How were you spanked ?
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#72 Mar 4, 2013
coyote wrote:
MM- T Y for all the info about Cndn government and the line of authority-- when I took down the Union Jack I put up our new flag. "Beef with the British"- don't be so daft boy ! However; you know we have to be careful in Canada as it is important to maintain solidarity from coast to shining coast and as C. DeGaulle proved- things get touchy at times ! If Justin had a chance of becoming PM, the harmony or lack of would be interesting- but likely not gonna happen !
That doesn't explain the trashing you gave Large over his nation's constitutional system, on which Canada's has always been based, or its monarch, who is also Canada's. And forgetting that Canada as a nation was founded in the House of Commons at Westminster.No Declaration of Independence, no revolution, no 18th or 19th Century constitutional convention in Canada itself. Don't appreciate the irony of your statements? That's too bad. As for Justin, remember that he's Margaret's son, too. His father kept your country from splitting apart without an actual civil war--only some troops in the streets to prevent further terroristic acts during the October crisis. And speaking of thosethose separatist terrorists, the FLQ, don't forget his display of courage on St Jean-Baptiste, the day before the 68 election. Or his patriation from Britain of Canada's constitution? How can any son live up to that? It would be much easier to live up to his mother's legacy, so you have to give him some credit for wanting to follow in his dad's footsteps. But the nation he would lead, thanks considerably to his father, won't afford him the great challenges to its survival that his father faced and which afforded him the opportunity for greatness. Would any Beatles fan be satisfied to listen to "Valotte"?
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#73 Mar 4, 2013
Although I doubt that Justin would want to follow in his lovely mother's footsteps. Sex with Mick Jagger? Although I wouldn't mind if he reopened Studio 54. It was a cool place.. Of course, I was just a college kid. Perhaps I'd hate it today.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#74 Mar 4, 2013
BamBam31 wrote:
When I was a child I was abused I got more than just a spanking. However with my kids I have found that for my daughter taking her phone away is worse than a swat. With my son grounding, talking to him doesn't phase him but swats do. Even than he only gets swats for lies and stealing so not very often at all.
Well, if Largelout and Malmon were your sons you would certainly give them frequent spankings for said reasons.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#75 Mar 4, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
You foolish little man! Swatting causes long term damage! And spanking him will only discourage him from being honest! And you shouldn't force honesty, you should help the kids build openness, you vile piece of filth!
Now now boy, watch your language. You are the biggest example why out of control kids should be spanked.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#76 Mar 4, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not next claim to be president of Canada?
Only a nutcase like you, or MM, would claim such a thing.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#79 Mar 4, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Although I doubt that Justin would want to follow in his lovely mother's footsteps. Sex with Mick Jagger? Although I wouldn't mind if he reopened Studio 54. It was a cool place.. Of course, I was just a college kid. Perhaps I'd hate it today.
Is sex and kids the only thing you ever talk about?
Rush

Fairbury, NE

#80 Mar 4, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
You foolish little man! Swatting causes long term damage! And spanking him will only discourage him from being honest! And you shouldn't force honesty, you should help the kids build openness, you vile piece of filth!
Largelanguage
Wrexham, UK
Reply »
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Sunday Feb 10
Judged:
4
4
3
Grandpasmurf952 wrote:
The real shame is in the denial of the reality of sexual orientation being determined before birth that homosexual people have been insisting is so for centuries and science is slowly confirming to be so.
This denial is clung to by religions that depend on a consistent patriarchal hierarchical order to support their religion that conflicts with the reality of unconditional LOVE.
How many more suicides of innocent young children rejected by their parent's religions do we have to see before people wake up to the reality of this horrible situation?
How many children need to be bullied every day they go to school for how they were born?
Why don't we question the validity of religions that use the hate of minorities and the fear of eternal damnation to protect their dogma?
.
.
.
.
.
.
Largelanguage wrote:
Your use of the word patriarchy shows your bigotry. And I'm perfectly fine with gay kids being bullied to death.
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#82 Mar 4, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Is sex and kids the only thing you ever talk about?
m WTF does Studio 54, my having gone there several times as a 20- and 21 y/o, and Margaret Trudeau having sex with Mick Jagger, or the prospect of Justin Trudeau, who is 41 years old, following in his father's footsteps to become Prime Minister of Canada have to do with sex with kids? YOU raised the topic--not I, you sick, paranoid, angry, resentful, homophobic, closeted homosexual, poster of child pornography and apologist for paedophiles
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#83 Mar 4, 2013
And this fraud, who is now on his third screen name (at least) in less than a year, insists that others need help when he is the one who needs to be locked away. Frankly, I don't care if he ever gets help: he simply needs to be removed from the streets, from chasing boys around town. If the worst he did was to insult me without justification, I wouldn't care at all. But having posted links to child pornography, then having denied that he did so, this is a very dangerous individual. He has no conscience, which is the very definition of a sociopath.
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#85 Mar 5, 2013
And he no doubt will change it again.. As if it made any difference.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#86 Mar 5, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
And his arrogance too. But zuiko tried to imitate some responsible young 40something adult, but then after making a fool of himself, changed his username.
I never posted as 40something, boy, never imitated anyone, and only you and another poster are making fools of yourselves, and everyone is making a fool of you.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#87 Mar 5, 2013
Zuiko: I do not recall you being MM or Bob from Location hidden but I think one of the above has posed as Bob from their location(s). What is wrong with them ?? Do as "they say" not as they do....T'aint rite !

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#88 Mar 5, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text>m WTF does Studio 54, my having gone there several times as a 20- and 21 y/o, and Margaret Trudeau having sex with Mick Jagger, or the prospect of Justin Trudeau, who is 41 years old, following in his father's footsteps to become Prime Minister of Canada have to do with sex with kids? YOU raised the topic--not I, you sick, paranoid, angry, resentful, homophobic, closeted homosexual, poster of child pornography and apologist for paedophiles
You are so obsessed with naked boys that you do not realize that most of your posts are about naked boys, and that you have started multiple threads about naked boys.
And no, I have not started the topic at all, it is you who wants to turn every topic into one about naked boys. So "sick, paranoid, angry, homophobic, closeted homosexual, and child pornographist and apologist" all apply to you. None of those comments apply to me.
I also assure you that I am not angry at all, as is shown in all your desperate posts. If anything I am amused by your and your pet friend's pathological and lunatic posts.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#89 Mar 5, 2013
coyote wrote:
Zuiko: I do not recall you being MM or Bob from Location hidden but I think one of the above has posed as Bob from their location(s). What is wrong with them ?? Do as "they say" not as they do....T'aint rite !
Their hypocricy is extreme. In one post they defend homosexuals and in the other they say that they want homosexuals bullied to death. They claim that they are against the abuse of kids and at the same time they are in favour of women being raped. And one could go on. If this isn't gross hypocricy, it is downright insanity. Which one do you think it is?
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#90 Mar 5, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Their hypocricy is extreme. In one post they defend homosexuals and in the other they say that they want homosexuals bullied to death. They claim that they are against the abuse of kids and at the same time they are in favour of women being raped. And one could go on. If this isn't gross hypocricy, it is downright insanity. Which one do you think it is?
You are even dumber than I thought you were, you phony closeted gay homophobe. You accuse "they" of saying "they want homosexuals like you bullied to death. I can understand you, in particular, objecting to that--while failing to object to any of the many graphic postings of your intellectual lord and master, Bob of Dorval, describing, and mocking, the brutal anal rape of young boys. I never said anything of the sort that you claim about homosexuals. Never wished anyone would bully anybody, including homosexuals. Not ever. You,are, as I have said before an inveterate pathological liar. And your attacks on me, which feature and emphasize your made-up bullshit, are curious in the face of your schoolgirl-giggly approval of Bob's maliciously spirited, luridly detailed, repulsively uncivilized, offensively repugnant scenarios about raping childrem Complete silence. You approve of them and of the sick and very dangerous criminal who cteated and posted them.
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#92 Mar 5, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so obsessed with naked boys that you do not realize that most of your posts are about naked boys, and that you have started multiple threads about naked boys.
And no, I have not started the topic at all, it is you who wants to turn every topic into one about naked boys. So "sick, paranoid, angry, homophobic, closeted homosexual, and child pornographist and apologist" all apply to you. None of those comments apply to me.
I also assure you that I am not angry at all, as is shown in all your desperate posts. If anything I am amused by your and your pet friend's pathological and lunatic posts.
That is like sayng that a forecast of rain is about water and mud. You know, you are so stupid,,and such a fraud, that by comparison Pedo Bob actually seems to have a modicum of ontegrity. My posts are about "men" such as you, who find young boys sexy, who post links to photos of nude young boys and then deny it, who serve on an online battalion of apologists for rral pedophiles, sexual predators, and child pornographers. My obsession is with guys like you who abuse young boys, who regard them as purely sexual objects, who have no qualms about violently violating them only to laugh about it afterwards. And you are a liar--something else I despise. Mu obsession is with you and your like-minded sociopaths. My only concern with boys is that they be permitted a life free of fear of the likes of you.
Bob

Châteauguay, Canada

#93 Mar 5, 2013
Rush wrote:
<quoted text>
Largelanguage
Wrexham, UK
Reply »
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Sunday Feb 10
Judged:
4
4
3
Grandpasmurf952 wrote:
The real shame is in the denial of the reality of sexual orientation being determined before birth that homosexual people have been insisting is so for centuries and science is slowly confirming to be so.
This denial is clung to by religions that depend on a consistent patriarchal hierarchical order to support their religion that conflicts with the reality of unconditional LOVE.
How many more suicides of innocent young children rejected by their parent's religions do we have to see before people wake up to the reality of this horrible situation?
How many children need to be bullied every day they go to school for how they were born?
Why don't we question the validity of religions that use the hate of minorities and the fear of eternal damnation to protect their dogma?
.
.
.
.
.
.
Largelanguage wrote:
Your use of the word patriarchy shows your bigotry. And I'm perfectly fine with gay kids being bullied to death.
Interesting that Largelanguage thinks gay kids being bullied to death is OK.
Since MaltaMon claims to have a gay son, I wonder what he would
think of your attitude...
Bob

Châteauguay, Canada

#94 Mar 5, 2013
So much for your ally and acolyte, MaltaMon: Largelanguage thinks gay kids should be bullied to death!
Sorry to spoil the party for you two losers!
Hahahahahaha!
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#95 Mar 5, 2013
AND that other loving parents won't have to endure the never-ending heartache that descends when theit sons and daughters are violent forced from the innocence and joy of childhood into the beds of perverted, malicious animals such as you and your Canadian idle, Pedo Bob.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#96 Mar 5, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Their hypocricy is extreme. In one post they defend homosexuals and in the other they say that they want homosexuals bullied to death. They claim that they are against the abuse of kids and at the same time they are in favour of women being raped. And one could go on. If this isn't gross hypocrisy, it is downright insanity. Which one do you think it is?
Obviously the melted man (men ?) has lost his will and as leader cannot even provide direction to his only ally- Large (inc. his parrot of course). He will not take LL to task for posting the terrible things you have noted. Guess it is hypocrisy plus total lack of commitment to his fabled cause.....who cares..

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Punishment Hat Is Legal 7 hr Punish Her Ill Lad 7
Punishment (Nov '14) 7 hr Punish Her Ill Lad 73
News WNC sees unease over corporal punishment (Apr '08) 7 hr Punish Her Ill Lad 198
Spanking Phil And MaltaMon (S.P.A.M. ) 7 hr Pubic Hair Itchy ... 12
Should I Spank my Sons over the pants,over the ... (Apr '14) 7 hr Pubic Hair Itchy ... 52
should spanking be brought back to schools ? (Apr '12) 7 hr Pubic Hair Itchy ... 291
News Paddling teacher under fire (Aug '14) 7 hr Parent Holds Its ... 38
More from around the web