should spanking be brought back to sc...
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#201 Apr 9, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
And what, silly Philly, do you imply with those posts, they are not mine. The fact is that I am not obsessed with this subject of naked boys as you are, with hundreds of continuous posts on one topic alone with the title of Boys Swimming Naked at School. It is the same for your lying, hypocrite partner Molly. The thread about Nude Boys is full of posts by you two. It is no use trying to deflect from this fact.
And why did you Google nude swimming?

Still waiting.
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#202 Apr 9, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
Amusing...The two biggest enemies on this forum have now become partners and lovers, to cover up for each other after being revealed for what they are, pedo-gays.
Amusing that despite overwhelming evidence (not opinion) that you have an unhealthy interest in boys being nude in front of clothed women that you still try to squirm your way out of it.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#203 Apr 9, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
And why did you Google nude swimming?
Still waiting.
Because I was curious about the subject. Is there anything wrong or unusual in that?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#204 Apr 9, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Amusing that despite overwhelming evidence (not opinion) that you have an unhealthy interest in boys being nude in front of clothed women that you still try to squirm your way out of it.
And what is this "overwhelming evvidence"? The only overwhelming evidence that we have is that you have been interested and obsessed with the subject of nude boys for a long and continuous time.
Phil

UK

#205 Apr 9, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Your link shows the poster answering several other posters, including Katie. So are you implying that they are also what you mention about me?
Poor try again, Philly, nothing but insinuations. The fact remains that only you and MM have been obsessed with this subject of naked boys for a long time, as my links have shown.
The posts I reproduced are responses directed at you as Sir Arthur, not replies to Katie or anyone else, no doubt in response to your usual Sir Arthur questions, asking who saw the boys naked, who else was in the room, etc.
Phil

UK

#206 Apr 9, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Because I was curious about the subject. Is there anything wrong or unusual in that?
In the same way you are 'curious' about who (or what gender) supervised the boys while in the shower, while swimming or being medically examined, while naked.
Phil

UK

#207 Apr 9, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
And what, silly Philly, do you imply with those posts, they are not mine. The fact is that I am not obsessed with this subject of naked boys as you are, with hundreds of continuous posts on one topic alone with the title of Boys Swimming Naked at School. It is the same for your lying, hypocrite partner Molly. The thread about Nude Boys is full of posts by you two. It is no use trying to deflect from this fact.
Hundreds of posts?
If you bothered to check very few are on topic but most are exchanges between Maltamon and I with my (unwelcome) opinions on his supposed case against Bob and also my disagreement with Censored about his obsession with CFNM, as opposed to your obsession with CFNB (b for boy).
MaltaMon

Mullica Hill, NJ

#208 Apr 9, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Plase Molly, your insinuations and lies don't mean anything. It is YOU who said that people should be allowed to take photos of naked children, not me. And not surprisingly your mate Phil has said that he agrees with you. Do you want me to link your posts about this again? What I say I can prove, unlike your insinuation, unproved posts.
When did I say any such thing? Provide the link to it. Prove that this isn't another of your desperate, baldface lies. You will not do that because it isn't possible. I have been consistent in my unequivocal condemnation of photographing naked children, and of posting photos of naked children, as you and your fellow child-porn enthusiast D-J-W have, as child pornography, and have repeatedly warned you of its criminality. No exceptions. This latest lie of yours is perhaps your most transparent and ludicrous of all.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#209 Apr 9, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> When did I say any such thing? Provide the link to it. Prove that this isn't another of your desperate, baldface lies. You will not do that because it isn't possible. I have been consistent in my unequivocal condemnation of photographing naked children, and of posting photos of naked children, as you and your fellow child-porn enthusiast D-J-W have, as child pornography, and have repeatedly warned you of its criminality. No exceptions. This latest lie of yours is perhaps your most transparent and ludicrous of all.
Oh, so I'm a liar. I just pointed it out to you a few days ago. So to refresh your memory here it is again. Notice how after a whole page full of your posts urging kids to be naked, and saying that it is unnatural for kids not wanting to be seen naked, you say that it is preposterous for the law not to allow people to take nude photos of kids.
Notice also the other liar Phil who says that most of his posts are not about the subject when the page has several posts by him on the subject as also most of the other pages full of his and your posts about naked boys.

http://www.topix.com/forum/education/TV5C3Q72...


Post #573
"We've already reached the preposterous milestone at which naked photographs of our own infants and toddlers is regarded as child pornography."

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#210 Apr 9, 2013
The following page of above link, post #600 by Maltamon, continuing with his argument that a child who refuses to be seen naked becomes a "dysfunctional adult".

" And to indulge a child's unreasoning terror of nudity--to encourage it rather than to address his phobia-- when nude is what all human beings are under our man-made armour, is to sow the seeds of terrible adult dysfunction. No, it isn't a solution."
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#211 Apr 9, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
The following page of above link, post #600 by Maltamon, continuing with his argument that a child who refuses to be seen naked becomes a "dysfunctional adult".
" And to indulge a child's unreasoning terror of nudity--to encourage it rather than to address his phobia-- when nude is what all human beings are under our man-made armour, is to sow the seeds of terrible adult dysfunction. No, it isn't a solution."
MaltaMon was speaking in context of a stable society, but in this society he knows forced nudity has no place, and is simply rape.

Unless you lied that he said that, BOY! You're getting pushed around a lot aint ya BOY? Eh BOY?
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#212 Apr 9, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, so I'm a liar. I just pointed it out to you a few days ago. So to refresh your memory here it is again. Notice how after a whole page full of your posts urging kids to be naked, and saying that it is unnatural for kids not wanting to be seen naked, you say that it is preposterous for the law not to allow people to take nude photos of kids.
Notice also the other liar Phil who says that most of his posts are not about the subject when the page has several posts by him on the subject as also most of the other pages full of his and your posts about naked boys.
http://www.topix.com/forum/education/TV5C3Q72...
Post #573
"We've already reached the preposterous milestone at which naked photographs of our own infants and toddlers is regarded as child pornography."
You will note that the posts on this ONE page from me are arguing in favour of not embarrassing boys by not imposing forced nudity.
Quite the opposite to your well documented stance, one of having the boys swim naked alongside suited girls and (in your fantasies) supervised by clothed females.
There is plenty of evidence to show that.
Also note at no point did I post a link to a dodgy website containing photos of nude boys in the shower.
Nor did I post questions (more than once) when boys and nudity was mentioned, asking who else was in the room or who saw the boys naked while showering or being examined.
You did.
I am still waiting to be shown the 'hundreds' of posts where I talk 'continuously' about nude boys.
Fact, not opinion.
MaltaMon

United States

#213 Apr 9, 2013
What ZuikiPed regards as 'posting about nude boys'(disingenuously, mind you... because he knows better. He's just a liar) is any post written by a critic of his that contributes anything at all, even condemnation or a more civilized opposing perspective, on the threads on which he has posted his lustful yearnings for naked young boys, his interest in every lusty, erotic detail about anyone who had to go naked as a boy, and his link to a web site that contains photos of nude boys. He claims all that his opponents have posted in criticism of him, opposed to nudity of chidren in public--or any forced nudity of children--opposed to child sexual abuse and humiliation, opposed to his very presence on these threads, regardless of what he's said, as "posting about boy nudity". He will never offer any evidence of anything else. He doesn't care to even try, because he knows that he won't find anything that fits the bill. He just persists in his groundless, ridiculous accusations in the delusion that he's actually making his point, as disingenuous as it is. He's just a born liar.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#214 Apr 10, 2013
Oh please Philly and Molly, your insinuations are laughable. You keep asking for proof that you both are obsessed with nude boys and I keep giving it to you. Just look at the topic about the subject, which is full of your posts on every page right from the very start, and all about nude boys swimming. I am certainly not obsessed with this subject because few of my posts are about it, and no posts of mine there except maybe late and few on your favorite subject.

http://www.topix.com/forum/education/TV5C3Q72...
Phil

UK

#215 Apr 10, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
Oh please Philly and Molly, your insinuations are laughable. You keep asking for proof that you both are obsessed with nude boys and I keep giving it to you. Just look at the topic about the subject, which is full of your posts on every page right from the very start, and all about nude boys swimming. I am certainly not obsessed with this subject because few of my posts are about it, and no posts of mine there except maybe late and few on your favorite subject.
http://www.topix.com/forum/education/TV5C3Q72...
So why do you think (and why did you post) that boys should swim nude?
Why were you interested in who else saw the boys while they showered as you once posted?
Why the interest in and the posts about boys being medically examined naked and the gender of the adults involved?
Phil

UK

#216 Apr 10, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
Oh please Philly and Molly, your insinuations are laughable. You keep asking for proof that you both are obsessed with nude boys and I keep giving it to you. Just look at the topic about the subject, which is full of your posts on every page right from the very start, and all about nude boys swimming. I am certainly not obsessed with this subject because few of my posts are about it, and no posts of mine there except maybe late and few on your favorite subject.
http://www.topix.com/forum/education/TV5C3Q72...
They are not insinuations.
The evidence to back it up is there for all to see.
Once again you have proven nothing.
I have proven plenty.
Phil

UK

#217 Apr 10, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
Oh please Philly and Molly, your insinuations are laughable. You keep asking for proof that you both are obsessed with nude boys and I keep giving it to you. Just look at the topic about the subject, which is full of your posts on every page right from the very start, and all about nude boys swimming. I am certainly not obsessed with this subject because few of my posts are about it, and no posts of mine there except maybe late and few on your favorite subject.
http://www.topix.com/forum/education/TV5C3Q72...
I will say again, most of my posts are not on topic.
Few relate to the subject matter.
Show me again the 'hundreds' of posts where I talk 'continuously' about nude boys.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#218 Apr 10, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
Oh please Philly and Molly, your insinuations are laughable. You keep asking for proof that you both are obsessed with nude boys and I keep giving it to you. Just look at the topic about the subject, which is full of your posts on every page right from the very start, and all about nude boys swimming. I am certainly not obsessed with this subject because few of my posts are about it, and no posts of mine there except maybe late and few on your favorite subject.
http://www.topix.com/forum/education/TV5C3Q72...
We were speaking against forced nudity, we were against the idea of it, while you showed your obsession by supporting it.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#219 Apr 10, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
I will say again, most of my posts are not on topic.
Few relate to the subject matter.
Show me again the 'hundreds' of posts where I talk 'continuously' about nude boys.
Oh please, Philly, just go through that link, which is this topic after all, and go through it right from page 1 and page after page and show us if any post of yours is NOT on the topic of nude boys. But you are such a liar that you don't even believe it when it is in front of you. But then I don't blame you for joining Molly's club since you have inherited all his traits.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#220 Apr 10, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
We were speaking against forced nudity, we were against the idea of it, while you showed your obsession by supporting it.
Yes, of course Large, especially your support for the forced nudity and spanking of young underage girls. Your group of Malto/Phil/Large should be called the group of pervert clowns.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
females supervising male nude swimming programs... (Feb '13) 4 hr Dr Maltamon 685
I want to apply for scolarships what to choose ? 4 hr Maltamon 3
All JohnHampton1 threads fraudulent! 5 hr Scam Alert 1
braindumpsschool.com a scam site! 5 hr Scam Alert 1
CD0-001 Exam Questions and Answers with PDF, VC... 10 hr JohnHampton1 1
CAS-002 braindump with passing guarantee 10 hr JohnHampton1 1
220-902 exam success | Everyone Loves 220-902 B... 10 hr JohnHampton1 1
More from around the web