MaltaMon's Son Outed!
MaltaMon

Dillsburg, PA

#23 Mar 8, 2013
(forgive me: by "the following post" I meant the link that I've posted. Thanks. Here it is again:

http://www.topix.com/forum/education/T8A5V95S...
MaltaMon

Clifton Heights, PA

#24 Mar 9, 2013
And another, also from Friday Evening, March 8, on "How Were You Spanked". This one credited to "Bob" of "Dorval, Canada" and refers directly to his abuse of my son. Just noticed this now.(Last "Bob" from me until FN)

http://www.topix.com/forum/education/TDN5C434...
Bob

Châteauguay, Canada

#26 Mar 9, 2013
Peggy doesn't exist as an account user name on these threads, because it isn't a user name. Peggy is the real name of a drunk 50 year old woman who posts as tnmtndude and censoredbytopixcom.
Just as Moron is the real name of an idiot who posts as MaltaMon.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#27 Mar 9, 2013
Bob wrote:
Peggy doesn't exist as an account user name on these threads, because it isn't a user name. Peggy is the real name of a drunk 50 year old woman who posts as tnmtndude and censoredbytopixcom.
Just as Moron is the real name of an idiot who posts as MaltaMon.
I think he has reaading problems because he is always trying to twist what other posters say to suit his deranged logic.
Btw, I do remember tnmtndude, who had the same negative obsession with naked boys as these two idiots. He was actually decyphered by a name code expert as tn.mtn.dude, that is Tennesee mountain dude, the hillbilly. He stopped posting after that revelation. From his retarded posts, low language and post subjects this Malmon is also probably a hillbilly. His choice of name also indicates so.
MaltaMon

Hatfield, PA

#28 Mar 9, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
I think he has reaading problems because he is always trying to twist what other posters say to suit his deranged logic.
Btw, I do remember tnmtndude, who had the same negative obsession with naked boys as these two idiots. He was actually decyphered by a name code expert as tn.mtn.dude, that is Tennesee mountain dude, the hillbilly. He stopped posting after that revelation. From his retarded posts, low language and post subjects this Malmon is also probably a hillbilly. His choice of name also indicates so.
You just placed yourself under a microscope. You would not want to be in Canada or Canadian and post here. If you are, read the Criminal Code. And think of all the things you have posted on Topix as Zuiko and under other screen names, and of all the sites you have accessed, emails you have sent, and materials you have downloaded. All of that history is readily available.
MaltaMon

Bloomsburg, PA

#31 Mar 10, 2013
And another one, Gentlemen, from Dorval, Canada. This one opens a new thread about my son and is supposed to be a posting from HIM. Of course, it is anything but that.:

http://www.topix.com/forum/education/TV9CQ30U...

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#33 Mar 10, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not a hillbilly lol.


You are lower than a hillbilly, boy. So there is nothing to be happy about.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#34 Mar 10, 2013
naw little Large- Bob wud not do such a thing wud he ? The thing ya jest gotta admit Little is I think MM does have the son character residing in that area. Now; it may be reasonable to assume, if the son does not exist, there is a fraudster--otherwise-?!?

now, if the son does not exist, then

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#35 Mar 10, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> You just placed yourself under a microscope. You would not want to be in Canada or Canadian and post here. If you are, read the Criminal Code. And think of all the things you have posted on Topix as Zuiko and under other screen names, and of all the sites you have accessed, emails you have sent, and materials you have downloaded. All of that history is readily available.
Your childish scare tactics ain't scaring anyone. It is YOU who is breaking the Criminal Code, as I explained to you in another post, to which you had no answer and remained silent.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#38 Mar 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course he would. He joked about the graphic details within his comments.
Well that may be little Large.you have a point taken ! My interest in your thoughts on this matter includes your perception of the "post"... is it irrational to entertain the idea since the son (if he exists) lives in that area he could be the poster and that if the son does not exist then the poster is a hoax and could be Bob ???? U R pro the existence of "the son" and told us he lives in that area- R U sure then that he is not the poster and have evidence re that or are U just going to continue your instructions from Philly and rave on about Bob in the manner established and with the same depravity U employ on the posts Rush has revealed ?...jest 'askin....
Rush

Fairbury, NE

#39 Mar 11, 2013
OrangeLion


Wrexham, UK

Reply »

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#742
Aug 22, 2012




I hate femenists and teenagers, and gays, too many devils here, wish them all dead.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Largelanguage=orangelion
Just in case anyone missed it.
Phil

London, UK

#44 Mar 11, 2013
Rush wrote:
OrangeLion
Wrexham, UK
Reply »
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#742
Aug 22, 2012
I hate femenists and teenagers, and gays, too many devils here, wish them all dead.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Largelanguage=orangelion
Just in case anyone missed it.
No denial that this is you, Large?
Phil

London, UK

#46 Mar 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I'm not.
So it's not OK to post child porn (not many would disagree with you on that) but it is OK to put gays to death and to treat young teenage girls as sex objects?
Rush

Fairbury, NE

#47 Mar 11, 2013
Largelanguage


Wrexham, UK

Reply »

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#58
Monday Feb 11




Rush wrote:

<quoted text>
Why dont you explain your views on black people? You always say such interesting things about them.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Largelanguage wrote:
They love welfare = scroungers.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#50 Mar 11, 2013
Rush wrote:
OrangeLion
Wrexham, UK
Reply »
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#742
Aug 22, 2012
I hate femenists and teenagers, and gays, too many devils here, wish them all dead.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Largelanguage=orangelion
Just in case anyone missed it.
Only LL himself and his patron MM are ignoring these posts, because they are too shameful to admit, and is strong incrimination evidence against them. Keep on reminding these two hypocrite abusers about them. Good job, Rush.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#52 Mar 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
There is nothing wrong with being treated as a sex object. Being treated as sex object is not ignoring who we are as people. Being a sex object is part of what we are as people. Accepting people and valuing them sexually is not demeaning them, but in fact accepting them as people.
Young fool! Go pick and arguement with some little boy your own age!
You can't get away from all this evidenc, boy, and trying to twist the meaning. Treating underage girls as sex objects is the worst kind of pedophilia there is.
I wonder what Malmon has to say about this, and why he is keeping so silent about it, which proves what I have said about him all the way.
Rush

Fairbury, NE

#53 Mar 11, 2013
Largelanguage


Connahs Quay, UK

Reply »

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74
Saturday




Huey wrote:

I don't think queers should be having unprotected sex with underage boys.
.
.
.
.
.
Largelanguage wrote:
I agree! Instead we need to bring honour the the beautiful bodies of young naked teenage girls!
Phil

UK

#54 Mar 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
There is nothing wrong with being treated as a sex object. Being treated as sex object is not ignoring who we are as people. Being a sex object is part of what we are as people. Accepting people and valuing them sexually is not demeaning them, but in fact accepting them as people.
Young fool! Go pick and arguement with some little boy your own age!
So it is ok to view young teenage schoolgirls as sex objects?
Rush

Fairbury, NE

#56 Mar 11, 2013
Largelanguage


Connahs Quay, UK

Reply »

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#609096
Saturday




Honeysuckler_rose wrote:

<quoted text>
thats right 2 wrongs don't make a right
but the bible says spanking is right, so it is not wrong to spank if done properly.
and you are entitled to your opinion
just as i am.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Largelanguage wrote:
The Bible does not say spanking is right. In the hebrew the word is shabbat, which means staff, not rod. And in the hebrew the word is na'ar, which means an adolescent or a young man!

And spanking should only be used on teenage girls while fully naked, to show them our intense love for them onto their lovely smooth bottoms to inflict them with love in the form of powerful force!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#57 Mar 11, 2013
It also proves what I have been saying that Malmon's "raped son" fantasy accusations and calling everyone else a pedophile, except LL, is just a cover-up for his real pedophile interests.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
All TestDumps fake! Sat Elena 2
News Jaguar shot Sat Panther Had Its Life 4
Summer a bummer Sat Pastel Has Its Li... 5
News Consider Homeschooling with ADD (Jan '13) Sat Paddling has its ... 10
News Florida teens still behind national average on ... (Aug '08) Sat Paddling has its ... 20
Spankings and forced nude swim classes should b... Sat Paddling has its ... 5
News In the fight against sexual assault, this schoo... Sat Paddling has its ... 4
More from around the web