We were talking about Bob.
When in a hole, stop digging.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#74 Apr 1, 2013
Phil, it is you who is more under suspicion. What is your interest in these threads about nude boys swimming, and you have been so for a long time, if you are not a pedophile? Hiding under the guise of morality to avoid suspicion doesn't fool anyone. You have been here for years, long before I came here, so what is your special interest in this subject?
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#75 Apr 1, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
I did advocate it, but I only support the idea of it being allowed in a stable society, where the girls don't feel forced, ect. I would never at all do it with this society. I would never break the law. And I certainly would never do it if they didn't want it, don't equate my views on it with the likes of zuikosomething.
Funny how they have me advocating the same thing without having said a word about it, and without having seen your statements. nevertheless, I don't understand why spanking girls would be interesting to you, but no, you are in no way anywhere near ZuikoSomething. I may not understand what your point is, but I would rather not discuss it. It must have come out of your discussion with the faggots, and what they have to say about it, their phony outrage, isn't worth a moment of my time. they are pedofiles after all. And you are opposed to that. You know whence they come.
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#76 Apr 1, 2013
spanking children in this day and age is sexual abuse. I don't know whether you advocated it as punishment, or some other form of discipline, but it's terribly, terribly wrong. with regard to children of either sex.
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#77 Apr 1, 2013
As for the fa***ts on here, they don't disapprove of it. you have seen no statement of theirs anywhere that says any of them are opposed to it. My feeling is that when it comes to stripping females naked, they aren't interested at all. What they did-- all they did-- was attacked me for not having condemned your statements. But nowhere do you find their own condemnation of it. Females don't interest them. And they really don't care if female children are abused. It is merely their way of diverting attention from their own interest in naked young boys
Largelanguage

Wem, UK

#78 Apr 1, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
We were talking about Bob.
When in a hole, stop digging.
But yet you brought up the issue.
Largelanguage

Wem, UK

#79 Apr 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
spanking children in this day and age is sexual abuse. I don't know whether you advocated it as punishment, or some other form of discipline, but it's terribly, terribly wrong. with regard to children of either sex.
I don't advocate spankings as punishment. I only believe spanking should be done if the girl is happy with it, and not to hurt them. Spanking should never ever be used to discipline a child.

I sometimes believe some people spank children as punishment to gain sexual dominance, and control, which I believe is utterly wrong. Spanking as punishment is against everything right, and human.
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#80 Apr 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
As for the fa***ts on here, they don't disapprove of it. you have seen no statement of theirs anywhere that says any of them are opposed to it. My feeling is that when it comes to stripping females naked, they aren't interested at all. What they did-- all they did-- was attacked me for not having condemned your statements. But nowhere do you find their own condemnation of it. Females don't interest them. And they really don't care if female children are abused. It is merely their way of diverting attention from their own interest in naked young boys
Really?
Stop waffling in a feeble attempt to justify your failure to condemn a pedophile who advocates child abuse by pretending you had not seen his posts until he sought your views on those posts and left you with nowhere to hide, views I have condemned so many times.
It would be uncharitable to call you a liar but if the cap fits, as they say.
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#81 Apr 1, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
But yet you brought up the issue.
Yes, I brought up the issue of Bob in the context of a conversation with Maltamon, not with you.
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#82 Apr 1, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?
Stop waffling in a feeble attempt to justify your failure to condemn a pedophile who advocates child abuse by pretending you had not seen his posts until he sought your views on those posts and left you with nowhere to hide, views I have condemned so many times.
It would be uncharitable to call you a liar but if the cap fits, as they say.
What did I tell ya, Large? They'd find some excuse to attack even after I finally heard from you on the topic--though still without having seen any of your posts on it, the ones I should have "condemned" sight unseen, lol--so it doesn't matter WHAT I say. But the fact remains that none have condemned the abuse of female children, as I have after reading your admission to me that you had,advocated spanking naked girls. It isn't that it simply does not compute. It just doesn't matter to them what my position is. All that matters is the attack. You saw it with ZuikiFlithole's extreme rage and bellicose tirade of humiliating insults aimed at Phil in response to Phil's helpful and candid warning to him. And now you see it in Phil's reaction to my condemnation of the abuse of girls. What surprises me, however, is that this English "dad" just assumed that my reference to "the fa***ts on here" was a reference to HIM. Lol. Must be a self-perception. You've got to love these guys, Large. If I mentioned "fa***ts", would you presume that I was referring to you?
Largelanguage

Wem, UK

#83 Apr 1, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, I brought up the issue of Bob in the context of a conversation with Maltamon, not with you.
But who said I didn't have the right to say what I want, as long as it does not offend anyone(We don't really care if it offends you lol)?
Largelanguage

Wem, UK

#84 Apr 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> What did I tell ya, Large? They'd find some excuse to attack even after I finally heard from you on the topic--though still without having seen any of your posts on it, the ones I should have "condemned" sight unseen, lol--so it doesn't matter WHAT I say. But the fact remains that none have condemned the abuse of female children, as I have after reading your admission to me that you had,advocated spanking naked girls. It isn't that it simply does not compute. It just doesn't matter to them what my position is. All that matters is the attack. You saw it with ZuikiFlithole's extreme rage and bellicose tirade of humiliating insults aimed at Phil in response to Phil's helpful and candid warning to him. And now you see it in Phil's reaction to my condemnation of the abuse of girls. What surprises me, however, is that this English "dad" just assumed that my reference to "the fa***ts on here" was a reference to HIM. Lol. Must be a self-perception. You've got to love these guys, Large. If I mentioned "fa***ts", would you presume that I was referring to you?
My post didn't appear at first, anyway, this is my reply to that.

"I don't advocate spankings as punishment. I only believe spanking should be done if the girl is happy with it, and not to hurt them. Spanking should never ever be used to discipline a child.

I sometimes believe some people spank children as punishment to gain sexual dominance, and control, which I believe is utterly wrong. Spanking as punishment is against everything right, and human."
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#85 Apr 1, 2013
Whatever I say on the subject, it will never be enough. Lol... For them to admit that it is enough would mean they'd have to bring an end to the attacks on me for not having condemned what you said. As a matter of fact, now that you have admitted to me that what they said that you had advocated is true in part, it will have the perverse effect of having weakened their stance against me. It was far more convenient for them that I had not read your posts about spanking girls.(of course,I still haven't.. I'm going only on your informing me today that you'd "advocated" it, and I told you that I am unequivocally opposed to it under all circumstances, that spanking of children of either sex constitutes sexual abuse, and that I don't understand at all your advocating it... And wouldn't have expected it of you inasmuch as you have been outspoken against the sexual abuse of children) That said,,I repeat: they won't let it go. Ask Phil why he has not cobdemned unequivocally Pedo Bob's graphic and lurid (and continual) postings of his reconstructions of his own rape of young boys, including my son, and his response will be an attack on ne for not having condemned your statements (even though, ironically, he himself has not done so either) And I predict that he'll forgive PedoZuiko for his unjustified, offensive outburst at him. He needs him. And he won't criticize him again. Mark my words.
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#86 Apr 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> What did I tell ya, Large? They'd find some excuse to attack even after I finally heard from you on the topic--though still without having seen any of your posts on it, the ones I should have "condemned" sight unseen, lol--so it doesn't matter WHAT I say. But the fact remains that none have condemned the abuse of female children, as I have after reading your admission to me that you had,advocated spanking naked girls. It isn't that it simply does not compute. It just doesn't matter to them what my position is. All that matters is the attack. You saw it with ZuikiFlithole's extreme rage and bellicose tirade of humiliating insults aimed at Phil in response to Phil's helpful and candid warning to him. And now you see it in Phil's reaction to my condemnation of the abuse of girls. What surprises me, however, is that this English "dad" just assumed that my reference to "the fa***ts on here" was a reference to HIM. Lol. Must be a self-perception. You've got to love these guys, Large. If I mentioned "fa***ts", would you presume that I was referring to you?
Cut the bullshit and the lousy excuses about not seeing the posts relating to the abuse of girls which I condemned often while you sat on the fence.
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#87 Apr 1, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
But who said I didn't have the right to say what I want, as long as it does not offend anyone(We don't really care if it offends you lol)?
We?
I was talking to Maltamon.
Not you.
Largelanguage

Wem, UK

#88 Apr 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Whatever I say on the subject, it will never be enough. Lol... For them to admit that it is enough would mean they'd have to bring an end to the attacks on me for not having condemned what you said. As a matter of fact, now that you have admitted to me that what they said that you had advocated is true in part, it will have the perverse effect of having weakened their stance against me. It was far more convenient for them that I had not read your posts about spanking girls.(of course,I still haven't.. I'm going only on your informing me today that you'd "advocated" it, and I told you that I am unequivocally opposed to it under all circumstances, that spanking of children of either sex constitutes sexual abuse, and that I don't understand at all your advocating it... And wouldn't have expected it of you inasmuch as you have been outspoken against the sexual abuse of children) That said,,I repeat: they won't let it go. Ask Phil why he has not cobdemned unequivocally Pedo Bob's graphic and lurid (and continual) postings of his reconstructions of his own rape of young boys, including my son, and his response will be an attack on ne for not having condemned your statements (even though, ironically, he himself has not done so either) And I predict that he'll forgive PedoZuiko for his unjustified, offensive outburst at him. He needs him. And he won't criticize him again. Mark my words.
"I don't advocate spankings as punishment. I only believe spanking should be done if the girl is happy with it, and not to hurt them. Spanking should never ever be used to discipline a child.

I sometimes believe some people spank children as punishment to gain sexual dominance, and control, which I believe is utterly wrong. Spanking as punishment is against everything right, and human."

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
IBM certification C9020-568 exam dumps 10% OFF 1 hr jimy 1
Little League Coach Pleads Guilty to Spanking P... 5 hr WNC 1
News The NAACP's fight against private school vouchers (May '06) 6 hr Created 6
The "Real Nude Swimming in School People" (Jun '13) 8 hr TammyB1953 105
1Z0-460 Exam VCE - Pass 1Z0-460 Quickly (May '16) 11 hr Exam Dump Spam 3
Real CompTIA LX0-103 and LX0-104 Exam Dumps 11 hr Exam Dump Spam 2
Is it normal to want to smell a boy's butt? Tue Helen 1
More from around the web