Phil

Manchester, UK

#766 Mar 6, 2013
"...you disbelieved MaltaMon wrongly"

Did I?
And your evidence for this is what, exactly?
What factual proof have you that Maltamon is genuine in what he says.
Think about this for a second.
He has accused a man on a public forum of raping his son, but with no hard evidence and has even expressed doubts himself.
Ask yourself, would any sane, supposedly intelligent man do such a thing?
Ask yourself, if you were in Maltamon's position what would the police and your lawyer make of you 'associating' with someone who has allegedly committed such a crime on a public forum?
Do you think they would be happy or would they think your antics might prejudice a fair trial?
Ask yourself, after all these years, why is the alleged attacker still a free man?
Engage your brain just for a moment.
I know it will be difficult.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#767 Mar 6, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you even know what the phrase children are impressionable means? It means they are likely to copy others.
Then why are you saying this to others when it applies to you?
I never copy anyone, while you are constantly copying my words and phrases.
MaltaMon

Quakertown, PA

#768 Mar 6, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Is this another of your wild claims, being employed with the State Dept? You can't fool us with this one either. The State Dept. isn't concerned with internal policies, especially Topix Nude-Boy threads, with which you are obsessed.
For your information the State Dept. is about foreign policy and relations and nothing else. So this is another one of your gross lies.
Why don't you READ before you spout off? Your flitty little buddy Tinkerbell posted late last week that the husband of a friend of his "in Wilmington" (didn't mention which state) works for "John K". Tinkerbell said he phoned him, told him all about my postings on this pedo sex forum that he frequents all day every day, that as a Canadian he wanted Kerry's (United States) Department of State to check me out for being "an imposter". Tinkerbell warned me that he would find out the truth from the State Dept before I did, and that he hoped I had everything "in order" because my phone was "going to ring" soon. Meanwhile, my career as an intelligence officer was elsewhere in the federal government, with an agency unrelated to the State Dept and with a clearance that would put my work for nearly two decades out of reach of anyone with just an FSO's clearance.
MaltaMon

Quakertown, PA

#769 Mar 6, 2013
That was my point, SixtySomething. I was mocking coyote's threat as meaningless, his little menacing scenario that involved the US Dept of State checking into my life and career, the nationality of my wife and kids, and my accusations,against Pedo Bob and ended with my phone ringing--all on the basis of a complaint from a Canadian citizen, who spends his time trolling the "nude-schoolboy" discussions on the internet from his home in Nova Scotia, and whose only source of information is what he's read of an anonymous contributor's postings to those nude boy-pedophile discussions--is utterly implausible. Now you are all caught up with the rest of us.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#770 Mar 6, 2013
Well for goodness sakes- did coyote the tinkerbell cause all that problem to MM's fantasy land- I am very, very sorry !! I'll contact JK direct and call the suits off- whew, glad u mentioned how serious it became to simply repeat your own silly tact as a harmless pedo fearmonger... gotta go... gotta call...gotta get the suits off MM's case....later...
MaltaMon

North Wales, PA

#771 Mar 6, 2013
Nah. No problem, man. I rather enjoyed watching you make a complete fool of yourself as a Canadian by threatening me with the power of the United States government, which you clearly don't understand. And your subsequent description of ZuikiSomething was equally enjoyable, commensurately silly, and born of a very vivid pubescent imagination of what it must be like to consort with actual, real-life women. No, Sir, I loved all of it. Thanks for the entertainment.
MaltaMon

North Wales, PA

#772 Mar 6, 2013
And more pretty cartoon peanuts and colorful faces! Thanks, guys. It is so reassuring, and very rewarding, to know that I'm dealing with seasoned adults, with real men.
giffis

Pittsburgh, PA

#773 Mar 6, 2013
youtube.com/watch... Wheres the Beef?
NO
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#774 Mar 6, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Is this another of your wild claims, being employed with the State Dept? You can't fool us with this one either. The State Dept. isn't concerned with internal policies, especially Topix Nude-Boy threads, with which you are obsessed.
For your information the State Dept. is about foreign policy and relations and nothing else. So this is another one of your gross lies.
Zuiko, you should know by know that nude-boy threads are only investigated by "the local and federal", or the "MaltaMon Highway Patrol". Serious government agencies have better things to do than investigate trolls on Topix.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#775 Mar 6, 2013
Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Zuiko, you should know by know that nude-boy threads are only investigated by "the local and federal", or the "MaltaMon Highway Patrol". Serious government agencies have better things to do than investigate trolls on Topix.
Explain, then, the expense in terms of money and manpower to which law enforcement agencies from the local level to the RCMP and the FBI and Scotland Yard go to identify online child sexual predators. This is PRECISELY the sort of site that interests them, particularly after they receive reports from victims and outside vigilant organizations that paedophiles and child pornographers are trolling these sites. And even moreso after the discover the posting of lurid child-rape fantasies and photos of naked children. No, Bob, you're dead wrong about this. Why don't you use YOUR head, for heaven's ake? At long last
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#776 Mar 6, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Explain, then, the expense in terms of money and manpower to which law enforcement agencies from the local level to the RCMP and the FBI and Scotland Yard go to identify online child sexual predators. This is PRECISELY the sort of site that interests them, particularly after they receive reports from victims and outside vigilant organizations that paedophiles and child pornographers are trolling these sites. And even moreso after the discover the posting of lurid child-rape fantasies and photos of naked children. No, Bob, you're dead wrong about this. Why don't you use YOUR head, for heaven's ake? At long last
Exactly. But they haven't received any reports from any victims or outside vigilante organizations! You have no son, therefore he wasn't raped, therefore he never made a report to the police.
Your MaltaMen Vigilantes have made no reports to any police agencies.(What are ya gonna report? "Bob posted in favor of nude-swimming under my name! Boo-hoo-hoo-hoo!"?)
I certainly haven't posted any photos of naked children.(Post the link if I have, moron...)
And the only "lurid child-rape fantasies" I have posted are sick-jokes mocking your claims and your non-existent son.
Moron.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#777 Mar 6, 2013
Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. But they haven't received any reports from any victims or outside vigilante organizations! You have no son, therefore he wasn't raped, therefore he never made a report to the police.
Your MaltaMen Vigilantes have made no reports to any police agencies.(What are ya gonna report? "Bob posted in favor of nude-swimming under my name! Boo-hoo-hoo-hoo!"?)
I certainly haven't posted any photos of naked children.(Post the link if I have, moron...)
And the only "lurid child-rape fantasies" I have posted are sick-jokes mocking your claims and your non-existent son.
Moron.
Whatever you say, Bob. It's not a lie if YOU believe it.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#778 Mar 6, 2013
The only lie that anyone is believing is your lie about someone raping your non-existent son and that the police will make an arrest any day now.
You have been trumpeting that nonsense for over a year now, and it's really getting tired and worn out.
But I can understand you taking some encouragement: your lap dog Large-Ass-Wipe eats up every bit of manure you shovel his way.
Whatever you say, moron, it's not a lie if YOU believe it.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#779 Mar 6, 2013
Notice that MaltaMon doesn't respond to my challenge to post the link to photos of naked children?
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#780 Mar 6, 2013
Bob wrote:
Notice that MaltaMon doesn't respond to my challenge to post the link to photos of naked children?
Why should I? You ignored my challenge to you post a link to that filthy child-rape scenario you claimed just two days ago that I had written and had posted. You have ignored my repeated demands that you acknowledge yourself as the author of those other lurid boy-rape scenarios that you have posted under my name from your location. I don't have to do for you what you have refused so often, and so recently, to do for me. Va te faire enculer, Bob.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#782 Mar 7, 2013
Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. But they haven't received any reports from any victims or outside vigilante organizations! You have no son, therefore he wasn't raped, therefore he never made a report to the police.
Your MaltaMen Vigilantes have made no reports to any police agencies.(What are ya gonna report? "Bob posted in favor of nude-swimming under my name! Boo-hoo-hoo-hoo!"?)
I certainly haven't posted any photosphotos of naked children.(Post the link if I have, moron...)
And the only "lurid child-rape fantasies" I have posted are sick-jokes mocking your claims and your non-existent son.
Moron.
Your first honest characterization: they are "sick" jokes. And I told you, since you declined to post the link to the actual post,,which you wrote yourself and then mendaciously attributed to me just three days ago--indeed, you haven't even acknowledged my demand that you post that link, although I have twice acknowledged yours since you posted it 18 hours ago--I refuse to accede to your demand until you accede to mine. The difference is that I'm not lying about what you've done. But you are lying, inventing out of whole cloth a story that I posted something that you wrote expressly for your post the other day. Prove with a link that that post is mine, and I will then likewise post a link to yours.. Also, you must,admit the truth about all those other paedopgile scenarios that you posted under my name from your location. You've got quite a set on you to make a demand of me that is exactly the sort of demand I have made of you and which you have never once addressed. You've just ignored them. So until you post those things, as I have said, Cher Bob, Va te faire enculer.
Phil

Manchester, UK

#784 Mar 8, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Demeaning to the child. Feel hurt that your own son is being disrespected and not regarded, your own son, and is being dismissed.
It was a rhetorical question.
Look that up in your dictionary.
Phil

Manchester, UK

#786 Mar 8, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
But you bet you needed reminding, son!
I didn't
Phil

Manchester, UK

#788 Mar 8, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you sure did, boy!
Now you are just being silly and embarrassing yourself.
MaltaMon

Phillipsburg, NJ

#789 Mar 8, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you are just being silly and embarrassing yourself.
OMG.. Lol!! So says the "man" who has absolutely no shame--a guy who tacitly endorses paedophilia and believes that there is nothing wrong with child pornography. And YOU are embarrassing yourself. Don't be concerned, Large: the man's standards are impossible to follow. There are standards and then there are STANDARDS. Standards for those who make him feel like the fool that he is, standards for everyone else, and then there are a very few standards for him--none of which correspond to those of the first category, although they deal with the same words, behaviors, and mindsets.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Strike watch: Ontario may have to wait until Fr... 2 hr Birth Certificate... 1
70-347 practice test, Microsoft 70-347 Exam Dumps 3 hr thc2050724 1
70-346 practice test, Microsoft 70-346 Exam Dumps 3 hr thc2050724 1
70-342 practice test, Microsoft 70-342 Exam Dumps 3 hr thc2050724 1
70-337 practice test, Microsoft 70-337 Exam Dumps 3 hr thc2040988 1
70-336 exam dumps, Microsoft Lync Server 2013 7... 3 hr thc2040988 1
70-332 exam questions, Microsoft 70-332 Exam Dumps 3 hr thc2040956 1
More from around the web