Did You Swim Nude In High School?
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#734 Mar 5, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not? Why can't it be spoken of openly?
Their lawyers insist. Why, indeed, should I be permitted to discuss the troubles of others? what happened to each of us , to our kids, was traumatic. I can understand why they do not want me to discuss this on a website. I am free of course to discuss my own son who has given me permission to do so and monitors this site everyday is a matter of their feelings and their privacy
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#735 Mar 5, 2013
And Tinkerbell is just a goddamned paedophile apologist. you didn't see him taking Bob to task for the filthy posted. he approves. and only a sick queer like that would deny the existence obsessively of another man's child. you have children large. what do you think of his insistence that my son doesn't exist. If I ever met the guy I I would show him what angry father is like. fortunately for him he and I shall never meet.
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#736 Mar 5, 2013
*** that should read, quote the filth that Bob posted .
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#737 Mar 5, 2013
Damn, Tinkerbell, I'm driving and my phone is ringing. I will bet that it's John Kerry calling from overseas to tell me that his department has no authority over the agency for which I worked for nrarly 20 years, and that your boyfriends husband doesn't have a sufficient security clearance to check me out. I am sure that's what he will say.. because you know him personally, he won't tell me that your boyfriend husband doesn't exist.. it would make you look silly, and Secretary Kerry doesn't want to make Tinkerbell look silly.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#739 Mar 5, 2013
Aww MM- is Kerry turning out like that- guess he won't tell you your son does not exist as he would not want to make MM look silly .... how nice !...
MaltaMon

Woodstown, NJ

#740 Mar 5, 2013
coyote wrote:
Aww MM- is Kerry turning out like that- guess he won't tell you your son does not exist as he would not want to make MM look silly .... how nice !...
It wasn't Kerry, Tinkerbell. And you told me that my phone would ring with the State Department's Bureau of Ferreting Out Imposters From Unrelated Government Agencies would call to tell me that I shouldn't be posting on the Topix Nude-Boy Threads which you admitted to frequenting when you explained to them where to find me. And all along I was really very worried, because I know you would never fabricate out of thin air an entire menacing scenario, even one so utterly implausible as the one you sent as a dire warning to me.
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#741 Mar 5, 2013
When will you give up on this Peter Pan nonsense and grow the hell up?
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#742 Mar 5, 2013
you are the one that posted "and Sec. Kerry does not want to make Tinkerbell look silly"--- I just doubt he would want to make MM look silly either----just trying to support your reflection- thts all----stop being so paranoid....maybe....
Phil

London, UK

#743 Mar 6, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Their lawyers insist. Why, indeed, should I be permitted to discuss the troubles of others? what happened to each of us , to our kids, was traumatic. I can understand why they do not want me to discuss this on a website. I am free of course to discuss my own son who has given me permission to do so and monitors this site everyday is a matter of their feelings and their privacy
And your lawyers didn't insist that you NOT discuss your son's case on a public forum, sometimes in graphic detail?

Of course your (usual) lame response will be some bullshit about how obsessed I am about your son (utter bollocks) and how I have an unhealthy interest in your life (more bollocks).
Anything to avoid answering the question.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#744 Mar 6, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
And your lawyers didn't insist that you NOT discuss your son's case on a public forum, sometimes in graphic detail?
Of course your (usual) lame response will be some bullshit about how obsessed I am about your son (utter bollocks) and how I have an unhealthy interest in your life (more bollocks).
Anything to avoid answering the question.
Phil, I don't owe you a f--king thing. Who the hell do you think you are to demand anything, you arrogant prick? I asked you to stay out of my affairs. For the life of me, I don't understand your continued interest, much less your arrogant presumption that I have an obligation to give you what you, a disinterested observer (as opposed to uninterested, which you should be but are not), what you demand of me simply because you demand it. You are the strangest guy on this site. I have told you that care not what you think or want. I am not avoiding you: I do not care for you. And have nothing to say to you about my life. You always have insisted that you have a life of your own Go live it.
Phil

London, UK

#746 Mar 6, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Phil, I don't owe you a f--king thing. Who the hell do you think you are to demand anything, you arrogant prick? I asked you to stay out of my affairs. For the life of me, I don't understand your continued interest, much less your arrogant presumption that I have an obligation to give you what you, a disinterested observer (as opposed to uninterested, which you should be but are not), what you demand of me simply because you demand it. You are the strangest guy on this site. I have told you that care not what you think or want. I am not avoiding you: I do not care for you. And have nothing to say to you about my life. You always have insisted that you have a life of your own Go live it.
As I expected.
The usual hot air.
Only the imbeciles on here are taken in by your utter bullshit.

"You are the strangest guy on this site"

Coming from you that is funny.
Phil

London, UK

#748 Mar 6, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Phil is bad, but I've seen some other pretty strange posters on topix before, Phil isn't uniquely creepy.
This from Maltamon's toady in chief who sits waiting for the latest pronouncement from his idol, his new best friend, and then slavishly jumps in almost immediately to show his master what a tame and clever poodle he is and what big words he can use.
How normal is that?
Phil

London, UK

#750 Mar 6, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm here on my own accord, Phil. But you defend Bob like a good little doggie of his on a lead!
Do I?
Where?
You are adopting Maltamon's strange logic whereby if you disagree with him or dare question him you must be a pedo or similar.
You are obviously just as stupid as he is.
Only the village idiots on here take in his bullshit.
Which camp are you in?
Phil

London, UK

#752 Mar 6, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet you support naked images of young boys?
Once again, do I?
Where?
How?
In what way?
How do I 'support' such things?
Phil

London, UK

#754 Mar 6, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
You defend Bob. And say that MaltaMon's son has not been raped.
Come on.
You can do better than that.
Where do I defend Bob?

And you believe Bob raped Malatamon's son?
Why.
Because Maltamon said so?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#756 Mar 6, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Phil, I don't owe you a f--king thing. Who the hell do you think you are to demand anything, you arrogant prick? I asked you to stay out of my affairs. For the life of me, I don't understand your continued interest, much less your arrogant presumption that I have an obligation to give you what you, a disinterested observer (as opposed to uninterested, which you should be but are not), what you demand of me simply because you demand it. You are the strangest guy on this site. I have told you that care not what you think or want. I am not avoiding you: I do not care for you. And have nothing to say to you about my life. You always have insisted that you have a life of your own Go live it.
Excuse me, but this is funny. First you post hundreds of posts all over this forum about how your claimed son was raped, and then you tell prople not to ask questions and stay out of it, with complimentary name calling and wild accusations, as in this post. Strange, if you ask me.
I also suggest that you be more polite and less offensive when discussing with other posters.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#758 Mar 6, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> It wasn't Kerry, Tinkerbell. And you told me that my phone would ring with the State Department's Bureau of Ferreting Out Imposters From Unrelated Government Agencies would call to tell me that I shouldn't be posting on the Topix Nude-Boy Threads which you admitted to frequenting when you explained to them where to find me. And all along I was really very worried, because I know you would never fabricate out of thin air an entire menacing scenario, even one so utterly implausible as the one you sent as a dire warning to me.
Is this another of your wild claims, being employed with the State Dept? You can't fool us with this one either. The State Dept. isn't concerned with internal policies, especially Topix Nude-Boy threads, with which you are obsessed.
For your information the State Dept. is about foreign policy and relations and nothing else. So this is another one of your gross lies.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#760 Mar 6, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Everything you said was an exact copy of what MaltaMon said! Children(And Zuiko!) are impressionable.
I may find your and Malmon's posts hilarious, but certainly not impressionable. It is what infantile trolls are usually up to.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#761 Mar 6, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Just one question for you Phil, do you believe MaltaMon's son was not at all raped? If so, you have no reason to completely doubt MaltaMon.
Only an infantile person like you would believe such crap.
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#764 Mar 6, 2013
Largelanguage, Maltamon claims your being 'comfortable' with gay children being bullied to death is based on your religious beliefs.
He must be chronically stupid to believe that but out of curiosity what religion is that?
This is the sort of warped thinking that leads to the Taliban and other such odious regimes but does it say in the bible that 'thou should beat the shit out of gay kids'?
This is exactly what I meant by those who claim to have a faith are often the least tolerant, are small minded bigots and generally nasty pieces of work when you chip away at the glossy surface.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Latest C9020-567 study materials 9 hr C9020-567 exam 1
Updated IBM C9020-568 exam cram pdf 9 hr C9020-568 exam 1
Update Huawei certification H31-311-ENU dumps book 9 hr huaweiexams 1
News THS seniors show off community projects 18 hr Short sight 14
Bob: Were Boys Forced to Attend School Swim Les... (Sep '12) 23 hr Doug 2,320
News Pittsfield Super Tracking Impacts of... Sun Cops are degenerates 1
HS nude swimming (Feb '14) Sun Why Not Check 170
More from around the web