should spanking be brought back to sc...
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#221 Apr 10, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, of course Large, especially your support for the forced nudity and spanking of young underage girls. Your group of Malto/Phil/Large should be called the group of pervert clowns.
Look here kid, if speaking against forced nudity with boys is showing their obsession with naked boys, then speaking in favour of it like you did shows you have an obsession with naked boys even more so, doesn't it, BOY?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#222 Apr 10, 2013
Please, Large, only a very few of my posts are even about nude boys. Only your friends Philly and Molly are constantly talking about nude boys, with which they are obsessed. They have made everyone sick with their constant and long-going talk about nude boys. It seems they can't think of anything else. Their obsession, and yours, gives them away.
Phil

UK

#223 Apr 10, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
Please, Large, only a very few of my posts are even about nude boys. Only your friends Philly and Molly are constantly talking about nude boys, with which they are obsessed. They have made everyone sick with their constant and long-going talk about nude boys. It seems they can't think of anything else. Their obsession, and yours, gives them away.
So advocating that boys swim naked, asking detailed questions as to who saw boys showering and being medically examined while naked and posting a link showing boys in the shower is not an obsession and is perfectly normal behaviour?
Who is this 'everyone'?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#224 Apr 10, 2013
"advocating that boys swim naked"
You well know that was a humorous exchange with Katie and other posters, and only temporary, as against your constant and endless posts about nude boys, which I have shown you.

"asking detailed questions as to who saw boys showering and being medically examined while naked"
And where are these detailed questions that you speak of? They are part of a normal conversation if one talks about the subject. I am certainly not obsessedd with this subject as you are and have been for a very long time.

"posting a link showing boys in the shower"
The link was not about boys in the shower but a documented google site about the history of nude swimming. And you well know it because you never complained about it, except now.
More of your hypocricy is shown here because YOU posted MULTIPLE links to sites and articles about nude boys swimming in schools on another thread.
Add to this that both you and Molly agreed that it is "preposterous" for the law not to allow people to take nude photos of children. Such hypocrites, liars and perverts like you two is hard to find.
So stop wasting my time repeating the same things and getting the same answer from me to show what a hypocrite, liar and pervert you are. Get a life and stop your obsession about nude boys, even if it takes you medical-mental treatment.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#225 Apr 10, 2013
He keeps referring to it as "a Google site", as if Google created and uploaded it. What he means is that it is a "googled" site--one that he found by using Google as a search engine. Which can be true of ANY web site. And "documented"? Lol. What the hell does that mean--that it's approved by the FBI? What he means is that he has not taken credit for its existence.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#226 Apr 10, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
"advocating that boys swim naked"
You well know that was a humorous exchange with Katie and other posters, and only temporary, as against your constant and endless posts about nude boys, which I have shown you.
"asking detailed questions as to who saw boys showering and being medically examined while naked"
And where are these detailed questions that you speak of? They are part of a normal conversation if one talks about the subject. I am certainly not obsessedd with this subject as you are and have been for a very long time.
"posting a link showing boys in the shower"
The link was not about boys in the shower but a documented google site about the history of nude swimming. And you well know it because you never complained about it, except now.
More of your hypocricy is shown here because YOU posted MULTIPLE links to sites and articles about nude boys swimming in schools on another thread.
Add to this that both you and Molly agreed that it is "preposterous" for the law not to allow people to take nude photos of children. Such hypocrites, liars and perverts like you two is hard to find.
So stop wasting my time repeating the same things and getting the same answer from me to show what a hypocrite, liar and pervert you are. Get a life and stop your obsession about nude boys, even if it takes you medical-mental treatment.
What did you type in the Google search bar in order to find that website?
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#227 Apr 10, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
"advocating that boys swim naked"
You well know that was a humorous exchange with Katie and other posters, and only temporary, as against your constant and endless posts about nude boys, which I have shown you.
"asking detailed questions as to who saw boys showering and being medically examined while naked"
And where are these detailed questions that you speak of? They are part of a normal conversation if one talks about the subject. I am certainly not obsessedd with this subject as you are and have been for a very long time.
"posting a link showing boys in the shower"
The link was not about boys in the shower but a documented google site about the history of nude swimming. And you well know it because you never complained about it, except now.
More of your hypocricy is shown here because YOU posted MULTIPLE links to sites and articles about nude boys swimming in schools on another thread.
Add to this that both you and Molly agreed that it is "preposterous" for the law not to allow people to take nude photos of children. Such hypocrites, liars and perverts like you two is hard to find.
So stop wasting my time repeating the same things and getting the same answer from me to show what a hypocrite, liar and pervert you are. Get a life and stop your obsession about nude boys, even if it takes you medical-mental treatment.
You still have this issue with evidence and opinion
You have not shown my constant and endless posts about nude boys because I haven't posted constant and endless posts.
Just posting a link is not good enough.
I asked earlier for you to show me where I posted multiple links to articles and sites about boys swimming nude in schools.
Still waiting.
As regards the questions you asked about boys being observed in the shower, etc I have already posted the replies to your questions addressed to you.
The questions you asked were not in any way part of conversation.
They are the product of a perverted mind.
MaltaMon

Allentown, PA

#228 Apr 10, 2013
ZuikiFag: "advocating that boys swim naked"
You well know that was a humorous exchange with Katie and other posters, and only temporary, as against your constant and endless posts about nude boys, which I have shown you.

What is "humorous" about forcing children to swim nude? If that is the truth, it hardly absolves you from sexual perversion with regard to young boys. That you would joke about that indicates that you have no empathy for the child victims--no concern for their well-being, no feeling of repulsion toward their humiliation at being forced to go naked by aggressive, authoritarian, sexually abusive adult fantasy figures--a repulsion which would be normal for any sexually well-adjusted male of your age who cares about children. Your explanation defies logic. You cannot use it to justify your untoward interest in child nudity. Oh, and by the way, your pointing to my statements about locker rooms, where children of the same sex are required to shower, as I and all of my peers were so that we didn't return to class infected with germs and smelling like the river, is not "an interest in boy nudity". Quite the opposite. You neglected the context. Your pathologically hypocritical colleague D-J-W, your fellow child-porn enthusiast and distributor on Topix, was ranting on about how humiliating it was to force adolescents to shower after physical education class and school sports practices. It was a matter of hygiene--not sex. As I said, there is nothing sexual about requiring students to cleanse their bodies of germs and dirt and perspiration before returning to the close quarters of an academic classroom. It's a matter of good health and courtesy. It figures that you would use that: there is nothing else in your arsenal. But your deliberate miscasting of it is as transparent as the rest of your lying bullshit on these threads. You are a middle-aged man who is turned on by the nudity of young boys. Your postings, including that of that child-pornography web site, prove it. Phil here is right. "Humor" isn't the issue. I find nothing funny about your sexual interest in male minors.
Kevin Peters

100 Mile House, Canada

#229 Apr 11, 2013
Spanking for both boys and girls needs to be brought back to schools in the grades 6 to 9 In canada is was with a strap across the palms of the bare hands. Quite effective as I can remember. The Butt is a more sexual part and I would be against spanking on it for that reason. A good strapping on the bare palms is effective.
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#230 Apr 11, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
Please, Large, only a very few of my posts are even about nude boys. Only your friends Philly and Molly are constantly talking about nude boys, with which they are obsessed. They have made everyone sick with their constant and long-going talk about nude boys. It seems they can't think of anything else. Their obsession, and yours, gives them away.
Just say anything! If you find the truth inconvenient, just make somEthing up. The thing is, it won't work when pages and pages of hard evidence to the contrary are readily available on the same site as the lies. "Only a very few of" his postings! Lol.. Just make shit up, ZuikiLies. Just say anything!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#231 Apr 12, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Just say anything! If you find the truth inconvenient, just make somEthing up. The thing is, it won't work when pages and pages of hard evidence to the contrary are readily available on the same site as the lies. "Only a very few of" his postings! Lol.. Just make shit up, ZuikiLies. Just say anything!
The only "pages and pages of hard evidence" that we have is your long-going interest and obsession with nude boys. Nearly ALL your posts, as well as Phil's, are about this subject only. Very few of my posts are, even as Sir Arthur. Pointing to a few posts out of context and making insinuations is not proof but dishonesty.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#232 Apr 12, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
You still have this issue with evidence and opinion
You have not shown my constant and endless posts about nude boys because I haven't posted constant and endless posts.
Just posting a link is not good enough.
Are you serious, Phil? Posting a link to a topic about nude boys running hundreds of posts and pages which is full of your posts from the very first page and continuously throughout is not "good enough"? Then what is? You are an even bigger liar and hypocrite than Molly. No wonder you have joined him now to save face, after attacking him for so long.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#233 Apr 12, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
I asked earlier for you to show me where I posted multiple links to articles and sites about boys swimming nude in schools.
Still waiting.
Another of your outright lies. I showed it to you several times. So here it is again.

Phil
Manchester, UK
|#410
Dec 1, 2012 :

http://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/07/education/s ...
"It had last been featured in London tabloids in 1992, when a television documentary showed teachers and pupils swimming naked together"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/dec/01/ofst ...
"....and, weather permitting, staff and students can sunbathe in the nude"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summerhill_Schoo ...
"School meetings are held three times a week, where
Phil

UK

#234 Apr 12, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Another of your outright lies. I showed it to you several times. So here it is again.
Phil
Manchester, UK
|#410
Dec 1, 2012 :
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/07/education/s ...
"It had last been featured in London tabloids in 1992, when a television documentary showed teachers and pupils swimming naked together"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/dec/01/ofst ...
"....and, weather permitting, staff and students can sunbathe in the nude"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summerhill_Schoo ...
"School meetings are held three times a week, where
Is that it?
Three links in one single post
Is that what you refer to as an obsession?
Is that the best you can do?
Where did I post a link to images of boys in the shower as you did?
Phil

UK

#235 Apr 12, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you serious, Phil? Posting a link to a topic about nude boys running hundreds of posts and pages which is full of your posts from the very first page and continuously throughout is not "good enough"? Then what is? You are an even bigger liar and hypocrite than Molly. No wonder you have joined him now to save face, after attacking him for so long.
If you bothered to follow the link you will see few posts are on-topic but mostly exchanges with Censored about his CFNM obsession where I argue AGAINST forced nudity in schools and probably a good few words with Maltamon about the Bob issue.
Phil

UK

#236 Apr 12, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
The only "pages and pages of hard evidence" that we have is your long-going interest and obsession with nude boys. Nearly ALL your posts, as well as Phil's, are about this subject only. Very few of my posts are, even as Sir Arthur. Pointing to a few posts out of context and making insinuations is not proof but dishonesty.
You are lying to yourself.
You know the posts were in context and were responses to yiour blunt, direct, non-conversational questions as to who saw the boys naked and when.
That IS an obsession.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#237 Apr 12, 2013
yes, it's a good idea. Of course, there's a guidelines so it won' t be abused.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#238 Apr 12, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that it?
Three links in one single post
Is that what you refer to as an obsession?
Is that the best you can do?
Where did I post a link to images of boys in the shower as you did?
Your dishonesty and lies keep coming out. I posted your links because you denied posting them and wanted proof. No, it is not a single post about your obsession, this is shown in your hundreds of posts always about naked boys. It was also to show your hypocricy of accusing me of posting one single link about nude swimming, while you posted multiple ones.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#239 Apr 12, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
If you bothered to follow the link you will see few posts are on-topic but mostly exchanges with Censored about his CFNM obsession where I argue AGAINST forced nudity in schools and probably a good few words with Maltamon about the Bob issue.
Blatant lying again. "A few posts are on topic"? There are continuous posts on every page by you all about that topic on that thread about nude swimming boys. They are there for everyone to see. Your denialism in spite of all the evidence is crass.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#240 Apr 12, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
You are lying to yourself.
You know the posts were in context and were responses to yiour blunt, direct, non-conversational questions as to who saw the boys naked and when.
That IS an obsession.
No, that is NOT an obsession, it is a ridiculous insinuation of yours. An obsession is one who CONSTANTLY talks about nude boys, and has a topic about nude boys full of his posts, as you have.
I suggest that you take your own advice which you once gave to MM
"When in a hole, stop digging".

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Examgood a spanking site 5 hr Steven Stool 3
Updated Huawei HCIE-Storage H13-629-ENU exam qu... 5 hr Peepee CacaPoopoo 2
HCIE-Cloud certification H13-531 practice exam 20 hr Phil Pharter 2
JN0-661 Service Provider Routing and Switching ... 20 hr Peter Pooper 2
200-550 Zend Certified PHP Engineer dumps 20 hr Chuffy Cheeks 2
Bennett Kallas and boys' underwear 20 hr White Nude Christmas 1
endexam.com an internet scam site! Thu Fot Whiff 2
Did You Swim Nude In High School? (Dec '12) Dec 3 Phil 2,613
More from around the web