Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#633 Feb 27, 2013
SLC wrote:
<quoted text>
1. What is MaltaMon's PhD in?
It is obviously PhD in BS.
Largelanguage

UK

#634 Feb 27, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
It is obviously PhD in BS.
Like yours?
MaltaMon

Oaklyn, NJ

#635 Feb 27, 2013
I say this because I suspect that anyone who sees nothing wrong with vintage shots of naked boys in a gang shower, knows where to find them online and is eager to disseminate them to others almost certainly has on his hard drive images of children that are more obviously sexual and, the demented thoughts of that individual, erotic. If you don't possess such images on your hard drive, and if your Internet Service Provider has no record of your having cruised sites for such images, well, I suppose you have nothing to worry about, do you? As long as law enforcement has the same naive interpretation of sites such as the one you posted as "legitimate". But listen up, Zuiko: these officials are not naive. They regard sites such as yours as "entry-level" locations, and are no longer permitted to overlook their access by anyone whom they spot online that frequents and defends them openly. You know exactly what I mean. And I agree completely with the state attorney general of NJ that possession and distribution is as criminal as making these images So, again I ask you--rhetorically, because I don't really want an answer, but rather merely that reflect upon it yourself--is it worth it?
MaltaMon

Oaklyn, NJ

#636 Feb 27, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
It is obviously PhD in BS.
Yes, obviously. Lol. The likes of you and your element would know all about my education.
MaltaMon

Oaklyn, NJ

#638 Feb 27, 2013
ZuikiLeaks, I won't argue this point any longer withyou. You clearly are in denial, have an enormous bug up your ass and are determined to annoy me (which, by the way, has been a mostly unsuccessful endeavor) Kindly ignore all that I have just said to you and carry on as you wish. Let the chips fall where they may.
Largelanguage

UK

#639 Feb 27, 2013
LOL! I bet zuiko does not have education!
MaltaMon

Oaklyn, NJ

#640 Feb 27, 2013
If he does, it didn't take. Poor self-destructive bastard.
SLC

Arlington, VA

#641 Feb 27, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Mine is from SAIS at Johns Hopkins. I mentioned the subject, as,well as the topic of my dissertation, in an earlier post just last week. And no, you didn't "show me yours". But why does it matter? I assumed that when you said,,"It's Dr. SLC", you were telling the truth. Do you mean to suggest that,I am not? Btw, I also hold a "Maitrise" from the Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris, aka "Scences Po". But you know, Me. SLC, I get your point, as well as your pretension. I know what draws you here. Perhaps I was wrong about your being gullible; rather, I see that you rely upon the gullibility of others. And either you have been far better than some of your colleagues here at disguising your motives, or I have been as gullible as, OU have wanted ME to be.
Fair enough, my doctorate is from the Un. of Rochester in Rochester, NY.

In no way,shape, form, or regard was I questioning Maltamon's PhD. I asked him what it was in, he responded and identified the University, which, let the record show, I didn't ask him for. In response I identified my university (by the way, I received my BA degree with a major in physics from U.C. Berkeley.

If MaltaMon want's to believe that I contribute to this forum because of some prurient interest, I can't stop him. I stated my reasons and he can take them or leave them.
Largelanguage

UK

#642 Feb 27, 2013
SLC wrote:
<quoted text>
Fair enough, my doctorate is from the Un. of Rochester in Rochester, NY.
In no way,shape, form, or regard was I questioning Maltamon's PhD. I asked him what it was in, he responded and identified the University, which, let the record show, I didn't ask him for. In response I identified my university (by the way, I received my BA degree with a major in physics from U.C. Berkeley.
If MaltaMon want's to believe that I contribute to this forum because of some prurient interest, I can't stop him. I stated my reasons and he can take them or leave them.
Butts are arousive, it is well known throughout most adults SLC.
MaltaMon

Oaklyn, NJ

#643 Feb 27, 2013
I identified mine and the topic if my dissertation in a post five days ago. I know that you saw it, even though it was directed to Dr. coyote. What is your point? Is there one ? What do you want, Mr SLC?
SLC

Arlington, VA

#644 Feb 27, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
If you believe that you won't be the subject of a similar operation one day, you are delusional. Why not do yourself a favor and stop now, Zuiko, and save yourself the enormous challenge and expense of having to defend yourself in a more consequential forum? You are drawing attention to yourself that is surely not of the sort that you seek. Is it worth it?
MaltaMON, Brad's site to which Zuiko linked has passed muster with Google's attorneys and has been up for at least 2 years. So far, apparently, law enforcement in California has not seen fit to shut him down or arrest him. I think those folks are more conversant with the law then you are. The reason is very simple, it doesn't violate the laws against child pornography. Nudity is not pornography. Period, end of discussion.

And by the way, I don't have pornography of any kind on my hard drive.
SLC

Arlington, VA

#645 Feb 27, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
Butts are still viewed as sexual.
Cite the statute that says so. There are movies showing naked behinds that are rated PG.
Largelanguage

UK

#646 Feb 27, 2013
SLC wrote:
<quoted text>
MaltaMON, Brad's site to which Zuiko linked has passed muster with Google's attorneys and has been up for at least 2 years. So far, apparently, law enforcement in California has not seen fit to shut him down or arrest him. I think those folks are more conversant with the law then you are. The reason is very simple, it doesn't violate the laws against child pornography. Nudity is not pornography. Period, end of discussion.
And by the way, I don't have pornography of any kind on my hard drive.
He is probably lying, I doubt google did sponsor it.
Largelanguage

UK

#647 Feb 27, 2013
SLC wrote:
<quoted text>
Cite the statute that says so. There are movies showing naked behinds that are rated PG.
They are only costumes that looks like skin. Butts turn on the opposite sex. Do you get aroused from nude womens butts?
MaltaMon

Oaklyn, NJ

#648 Feb 27, 2013
SLC wrote:
<quoted text>
MaltaMON, Brad's site to which Zuiko linked has passed muster with Google's attorneys and has been up for at least 2 years. So far, apparently, law enforcement in California has not seen fit to shut him down or arrest him. I think those folks are more conversant with the law then you are. The reason is very simple, it doesn't violate the laws against child pornography. Nudity is not pornography. Period, end of discussion.
And by the way, I don't have pornography of any kind on my hard drive.
You miss the point. Take together all of what these guys have said and posted. Do you think that site is the extent of it? Besides, as I said, As the father of the victim of a cgild predator, I don't excuse or rationalize as hisorical curiosity any adult male's interest in photographs of naked schoolboys. The site, moreover, claims as its focus the required nudity of boys in swim classes back in the day. Meanwhilr, its lead-off photograph is of dozens of naked pubescent boys in a gang shower. WTF does that do to advance the edification of thosecwho seek to learn about the naked swim classes? The site is disguised for the express purpose of passing muster, but the intended audience is not composed entirely of those with history or the site-creator'scresearch and scholarship on their minds. And that site, in particular, and others like it are frequent tip-offs to law enforcement and to organizations that assist law enforcement by searching the internet for suspicious characters. Seen DJW around lately?
SLC

Arlington, VA

#649 Feb 27, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
I identified mine and the topic if my dissertation in a post five days ago. I know that you saw it, even though it was directed to Dr. coyote. What is your point? Is there one ? What do you want, Mr SLC?
Actually, I don't recall seeing it.
Largelanguage

UK

#650 Feb 27, 2013
SLC wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, I don't recall seeing it.
Really?
MaltaMon

Oaklyn, NJ

#651 Feb 27, 2013
I look at those kids just as I would the African-American slaves posed for a photo taken of them on a Southern plantation a century and a half ago. plantation. I am aware of the standards of the time, but my heart breaks for the individuals depicted. But unlike slavery, the sexual exploitation of children continues. And the complacency of adults who can look upon them without revulsion, who lack empathy for kids drafted into in those exploitive endeavors, whenever they took place, only enable and encourage those who today would violate children in that way. No, it is not all right.
Largelanguage

UK

#652 Feb 27, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
I look at those kids just as I would the African-American slaves posed for a photo taken of them on a Southern plantation a century and a half ago. plantation. I am aware of the standards of the time, but my heart breaks for the individuals depicted. But unlike slavery, the sexual exploitation of children continues. And the complacency of adults who can look upon them without revulsion, who lack empathy for kids drafted into in those exploitive endeavors, whenever they took place, only enable and encourage those who today would violate children in that way. No, it is not all right.
That is why I am on topix partly, to help stop abuse that goes behind closed doors, by calling the abusers out to account.
SLC

Arlington, VA

#653 Feb 27, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> You miss the point. Take together all of what these guys have said and posted. Do you think that site is the extent of it? Besides, as I said, As the father of the victim of a cgild predator, I don't excuse or rationalize as hisorical curiosity any adult male's interest in photographs of naked schoolboys. The site, moreover, claims as its focus the required nudity of boys in swim classes back in the day. Meanwhilr, its lead-off photograph is of dozens of naked pubescent boys in a gang shower. WTF does that do to advance the edification of thosecwho seek to learn about the naked swim classes? The site is disguised for the express purpose of passing muster, but the intended audience is not composed entirely of those with history or the site-creator'scresearch and scholarship on their minds. And that site, in particular, and others like it are frequent tip-offs to law enforcement and to organizations that assist law enforcement by searching the internet for suspicious characters. Seen DJW around lately?
Now MaltaMon is into speculation. He assumes that Brad is into child pornography because of what he has posted on his Google website. Given the strenuous efforts by he and his moderators to prevent the posting of naked underage boys and girls on his forum, I doubt it. If MaltaMon has evidence to the contrary, by all means take it to the appropriate law enforcement authorities. Again, Brad's CFNM fetish is kinky but that doesn't make him a child molester. Speculation is not admissible evidence in court.

By the way, I notice that MaltaMon is now moving the target, backing off on his charges of child pornography in Brad's website and asserting without evidence that Brad has other sites where he posts child pornography.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Penis comparison. Measuring flacid and erect sm... 1 hr Bob 51
Personal Injury Attorney, Jeffrey T. Jones Warn... 12 hr anon 2
500-254 practice exam & 500-254 question and an... 16 hr testhorseahx 1
500-201 practice exam & 500-201 question and an... 16 hr testhorseahx 1
500-005 practice exam & 500-005 question and an... 16 hr testhorseahx 1
650-294 practice exam & 650-294 question and an... 16 hr oacllceo 1
650-295 practice exam & 650-295 question and an... 17 hr oacllceo 1
•••

Education People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••