Pedo Bobby, We Hardly Knew Ye

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#209 Mar 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Damn, now that I mentioned a yen year-old boy playing "doctor", I can almost here the collective "zip" of the paedophiles' trouser flies flying over the image those words have brought to their fevered, secretive sick minds..
You really can't help mentioning ten year old boys, can you?
Any psychologist can easily analyze you for what you are, with your obsession with naked boys. Trying to hide behind name calling and childish accusations of others only reinforces your insanity and dirty leanings.
MaltoBene

Scranton, PA

#210 Mar 1, 2013
Ok, Pardner. Sorry for the fuss, but it's Mother Nature. It's what we do. Get here safely... and we'll shut the thing down, Bella Facia.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#211 Mar 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Please, Fellas, not all over your laptops this time!
Your insanity is driving you ever deeper into self destruction and filth.
Your filthy, sexually oriented posts are getting worse all the time, which speaks a lot about your low mentality and filthy deranged, immature mind.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#212 Mar 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Guys, shut the heck up. Leave him alone.
Get some help.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#213 Mar 1, 2013
The mon family must pay BIG health Insc. premiums.
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#214 Mar 1, 2013
"Projections of (my)self?" "Ten_yesr old boys", and "filthy"? Really? Of the two of us, which one has,(1) Posted on these threads a statement in which you claimed that teenaged girls require bathing suits to hold their tampons in place,(2) Posted on these threads ,PHOTOGRAPHS OF NAKED YOUNG BOYS, and (3) Referred l, in a post on these threads, to my oldest child as my "raped son"? You did, boy. "Insane"? Psychosis is a condition, a true life experience, with which YOU are intimately familiar. As opposed to, say, female human beings. That last one is almost as heinous and as repugnant, as filthy and as sick, as the second. The first is not your fsult. A homosexual male has no reason to understand the physiology of the female of our species. So why insist that you do? It is clear to everybody that you are not straight. And there is nothing wrong with being gay, Zuiko. But there is with posting photos of children and with mocking the victim of a child sexual predator. A lot wrong.
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#215 Mar 1, 2013
*** exploitive photos of NAKED children

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#216 Mar 1, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
"Projections of (my)self?" "Ten_yesr old boys", and "filthy"? Really? Of the two of us, which one has,(1) Posted on these threads a statement in which you claimed that teenaged girls require bathing suits to hold their tampons in place,(2) Posted on these threads ,PHOTOGRAPHS OF NAKED YOUNG BOYS, and (3) Referred l, in a post on these threads, to my oldest child as my "raped son"? You did, boy. "Insane"? Psychosis is a condition, a true life experience, with which YOU are intimately familiar. As opposed to, say, female human beings. That last one is almost as heinous and as repugnant, as filthy and as sick, as the second. The first is not your fsult. A homosexual male has no reason to understand the physiology of the female of our species. So why insist that you do? It is clear to everybody that you are not straight. And there is nothing wrong with being gay, Zuiko. But there is with posting photos of children and with mocking the victim of a child sexual predator. A lot wrong.
Apart from your long list of insane, imaginary claims, which are obviously all self-projections, I must break to you what has become obvious about your "son". He was not raped at all, but is a gay like his father. Why else would he prefer to live in Canada, which is nearer to Bob, than with his father in the US?
The obvious reason is that he was abused by his pedo-gay father as a boy, and would not want to live anywhere near him.
Not to mention that the boy you claim was raped is not your real son, but just an excuse to avoid suspicion on yourself. We have already analyzed your dirty intentions and leanings on this forum with your wild claims and sexual innuendos, so you are not fooling anyone. Certainly not Zuiko aka Sir Arthur.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#217 Mar 1, 2013
coyote wrote:
The mon family must pay BIG health Insc. premiums.
Yes, he must have a long history of mental insanity and deranged sexual behaviour in his family, even continuing with his claimed son.
MaltaMon

Conshohocken, PA

#218 Mar 1, 2013
I've got news for you, Tinkerbell. All self-employed Americans under 65 pay large health-insurance premiums. Your friend "John K" can't do anything about that, either.(You know he's Sec'y of Stste, don't you? Not President, not Defense Secretary. Not NSA, not DIA, not CIA, not CID, not Homeland Security Do you even know what DOS does?)
MaltaMon

Conshohocken, PA

#219 Mar 1, 2013
And ZuikiSomething, As my colleague in Iowa reminded you, you gave your sexuality away in January. You outed yourself on these very threads. And no real man ttashrs another man's child, no matter how much contempt he harbors for him. Don't you dare mention my son again if you have nothing kind to say about him. And you obviously do not because you don't know him. Homosexuality has nothing to do with becoming a man. You can still be a man and be gay. Why don't you try? Oh, and by the way, get a grip. I mean, "mentally insane"? Do you have "physical cancer"? Are you "mentally thinking"? You are so filled with hatred for me that you cannot think straight. I don't mind in the least, of course, but please, there are people reading this stuff. And how is Tinkerbell ever going to figure out what to say if he can't follow an articulate leader? Do it for him if not for your fans.
MaltaMon

Sicklerville, NJ

#222 Mar 6, 2013
None of these boy-loving flits is in the slightest way "manly". No real man covets children sexually or defends their exploitation or those who exploit them.
MaltaMon

Sicklerville, NJ

#223 Mar 6, 2013
With all these swinging boy-raping, child-porn apologist queens and their projectionist, shoot-from-the-hip responses that have become increasingly insane and, well, unresponsive, I'm starting to miss DJW's hypocrisy, which at least featured a strong defense of children, however insincere it may have been. He didn't defend the likes of Bob and ZuikiSomething, who clearly represent the worst threat to innocent kids that anyone will find on these threads. Perhaps he was just conflicted: his attraction to photos of naked children (some of the same that ZuikiSomething has posted, but hasn't had the cajones, much less the manly decency, to renounce) may have been a symptom of whatever abuse he may have suffered, or the turbulence of his own abnormal feelings, and his spirited, almost over-the-top defense of children as a sincere response to what lurks within him. Indeed, his contradictions are looking almost sensible in contrast to the insane statements of Tinkerbell, ZuikiSomething, and that nasty queer Brit with the "dangly bits" who shall remain nameless.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#225 Mar 7, 2013
No. Phil's the one who in November posted something about young boys' "dangly bits". Meaning, of course, their genitals
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#226 Mar 7, 2013
Very cute description, eh? The words that automatically come to the minds of normal, well adjusted adult men.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#230 Mar 7, 2013
It's rather queer for a grown man, isn't it? The little wierdo gives me the creeps. But don't take his bait. Hevreappeats periodically, and he will again after he signs off thiscl time. Bit he's no more than a lonely,embittered voyeur who is inexplicably obsessed with me.. His favorite dismissive (and my favorite of all his predictable bullshit):"(Unlike you,) I have a life". Lol.. He then immediately belies that claim by hanging on to my every word and posting more insults and exsmpled of his phony baloney, entirely self-styled legal "expertise", when he knows absolutely nothing aboit my son's case against Bob. Oh, and watch for his predictable dismissal from his perch some three thousand miles from where he attends university of my oldest child--indeed, of all three of them - simply to undermine my credibility. What an arrogant prick like that can never admit to himself is that nothing hevsays about any ofvthis matters at all. He fasions himself as some sort of modern-day Oracle of Delphi. But he only talks trash. Now, wait for his reaction to what I have written here. His own dangly bits, along with his bowels, will be in an uproar.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#231 Mar 7, 2013
And just let him go on about me. It's very entertaining. Now, he's already trashed everyone who believes there is a god. Just in the past two days. His beliefs are all that matter.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#233 Mar 7, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
With all these swinging boy-raping, child-porn apologist queens and their projectionist, shoot-from-the-hip responses that have become increasingly insane and, well, unresponsive, I'm starting to miss DJW's hypocrisy, which at least featured a strong defense of children, however insincere it may have been. He didn't defend the likes of Bob and ZuikiSomething, who clearly represent the worst threat to innocent kids that anyone will find on these threads. Perhaps he was just conflicted: his attraction to photos of naked children (some of the same that ZuikiSomething has posted, but hasn't had the cajones, much less the manly decency, to renounce) may have been a symptom of whatever abuse he may have suffered, or the turbulence of his own abnormal feelings, and his spirited, almost over-the-top defense of children as a sincere response to what lurks within him. Indeed, his contradictions are looking almost sensible in contrast to the insane statements of Tinkerbell, ZuikiSomething, and that nasty queer Brit with the "dangly bits" who shall remain nameless.
More self-projections and blabbery from a sick mind.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#235 Mar 7, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
More self-projections and blabbery from a sick mind.
More of the same copy-cat drivel from a closeted, embittered, resentful, mendacious, feverishly child-focuses sexual predator.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#236 Mar 7, 2013
***feverishly child-focused

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Lawyer: Timbuktu residents felt shame after sit... 1 hr Pope Holy In Lourdes 1
Babcock University Batch D/supp. Admission list... 1 hr Pope Holy In Lourdes 2
Babcock University Batch D and E Admission list... 1 hr Pope Holy In Lourdes 3
PHIL ASE actual questions 1 hr Priestly Hymn is ... 2
News FBI raids home of ex-College Board official in ... 1 hr Phillip 1
News Britney Spears releases album 'Glory': What are... 1 hr Phillip 1
Fred Smith abused by MaltaMon 1 hr Phillip 3
More from around the web