Letter: The case for required gym class

Letter: The case for required gym class

There are 22 comments on the Detroit News story from Mar 21, 2014, titled Letter: The case for required gym class. In it, Detroit News reports that:

Nearly one in three children in Michigan are overweight or obese, enough to fill Ford Field to capacity seven times.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Detroit News.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#7 Mar 24, 2014
From start to finish, all of the above--this entire thread of plagiarized pedophile fantasy, of sexual fixation on young boys, of several ostensible screen names--comes from a single morbidly lonely individual, DJW of the UK.
Phil

Godstone, UK

#8 Mar 24, 2014
MaltaMon wrote:
From start to finish, all of the above--this entire thread of plagiarized pedophile fantasy, of sexual fixation on young boys, of several ostensible screen names--comes from a single morbidly lonely individual, DJW of the UK.
All the other boys in DJW's class probably laughed at his small bits and he has had hangups ever since and likely to be the same reason Bob is also fixated with boys.
He is no doubt also riddled with feelings of inadequacy.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#9 Mar 24, 2014
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
All the other boys in DJW's class probably laughed at his small bits and he has had hangups ever since and likely to be the same reason Bob is also fixated with boys.
He is no doubt also riddled with feelings of inadequacy.
That has to be it. He's got a tiny penis. And testicles that haven't descended. Imagine how a woman would react to DJW's boyhood on a middle-aged man. Then again, the only females who would ever see it are nurses and doctors, and they wouldn't laugh about it in front of the patient. They'd have a good howl over it in the staff room.
MaltaMon

Woodstown, NJ

#16 Mar 25, 2014
DJW, I obviously hit a nerve. You sick fa**ggot pedophile. You'd have been more convincing if you had just denied that your so-called manhood is minuscule
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#18 Mar 26, 2014
MaltaMon wrote:
DJW, I obviously hit a nerve. You sick fa**ggot pedophile. You'd have been more convincing if you had just denied that your so-called manhood is minuscule
You've got to feel pity (along with the contempt) for DJW and Bob.
They post their immature fantasies about chldren (nobody else does) on the threads of others, desperate to get a reaction which they obviously get off on but the posters completely blank ignore them.
They have probably been marginalised and despised all their lives and they are just crying out for attention.
The sad thing is they think they are a bit on the edge, a little bit dangerous.
They are just sad excuses for men and it is just funny watching them make absolute pricks of themselves.
MaltaMon

Woodstown, NJ

#19 Mar 26, 2014
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
You've got to feel pity (along with the contempt) for DJW and Bob.
They post their immature fantasies about chldren (nobody else does) on the threads of others, desperate to get a reaction which they obviously get off on but the posters completely blank ignore them.
They have probably been marginalised and despised all their lives and they are just crying out for attention.
The sad thing is they think they are a bit on the edge, a little bit dangerous.
They are just sad excuses for men and it is just funny watching them make absolute pricks of themselves.
Try as I might, I could never feel pity for any middle-aged man with a sexual fixation on innocent schoolboys. Perhaps if they were merely sick, but, as you suggest, they are, indeed, rather dangerous. Contempt is the most benign of the harsh sentiments I have for these two and for their queer hangers-on. I can't think of any of them without hoping that they'd be disfigured, paralyzed or murdered by any of their victims, their victims' parents, the police, or, best of all, their future cell mates, who would rape them first. No, I feel no pity for them..
Bob

Mont-saint-hilaire, Canada

#20 Mar 26, 2014
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
You've got to feel pity (along with the contempt) for DJW and Bob.
They post their immature fantasies about chldren (nobody else does) on the threads of others, desperate to get a reaction which they obviously get off on but the posters completely blank ignore them.
They have probably been marginalised and despised all their lives and they are just crying out for attention.
The sad thing is they think they are a bit on the edge, a little bit dangerous.
They are just sad excuses for men and it is just funny watching them make absolute pricks of themselves.
"They post their immature fantasies about chldren (nobody else does) on the threads of others, desperate to get a reaction which they obviously get off on but the posters completely blank ignore them." Really? Pedo Phil and MaltaMon the Molester don't blank ignore us. They check in every day, and multiple times per day, to read what we post.

"They are just sad excuses for men and it is just funny watching them make absolute pricks of themselves." Funny, the only ones making absolute pricks of themselves are Pedo Phil and MaltaMon the Molester. Pedo Phil, because he claims these posts are not worth reading or responding to. But every day he reads and responds to them.
And MaltaMon the Molester, because he has been waging his pathetic "yourapedmysonandthepolic eareclosinginandyouwillbearres tedanydaynoworsoon" campaign for over two years, still convinced that people believe him, and still convinced that I will be arrested at any moment. He's even convinced himself that he has a son!
Bob

Mont-saint-hilaire, Canada

#21 Mar 26, 2014
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
All the other boys in DJW's class probably laughed at his small bits and he has had hangups ever since and likely to be the same reason Bob is also fixated with boys.
He is no doubt also riddled with feelings of inadequacy.
Thanks for the psychological analysis, Dr Phil! Perhaps you could now explain what mental disorder would prompt yourself to visit on a daily basis a site that you claim is only about homosexual pedophilia and not worth reading or responding to, in order to read and respond to?
Bob

Mont-saint-hilaire, Canada

#23 Mar 29, 2014
Notice that Dr. Pedo Phil was unable to answer my question?
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#25 Mar 30, 2014
Malta molestor wrote:
<quoted text>
Not an Apology to my old Games Teacher
Dear Mrs White, I felt that I should get in touch, and say,
I hope it wasn’t my fault that you ended up this way.
I trust you don’t blame me that you’ll never be let out -
trapped in that cell - and straitjacket - and foaming at the mouth.
I joined your class in ’78 and saw you purse your lips
As you opened up your register and saw me on the list.
You’d met me on the tennis court several times already
Not practising my backhand, but snogging Kev. And Freddy.
You made us do ‘cross country’. You said it would be fun.
I wasn’t keen on standing up, let alone being made to run.
If we didn’t do it fast enough, you’d send us off again
To trudge our way round town, in navy gym pants, in the rain.
Of course we took the short cuts, even though they were a risk.
It was hairy on the inside lane of a packed A46.
Once, we got a ride back in a truck with Mary’s dad.
Your face! as fifteen schoolgirls tumbled from his cab.
I hope I’m not the reason that your hands are all a quiver
But I knew there was a short cut if we went along the river.
I’d no idea that Sharon Bailey hadn’t learned to swim
If she’d said she liked the Osmonds, I wouldn’t have pushed her in.
In 1978 we didn’t have these mobile phones
So I couldn’t call for help about Natasha’s broken bones.
She said to take the short cut through the building site
And scale the roof that Monday. Well, they found her. Wednesday night.
It wasn’t all my fault we got lost and came back late.
I got chucked out of Guides. I never learned to navigate.
But I’m sorry that the police were called that day we disappeared
To find me and Jackie sobbing in a wood in Gloucestershire.
That fish and chip shop incident – I see why you were angry
But none of us had money. We were lost and we were hungry.
If he'd just agreed to give us free chips then and there
We would have been much nicer – tied him up with much more care.
So, Mrs White, I’m sad to say, you failed to convince
this pupil that to run was fun. I haven’t moved much since.
But I’d hate to think you blame me that you’re in this tragic state.
Locked in a cell, and dribbling, since 1978.
DJW, being as thick as pig shit continues his life's work, which is to copy and paste the work of others and passing it off as his own because he has never achieved anything by himself in his miserable existence, apart from being the object of ridicule throughout his schooldays and beyond.
When challenged he simply copies yet more work from anybody with more maturity intelligence and wit than him.
In short, everybody.
Apart from Bob.
Bob

Montréal, Canada

#26 Jan 10, 2016
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
You've got to feel pity (along with the contempt) for DJW and Bob.
They post their immature fantasies about chldren (nobody else does) on the threads of others, desperate to get a reaction which they obviously get off on but the posters completely blank ignore them.
They have probably been marginalised and despised all their lives and they are just crying out for attention.
The sad thing is they think they are a bit on the edge, a little bit dangerous.
They are just sad excuses for men and it is just funny watching them make absolute pricks of themselves.
You've got to feel pity ( along with contempt) for Phil and MaltaMon.
They read immature fantasies about children (nobody else does) which they obviously get off on. Desperate to get a reaction they respond to posts not directed at them, yet condemn the same practice in others.
They claim to have complained to the authorities but the police just blank ignore them.
MaltaMon and Phil have been marginalized and despised all their lives and they are just crying out for attention.
The sad thing is they think no one suspects that they zoooom in to read because they get off on it.
They are just sad excuses for men and it's funny just watching them make absolute pricks of themselves.
Phil

Manchester, UK

#27 Jan 11, 2016
Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
You've got to feel pity ( along with contempt) for Phil and MaltaMon.
They read immature fantasies about children (nobody else does) which they obviously get off on. Desperate to get a reaction they respond to posts not directed at them, yet condemn the same practice in others.
They claim to have complained to the authorities but the police just blank ignore them.
MaltaMon and Phil have been marginalized and despised all their lives and they are just crying out for attention.
The sad thing is they think no one suspects that they zoooom in to read because they get off on it.
They are just sad excuses for men and it's funny just watching them make absolute pricks of themselves.
"They read immature fantasies about children"

Bob,

Thanks you for admitting that you post such material, that they are indeed your fantasies about children and that, as we (and you) knew, you are immature.
Who else posts sexual fantasies involving children, Bob, or is it only you?
Try to respond in your own words if you can.
I know you find that really difficult.
If you really, truly believe that you have broken no law you will have absolutely no problem defending the content of your posts on a public forum and explaining why your posting your fantasies involving the sexual abuse of children is legal and how it is your "right" to post such material.
Unless of course you are a gutless liar and you acknowledge by your silence and your refusal to do so that you are indeed a child pornographer and what you do is illegal?
You can't have it both ways.
Bob

Montréal, Canada

#28 Jan 11, 2016
Thank you for admitting that you read such material, that you get off on reading immature fantasies about children.
Who else reads my material besides you and MaltaMon, Phil?
If you really truly believe that reading my posts on a daily basis does not mean you are attracted to them, you will have absolutely no problem defending on a public forum why you read such material.
Unless of course you are are gutless liar and you acknowledge by your silence that you like reading pornography and what you do is for pleasure.
Reading it every day, but claiming you don't like it? You can't have it both ways.
Phil

Manchester, UK

#29 Jan 11, 2016
Bob wrote:
Thank you for admitting that you read such material, that you get off on reading immature fantasies about children.
Who else reads my material besides you and MaltaMon, Phil?
If you really truly believe that reading my posts on a daily basis does not mean you are attracted to them, you will have absolutely no problem defending on a public forum why you read such material.
Unless of course you are are gutless liar and you acknowledge by your silence that you like reading pornography and what you do is for pleasure.
Reading it every day, but claiming you don't like it? You can't have it both ways.
Bob won't (can't) defend the content of his posts because he doesn't really believe for one moment that he has broken no law.
I have nothing to defend because I haven't posted any child pornography.

"......reading immature fantasies about children.
Who else reads my material"

Another admission.
Bob is nothing if not consistently stupid.
A shit lawyer on hs worst day will rip Bob's arguments apart.
Bob

Montréal, Canada

#30 Jan 11, 2016
Phil can't (won't) defend the reading of my posts, because he won't (can't) admit he gets off on them.
I have nothing to defend because I haven't posted any child pornography either.
Phil won't admit to reading my material even though he has been reading and responding to it for four years.
Consistently stupid, he actually thinks people will believe that he responds to posts but doesn't read what he responds to.
Myself, I don't even need a shit lawyer, as I will never stand in the dock.
Maltamon

North Wales, PA

#31 Jan 11, 2016
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Bob won't (can't) defend the content of his posts because he doesn't really believe for one moment that he has broken no law.
I have nothing to defend because I haven't posted any child pornography.
"......reading immature fantasies about children.
Who else reads my material"
Another admission.
Bob is nothing if not consistently stupid.
A shit lawyer on hs worst day will rip Bob's arguments apart.
Lol. Poor Pedo Bob falls for it again. In attacking you and me, Phil, he forgets himself and offers up admission after admission after admission that what we've said about him is absolutely true. And now he'll reply to this by using most of my words and yours. Nothing original. Except for his disgusting child porn, which he's posted everywhere today.
Phil

Manchester, UK

#32 Jan 12, 2016
Maltamon wrote:
<quoted text>Lol. Poor Pedo Bob falls for it again. In attacking you and me, Phil, he forgets himself and offers up admission after admission after admission that what we've said about him is absolutely true. And now he'll reply to this by using most of my words and yours. Nothing original. Except for his disgusting child porn, which he's posted everywhere today.
He is obviously not at all confident that what he posts is legal and isn't child pornography.
I would ask him to define child pornography, what constitutes such material in his view as he claims what he posts isn't, as such but he clearly hasn't the intelligence, maturity or the education to respond positively.
Instead he will think (emphasis on the think) he is being clever and attempt in his usual weak, cowardly and laughable fashion to try deflect the question and make my point for me.
Bob

Montréal, Canada

#33 Jan 12, 2016
Maltamon wrote:
<quoted text>Lol. Poor Pedo Bob falls for it again. In attacking you and me, Phil, he forgets himself and offers up admission after admission after admission that what we've said about him is absolutely true. And now he'll reply to this by using most of my words and yours. Nothing original. Except for his disgusting child porn, which he's posted everywhere today.
LOL, MaltaMon falls for it again. In reading and responding to my posts, Phil and himself offer up admission after admission after admission that what I've said about them is true. Despite their insults, and voluminous and weak protestations to the contrary, they get off on what I write. Their daily visits to read and respond prove this. And now I'll respond by showing MaltaMon how his words actually apply to him, not myself. MaltaMon and Phil post nothing original: same tired accusations, same tired insults, same tired protests of offense.
MaltaMon is disgusting: he finishes by admitting that he just read everything I posted today.
Bob

Montréal, Canada

#34 Jan 12, 2016
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
He is obviously not at all confident that what he posts is legal and isn't child pornography.
I would ask him to define child pornography, what constitutes such material in his view as he claims what he posts isn't, as such but he clearly hasn't the intelligence, maturity or the education to respond positively.
Instead he will think (emphasis on the think) he is being clever and attempt in his usual weak, cowardly and laughable fashion to try deflect the question and make my point for me.
I am obviously confident that whatever I post, Phil and MaltaMon will zoooom in to read it.
The issue isn't defining what I post, but defining what Phil and MaltaMon are for their insatiable desire to read what I post. Clearly, neither one has the intelligence, maturity, or education to admit that no one would read and respond to material on a daily basis for four years if they didn't get off on it.
Instead, Phil will think (emphasis on the think) he is being clever and attempt in his usual weak, cowardly, and laughable fashion to deflect the question and refuse to admit the obvious: that he reads my posts because he derives pleasure from it. He makes my point for me.
.
Maltamon

Ambler, PA

#35 Jan 12, 2016
Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, MaltaMon falls for it again. In reading and responding to my posts, Phil and himself offer up admission after admission after admission that what I've said about them is true. Despite their insults, and voluminous and weak protestations to the contrary, they get off on what I write. Their daily visits to read and respond prove this. And now I'll respond by showing MaltaMon how his words actually apply to him, not myself. MaltaMon and Phil post nothing original: same tired accusations, same tired insults, same tired protests of offense.
MaltaMon is disgusting: he finishes by admitting that he just read everything I posted today.
Lol. What did I tell you, Phil? It's like pushing a button. Only easier.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
1D0-635 Exam - Download Free Demo of 1D0-635 7 min JohnHampton1 1
Updated 1D0-61C Questions - Crack 1D0-61C Exam ... 10 min JohnHampton1 1
1D0-61B Exam Questions and Answers with PDF, VC... 12 min JohnHampton1 1
1D0-61A Exam - Download Free Demo of 1D0-61A 17 min JohnHampton1 1
1D0-610 exam success | Everyone Loves 1D0-610 B... 24 min JohnHampton1 1
Updated 1D0-571 Questions - Crack 1D0-571 Exam ... 26 min JohnHampton1 1
Real 1D0-525 Exam Braindumps - Hidden Mystery 27 min JohnHampton1 1
females supervising male nude swimming programs... (Feb '13) 15 hr kirton 683
More from around the web