MaltaMon

Boyertown, PA

#1366 Aug 3, 2014
DJW feels that he can change the laws of Nature to require all human beings to be born fully clothed. Of course, that challenges the entire process of human reproduction from conception to birth. How can a woman give birth if Nature mandates that she be fully clothed? And how can DJW himself masturbate to images and fantasies of naked schoolboys if the young boys he desires so manifestly cannot BE naked and if DJW cannot remove or otherwise open his clothing to access his own genitals and anus? Kind of kills all the enormous pleasure it brings him. And without his only pleasure, what would he have to live for?
Phil

UK

#1367 Aug 3, 2014
MaltaMon wrote:
DJW feels that he can change the laws of Nature to require all human beings to be born fully clothed. Of course, that challenges the entire process of human reproduction from conception to birth. How can a woman give birth if Nature mandates that she be fully clothed? And how can DJW himself masturbate to images and fantasies of naked schoolboys if the young boys he desires so manifestly cannot BE naked and if DJW cannot remove or otherwise open his clothing to access his own genitals and anus? Kind of kills all the enormous pleasure it brings him. And without his only pleasure, what would he have to live for?
You just know DJW will copy and paste his reply because he really is that thick.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#1368 Aug 3, 2014
DJW, your obsessive fixation on nudity is so extreme as to be psychotic. It's a lifelong siege. It is far beyond any normal man's reaction, some thirty years on, to having been seen half naked by girls at the age of fourteen or fifteen. No normal woman would be so terminally infected by that if she'd been seen in her towel by a roomful of her male peers. Normal people understand that we're all naked under our clothing, that we enter and leave this life naked, and that those of us who are properly hygienic are nude,at least once a day. You, DJW, have a very,serious problem. First, you are obsessed with, and obviously excited by, the very idea of nudity. Second, and far worse, your obsession involves the nudity of children--of boys, mostly, who are even younger than you were when some girls allegedly saw your bare chest and back, and your ass covered by a towel. Your obsession with nude young boys is quite obviously sexual and abusive, given the substance of what you routinely post. No matter what good you insist you are doing, you reveal yoursrlf as,a fraud and a sick old pervert and pedophile every time you post stories, whether true or fantasy (overwhelmingly the latter), that you've searched for and found on pedophile websites, with every link you post to nude photos of young schoolboys, to videos of naked teenaged boys wrestling, to videos of naked actors in performance, to videos and photos nudists. Finally, you clearly hate your own body. Every man was seen nude by girls as a teenager. The overwhelming majority had no problem with it at the time, and the overwhelming majority of those who did long since have got over it. But not you.
Phil

UK

#1370 Aug 5, 2014
Bob wrote:
Pil, if anyone other than you or MaltaMon read my stuff, they obviously aren't commenting. But presumably they aren't complaining, as my posts are not removed.
So we come back to the eternal question: whatcha gonna do about it, huh, loser?
I've already done it (and will continue to do it).
The Authorities

Dorval, Canada

#1371 Aug 5, 2014
To: Graham Philip Butterworth
Choirmaster
Church of the Foreskin of the Nazarene MaltaMon
Salford, UK

Dear Mr Butterworth,

Thank you for your complaint in regards to the postings of a certain Mr Bob. We always appreciate input, and do our best to investigate all claims.
After a thorough analysis of Mr Bob's posts, we can only conclude that your complaint, although eloquent and long-winded, is without merit.
Although Mr Bob's posts are undoubtedly controversial, and in questionable taste, none of his postings violate any law in the UK, the US, or Canada.
In regard to your specific complaint that Mr Bob makes light of child abuse, we agree that we do not find the subject particularly funny, and consider some of it mildly disturbing, in no jurisdiction is it illegal.
We do however, find a certain MaltaMon to be guilty of slander and libel in his posts both to Mr Bob and other posters, and his language to be decidedly crude, racist, and homophobic.
And a certain individual who posts under the name of LargeLanguage or LineDazzle, is guilty of the most atrocious spelling mistakes, and of the poorest grammar imaginable.

Thank you again, and please do not hesitate to contact us with any other concerns.

The Authorities
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#1372 Aug 5, 2014
"Racist"? Give me an example. Pedophilia is not a race. Who now "slanders" whom?(Oh, and it's not "slander", Pedo Baby, it's "libel") Bob, you are a pedophile.
Phil

UK

#1376 Aug 9, 2014
Bob wrote:
And noe MaltaMon calls me a pedophile.(Boo-hoo.)
So what ELSE are you and Phil gonna do about me, huh, A-hole?
Hahahahaha!
Why bother doing anything else when it is so much fun watching you dig yourself into a hole that gets deeper with every post.
MaltaMon

Riverton, NJ

#1378 Aug 9, 2014
djw wrote:
<quoted text>
At least he is not balls deep inside some boy's hole!
Actually, he is! He's Pedo Bob, after all. And you sure know the pedophile's lexicon, don't you, DJ?
white

Los Angeles, CA

#1383 Sep 2, 2014
I attended junior and senior high school in Los Angeles in the 1940s. Thomas Starr King and Los Angeles High School. Both schools had indoor pools and nude swimming for boys was the rule. No one thought anything about it. I never heard a comment from adults or any of my peers at the time. That was just the way it was. Females wore suits, at different hours. I have no idea what brought about the change. I believe so-called sexual freedom is much more wide spread today, with the often unpleasant results.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#1385 Sep 2, 2014
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks CA DAD. I went to school in Scranton Pennsylvania in 1973 and after our mandatory genital exams for Physical education Participation and nude weigh ins in the gym for wrestling all us boys had to swim nude in the school pool.
Girls were not present during swimming practice and they always wore tank suits, Boys had to strip nude take a compulsory nude shower before and after swimming.
I was part of the school swim team. Other schools who visited our pool could wear speedos or nylon suits but our coach Sandusky insisted we swim nude whether we competed at home or away. Family members including mothers and sisters could watch us fully clothed while we done naked star jumps to limber up.
We thought it was normal then and because we swam competitively our team had to shave their pubic hair to prevent speed resistance in the water. Coach also made us bend and squat to ensure we had washed thoroughly to stop ecoli infection in the water.
It was the end of the draft, the implementation of Title IV and the rise of the feminist/Global gay &lesbian rights movement combined with a rise in Pedophilia that prompted the school to introduce tank suit shorts for boys in 1975. By 1979 after I left school budget cuts meant my younger brother Maltaboy had to bring his own towel and swim suit to school. Oh for a return to the good old days and bare nekkid values.
Also in our school any breach of the rules meant a bare bottom paddling by the school principal. Girls could only be hit on the hand to preserve modesty.
Not mine, of course. This is a work of plagiarize-and-paste by The UK's own DJW. I don't plagiarize, and I have no stories or fantasies of my own like his. I'm not the least bit interested in male nudity, whereas DJW is obsessed with it--particularly that of pre-pubescent and pubescent boys, or what he euphemistically refers to as "young teens".
MaltaMon

Montross, VA

#1387 Sep 2, 2014
MaltaMon wrote:
I am not the least bit interested in male nudity.
But I am obsessed with boy and teen nudity, and will read with delight anything that DJW or Bob write on the subject.
Makes no sense coming from me, but then, as anyone can tell from location and content, it doesn't come from me. Grow up, you infantile boy-obsessed perverted psychopathic queer.
Phil

UK

#1389 Sep 3, 2014
Bob wrote:
"Grow up, you infantile boy-obsessed perverted psychopathice queer."
(To get the full effect of MaltaMon's voice, read the above in a high-pitched whiny little school girl voice.)
To get the full effect of queer Bob's high pitched whiny, effeminate voice when he is taken from behind (willingly) in the prison showers.......
Phil

UK

#1391 Sep 3, 2014
Bob wrote:
And why, Epheminate-Phil, would I even be in a prison shower?
As I have committed no crime, it's unlikely that I will end up in any prison.
What law have I broken, Phil?
Oh sorry, I forgot, despite your constant threats and puffery about me being arrested soon, what crime I have committed is one of those questions you won't, and obviously can't answer.
And once again, Sissiphied-Phil, the choriister-felator and nephew-raper proves what a loser he is.
Loser.
Hahahaha!
No, all that happens when you post is to embarrass yourself and prove yet again what a poor liar you are.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#1392 Sep 3, 2014
"Nephew raper"? Now where in hell did you get that, NAMBLA Bob? You just make shit up, don't you?
WinlowCFlydipper

Cary, IL

#1396 Sep 5, 2014
Dad Jokes Woefully wrote:
<quoted text>
One of the reasons that I started this thread to find out how many schools did this and how long..
YOU started this thread? I thought I did, or am I just a figment of Maltamon's fantasy?
I'd also like to know why it stopped, just as I'd like to know why it continued long after its expiration date.
I've got the logic for the original practice--in the late 19th century, there were hardly any female swimmers, and the filters did get clogged.
But why, especially since the practice was deemed unnecessary as early as 1962, did it continue at all?
MaltaMon

Emmaus, PA

#1397 Sep 5, 2014
WinlowCFlydipper wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU started this thread? I thought I did, or am I just a figment of Maltamon's fantasy?
I'd also like to know why it stopped, just as I'd like to know why it continued long after its expiration date.
I've got the logic for the original practice--in the late 19th century, there were hardly any female swimmers, and the filters did get clogged.
But why, especially since the practice was deemed unnecessary as early as 1962, did it continue at all?
Cut the bullshit. Stop talking to yourself. Nobody believes the childish charade.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#1399 Sep 6, 2014
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text>
Cut the bullshit. Stop talking to yourself. Nobody believes the childish charade.
Compared to the thousands who believe your blabbery....
dannir

Mountain View, CA

#1400 Sep 18, 2014
Yes I had swim nude. It. Was hard to so at first but after two days I got over shock

Upnto that point I was never asked any where other then home
thad

Fort Wayne, IN

#1403 Sep 25, 2014
Yes, I did swim nude in high school and I enjoyed it a great deal. It was one of the few bright times in an otherwise dark and depressing period in my life! My greatest regret is that there was no n*****d swimming in my middle school.
Phil

Salt, Spain

#1407 Oct 17, 2014
dannir wrote:
Yes I had swim nude. It. Was hard to so at first but after two days I got over shock
Upnto that point I was never asked any where other then home
http://www.vocativ.com/culture/fun/fairly-rec...

Until Fairly Recently, the YMCA Actually Required Swimmers to Be Nude

Last week, I was eating lunch with a friend and her dad in Manhattan on 23rd Street, directly across from what used to be the McBurney YMCA, when my friend’s dad had a sudden recollection.

Apparently, in 1968, as part of a freshman requirement for the city college he attended, all male students took a swim class at the YMCA. For reasons somewhat unclear to him at the time (and, we joked, probably repressed until now) the Y had a particular rule: If you’re going to swim, you must swim nude.

Nude-nude?” I asked.“Totally nude,” he said.

He remembers the instructor telling them something about it being more sanitary that way.“But,” he conceded,“no one really questioned it.” After a moment, he paused.

“What the hell was that all about?”

I thought I’d investigate. Was my friend’s dad just recalling some adolescent nightmare? Was his swim teacher some pervy old dude? Or was this requirement legit? And if it was, why? How would not wearing a bathing suit be any less sanitary than skinny-dipping?

I called up Ryan Beam, who manages the official YMCA archives at the University of Minnesota, to ask him this question. He chuckled.“I get old guys calling up semi-regularly asking,‘Whatever happened to nude swimming?’” Beam says.“It’s kind of a hidden mystery.”

Beam confirms my friend’s dad’s story, but notes that nude swimming classes weren’t just a YMCA thing. In fact, they were a national thing. The American Public Health Association mandated them from 1926 until 1962, and thousands of high schools around the country enforced the tradition.

In general, Americans might have been more buttoned-up at the time. But when it came to all-male activities–like swimming–there wasn’t much of a taboo around stripping down.

YMCA Nude Swimming_03
Aquatic directors did the "visual inspections" before a boy could enter the pool.
The nude swimming tradition is even the basis for a couple of short YouTube documentaries, like this one, titled “Nude Swimming: Why Have We Forgotten About It?” that presents nude swimming through a sort of socio-cultural lens.“Our society has so sexualized nudity, particularly child nudity, that we can’t conceive of a time when kids went naked without any sexual implications,” offers the narrator.

Beam explains that the first recreational indoor pool in America opened in the Brooklyn YMCA in New York in 1885. Because swimsuits back then were made of wool, and their fibers would clog the pool’s relatively unsophisticated filtration systems, nude swimming was enforced to make sure the pool didn’t break.

By the 1920s, there were other, more comfortable swimming alternatives that didn’t shed fibers. However, nude swimming continued. The rationale this time around was that nude swimming was more hygienic. I asked Beam how so.

“There was the visual inspection,” he says, noting that part of the aquatic director’s job duty was to inspect the men before they jumped into the pool. The inspectors weren’t just checking for venereal diseases. The idea was to look for any open wounds or other indications that the swimmer might have some infectious disease.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Teachers Group Wants End To Major Standardized ... 1 hr parent 3
Bob: Were Boys Forced to Attend School Swim Les... (Sep '12) 6 hr Phil 2,183
NCMH Now Accepting Applications for Project Bau... Thu blueplate 1
TestHorse ISM v2 E10-001 practice exam dumps Mar 4 a70341exam 1
More from around the web