Eight weird things schools banned this year

The 20 banned songs included "Shake" - Pitbull; "Get Buck in Here" - P. Diddy; "Drop" - Timbaland; "Low" - Flo Rida ; "One More Drink" - Ludacris; and "Right Round". Full Story
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

“Colleges Search Engine ”

Since: Mar 12

www.schoolanduniversity.com

#1 Jun 14, 2013
Some is irrelevant banned.

“Never summon "Anything" ....”

Since: Feb 11

..... you can't banish, lol

#2 Jun 14, 2013
I think the dumbest thing schools did was to ex spell small children for bringing those tiny GI Joes guns. You know, the little ones that go with action figures ..... dumb.
I can understand cap gun, aerosol guns, stuff that looks real. 2 inch guns are another story.

“I laugh at trolls, because”

Since: Apr 10

they are the laughing stock!

#3 Jun 14, 2013
Fish_sticks wrote:
I think the dumbest thing schools did was to ex spell small children for bringing those tiny GI Joes guns. You know, the little ones that go with action figures ..... dumb.
I can understand cap gun, aerosol guns, stuff that looks real. 2 inch guns are another story.
The one "rule" school districts must do away with is the one that keeps school administrators and teachers from using COMMON SENSE!

“Never summon "Anything" ....”

Since: Feb 11

..... you can't banish, lol

#4 Jun 14, 2013
ROTFL wrote:
<quoted text>
The one "rule" school districts must do away with is the one that keeps school administrators and teachers from using COMMON SENSE!
Common sense just ain't so common anymore, lol.

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#5 Aug 8, 2013
Fish_sticks wrote:
I think the dumbest thing schools did was to ex spell small children for bringing those tiny GI Joes guns. You know, the little ones that go with action figures ..... dumb.
I can understand cap gun, aerosol guns, stuff that looks real. 2 inch guns are another story.
I agree. The bottomline is parents and even the school people should be open enough to discuss things like these to children. It is just in the way of explaining things to children. We cannot ban everything they see rather we can explain everything to them the way we'd like them to see and handle things themselves.

“Forehead wrinkle”

Since: Dec 10

Homefries

#6 Aug 8, 2013
katherinejones24 wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree. The bottomline is parents and even the school people should be open enough to discuss things like these to children. It is just in the way of explaining things to children. We cannot ban everything they see rather we can explain everything to them the way we'd like them to see and handle things themselves.
I agree with you Katherine.
Would you like to make some children with me and give your theory a test?

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#7 Aug 8, 2013
Banning things just makes them more appealing sometimes when they may not have otherwise been
like those I <3 boobies bracelets

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#8 Aug 8, 2013
How about the kid that was suspended for wearing a pro-second ammendment shirt? But in some schools it is ok to show your underwear. Stupid.
MaltoMon

Dorval, Canada

#9 Aug 31, 2013
It is a shame some schools, particularly in Utah, have banned nude swimming for the boys. And in many cases, group shower rooms have been replaced with cubicles.
Worst of all is the banning of bare bottom spanking for errant boys.

Nude swimming builds camaraderie in a healthy atmosphere. Group showers promote personal hygiene while teaching boys to admire other boys' bodies.
Boys require discipline, and nothing builds character and develops respect for authority more than receiving a bare bottom spanking from a female administrator in front of the girls of the class.
What a shame.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#10 Aug 31, 2013
MaltoMon wrote:
It is a shame some schools, particularly in Utah, have banned nude swimming for the boys. And in many cases, group shower rooms have been replaced with cubicles.
Worst of all is the banning of bare bottom spanking for errant boys.
Nude swimming builds camaraderie in a healthy atmosphere. Group showers promote personal hygiene while teaching boys to admire other boys' bodies.
Boys require discipline, and nothing builds character and develops respect for authority more than receiving a bare bottom spanking from a female administrator in front of the girls of the class.
What a shame.
This isn't me, MaltaMon. This is from MaltoMon--note the 'o' in place of the 'a'--aka Pedo Bob of Montreal/Dorval, Canada. Just ignore Bob when he poses as someone else, which he does often, just to engage in his obsession of forced nudity of young boys and abuse of those young boys while nude. Do not ignore it, however, when he poses as a minor or otherwise engages in stalking an actual minor, cyber-bulling of a minor, or sexual abuse of a minor online, as he has with "Elena" of Utah. When a minor is involved, please report him to the Montreal Police, Poste de Quartier 5, Pointe Clair, QC, Canada, and to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, "C Division" Headquarters in Westmount (Montreal), QC. Thanks.
MaltaMon

Philadelphia, PA

#11 Aug 31, 2013
Note: Any post on these threads which originates from a location in or near Montreal, Canada, is always Pedo Bob, regardless of the name under which it appears.
Bab

Dorval, Canada

#12 Aug 31, 2013
I like raping boys. I raped MaltaMon's son. Their are other victims. I have posted child pornography. I am stalking MaltaMon's son. The police will arrest me soon.
Bob

Dorval, Canada

#14 Aug 31, 2013
This isn't me, Bob. This is from Bab - note the'a' in place of the 'o', and the typo in "there" - aka the Pittsburgh Pedophile of Pennsylvania. Just ignore MaltaMon when he poses as someone else, as he does often, just to engage in his passion for raping boys and projecting his crimes onto others. Just ignore his threats to call the police on you when you out him. When a minor is involved, please post a complaint on Topix, and I will post a reply with a website which will provide the proper police telephone number. Do not call 911 or your local police. Please report him to the RCPM.
phil

Manchester, UK

#15 Sep 1, 2013
MaltoMon wrote:
It is a shame some schools, particularly in Utah, have banned nude swimming for the boys. And in many cases, group shower rooms have been replaced with cubicles.
Worst of all is the banning of bare bottom spanking for errant boys.
Nude swimming builds camaraderie in a healthy atmosphere. Group showers promote personal hygiene while teaching boys to admire other boys' bodies.
Boys require discipline, and nothing builds character and develops respect for authority more than receiving a bare bottom spanking from a female administrator in front of the girls of the class.
What a shame.
As you can see Bob is a very mature, sane and balanced individual who sees nothing wrong with posting the same thing on thread after thread, time and time again.
In his eyes this is all perfectly normal.
He thinks it's funny.
Everybody else thinks he is a tragic figure, obviously living an empty, unhappy and lonely existence.
Bob

Rawdon, Canada

#16 Sep 1, 2013
As you can see, Philthy Phil is an insane, unbalanced and immature individual, who sees nothing hypocritical in dismissing threads as garbage and not worth responding to, yet returning multiple times to read and respond.
In his eyes this is all perfectly normal.
He thinks it's intelligent.
Everybody else thinks he's a hypocritical, pathetic loser, with no life.
But he does have a life: as a phox hound for the son-raping MaltaMon, aka the Pittsburgh Pedophile and the Pennsylvania Pederast.

As they say, it's a dog's life!

Hahahaha!
Bob

Rawdon, Canada

#17 Sep 1, 2013
Sweetheart Tart wrote:
<quoted text>
u r sick
Pay no attention to this post, Sweetheart, it was posted by MaltaMon. Notice how he changed one letter in my name to make it look similar.
He is the one who likes raping boys. He got his taste for it after raping his own son. HIS OWN SON!
And he gets moral support from apologists such as Philthy Phil, LineDazzle, and CaDad.
If he ever responds to one of your posts, don't answer, just call the Pittsburgh police.You can find the number on their website:
ci.pittsburg.ca.us
I have spoken to police chief Brian Addington about you, and he awaits your call.He told me that MaltaMon is being tracked, and they expect to arrest him any day now.
If you are a minor, Sweetheart, it is very important to tell your parents If you wish, I will speak to them. But under no circumstance respond to MaltaMon. He is a dangerous pedophile, but will be arrested soon.

Since: Apr 13

Toronto, Canada

#18 Sep 1, 2013
Fish_sticks wrote:
<quoted text>
Common sense just ain't so common anymore, lol.
LOL. That is a favourite saying of mine, fish_sticks, but no one ever got it before. It is a quote of Voltaire, I believe.
Phil

Manchester, UK

#19 Sep 1, 2013
Bob wrote:
As you can see, Philthy Phil is an insane, unbalanced and immature individual, who sees nothing hypocritical in dismissing threads as garbage and not worth responding to, yet returning multiple times to read and respond.
In his eyes this is all perfectly normal.
He thinks it's intelligent.
Everybody else thinks he's a hypocritical, pathetic loser, with no life.
But he does have a life: as a phox hound for the son-raping MaltaMon, aka the Pittsburgh Pedophile and the Pennsylvania Pederast.
As they say, it's a dog's life!
Hahahaha!
I rest my case.
Bob thinks his original post is what grown up men do and is quite normal and he can't see what is wrong with it.
That is why he is a danger to children.
He is the sort of greasy, loathesome creep who will abuse your child and tell the court the child came on to him and made him do it.
He probably spends his spare time hanging around the children's playgrounds or school gates with a camera.
As usual, as he is also as thick as pig shit he simply regurgitates and repeats what others have posted as he hasn't the wit or intelligence to do otherwise.
You can see why he is attracted to young boys because mentally he is one.
No doubt he will pretty much repeat the same response in the same way he repeats his single 'joke' over and over and over again.
Phil

Manchester, UK

#20 Sep 1, 2013
Bob posts such things because his life is so empty and he is so desperate for some attention.
He probably things he is edgy, a little dangerous and a bit 'out there' but he is away with the fairies and living in a sad fantasy world involving young boys because he can't cut it in the adult world.
do justice women

Bradford-on-avon, UK

#21 Sep 1, 2013
1 September 2013 Marks the start of the new UK school term this week but males are still the victims of state managed mysandry which would not be tolerated under the Equalities Act 2010 if private companies had immodest uniform policies for female employees.

So is it ok Maltamon/Phil/ Line Dazzle for boys 16 and below to suffer.

Check this website for testwood school http://www.testwoodsportscollege.co.uk/...

In this case the Pe kit is demonstrated pictorally rather than the usual uniform list or link to a company shopping list basket.

Yet for girls it is compulsory to wear sports trousers but boys are forced to bare their legs and wear shorts.

This is just a diluted version of the discrimination that used to occur in the 1970's and 1980's where boys could be forced to do pe topless in the gym on the grounds they might asphyxiate on the gym equipment or were subject to no underwear rules on the games pitch or were forced to play skins versus shirts.

Yet today we have different school acadamies with different arbitrary rules.

Some rules are worse in primary schools all have a strict uniform rules such as white shirts and black shorts. Ironically primary school kits were less stringent in the 1970's and 1980's.

When boys do swimming they are forced to do pe in speedo's or short shorts despite the fact that when boys go to the seaside they prefer to wear bermuda shorts, rash vests and wetsuits. Yet girls are allowed to wear 1 piece swimsuits which like leotards are increasingly getting longer.

Some schools like Rainham Grammar school still force boys to wear all white PE kits but girls get to wear red shirts and black shorts. Would it be acceptable for girls to wear an all white pe kit where the boys could see their bra's and panties!

In many schools they still have reversible rugby shirts. Is it acceptable for boys to just to rugby and football while girls do netball and hockey, dance & gymnastics? Would girls find it acceptable if they were first split into teams and then on a freezing cold rugby pitch half the team were told to take their tops off and turn them inside out?

Is it acceptable that many boys are forced to buy football boots but girls just need to buy trainers?

Then there are tracksuits. In some schools they are compulsory for girls but not available for boys in others girls have an unfettered option to wear track suits but boys are either limited to "Inclement weather", "the winter period" or at "the discretion of the teacher".

Some primary schools still require boys to do pe kit in just shorts and underpants but girls get the choice of leotard (usually to the ankles now) polo shirts (which are thick) or tshirts. In some they have allowed boys just to wear vests rather than go bare chested and some primary schools still expect kids to do pe in just vest and knickers.

Then there is the bare foot requirement. While more humane schools allow or give the option or requirement of plimsolls and trainers.

Some schools allow boys to opt into sports trousers but shorts are the default option. While for girls sport trousers are the default and shorts the option.

There are other schools that make it compulsory to wear swim trunks under per kit but there is no requirement for girls to remove their underwear and put on swimsuits. Often the girls are not required or allowed to shower.

Some schools require both sexes to shower but boys have to go the extra distance and change their underwear before the start of pe but girls can wear the same underwear.

I beseech Phil lobby your MP's and councillors stop this discrimination. Would it be acceptable for male teachers to be foced to teach in just white vest and shorts while the women wear tracksuits?

If female police officers were made to patrol in bikini tops and shorts while male officers were fully clothed would this be gender equality?

Maltamon lobby your forces across the pond. EQUALITY NOW. DO JUSTICE WOMEN!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
high school naked swimming (Feb '14) 44 min Not Scared 78
DEV-501 Exam Testing Exam 11 hr passokay123 1
The Best IBM M6040-419 Exam Training materials 15 hr Harryexam 1
Latest IBM C2150-400 of exam practice questions... 15 hr Harryexam 1
The Best IBM M2060-730 exam practice questions ... 15 hr Harryexam 1
IBM certification P2170-033 exam training methods 15 hr Harryexam 1
IBM P2070-048 the latest exam questions and ans... 15 hr Harryexam 1

Education People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE