cmnf
MaltaMon

Riverton, NJ

#115 Jun 30, 2013
Pedo Bob (aka The Dorval Destroyer, accoding to the CoyFag of Canada) has become something of a side show compared to the flamboyant pedophilia of DJW/Zwacko and his most outspoken supporter, Coyote, who has endorsed with fawning adolescent enthusiasm his repeated postings of child pornography and, more recently, gay teenage sex videos. A man's man. Pedo Bob can hardly compete with that sort of Stonewalling.
Thomas

Buffalo, NY

#116 Jun 30, 2013
The topic is cmnf, not cnfnm.
Also, some of the posts here are seriously disturbing. I am begining to think that this is not a place populated by normal people.

Anyway...

You say that about beauty LineDazzle, but the truth is that even most women say that women are more beautiful. At least that has been my experience. Almost no man will ever say that men are more "beautiful". That's of course in a NORMAL situation.

Studies also suggest that women tend to be bisexual. They are aroused by both females and males equally, and they get aroused slower, less often and in a more unpredictable manner than men.
It must be noted that women's actual sexual behaviour often does not match their reported behavior. They might report that they are very sexually aroused by porn, and to only a particular gender, but studies conducted by attaching sensors to their genitals and comparing it with males reveal otherwise.

And women react or express themselves differenty to porn and situations involving nudity than men. That much is certain from their reactions and expressions.( For example, they might giggle, or shout, but these are not sexual reactions at all.)

Women also very often prefer verbally talking or reading about sexual stories , where as men will just prefer to watch or visualize.

Women also show different pattern of brain activation to pornographic images than men. Several studies show that.

Studies also link testosterone to sexual behaviour and lust and we all know that men have significantly more of this hormone.
Women's testosterone levels only go up during the time when they approach middle ages (after becoming mothers), in their thirties. But even then, this hormone is processed differently by the male brain and the female brain. The male brain almost unconscioussly responds to responds to testosterone, the female brain does not.

(There are also differences in the way male and female brain use serotonin.)

Plenty of straight women themselves report that they feel no arousal to naked males. Hardly any straight man says that about the other sex.

And LineDazzle says "a turn on", but I have reason to not take it very seriously. A sense of power can be quite thrilling in itself. This kind of power related "turn on" can be as exciting as a sexual turn on. I am sure plenty of women might actually love that kind of thrill, even if it comes at the cost of men. It's quite possible that when many of these women "report" their sexual arousal, they are actually reporting their sense of power and hence they are not being detected by their actual genital arousal.

Quite frankly, I can care less if a woman derives sexual pleasure from a naked man, what I would hate is if this woman gains a sense of power, status or superiority in such a situation. That promotes the men as "inferor and disposable" and women the "superior" sex. Now THAT is sexist. And women seek status at least as much as men, probably more.

I am not really against cfnm as long as the males are doing it by their own choice and their privacy is not attacked, however in that case we must equally allow the reverse case - cmnf. Otherwise, the whole concept of gender equality is meaningless. I find so little cmnf discussion here , yet so much cfnm. We need a change. Discuss cmnf.

What about the cmnf in that Danish show called "Blachman"? The ladies had given full consent and came willingly, but still the show got a lot of negative publicity in the feminist brainwashed USA. I can see nothing wrong with the show.
Yet the stories that I see here are mostly men or boys getting into cfnm situations unwillingly and having no choice.
The real criteria for me is consent or willingness. Some may be OK with something, some may not, but nothing should be forced on anyone.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1109zq_blac... ?

This should be perfectly OK.
MaltaMon

Riverton, NJ

#117 Jun 30, 2013
The problem is that any adult, heterosexual fetish will attract the most perverted fetishists, including those, such as coyote, djw/Zuiko and Bob, whose fetishes focus on children--in their case, underaged boys--because they regard them as normal adult preoccupations.
MaltaMon

Riverton, NJ

#118 Jun 30, 2013
That is, not the adult fetish itself, but rather the open discussion of it in an anonymous forum, will attract the attention and interest of the truly sick perverts who covet young boys, as those three do.
MaltaMon

Riverton, NJ

#128 Jul 1, 2013
This guy's analysis of men's and women's sexuality is nonsense. What "studies" conclude that "women tend toward bisexuality"? That's just fantasy from a man who is turned on by that preposterous notion. He is excited, as many men are, by the anomaly of two women getting it on. That doesn't mean that women in general are wired for erotic same-sex encounters. Is this guy married? How much experience has he had with women? My hunch is that he has not much intimate experience with heterosexual women.. And what is his point? I suppose that those other "experts" on women, coyote and hos band of gay old men, will enlighten is with their "erudition".
djw

Bath, UK

#130 Jul 1, 2013
Thomas wrote:
The topic is cmnf, not cnfnm.
The real criteria for me is consent or willingness. Some may be OK with something, some may not, but nothing should be forced on anyone.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1109zq_blac... ?
This should be perfectly OK.
Yes Thomas but are the women consenting and are they "willing" that is the question!

In Maltamom's country they directly elect some pretty sick judges and District Attorney's who delight in forcing females into CFNM situations as part of court proceedings!

http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/ar...

Judge says woman must pose nude for photos
By The Associated Press

MONTESANO, Grays Harbor County — A 35-year-old woman accused of having sex with a 14-year-old boy who worked at her bowling alley has been ordered by a judge to pose nude for evidence photos sought by the prosecution.

Prosecutors said their case against Dewanna L. "Dee" Granberg, who is charged with third-degree child rape, will be strengthened if the boy's description of her physical characteristics is confirmed by the photos.

If the boy "has seen her naked, it increases the chances that he had sex with her, that's just obvious," said Deputy Prosecutor Paul Conroy.

Granberg and her husband own Viking Bowl in Westport. She denies the boy's allegations.

The boy's parents first contacted Westport police in December. Granberg was arrested in January but released after posting bond. Trial is set for May 21.

Granberg's lawyers, Gary Morean and Erik Kupka, were outraged that the prosecutor secured a search warrant for the photos recently from a district-court judge without notifying them or Granberg.

"This kind of personal invasion should not be allowed," Morean said Tuesday.

When Westport police served the warrant on Granberg, she refused to be photographed.

But Grays Harbor County Superior Court Judge Mark McCauley agreed that the photos may prove to be "fruitful evidence." Whether the boy can identify telling things about Granberg's body could be a "crucial" element in the case, the judge said.

McCauley did specify that Granberg's face not be visible in the photos and that only the prosecution and defense will have access to them.

Whether a jury will see the photos will be decided later.

A woman officer must be present if the photos are being taken at the Westport Police Department, or Granberg can hire a professional photographer, the judge said, adding that the boy will not be allowed to see them.

Molly & wine razzle must stand up for individual privacy against the guantanamo US state!
MaltaMon

Riverton, NJ

#132 Jul 1, 2013
Go to prison, you sick sexually sordid sissy sleazeball bastard, djw/Zwacko
djw

Bath, UK

#134 Jul 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Go to prison, you sick sexually sordid sissy sleazeball bastard, djw/Zwacko
Maltamom join me deep down you know I fight for truth, justice and the American way just like Edward Snowden is fighting against US industrial espionage, Guantanamo bay style forced nudity and drone strikes.

You are better than that Auschwitz loving Rhine Bazzle who wants the English Defence League to take over Britain so he can put the muslims in extermination camps and give cuddles to pre-pubescent school girls in the communal conscripted showers!

There will be no Hitler Youth in this country Y'all it is time for Halifax and Dorval to rise.

I alone can put an end to CMNF & CFNM atrocities committed by Western states Governments and their proxies.

All I ask is for support from the good people of Penisylvania!
MaltaMon

Riverton, NJ

#135 Jul 1, 2013
I would love to watch him be castrated in public with a steak knife, the sick pedophile bastard.
MaltaMon

Riverton, NJ

#136 Jul 1, 2013
Line, Send his postings and his links to the authorities in Britain. Let's get the queer child-pornography traffficker locked up.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#137 Jul 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
That is, not the adult fetish itself, but rather the open discussion of it in an anonymous forum, will attract the attention and interest of the truly sick perverts who covet young boys, as those three do.
I suggest that the truly sick perverts attracted to such a forum, are the ones who read and post the most.
Two such obvious candidates would be MaltaMon and LineDazzle.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#138 Jul 2, 2013
Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
I suggest that the truly sick perverts attracted to such a forum, are the ones who read and post the most.
Two such obvious candidates would be MaltaMon and LineDazzle.
After, that is, Pedo Bob, who not only has posted the most over the longest period of time on these threads, but has posted (1) admissions that he'd raped my son in 2004,(2) admissions that he'd been stalking my son in 2012 and 2013,(3) many liurid and very graphic descriptions of a middle-aged man, whom he identifies in several of thos accounts,as himself, Pedo Bob, brutally raping young boys anally,(4) many entries, posted under aliases but clearly originating from Dorval (and which he himself has admitted are his postings), depicting child sexual abuse including forced public nudity and bare-assed spankings of male schoolchildren, as well as the enthusiasm and sexual interest of the narrator in these abusive acts,,and (5) endorsement of the child pornography and of the gay-teen sex videos that DJW/Zuiko have posted.. Clearly, Pedo Bob has no competition in the categories of interest and activity in these nude-boy/ child-sexual-abuse threads
DJW

Bournemouth, UK

#139 Jul 2, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> After, that is, Pedo Bob, who not only has posted the most over the longest period of time on these threads, but has posted (1) admissions that he'd raped my son in 2004,(2) admissions that he'd been stalking my son in 2012 and 2013,(3) many liurid and very graphic descriptions of a middle-aged man, whom he identifies in several of thos accounts,as himself, Pedo Bob, brutally raping young boys anally,(4) many entries, posted under aliases but clearly originating from Dorval (and which he himself has admitted are his postings), depicting child sexual abuse including forced public nudity and bare-assed spankings of male schoolchildren, as well as the enthusiasm and sexual interest of the narrator in these abusive acts,,and (5) endorsement of the child pornography and of the gay-teen sex videos that DJW/Zuiko have posted.. Clearly, Pedo Bob has no competition in the categories of interest and activity in these nude-boy/ child-sexual-abuse threads
The Maltamon has done nothing to support boys privacy right in Holland let it be noted in this non pornographic video approved by the Philadelphia police department that the girl on the see saw gets to keep her dignity but the boy is repeatedly required to be nude in the sauna!

This video has been age-restricted based on our Community Guidelines

Dailymotion understands that some content may not be appropriate for all users.

We provide an Age Gate so that you can choose the content best suited to your personal interest.

Turning OFF the Age Gate may display content that is only suitable for viewers over 18 years of age.

Click the button below if you are over 18 and would like to turn OFF the Age Gate.

Sem Roeters - Naakt (2006) &#57394;
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xdu24f_sem-r...

This is not a porn site and even has 141 likes on Facebook. This 7 minute 25 second video has been approved by the Netherlands government.

Will the Maltamum not join me and campaign for Australian style laws banning under 18 children from appearing nude on TV, video or in stage productions!

Notice Line Dazzle in the shower smiling down!

Jun 27, 2010 - A little boy (Sem Roeters) goes to a sauna with his mother. The required nudity is a bit scary at first, but interesting after a while....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nudity_in_film

As usual MM and LineDazzle are silent on this issue but have the audacity to label me Bob and Don Coyote as sexual predators. The pot calling the kettle black... Me thinks!
MaltaMon

Cherry Hill, NJ

#140 Jul 2, 2013
More sick sexual-abuse fantasies about children from this obstinate demented queer, djw.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#141 Jul 2, 2013
a total , absolute truth DJW and well posted !
DJW

Bournemouth, UK

#142 Jul 2, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
More sick sexual-abuse fantasies about children from this obstinate demented queer, djw.
No Molly I speak truth to Power even Nude Panty Line Dazzle recognises that!

You refuse to leave your Villanova porch and find out what is going on outside your trailer park.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xpvm0w_footb...

This video has been age-restricted based on our Community Guidelines
Maltamon

Southampton, UK

#145 Jul 9, 2013
Bob wrote:
There's no location for Thomas' post. That's really going to confuse LargeLanguage.
At the beginning of each school year, which is September in England, every girl in the school had a medical check-up. This was done methodically on a class by class basis, starting with the most junior girls, then working up the school to the senior girls in the Upper Sixth. At a specified time, each class of girls had to line up in the corridor outside Matron’s surgery, wearing only our knickers. One by one Matron called us into her waiting room, where we had to remove our knickers and surrender them to be placed in a cupboard. Then, still accompanied by Matron, we entered the surgery to have a naked check-up with Dr. Haslam.

Most medical situations at the school were not serious, and were dealt with by Matron herself. However, Dr. Haslam was a local GP who also acted as our school doctor, and he visited for more serious cases as and when needed. He also did the annual checkups. It seems somehow strange to me that he saw every girl in the school naked at least once a year, and sometimes more than once if they ever needed any treatment, but I guess that is just part of a doctor’s job. I am sure that he saw plenty of human bodies in his everyday work, and in our case Matron was always present. Although he sometimes had to touch us, for example when measuring blood pressure, he always wore medical gloves, and was very professional in all respects.

My first inspection, at the age of 13, was particularly traumatic. No man had ever seen me naked before except my father (and that was when I was about 2 years old), so I was acutely embarrassed. I tried to cover up my nakedness – one arm across my chest, which had started to bud, and the other hand shielding the area between my legs. But Matron wasn’t having any of that, she told me not to be so bashful, and to stand still with my arms straight at my side while the doctor spoke to me. So that is what I did, and the examination proceeded.

Dr. Haslam saw me naked every year after that, including the Upper Sixth when I was 18. Just think, at 18 I had a fully developed woman’s body, yet I still had to line up in the corridor wearing only my knickers, and then present myself naked for Dr. Haslam. He was a tall, thin, man with a full head of dark hair, and who wore glasses. I thought he was very old at the time, but I guess he was about forty, and he had a friendly, encouraging manner. He would ask you your name first, to make sure he had the right girl and her records. He would ask if you were well, and whether you had any medical problems. Then you were weighed, and your height was measured, and all this was recorded and compared with the previous year’s entries. The rest of the check-up was normal, and quite thorough.

Part of the check-up involved standing with your legs apart, then bending right over and touching your toes while keeping your legs perfectly straight. This apparently was to test our suppleness and fitness, and we were required to hold that position, without moving, for one minute. I always found this “test” especially embarrassing because it would be in complete silence with Matron and Dr. Haslam looking on. On one occasion my legs started to hurt, and I began to stand up. I got a very hard slap on the bottom with matron’s hand, and she told me to bend back down, and start the one minute again from the beginning. Oww, it really stung, and I had a red palm print on my bottom for the rest of that day.
Maltamon

Southampton, UK

#146 Jul 9, 2013
Probably the worst medical check-up I had was in the Fifth Form, when I was 16, in September 1990. This is because I had six vivid strap marks across my bottom, from a classroom flogging the day before. You weren’t exempt from the check-up if you’d been flogged, any more than you were exempt from the communal showers. I felt very embarrassed showing the strap marks to a man, especially during the bending over and touching toes test. Well, there I was, completely naked, with my feet apart, bending right over and pointing my bare bum at the ceiling, and clearly displaying the strap marks to Dr. Haslam in the most blatant way possible. I was mortified, but he didn’t react, and made no comment.

I guess he already knew that Felixstowe was a school that used corporal punishment. In fact it was worse for some other girls, who had their medical checkups with cane marks on their bottoms. I remember one girl in particular, Anne Hickson, a sixth former who had six blazing weals across her bum from a caning only the previous night. While she was doing the bending over and touching her toes test, Dr. Haslam had a conversation with Matron about the cane.

Apparently, Matron then explained to him in great detail all about the cane, including the dreaded Felixstowe punishment position, the fact that it must always be on the bare bottom, and the number of strokes. As if to illustrate what she was saying about the number of strokes, she pointed at Anne’s bottom and said that “this girl” had received six last night. The doctor was very interested, and although he didn’t touch Anne, he examined the weals on her bottom closely, and even shone some sort of medical torch on them. He commented that two of the weals had broken the outer most layer of skin, and asked if girls’ bottoms ever needed special cream, or other medical treatment, after a caning.

Matron replied that girls’ bottoms are extremely soft and sensitive, which is why beating them caused such terrible agony. This is the whole reason why bottoms were beaten at Felixstowe. This is why the cane on a girl’s bare bottom was such a good and effective punishment. This was why the Headmistress imported only the best quality, and most expensive, rattan from Indonesia for her canes. To inflict the maximum agony that was possible on girls’ soft bottoms. She said that the cane wounds on girls’ bottoms were never treated, and were left to heal on their own. She also remarked that she wished we could return to the old days, when girls got the cane during lessons, in front of the whole class.Poor Anne told us all about what had happened, later. As you can imagine, she was horribly embarrassed and humiliated by the whole episode. She’d had to remain in position, naked and touching her toes, while the discussion was taking place, and she was not at liberty to rise until Matron gave her permission. She’d had to remain completely silent throughout, displaying her bottom and cane marks, like some sort of animal or slave. She also complained bitterly that the discussion had lasted for at least five minutes, and she’d had to stay bending over the whole time, and then for another minute afterwards.

We were surprised at Matron’s apparent attitude to corporal punishment. Her comments to Dr. Haslam seemed to suggest that not only did she favour the cane, but thought it should be used more often. This was not the impression that she normally gave. She was normally brisk and hearty, but not unsympathetic, and although she had authority to flog girls’ bottoms with the strap, she rarely did so.
Maltamon

Southampton, UK

#147 Jul 9, 2013
One of my readers wrote to ask me about pubic hair, and I think that it is relevant to deal with it in this post. The issue is easily resolved. There was none. By the time I started at Felixstowe College in 1987 it had become deeply unfashionable for girls to have pubic hair. Most western girls shaved it off at puberty immediately, as soon as it started growing, and then repeated this every month. Depilating, I think it’s called. I started doing this myself before I even got to Felixstowe, and I can’t think of a single girl at the school who had pubic hair. I still do it now, and I doubt if there are many western women under the age of 40 who have pubic hair. I’m not sure what Matron thought of this, by the way, but it was universal and she did not make an issue of it.

By the time Dr. Haslam had finished writing up his records and discussing them with Matron, maybe ten or fifteen minutes had passed. Then you went back to the waiting room with Matron, retrieved your knickers and the next girl was called in. You would go straight back to the dorm and change into full school uniform again.

Here is a picture I found of a schoolgirl having a naked medical check-up at school. It’s exactly the same as it was at Felixstowe. I’m afraid I don’t know what school it is. Normally I could tell from the school uniform, but in this case she isn’t wearing one !

[email protected]
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#148 Jul 9, 2013
The above two posts are classic examples of (1) Pedo Bob, a known child sexual predator of Dorval (Montreal), Canada, stealing the identity of another member (in these two instances, as in so many others, my identity), and (2) posting his filthy pedophile fantasies.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jerry Sandusky Convicted (Jun '12) 2 hr Phil 14
Boy-Lover Bob Has NOT Disappeared (Oct '12) 2 hr Phil 14
FUTA 1st Batch Admission list 2015/2016 Release... 2 hr MichaelN 3
Obama repeals boys' nude-swimming act (Sep '13) 2 hr Phil 44
Bob: Were Boys Forced to Attend School Swim Les... (Sep '12) 2 hr Phil 2,235
EME Record Label (Banky W) Need Upcoming Artist... 3 hr Akindele Emmanuel 1
Dem Mama Record Label (Timaya) Need Upcoming Ar... 3 hr Akindele Emmanuel 1
More from around the web