Schools in brief

The following students were chosen for the 2007-08 Artistically Talented program: North Central student announcements North Central will host the annual Empty Bowls Dinner 4:30 to 7:30 p.m. Oct. Full Story
What a shame

Indianapolis, IN

#1 Sep 27, 2007
Code Red is nothing but a bunch of immature children who live in nice houses driving their parent's cars and talking shit... that's it but that doesn't mean nothing will happen... They may do something to prove they are a man or something to act all big and bad and it’s just really annoying... just think if this is what the next generation is going to be like I give America another 20 years if that before everything collapses and then we will all know what it’s like to have a bad life. So for everyone who is supporting this ask yourself do you want your kids, your brothers, and sisters messed up in this shit and make their lives worthless because 'it's the only thing you can do to survive?' There are plenty of opportunities out there so make your life better or stay where you are and shut the fuck up and leave people alone, so they can make something out of themselves.
MaltoMon

Montréal, Canada

#2 Jul 26, 2013
I prefer to see a Schoolboy in Briefs.

I think it would aid physical mobility if boys had to perform PE in just their undershorts. No restrictive tank tops or shorts, or confining shoes.
I like my women barefoot and pregnant; I like my boys barefoot and in briefs.

The only improvement I can think of is to have boys do PE in the nude.
LineDazzle

Southampton, UK

#3 Jul 26, 2013
When I was a boy in Wrexham the school master strictly enforced the no briefs and vests under our school uniform. Along with the no coats rule we went to school in just white shirt tie black shorts blue socks and brown shoes.

It made it a lot easier for gym practice when we competed in just white satin shorts before removing them and having our nude swimming lessons!

I knew when I met headmaster Maltesermom it was love at first strike with the giant paddle y'all
phil

Southampton, UK

#4 Jul 26, 2013
Telegraph.co.uk Friday 26 July 2013 | UK News feed
»UK NewsTeacher with MBE 'streaked naked across field on school trip'
A teacher who was presented with an MBE for his work organising Duke of Edinburgh Award schemes has been found guilty of misconduct after streaking naked with pupils across a field on a school trip.

David Bradley outside the General Teaching Council hearing in Coventry Photo: NewsteamBy Telegraph reporters
10:11AM GMT 17 Jan 2013
David Bradley, 55, also undressed in a shower area where children, aged 12 and 13, were naked and on another occasion he hugged a female pupil.

He also presided over a bizarre 'peeing' competition between students from North Cestrian Grammar School, Altrincham, Cheshire, on the camping trip between November 4 and 6, 2011.

The incidents took place when he was in charge of 11 pupils who were staying at the Solwaybank centre in Dumfries and Galloway, in Scotland.

Bradley was awarded an MBE in 2008 for services to young people after running Duke of Edinburgh Award schemes for 30 years.

On Thursday married Bradley, from Hale Barns, Greater Manchester, was found guilty of unacceptable professional conduct at a Teaching Agency disciplinary hearing in Coventry.

The panel found it was inappropriate for him to streak naked across a field in full view of students.

He admitted he had undressed in front of male students while they showered and sat a male pupil on his knee, but this was ruled not sufficient to amount to misconduct.

Bradley also admitted hugging a female pupil but he was cleared of misconduct when he claimed he held her because he feared she was suffering from hypothermia.

He also admitted asking two boys if they were having a "peeing competition" before saying "ready steady go" but this was also ruled not inappropriate behaviour.

An allegation that he suggested giving a pupil a forfeit by putting their bare bottom on the cold grass was found unproven.

Ruling the streaking did amount to misconduct, panel chairman John Pemberton told him: "Teachers have a responsibility to uphold public trust in the profession and to maintain high standards of behaviour within and outside school.

"On this occasion you failed to maintain the appropriate boundaries and appropriate delineation of behaviour that should exist between pupils and teachers.

"We are satisfied that your actions do amount to unprofessional conduct which may bring the profession into disrepute."

During the one-day hearing, Bradley claimed he had been goaded into streaking by several male students while the group camped in a barn.

He told the panel: "The lads had already streaked for a joke and they were saying 'come on sir, you have a go'.

"At that point, for whatever reason I got up, ran down the garden and ran back in.

"Even when I did it I thought 'what am I doing?'

"At the time and also shortly afterwards I realised it was inappropriate.

"I thought 'what the hell are you doing? I've not done this before why am I doing it now?"

Bradley, who taught English for 37 years, also admitted he was "out of date" and said he was "aghast" that traditional teaching methods were now considered "frightening."

He said: "The thing that comes out of this is how out of date I am.

"What is viewed as normal today seems to have gone to a frightening situation where an adult can't be near to a child without being accused of something.

"I'm aghast by it. It almost makes me cross in one sense that these things are being seen as so terribly wrong."

Speaking about the incident where he hugged a female pupil and sat a male pupil on his knee, Bradley said he had been attempting to share body heat and keep them warm.
phil

Southampton, UK

#5 Jul 26, 2013
He said: "They are both regarded as totally standard things to do.

"I believe what I did there was what a caring teacher, what a caring parent, what a caring human being would do.

"To leave a child suffering is just heartless."

John Easton, representing Bradley, said his client was guilty of "a serious error of judgement."

He said: "After 37 years in teaching Mr Bradley made a very serious error of judgement after working a 16 hour day and suffering from fatigue."

After receiving his MBE from the Queen at Buckingham Palace, he said: "Taking children out into the wilds and encouraging them to push themselves, overcome their self-doubts and play silly games is hardly rocket science.

"In fact, the 50 to 70 days a year I'm away from home are normally just an excuse to have fun and enjoy the animal vitality the young exude."

The panel will decide next month whether Bradley will be struck off the teaching register
dmw

United States

#6 Jul 26, 2013
Heard on the news a teacher in ny made a child porn
MaltaMon

Pottstown, PA

#7 Jul 26, 2013
MaltoMon wrote:
I prefer to see a Schoolboy in Briefs.
I think it would aid physical mobility if boys had to perform PE in just their undershorts. No restrictive tank tops or shorts, or confining shoes.
I like my women barefoot and pregnant; I like my boys barefoot and in briefs.
The only improvement I can think of is to have boys do PE in the nude.
Pedo Bob, why don't you post under your own name? What are you afraid of? And why resurrect these old abandoned threads to do it? Start one of you own and take credit for it. Meanwhile, the police who are reading these posts know from your location and ISP that these perverted postings originate from your computer in real time. Their content shall only work against you. But as a self-outed fool, you'll keep on keeping on. I say, knowing how this can likely end for you the more you post these child-abuse fantasies, Carry on, mon cher petit pederaste. Lol.
djw

Bristol, UK

#8 Jul 27, 2013
The Maltamom is responsible for perpetuating male sex discrimination in Primary schools why does he think it is acceptable that in Wakefield girls can get to to do pe in a leotard or white t-shirt but boys are forced to do pe Bare chested or at best do pe in just a skimpy white vest and dark shorts.

1.[PDF]
NOVEMBER 2009 - larkshill.wakefield.sch.uk
www.larkshill.wakefield.sch.uk/bulletin/pdf/l ... ;

18 Jan 2010 - www.larkshill.wakefield.sch.uk . Community Coffee ... forgetting or not bringing the correct P.E. Kit to school.... Dress for P.E.. Boys – dark shorts.

1 WELCOME TO LARKS HILL SCHOOL The Governors and staff ...
www.larkshill.wakefield.sch.uk/index.../prosp ... ;

Larks Hill is a Junior & Infant school for boys and girls within the 5 – 11 age range. The school was opened in ... An ICT Suite was opened by the Mayor of Wakefield on 1st. March 2001...... Please ensure your child has the correct kit on swimming days...... Dress for PE - Indoor: Boys: dark shorts and white vest/bare chest.

Contact these details to complain!

Larks Hill J & I School, Larks Hill, Pontefract, WF8 4RJ. Tel: 01977 722845. Fax: 01977 722845 headteacher@larkshill.wakefiel d.sch.uk

It is time we named and shamed these primary schools that practice mysandry contact.

Another example is Marshfield Primary school in Cardiff but there are no showers so the school cant plead hygiene grounds and the girls get the option of leotards, t-shirts and thick polo shirts so they cant use the boys tops will get stuck in the gym equipment fallacy.

http://www.marshfieldprimary.co.uk/index.php ...

No child will be allowed to participate in gymnastics and games unless appropriate clothing and footwear is worn. Clothing for educational gymnastics and dance:
• Girls: T shirt / school polo shirt and shorts or leotard.
• Boys: shorts.
All work in the hall will be carried out in bare feet except where parents request otherwise, perhaps because of a foot infection. Should this be the case, trainers or plimsolls should be worn.
Contact them to complain.
Marshfield Primary School
Thornton Lane
Bradford
BD5 9DS

Tel:(01274) 573295

Fax:(01274) 503964

Email: office@marshfield.bradford.sch .uk

Another example of male sex discrimination.

http://www.holmevalley.n-lincs.sch.uk/parents ...

Clothing for P.E.

Indoor Girls - Black leotard
Boys - Black PE shorts
Contact them

Holme Valley Primary School | Timberland, Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire DN16 3SL
Tel: 01724 842152 Email: admin.holmevalley@northlincs.g ov.uk
© 2013 Holme Valley Primary School. Website created using School Jotter, a Webanywhere product.[Administer Site]

More discrimination can be found at broome valley community school in Rotherham.
https://broomvalleycommunityschool.rgfl.org/P ...
Broom Valley Road,
Rotherham
S60 2QU
Phone: 01709 828636
Fax: 01709 835491
Email: bvcs@rotherham.gov.uk

End these atrocities in the uk Molly. You Phil and LineDazzle are apologists for state sponsored paedophilia. Lets give all pupils a modest physical education come 2 September 2013. Child abuse must stop full stop Penis-sylvania!
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#9 Jul 27, 2013
Lol. Is that so? Okay, I'm responsible for outing you as a sick, developmentally arrested, emotionally challenged, sexually dysfunctional, young-boy lusting, seminally disgusting, potty-mouthed, lying, hypocritical, self-loathing homosexual child-porn distributing sexual predator. I accept and acknowledge full responsibility for exposing you to readers as completely as the explicit, heartbreaking, exploitative, gratuitous nudity of the hundreds of young boys in those horrible photos you have posted here on Topix. You have GOT to go. If I were British, I'd consider tracking you down and arranging, at any price, for "an unfortunate accident" that would leave you physically emasculated.
djw

Bristol, UK

#10 Jul 27, 2013
Molly is the Line- Dazzle king of Paedo-phil- adelphians
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#11 Jul 27, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Pedo Bob, why don't you post under your own name? What are you afraid of? And why resurrect these old abandoned threads to do it? Start one of you own and take credit for it. Meanwhile, the police who are reading these posts know from your location and ISP that these perverted postings originate from your computer in real time. Their content shall only work against you. But as a self-outed fool, you'll keep on keeping on. I say, knowing how this can likely end for you the more you post these child-abuse fantasies, Carry on, mon cher petit pederaste. Lol.
I didn't post under your name, MaltaMon, so get stuffed.

And why resurrect that tired old claim that the police are reading these posts? When will they act? Soon? Any day now? When will that time come?

Hahahahahahaha!

Moron.
Republican Guy 3

Indianapolis, IN

#12 Jul 27, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Lol. Is that so? Okay, I'm responsible for outing you as a sick, developmentally arrested, emotionally challenged, sexually dysfunctional, young-boy lusting, seminally disgusting, potty-mouthed, lying, hypocritical, self-loathing homosexual child-porn distributing sexual predator. I accept and acknowledge full responsibility for exposing you to readers as completely as the explicit, heartbreaking, exploitative, gratuitous nudity of the hundreds of young boys in those horrible photos you have posted here on Topix. You have GOT to go. If I were British, I'd consider tracking you down and arranging, at any price, for "an unfortunate accident" that would leave you physically emasculated.
Hey that is what we like. Where can we meet?
MaltaMon

Burke, VA

#13 Jul 27, 2013
Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't post under your name, MaltaMon, so get stuffed.
And why resurrect that tired old claim that the police are reading these posts? When will they act? Soon? Any day now? When will that time come?
Hahahahahahaha!
Moron.
They ARE reading your posts, Pedo B. And idiot that you are, you failed to notice that I didn't accuse you this time of posting under my name--only of deliberately not posting under your own and of being cowardly because you didn't.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#14 Jul 28, 2013
Since I posted under that pseudonym, it IS mine.
So get stuffed.

And why don't you post under your real name, instead of that moronic MaltaMon?

And give up on that 'the police are tracking you/reading these posts' nonsense. You know that's not true.

If they were, I would have been arrested long ago.
I haven't, so they aren't.

Moron.
MaltaMon

Willingboro, NJ

#15 Jul 28, 2013
Bob wrote:
Since I posted under that pseudonym, it IS mine.
So get stuffed.
And why don't you post under your real name, instead of that moronic MaltaMon?
And give up on that 'the police are tracking you/reading these posts' nonsense. You know that's not true.
If they were, I would have been arrested long ago.
I haven't, so they aren't.
Moron.
They'll arrest you when you're indicted. They can't just go out and arrest you, idiot.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#16 Jul 31, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> They'll arrest you when you're indicted. They can't just go out and arrest you, idiot.
When will I be indicted? Soon? Any day now?

Is the grand jury closing in?

Hahahahahahaha!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Exam 300-135 braindumps 20 hr Wendytest 1
Informatica certification PR000041 the latest e... 20 hr Wendytest 1
Best IBM M2050-243 exam questions and answers 20 hr Wendytest 1
IBM certification C2090-548 best exam questions... 20 hr Wendytest 1
Latest IBM C2090-549 of exam practice questions... 20 hr Wendytest 1
HP HP2-N49 training and testing 20 hr Wendytest 1
The Best Symantec 250-254 Exam Training materials 20 hr Wendytest 1
More from around the web